No Starch Press has published the finest in geek entertainment since 1994, creating both timely and timeless titles like Python Crash Course , Python for Kids , How Linux Works , and Hacking: The Art of Exploitation . An independent, San Francisco-based publishing company, No Starch Press focuses on a curated list of well-crafted books that make a difference. They publish on many topics, including computer programming, cybersecurity, operating systems, and LEGO. The titles have personality, the authors are passionate experts, and all the content goes through extensive editorial and technical reviews. Long known for its fun, fearless approach to technology, No Starch Press has earned wide support from STEM enthusiasts worldwide.
Product details.
Click to play video
Josh @ EasyPars
Butterflies In Space Joe
About the author, eric matthes.
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Customers find the writing and content organized and laid out well for learning. They also say the projects are a blast to make and the content is not difficult to understand.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book well-organized, laid out well for learning, and straightforward. They also say it's a great beginner's book and an introduction to object-oriented programming with Python.
"...the major Python entry level concepts and introduces some intermediate but easily understandable concepts like unit testing...." Read more
"...Total python newbie, lotta info! Well thought out !" Read more
"...The author has done an excellent job of breaking down complex concepts into digestible sections, making it accessible for both beginners and those..." Read more
"...So far this has been great at explaining everything and giving examples and exercises to reinforce what you are learning." Read more
Customers find the projects in the book a blast to make and the content not difficult to understand. They also appreciate the hands-on activities on nearly every page.
"...And many assignments to keep your learning fun and etched into your coding memory...." Read more
"...are new to Python it's a great beginners book as well as gives you some nice projects in "Part 2" that you can see different paths to pursue for..." Read more
"Covers python well and has simple projects ." Read more
"...The projects were a blast to make , and the content wasn't difficult to understand...." Read more
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..
Yanxiang Zhao
Department of Mathematics, The George Washington University
Basic information.
Course: Math 3553.80 Numerical Analysis
Semester: Fall 2024
Time: 08/22/2024-12/09/2024, Mon&Wed 12:45pm-02:00pm;
Location: Duques 251
Instructor: Yanxiang Zhao, Phillips Hall 702
Phone: 202-994-0606
Email: username at email dot gwu dot edu username equals yxzhao
Office Hour: Mon&Wed 02:00pm-03:00pm or by appointment
This course covers: Linear systems and matrices; Direct and iterative methods for solving linear equations; Sparse matrices; Solution of nonlinear equations; interpolation and approximate representation of functions; splines.
As a result of completing this course, the students will be able to:
The use of AI and ChatGPT is completely forbidden for the homework assignments, quizzes and exams.
More than 2/3 of the time you devote to this class should take place outside the classroom (lecture and recitation). Even the best students in the class should plan on spending an average of at least 5 hours a week on homework and other studying. Students who struggle with the material may need to spend more time in order to earn a grade they will find acceptable.
Week01. Aug26-Aug30 Aug 26 Aug28
Week02. Sep02-Sep06 Labor Day Sep04: quiz01
Week03. Sep09-Sep13 Sep09 Sep11
Week04. Sep16-Sep20 Sep16 Sep18: quiz02
Week05. Sep23-Sep27 Sep23 Sep25
Week06. Sep30-Oct04 Sep30 Oct02: quiz03
Week07. Oct07-Oct11 Oct 07 Oct09 ( midterm )
Week08. Oct14-Oct18 Oct14 Oct16
Week09. Oct21-Oct25 Oct21 Oct23: quiz04
Week10. Oct28-Nov01 Oct28 Oct30
Week11. Nov04-Nov08 Nov04 Nov06: quiz05
Week12. Nov11-Nov15 Nov11 Nov13
Week13. Nov18-Nov22 Nov18 Nov20 : quiz06
Week14. Nov25-Nov29 Thanksgiving Thanksgiving
Week15. Dec02-Dec06 Dec02 Dec04
Week16. Dec09-Dec13 Dec09 ( last day ) Final (announced later)
NOTE: In accordance with university policy, the final exam will be given during the final exam period (Dec 12-17). There will be no accommodation for Christmas flight before scheduled final exam.
Homework will NOT be collected and will NOT be graded. The main purpose of the homework assignment is for you to prepare for the bi-weekly quizzes and the exams.
