define case study process

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• What Is a Case Study? | Definition, Examples & Methods

What Is a Case Study? | Definition, Examples & Methods

Published on May 8, 2019 by Shona McCombes . Revised on November 20, 2023.

A case study is a detailed study of a specific subject, such as a person, group, place, event, organization, or phenomenon. Case studies are commonly used in social, educational, clinical, and business research.

A case study research design usually involves qualitative methods , but quantitative methods are sometimes also used. Case studies are good for describing , comparing, evaluating and understanding different aspects of a research problem .

Table of contents

When to do a case study, step 1: select a case, step 2: build a theoretical framework, step 3: collect your data, step 4: describe and analyze the case, other interesting articles.

A case study is an appropriate research design when you want to gain concrete, contextual, in-depth knowledge about a specific real-world subject. It allows you to explore the key characteristics, meanings, and implications of the case.

Case studies are often a good choice in a thesis or dissertation . They keep your project focused and manageable when you don’t have the time or resources to do large-scale research.

You might use just one complex case study where you explore a single subject in depth, or conduct multiple case studies to compare and illuminate different aspects of your research problem.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Once you have developed your problem statement and research questions , you should be ready to choose the specific case that you want to focus on. A good case study should have the potential to:

• Provide new or unexpected insights into the subject
• Challenge or complicate existing assumptions and theories
• Propose practical courses of action to resolve a problem
• Open up new directions for future research

TipIf your research is more practical in nature and aims to simultaneously investigate an issue as you solve it, consider conducting action research instead.

Unlike quantitative or experimental research , a strong case study does not require a random or representative sample. In fact, case studies often deliberately focus on unusual, neglected, or outlying cases which may shed new light on the research problem.

Example of an outlying case studyIn the 1960s the town of Roseto, Pennsylvania was discovered to have extremely low rates of heart disease compared to the US average. It became an important case study for understanding previously neglected causes of heart disease.

However, you can also choose a more common or representative case to exemplify a particular category, experience or phenomenon.

Example of a representative case studyIn the 1920s, two sociologists used Muncie, Indiana as a case study of a typical American city that supposedly exemplified the changing culture of the US at the time.

While case studies focus more on concrete details than general theories, they should usually have some connection with theory in the field. This way the case study is not just an isolated description, but is integrated into existing knowledge about the topic. It might aim to:

• Exemplify a theory by showing how it explains the case under investigation
• Expand on a theory by uncovering new concepts and ideas that need to be incorporated
• Challenge a theory by exploring an outlier case that doesn’t fit with established assumptions

To ensure that your analysis of the case has a solid academic grounding, you should conduct a literature review of sources related to the topic and develop a theoretical framework . This means identifying key concepts and theories to guide your analysis and interpretation.

There are many different research methods you can use to collect data on your subject. Case studies tend to focus on qualitative data using methods such as interviews , observations , and analysis of primary and secondary sources (e.g., newspaper articles, photographs, official records). Sometimes a case study will also collect quantitative data.

Example of a mixed methods case studyFor a case study of a wind farm development in a rural area, you could collect quantitative data on employment rates and business revenue, collect qualitative data on local people’s perceptions and experiences, and analyze local and national media coverage of the development.

The aim is to gain as thorough an understanding as possible of the case and its context.

In writing up the case study, you need to bring together all the relevant aspects to give as complete a picture as possible of the subject.

How you report your findings depends on the type of research you are doing. Some case studies are structured like a standard scientific paper or thesis , with separate sections or chapters for the methods , results and discussion .

Others are written in a more narrative style, aiming to explore the case from various angles and analyze its meanings and implications (for example, by using textual analysis or discourse analysis ).

In all cases, though, make sure to give contextual details about the case, connect it back to the literature and theory, and discuss how it fits into wider patterns or debates.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Normal distribution
• Degrees of freedom
• Null hypothesis
• Discourse analysis
• Control groups
• Mixed methods research
• Non-probability sampling
• Quantitative research
• Ecological validity

Research bias

• Rosenthal effect
• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Selection bias
• Negativity bias
• Status quo bias

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, November 20). What Is a Case Study? | Definition, Examples & Methods. Scribbr. Retrieved August 26, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/case-study/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, primary vs. secondary sources | difference & examples, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is action research | definition & examples, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

The Ultimate Guide to Qualitative Research - Part 1: The Basics

• Introduction and overview
• What is qualitative research?
• What is qualitative data?
• Examples of qualitative data
• Qualitative vs. quantitative research
• Mixed methods
• Qualitative research preparation
• Theoretical perspective
• Theoretical framework
• Literature reviews

Research question

• Conceptual framework
• Conceptual vs. theoretical framework

Data collection

• Qualitative research methods
• Focus groups
• Observational research

What is a case study?