There are 6 10-minute biweekly quizzes, each out of 25 points, on Wednesday's classes. Each quiz will cover the the lecture of the same Monday, lectures of the previous Monday and Wednesday, and the lecture of the Wednesday before the previous week. The first quiz will only cover the lectures from Aug 26&28. 4 highest quizzes count for the final grade. NO MAKEUP QUIZZES for any excuses .
There will be an in-class midterm exam on Oct 09, and a final exam in final exam period of Dec 12-17.
Your course grade will be determined by your cumulative average at the end of the term and will be based on the following scale:
A | A- | B+ | B | B- | C+ | C | C- | D+ | D | D- | |
Scale | 95% | 90% | 87% | 83% | 80% | 77% | 73% | 70% | 67% | 63% | 60% |
Your cumulative average will be the higher one of the following two weighted averages:
HW | Quiz | Midterm | Final | |
Scheme I | 0% | 30% | 30% | 40% |
Scheme II | 0% | 30% | 0% | 70% |
Academic integrity is an essential part of the educational process, and all members of the GW community take these matters very seriously. As the instructor of record for this course, my role is to provide clear expectations and uphold them in all assessments. Violations of academic integrity occur when students fail to cite research sources properly, engage in unauthorized collaboration, falsify data, and otherwise violate the Code of Academic Integrity . If you have any questions about whether particular academic practices or resources are permitted, you should ask me for clarification. If you are reported for an academic integrity violation, you should contact Conflict Education and Student Accountability (CESA), formerly known as Student Rights and Responsibilities (SRR), to learn more about your rights and options in the process. Consequences can range from failure of assignment to expulsion from the University and may include a transcript notation. For more information, refer to the CESA website at students.gwu.edu/code-academic-integrity or contact CESA by email [email protected] or phone 202-994-6757.
Students must notify faculty during the first week of the semester in which they are enrolled in the course, or as early as possible, but no later than three weeks prior to the absence, of their intention to be absent from class on their day(s) of religious observance. If the holiday falls within the first three weeks of class, the student must inform faculty in the first week of the semester. For details and policy, see provost.gwu.edu/policies-procedures-and-guidelines .
Students are encouraged to use electronic course materials, including recorded class sessions, for private personal use in connection with their academic program of study. Electronic course materials and recorded class sessions should not be shared or used for non-course related purposes unless express permission has been granted by the instructor. Students who impermissibly share any electronic course materials are subject to discipline under the Student Code of Conduct. Contact the instructor if you have questions regarding what constitutes permissible or impermissible use of electronic course materials and/or recorded class sessions. Contact Disability Support Services at disabilitysupport.gwu.edu if you have questions or need assistance in accessing electronic course materials.
Academic Commons is the central location for academic support resources for GW students. To schedule a peer tutoring session for a variety of courses visit go.gwu.edu/tutoring . Visit academiccommons.gwu.edu for study skills tips, finding help with research, and connecting with other campus resources. For questions email [email protected] .
GW Writing Center cultivates confident writers in the University community by facilitating collaborative, critical, and inclusive conversations at all stages of the writing process. Working alongside peer mentors, writers develop strategies to write independently in academic and public settings. Appointments can be booked online at gwu.mywconline .
GW Emergency Services: 202-994-6111
For situation-specific instructions, refer to GW’s Emergency Procedures guide .
GW Alert is an emergency notification system that sends alerts to the GW community. GW requests students, faculty, and staff maintain current contact information by logging on to alert.gwu.edu . Alerts are sent via email, text, social media, and other means, including the Guardian app. The Guardian app is a safety app that allows you to communicate quickly with GW Emergency Services, 911, and other resources. Learn more at safety.gwu.edu .
GW prescribes four protective actions that can be issued by university officials depending on the type of emergency. All GW community members are expected to follow directions according to the specified protective action. The protective actions are Shelter, Evacuate, Secure, and Lockdown (details below). Learn more at safety.gwu.edu/gw-standard-emergency-statuses .
Everyone is strongly encouraged to ask questions during class, and during office hours! Should you need further assistance, you may consider hiring a tutor (the department keeps a list of tutors).
This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. Visit GW’s Website Privacy Notice to learn more about how GW uses cookies.
Full disclosure: I’m not sure this is a good idea (since it is seriously cryptic when you first encounter it, and hard to look up on your own), so I have precisely zero plans to pursue it any further myself. I do, however, find it to be an intriguing idea (prompted by this post in the PEP 736 discussion thread), so it seemed worth sharing in case someone else liked it enough to pick it up and run with it.
The core of the idea:
Handling different kinds of assignment targets:
Disallowed due to the potential for ambiguity:
Note that it isn’t that there’s no reasonable meaning for these (see the various comments about that later in the thread), it’s that the use cases for them are weak and they’d necessarily be harder to interpret than the simpler cases above. If they’re left out initially, it’s straightforward to add them later. If they’re included up front and are later found to be problematic, they’re hard to get rid of.
The mnemonic for remembering this use of the @ (“at”) symbol is the acronym “AT” for “Assignment Target”. Aside from the shared symbol, it has no connection to function decorators or matrix multiplication. As a style recommendation, it would be worth pointing out that combining assignment target references and the matrix multiplication operator in the same expression is intrinsically hard to read (due to the potential confusion between the two uses).
Edit: added a clarifying note to the list of arguably ambiguous targets
If this doesn’t comply with the presented idea, please disregard as off-topic.
I would find assignment targets useful in a for-loop where the assignment is implicit.
(I made-up the syntax).
The = @.lower() examples reminded me of the previous .= assignment discussion . Still not sure whether it would be a good idea, but the @ form is more general than the .= special case. Definitely intriguing …
I’d write that numlist = [num + 100 for num in numlist]
The more I think about it, the more I like it. The matrix multiplication thing does seem a bit of an issue though.
Also, I would consider allowing multiple targets on rightmost.
Given it can provide a significant decrease in verbosity, it would be a shame to not be able to take full advantage of it:
Or could specify which one (also, exclamation mark on its own looks pretty bad, adding a number to it makes it a bit better):
That’s semantically different, though, creating a new list instead of modifying an existing list.
I was pretty skeptical when I started reading, but the examples section really sold it to me!
So many of these are things I’ve had to do many times and shrugged about the verbosity.
Especially these:
(and similar)
Infact, the function call examples (PEP 736-like) seemed the least useful and intuitive to me, and I’m not quite sure I follow on how they’re consistent with the other assignment targets
The idea wouldn’t be useful in a regular for loop, but could reasonably be defined in comprehensions and generator expressions:
Less useful though, since it’s already acceptable style to use one letter iteration variable names in such cases.
I listed those separately because they’re genuinely different from the pure assignment case. Specifically, they’re looking up the given name in a different context from the one where the name is getting set.
Both tuple unpacking and multi-assigment could be allowed by having @ be a tuple in those cases.
My problem with that for multi-assigment is that it feels hard to remember (since rightmost and leftmost target remain plausible alternative meanings)
For tuple unpacking, the restriction could be limited to cases without star unpacking rather than all tuple targets, but it just doesn’t seem useful enough to justify that complexity.
I like the idea a lot, and I don’t quite see what can be potentially ambiguous about the two usages quoted above. The reversed example in particular makes the intent of the code that much more pronounced.
I do think that we should disallow mixed usage of matrix multiplication and the proposed assignment target reference as a special case though.
Maybe I’m missing something obvious, but I don’t even see what can be ambiguous about allowing a starred expression in the assignment targets, where the quoted example would intuitively translate into:
Also note that we should preserve the data types of tuples and/or lists in the assignment targets when evaluating them on the RHS:
This would be ambiguous if the function returns a value to an assignment target:
Meng Qinyuan
Aug 27, 2023
Hi @ncoghlan ,
Thanks for sharing this interesting idea! I think the use of @ to refer to assignment targets could be a neat feature, especially for scenarios where we need to reference the target itself, like in the examples with collections.NamedTuple and typing.NewType .
However, I do agree that the initial learning curve might be steep for newcomers, and the potential for confusion with existing uses of @ (decorators and matrix multiplication) is a concern.
It would be great to see more community feedback on this proposal, especially regarding the specific cases where it’s disallowed and how those could be handled differently.
Looking forward to seeing how this evolves!
MengQinyuan
It looks prety Perlish to me.