Applications for case study research, what is a good case study, process of case study design, benefits and limitations of case studies.

• Ethnographical research
• Ethical considerations
• Confidentiality and privacy
• Power dynamics
• Reflexivity

Case studies

Case studies are essential to qualitative research , offering a lens through which researchers can investigate complex phenomena within their real-life contexts. This chapter explores the concept, purpose, applications, examples, and types of case studies and provides guidance on how to conduct case study research effectively.

Whereas quantitative methods look at phenomena at scale, case study research looks at a concept or phenomenon in considerable detail. While analyzing a single case can help understand one perspective regarding the object of research inquiry, analyzing multiple cases can help obtain a more holistic sense of the topic or issue. Let's provide a basic definition of a case study, then explore its characteristics and role in the qualitative research process.

Definition of a case study

A case study in qualitative research is a strategy of inquiry that involves an in-depth investigation of a phenomenon within its real-world context. It provides researchers with the opportunity to acquire an in-depth understanding of intricate details that might not be as apparent or accessible through other methods of research. The specific case or cases being studied can be a single person, group, or organization – demarcating what constitutes a relevant case worth studying depends on the researcher and their research question .

Among qualitative research methods , a case study relies on multiple sources of evidence, such as documents, artifacts, interviews , or observations , to present a complete and nuanced understanding of the phenomenon under investigation. The objective is to illuminate the readers' understanding of the phenomenon beyond its abstract statistical or theoretical explanations.

Characteristics of case studies

Case studies typically possess a number of distinct characteristics that set them apart from other research methods. These characteristics include a focus on holistic description and explanation, flexibility in the design and data collection methods, reliance on multiple sources of evidence, and emphasis on the context in which the phenomenon occurs.

Furthermore, case studies can often involve a longitudinal examination of the case, meaning they study the case over a period of time. These characteristics allow case studies to yield comprehensive, in-depth, and richly contextualized insights about the phenomenon of interest.

The role of case studies in research

Case studies hold a unique position in the broader landscape of research methods aimed at theory development. They are instrumental when the primary research interest is to gain an intensive, detailed understanding of a phenomenon in its real-life context.

In addition, case studies can serve different purposes within research - they can be used for exploratory, descriptive, or explanatory purposes, depending on the research question and objectives. This flexibility and depth make case studies a valuable tool in the toolkit of qualitative researchers.

Remember, a well-conducted case study can offer a rich, insightful contribution to both academic and practical knowledge through theory development or theory verification, thus enhancing our understanding of complex phenomena in their real-world contexts.

What is the purpose of a case study?

Case study research aims for a more comprehensive understanding of phenomena, requiring various research methods to gather information for qualitative analysis . Ultimately, a case study can allow the researcher to gain insight into a particular object of inquiry and develop a theoretical framework relevant to the research inquiry.

Why use case studies in qualitative research?

Using case studies as a research strategy depends mainly on the nature of the research question and the researcher's access to the data.

Conducting case study research provides a level of detail and contextual richness that other research methods might not offer. They are beneficial when there's a need to understand complex social phenomena within their natural contexts.

The explanatory, exploratory, and descriptive roles of case studies

Case studies can take on various roles depending on the research objectives. They can be exploratory when the research aims to discover new phenomena or define new research questions; they are descriptive when the objective is to depict a phenomenon within its context in a detailed manner; and they can be explanatory if the goal is to understand specific relationships within the studied context. Thus, the versatility of case studies allows researchers to approach their topic from different angles, offering multiple ways to uncover and interpret the data .

The impact of case studies on knowledge development

Case studies play a significant role in knowledge development across various disciplines. Analysis of cases provides an avenue for researchers to explore phenomena within their context based on the collected data.

This can result in the production of rich, practical insights that can be instrumental in both theory-building and practice. Case studies allow researchers to delve into the intricacies and complexities of real-life situations, uncovering insights that might otherwise remain hidden.

Types of case studies

In qualitative research , a case study is not a one-size-fits-all approach. Depending on the nature of the research question and the specific objectives of the study, researchers might choose to use different types of case studies. These types differ in their focus, methodology, and the level of detail they provide about the phenomenon under investigation.