I’m not sure about this idea but I can see applications of it. One that comes up a lot in SymPy:
It is very easy to make a mistake with that and can easily cause bugs. This would be better:
Or maybe that is excluded because the assignment target is not an identifier…
My current summary of my own feelings: “Wow, that’s cool… I think I hate it”. Super useful (so it would get used), but super cryptic and not pretty to read (so I’d feel bad every time I used it, or saw someone else use it). I want to like it because of its utility and practicality, but the way it looks… ugh.
I only left out string forms for the non-identifier cases because I couldn’t think of a reasonable use case for them.
Defining it to be the literal source code target string regardless of the target kind wouldn’t be ambiguous though (and wouldn’t change the meaning for identifiers). That way APIs that accept comma separated strings that are expected to match the names of tuple assignment targets could be passed @'' as shown, while those that accept iterables could be passed @''.split(',') .
It would also strengthen the case for allowing @ for target tuples in general (since it would be odd if @'' was allowed, but @ wasn’t).
TensorFlow has the same design.
In my opinion, Jax solved this problem through better design. Instead of creating the symbols by binding a name, you do:
The decorator replaces the passed-in value x with a symbol x , produces the expression graph, compiles it, and then calls it with the passed-in arguments.
Similarly, SymPy could have been designed this way:
That is not a nice design for something that is often used interactively or in notebooks, short scripts etc. I guess jax has a more limited scope for how the symbols are used but needing to have all code in functions would be quite limiting for most SymPy users (including many who are not really “programmers” as such).
Other computer algebra systems often just allow symbols to be appear automagically without needing to be declared (which is both good and bad). Some like Matlab and Julia which are programming languages that have symbolic capability allow a nicer declaration something like:
Those languages could be extended to support this in a nicer way but Python can’t because it lacks macros and it would be considered out of scope for this sort of thing to be built in. The duplication in x, y = symbols('x, y') is of course not unique to SymPy and applies to the other situations mentioned in this thread as well which might equally be solved by macros in other languages.
In this lesson, you’ll learn about the biggest change in Python 3.8: the introduction of assignment expressions . Assignment expression are written with a new notation (:=) .This operator is often called the walrus operator as it resembles the eyes and tusks of a walrus on its side.
Assignment expressions allow you to assign and return a value in the same expression. For example, if you want to assign to a variable and print its value, then you typically do something like this:
In Python 3.8, you’re allowed to combine these two statements into one, using the walrus operator:
The assignment expression allows you to assign True to walrus , and immediately print the value. But keep in mind that the walrus operator does not do anything that isn’t possible without it. It only makes certain constructs more convenient, and can sometimes communicate the intent of your code more clearly.
One pattern that shows some of the strengths of the walrus operator is while loops where you need to initialize and update a variable. For example, the following code asks the user for input until they type quit :
This code is less than ideal. You’re repeating the input() statement, and somehow you need to add current to the list before asking the user for it. A better solution is to set up an infinite while loop, and use break to stop the loop:
This code is equivalent to the code above, but avoids the repetition and somehow keeps the lines in a more logical order. If you use an assignment expression, then you can simplify this loop further:
This moves the test back to the while line, where it should be. However, there are now several things happening at that line, so it takes a bit more effort to read it properly. Use your best judgement about when the walrus operator helps make your code more readable.
PEP 572 describes all the details of assignment expressions, including some of the rationale for introducing them into the language, as well as several examples of how the walrus operator can be used. The Python 3.8 documentation also includes some good examples of assignment expressions.
Here are a few resources for more info on using bpython, the REPL (Read–Eval–Print Loop) tool used in most of these videos:
00:00 In this video, you’ll learn about what’s being called the walrus operator. One of the biggest changes in Python 3.8 is the introduction of these assignment expressions. So, what does it do?
00:12 Well, it allows the assignment and the return of a value in the same expression, using a new notation. On the left side, you’d have the name of the object that you’re assigning, and then you have the operator, a colon and an equal sign ( := ), affectionately known as the walrus operator as it resembles the eyes and tusks of a walrus on its side.
00:32 And it’s assigning this expression on the right side, so it’s assigning and returning the value in the same expression. Let me have you practice with this operator with some code.
00:44 Throughout this tutorial, when I use a REPL, I’m going to be using this custom REPL called bpython . I’ll include links on how to install bpython below this video.
00:53 So, how do you use this assignment operator? Let me have you start with a small example. You could have an object named walrus and assign it the value of False , and then you could print it. In Python 3.8, you can combine those two statements and do a single statement using the walrus operator. So inside of print() , you could say walrus , the new object, and use the operator, the assignment expression := , and a space, and then say True . That’s going to do two things. Most notably, in reverse order, it returned the value True . And then it also assigned the value to walrus , and of course the type of 'bool' .
01:38 Keep in mind, the walrus operator doesn’t do anything that isn’t possible without it. It only makes certain constructs a bit more convenient, and can sometimes communicate the intent of your code more clearly.
01:48 Let me show you another example. It’s a pattern that shows some of the strengths of the walrus operator inside of while loops, where you need to initialize and update a variable. For example, create a new file, and name it write_something.py . Here’s write_something.py .
02:09 It starts with inputs , which will be a list. So create a list called inputs .
02:16 Into an object named current , use an input() statement. The input() statement is going to provide a prompt and read a string in from standard input. The prompt will be this, "Write something: " .
02:28 So when the user inputs that, that’ll go into current . So while current != "quit" — if the person has not typed quit yet— you’re going to take inputs and append the current value.
02:44 And then here, you’re asking to "Write something: " again.
02:50 Down here at my terminal, after saving—let’s see, make sure you’re saved. Okay. Now that’s saved.
03:00 So here, I could say, Hello , Welcome , and then finally quit , which then would quit it. So, this code isn’t ideal.
03:08 You’re repeating the input() statement twice, and somehow you need to add current to the list before asking the user for it. So a better solution is going to be to set up maybe an infinite while loop, and then use a break to stop the loop. How would that look?
03:22 You’re going to rearrange this a little bit. Move the while loop up, and say while True:
03:35 and here say if current == "quit": then break . Otherwise, go ahead and append it. So, a little different here, but this is a while loop that’s going to continue as long as it doesn’t get broken out of by someone typing quit . Okay.
03:53 Running it again. And there, you can see it breaking out. Nice. So, that code avoids the repetition and kind of keeps things in a more logical order, but there’s a way to simplify this to use that new assignment expression, the walrus operator. In that case, you’re going to modify this quite a bit.
04:17 Here you’re going to say while , current and then use that assignment operator ( := ) to create current .
04:23 But also, while doing that, check to see that it’s not equal to "quit" . So here, each time that assigns the value to current and it’s returned, so the value can be checked.
04:35 So while , current , assigning the value from the input() , and then if it’s not equal to "quit" , you’re going to append current . Make sure to save.
04:42 Run the code one more time.
04:47 And it works the same. This moves that test all the way back to the while line, where it should be. However, there’s a couple of things now happening all in one line, and that might take a little more effort to read what’s happening and to understand it properly.
05:00 There are a handful of other examples that you could look into to learn a little more about assignment expressions. I’ll include a link to PEP 572, and also a link to the Python docs for version 3.8, both of which include more code examples.
05:14 So you need to use your best judgment as to when this operator’s going to make your code more readable and more useful. In the next video, you’ll learn about the new feature of positional-only arguments.
rajeshboyalla on Dec. 4, 2019
Why do you use list() to initialize a list rather than using [] ?
Geir Arne Hjelle RP Team on Dec. 4, 2019
My two cents about list() vs [] (I wrote the original article this video series is based on):
That said, if I’m initializing a list with existing elements, I usually use [elem1, elem2, ...] , since list(...) has different–and sometimes surprising–semantics.
Jason on April 3, 2020
Sorry for my ignorance, did the the standard assignment = operator work in this way? I don’t understand what has been gained from adding the := operator. If anything I think it will allow people to write more obfuscated code. But minds better than mine have been working on this, so I’ll have to take their word it is an improvement.
As for the discussion on whether [] is more readable than list(). I’d never seen list() before, so to me [] is better. I’ve only just come over from the dark 2.7 side so maybe it’s an old python programmer thing?
Oh I checked the operation on the assignment operator. I was obviously wrong. lol Still I think the existing operator could’ve been tweaked to do the same thing as := … I’m still on the fence about that one.
gedece on April 3, 2020
you are right in that the existing operator could have worked, but it can lead to something unexpected.
if you do something like
if (newvar = somevar): it gives a traceback, because you are supposed to use == for comparations.
So if you use the normal operator for this, then that expression is valid and you’ll be hard pressed to realize the mistake.