Understanding these types is crucial for selecting the most appropriate approach for your research project and effectively achieving your research goals. Let's briefly look at the main types of case studies.

Exploratory case studies

Exploratory case studies are typically conducted to develop a theory or framework around an understudied phenomenon. They can also serve as a precursor to a larger-scale research project. Exploratory case studies are useful when a researcher wants to identify the key issues or questions which can spur more extensive study or be used to develop propositions for further research. These case studies are characterized by flexibility, allowing researchers to explore various aspects of a phenomenon as they emerge, which can also form the foundation for subsequent studies.

Descriptive case studies

Descriptive case studies aim to provide a complete and accurate representation of a phenomenon or event within its context. These case studies are often based on an established theoretical framework, which guides how data is collected and analyzed. The researcher is concerned with describing the phenomenon in detail, as it occurs naturally, without trying to influence or manipulate it.

Explanatory case studies

Explanatory case studies are focused on explanation - they seek to clarify how or why certain phenomena occur. Often used in complex, real-life situations, they can be particularly valuable in clarifying causal relationships among concepts and understanding the interplay between different factors within a specific context.

Intrinsic, instrumental, and collective case studies

These three categories of case studies focus on the nature and purpose of the study. An intrinsic case study is conducted when a researcher has an inherent interest in the case itself. Instrumental case studies are employed when the case is used to provide insight into a particular issue or phenomenon. A collective case study, on the other hand, involves studying multiple cases simultaneously to investigate some general phenomena.

Each type of case study serves a different purpose and has its own strengths and challenges. The selection of the type should be guided by the research question and objectives, as well as the context and constraints of the research.

The flexibility, depth, and contextual richness offered by case studies make this approach an excellent research method for various fields of study. They enable researchers to investigate real-world phenomena within their specific contexts, capturing nuances that other research methods might miss. Across numerous fields, case studies provide valuable insights into complex issues.

Critical information systems research

Case studies provide a detailed understanding of the role and impact of information systems in different contexts. They offer a platform to explore how information systems are designed, implemented, and used and how they interact with various social, economic, and political factors. Case studies in this field often focus on examining the intricate relationship between technology, organizational processes, and user behavior, helping to uncover insights that can inform better system design and implementation.

Health research

Health research is another field where case studies are highly valuable. They offer a way to explore patient experiences, healthcare delivery processes, and the impact of various interventions in a real-world context.

Case studies can provide a deep understanding of a patient's journey, giving insights into the intricacies of disease progression, treatment effects, and the psychosocial aspects of health and illness.

Asthma research studies

Specifically within medical research, studies on asthma often employ case studies to explore the individual and environmental factors that influence asthma development, management, and outcomes. A case study can provide rich, detailed data about individual patients' experiences, from the triggers and symptoms they experience to the effectiveness of various management strategies. This can be crucial for developing patient-centered asthma care approaches.

Other fields

Apart from the fields mentioned, case studies are also extensively used in business and management research, education research, and political sciences, among many others. They provide an opportunity to delve into the intricacies of real-world situations, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of various phenomena.

Case studies, with their depth and contextual focus, offer unique insights across these varied fields. They allow researchers to illuminate the complexities of real-life situations, contributing to both theory and practice.

Whatever field you're in, ATLAS.ti puts your data to work for you

Download a free trial of ATLAS.ti to turn your data into insights.

Understanding the key elements of case study design is crucial for conducting rigorous and impactful case study research. A well-structured design guides the researcher through the process, ensuring that the study is methodologically sound and its findings are reliable and valid. The main elements of case study design include the research question , propositions, units of analysis, and the logic linking the data to the propositions.

The research question is the foundation of any research study. A good research question guides the direction of the study and informs the selection of the case, the methods of collecting data, and the analysis techniques. A well-formulated research question in case study research is typically clear, focused, and complex enough to merit further detailed examination of the relevant case(s).

Propositions

Propositions, though not necessary in every case study, provide a direction by stating what we might expect to find in the data collected. They guide how data is collected and analyzed by helping researchers focus on specific aspects of the case. They are particularly important in explanatory case studies, which seek to understand the relationships among concepts within the studied phenomenon.

Units of analysis

The unit of analysis refers to the case, or the main entity or entities that are being analyzed in the study. In case study research, the unit of analysis can be an individual, a group, an organization, a decision, an event, or even a time period. It's crucial to clearly define the unit of analysis, as it shapes the qualitative data analysis process by allowing the researcher to analyze a particular case and synthesize analysis across multiple case studies to draw conclusions.

Argumentation

This refers to the inferential model that allows researchers to draw conclusions from the data. The researcher needs to ensure that there is a clear link between the data, the propositions (if any), and the conclusions drawn. This argumentation is what enables the researcher to make valid and credible inferences about the phenomenon under study.

Understanding and carefully considering these elements in the design phase of a case study can significantly enhance the quality of the research. It can help ensure that the study is methodologically sound and its findings contribute meaningful insights about the case.

Ready to jumpstart your research with ATLAS.ti?

Conceptualize your research project with our intuitive data analysis interface. Download a free trial today.

Conducting a case study involves several steps, from defining the research question and selecting the case to collecting and analyzing data . This section outlines these key stages, providing a practical guide on how to conduct case study research.

Defining the research question

The first step in case study research is defining a clear, focused research question. This question should guide the entire research process, from case selection to analysis. It's crucial to ensure that the research question is suitable for a case study approach. Typically, such questions are exploratory or descriptive in nature and focus on understanding a phenomenon within its real-life context.

Selecting and defining the case

The selection of the case should be based on the research question and the objectives of the study. It involves choosing a unique example or a set of examples that provide rich, in-depth data about the phenomenon under investigation. After selecting the case, it's crucial to define it clearly, setting the boundaries of the case, including the time period and the specific context.

Previous research can help guide the case study design. When considering a case study, an example of a case could be taken from previous case study research and used to define cases in a new research inquiry. Considering recently published examples can help understand how to select and define cases effectively.

Developing a detailed case study protocol

A case study protocol outlines the procedures and general rules to be followed during the case study. This includes the data collection methods to be used, the sources of data, and the procedures for analysis. Having a detailed case study protocol ensures consistency and reliability in the study.

The protocol should also consider how to work with the people involved in the research context to grant the research team access to collecting data. As mentioned in previous sections of this guide, establishing rapport is an essential component of qualitative research as it shapes the overall potential for collecting and analyzing data.

Collecting data

Gathering data in case study research often involves multiple sources of evidence, including documents, archival records, interviews, observations, and physical artifacts. This allows for a comprehensive understanding of the case. The process for gathering data should be systematic and carefully documented to ensure the reliability and validity of the study.

Analyzing and interpreting data

The next step is analyzing the data. This involves organizing the data , categorizing it into themes or patterns , and interpreting these patterns to answer the research question. The analysis might also involve comparing the findings with prior research or theoretical propositions.

Writing the case study report

The final step is writing the case study report . This should provide a detailed description of the case, the data, the analysis process, and the findings. The report should be clear, organized, and carefully written to ensure that the reader can understand the case and the conclusions drawn from it.

Each of these steps is crucial in ensuring that the case study research is rigorous, reliable, and provides valuable insights about the case.

The type, depth, and quality of data in your study can significantly influence the validity and utility of the study. In case study research, data is usually collected from multiple sources to provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the case. This section will outline the various methods of collecting data used in case study research and discuss considerations for ensuring the quality of the data.

Interviews are a common method of gathering data in case study research. They can provide rich, in-depth data about the perspectives, experiences, and interpretations of the individuals involved in the case. Interviews can be structured , semi-structured , or unstructured , depending on the research question and the degree of flexibility needed.

Observations

Observations involve the researcher observing the case in its natural setting, providing first-hand information about the case and its context. Observations can provide data that might not be revealed in interviews or documents, such as non-verbal cues or contextual information.

Documents and artifacts

Documents and archival records provide a valuable source of data in case study research. They can include reports, letters, memos, meeting minutes, email correspondence, and various public and private documents related to the case.

These records can provide historical context, corroborate evidence from other sources, and offer insights into the case that might not be apparent from interviews or observations.

Physical artifacts refer to any physical evidence related to the case, such as tools, products, or physical environments. These artifacts can provide tangible insights into the case, complementing the data gathered from other sources.

Ensuring the quality of data collection

Determining the quality of data in case study research requires careful planning and execution. It's crucial to ensure that the data is reliable, accurate, and relevant to the research question. This involves selecting appropriate methods of collecting data, properly training interviewers or observers, and systematically recording and storing the data. It also includes considering ethical issues related to collecting and handling data, such as obtaining informed consent and ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of the participants.