It then makes complete sense to use a different operator as that helps to clarify intent in code.
Jason on April 6, 2020
Yes, I’ve accidentaly done that in other languages before and it can be a difficult to “see” bug.
varelaautumn on Sept. 26, 2020
I watched this earlier today and now tonight I just can’t stop myself from throwing these walrus operators everywhere.
(I’m new and learning so these are just personal fooling around programs)
For example I have this function which cycles through a bunch of other very simple parsing functions that check if my input string is valid in the context of the game state. If the string doesn’t pass one of these parsers it returns a string with an error message such as “Input must be less than 5 characters”. And then the parse_input function returns that error string.
I mean it’s not a huge change, but it saves an extra call of the function, and I feel like it makes it much more readable.
I’m not sure if this other case might be considered abuse of the walrus operator, but I decided to use it twice in one line.
This function repeatedly asks for input. If the input does not pass the parser functions, then the error will be returned and printed out in the while loop. Otherwise the input was valid and it gets returned.
I’m able to pass my input into a function and check the result of that function all while retaining my input and the return of the function as their own variables to be used in the next line.
I think the walrus operator helped me put all the relevant details on the three lines. Like if you just read the first words of each line, it basically says “while error, print error, else return input_string.” I don’t see how I could have done that without this cool walrus operator so I’m really appreciative for this video you made! I’ve been converted to a strong believer in the walrus operator.
Geir Arne Hjelle RP Team on Sept. 26, 2020
@varelaautumn Nice examples, thanks for sharing!
I agree that the walrus operator will not revolutionize your code, but it can bring these sorts of small improvements that add up in the long run.
Become a Member to join the conversation.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
math. trunc (x) ¶ Return x with the fractional part removed, leaving the integer part. This rounds toward 0: trunc() is equivalent to floor() for positive x, and equivalent to ceil() for negative x.If x is not a float, delegates to x.__trunc__, which should return an Integral value.. math. ulp (x) ¶ Return the value of the least significant bit of the float x:. If x is a NaN (not a number ...
Getting to Know the Python math Module. The Python math module is an important feature designed to deal with mathematical operations. It comes packaged with the standard Python release and has been there from the beginning. Most of the math module's functions are thin wrappers around the C platform's mathematical functions. Since its underlying functions are written in CPython, the math ...
Arithmetic operators are used to perform mathematical operations like addition, subtraction, multiplication, etc. For example, ... Here's a list of different assignment operators available in Python. Operator Name Example = Assignment Operator: a = 7 += Addition Assignment: a += 1 # a = a + 1-= Subtraction Assignment:
The assignment operator is one of the most frequently used operators in Python. The operator consists of a single equal sign ( = ), and it operates on two operands. The left-hand operand is typically a variable , while the right-hand operand is an expression.
Python Assignment Operators. Assignment operators are used to assign values to variables. They can also perform arithmetic operations in combination with assignments. The canonical assignment operator is the equal sign ( =). Its purpose is to bind a value to a variable: if we write x = 10, we store the value 10 inside the variable x.
Here, variable represents a generic Python variable, while expression represents any Python object that you can provide as a concrete value—also known as a literal—or an expression that evaluates to a value. To execute an assignment statement like the above, Python runs the following steps: Evaluate the right-hand expression to produce a concrete value or object.
Math module provides built-in functions to find such values and even to change the values between degrees and radians. 1. Finding sine, cosine, and tangent. sin (), cos (), and tan () functions returns the sine, cosine, and tangent of value passed as the argument. The value passed in this function should be in radians.
Python Operators: Arithmetic, Assignment, Comparison, Logical, Identity, Membership, Bitwise. Operators are special symbols that perform some operation on operands and returns the result. For example, 5 + 6 is an expression where + is an operator that performs arithmetic add operation on numeric left operand 5 and the right side operand 6 and ...
These free exercises are nothing but Python assignments for the practice where you need to solve different programs and challenges. All exercises are tested on Python 3. Each exercise has 10-20 Questions. The solution is provided for every question. These Python programming exercises are suitable for all Python developers.
Python Identity Operators. Identity operators are used to compare the objects, not if they are equal, but if they are actually the same object, with the same memory location: Operator. Description. Example. Try it. is. Returns True if both variables are the same object. x is y.
Quadratic function : (a * x^2) + b*x + c a: 25 b: 64 c: 36 There are 2 roots: -0.834579 and -1.725421. Click me to see the sample solution. 31. Write a Python program to convert a decimal number to a binary number. Expected Output : Input a binary number: 101011 The decimal value of the number is 43.
The Walrus Operator in Python is a new assignment operator which is introduced in Python version 3.8 and higher. This operator is used to assign a value to a variable within an expression. Syntax: a := expression. Example: In this code, we have a Python list of integers. We have used Python Walrus assignment operator within the Python while loop.
Diving into Python, one of the most popular programming languages today, it's crucial to grasp the basics. Operators in Python are the building blocks for performing calculations, making decisions, and storing values. I'll walk you through the essentials of arithmetic, comparison, and assignment operators, which are foundational for anyone looking to code in Python.
Python Assignment Operators. Assignment operators are used to assign values to variables: Operator. Example. Same As. Try it. =. x = 5. x = 5.
Variables and Assignment¶. When programming, it is useful to be able to store information in variables. A variable is a string of characters and numbers associated with a piece of information. The assignment operator, denoted by the "=" symbol, is the operator that is used to assign values to variables in Python.The line x=1 takes the known value, 1, and assigns that value to the variable ...
An arithmetic operator is a symbol that performs a mathematical operation on one or more operands. The basic arithmetic operators in Python include addition (+), subtraction (-), multiplication (*), division (/), floor division (//), modulus (%), and exponentiation (**). These operators are used to perform calculations and return a numeric result.
Return the Sum of Two Numbers. Create a function that takes two numbers as arguments and returns their sum. Examples addition (3, 2) 5 addition (-3, -6) -9 addition (7, 3) 10 Notes Don't forget to return the result. If you get stuck on a challenge, find help in the Resources tab.
Each new version of Python adds new features to the language. Back when Python 3.8 was released, the biggest change was the addition of assignment expressions.Specifically, the := operator gave you a new syntax for assigning variables in the middle of expressions. This operator is colloquially known as the walrus operator.. This tutorial is an in-depth introduction to the walrus operator.
This PEP is a tutorial for the pattern matching introduced by PEP 634. PEP 622 proposed syntax for pattern matching, which received detailed discussion both from the community and the Steering Council. A frequent concern was about how easy it would be to explain (and learn) this feature. This PEP addresses that concern providing the kind of ...
For the future time traveler from Google, here is a new way (available from Python 3.8 onward): b = 1 if a := b: # this section is only reached if b is not 0 or false. # Also, a is set to b print(a, b) This is known as "the walrus operator". More info at the What's New In Python 3.8 page.
The best way to learn is by practising it more and more. The best thing about this Python practice exercise is that it helps you learn Python using sets of detailed programming questions from basic to advanced. It covers questions on core Python concepts as well as applications of Python in various domains.
About the Author . Eric Matthes is a high school science and math teacher living in Alaska, where he teaches an introductory Python course. He has been writing programs since he was five years old. Eric currently focuses on writing software that addresses inefficiencies in education and brings the benefits of open source software to the field of education.
The official Python docs suggest using math.fmod() over the Python modulo operator when working with float values because of the way math.fmod() calculates the result of the modulo operation. If you're using a negative operand, then you may see different results between math.fmod(x, y) and x % y.You'll explore using the modulo operator with negative operands in more detail in the next section.
Basic Information Course: Math 3553.80 Numerical Analysis Semester: Fall 2024 Time: 08/22/2024-12/09/2024, Mon&Wed 12:45pm-02:00pm; Location: Duques 251 Instructor: Yanxiang Zhao, Phillips Hall 702 Phone: 202-994-0606 Email: username at email dot gwu dot edu username equals yxzhao Office Hour: Mon&Wed 02:00pm-03:00pm or by appointment Course Description This course covers: Linear systems and ...
Exactly what that means depends on the nature of the assignment target (more details on that below). When the assignment target is an identifier, @'' or @"" can be used to mean "the assignment target as a string" (useful for APIs like collections.NamedTuple and typing.NewType
In this lesson, you'll learn about the biggest change in Python 3.8: the introduction of assignment expressions.Assignment expression are written with a new notation (:=).This operator is often called the walrus operator as it resembles the eyes and tusks of a walrus on its side.. Assignment expressions allow you to assign and return a value in the same expression.