Data analysis

Analyzing case study research involves making sense of the rich, detailed data to answer the research question. This process can be challenging due to the volume and complexity of case study data. However, a systematic and rigorous approach to analysis can ensure that the findings are credible and meaningful. This section outlines the main steps and considerations in analyzing data in case study research.

Organizing the data

The first step in the analysis is organizing the data. This involves sorting the data into manageable sections, often according to the data source or the theme. This step can also involve transcribing interviews, digitizing physical artifacts, or organizing observational data.

Categorizing and coding the data

Once the data is organized, the next step is to categorize or code the data. This involves identifying common themes, patterns, or concepts in the data and assigning codes to relevant data segments. Coding can be done manually or with the help of software tools, and in either case, qualitative analysis software can greatly facilitate the entire coding process. Coding helps to reduce the data to a set of themes or categories that can be more easily analyzed.

Identifying patterns and themes

After coding the data, the researcher looks for patterns or themes in the coded data. This involves comparing and contrasting the codes and looking for relationships or patterns among them. The identified patterns and themes should help answer the research question.

Interpreting the data

Once patterns and themes have been identified, the next step is to interpret these findings. This involves explaining what the patterns or themes mean in the context of the research question and the case. This interpretation should be grounded in the data, but it can also involve drawing on theoretical concepts or prior research.

Verification of the data

The last step in the analysis is verification. This involves checking the accuracy and consistency of the analysis process and confirming that the findings are supported by the data. This can involve re-checking the original data, checking the consistency of codes, or seeking feedback from research participants or peers.

Like any research method , case study research has its strengths and limitations. Researchers must be aware of these, as they can influence the design, conduct, and interpretation of the study.

Understanding the strengths and limitations of case study research can also guide researchers in deciding whether this approach is suitable for their research question . This section outlines some of the key strengths and limitations of case study research.

Benefits include the following:

• Rich, detailed data: One of the main strengths of case study research is that it can generate rich, detailed data about the case. This can provide a deep understanding of the case and its context, which can be valuable in exploring complex phenomena.
• Flexibility: Case study research is flexible in terms of design , data collection , and analysis . A sufficient degree of flexibility allows the researcher to adapt the study according to the case and the emerging findings.
• Real-world context: Case study research involves studying the case in its real-world context, which can provide valuable insights into the interplay between the case and its context.
• Multiple sources of evidence: Case study research often involves collecting data from multiple sources , which can enhance the robustness and validity of the findings.

On the other hand, researchers should consider the following limitations:

• Generalizability: A common criticism of case study research is that its findings might not be generalizable to other cases due to the specificity and uniqueness of each case.
• Time and resource intensive: Case study research can be time and resource intensive due to the depth of the investigation and the amount of collected data.
• Complexity of analysis: The rich, detailed data generated in case study research can make analyzing the data challenging.
• Subjectivity: Given the nature of case study research, there may be a higher degree of subjectivity in interpreting the data , so researchers need to reflect on this and transparently convey to audiences how the research was conducted.

Being aware of these strengths and limitations can help researchers design and conduct case study research effectively and interpret and report the findings appropriately.

Ready to analyze your data with ATLAS.ti?

See how our intuitive software can draw key insights from your data with a free trial today.

• Privacy Policy

Home » Case Study – Methods, Examples and Guide

Case Study – Methods, Examples and Guide

Table of Contents

A case study is a research method that involves an in-depth examination and analysis of a particular phenomenon or case, such as an individual, organization, community, event, or situation.

It is a qualitative research approach that aims to provide a detailed and comprehensive understanding of the case being studied. Case studies typically involve multiple sources of data, including interviews, observations, documents, and artifacts, which are analyzed using various techniques, such as content analysis, thematic analysis, and grounded theory. The findings of a case study are often used to develop theories, inform policy or practice, or generate new research questions.

Types of Case Study

Types and Methods of Case Study are as follows:

Single-Case Study

A single-case study is an in-depth analysis of a single case. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to understand a specific phenomenon in detail.

For Example , A researcher might conduct a single-case study on a particular individual to understand their experiences with a particular health condition or a specific organization to explore their management practices. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as content analysis or thematic analysis. The findings of a single-case study are often used to generate new research questions, develop theories, or inform policy or practice.

Multiple-Case Study

A multiple-case study involves the analysis of several cases that are similar in nature. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to identify similarities and differences between the cases.

For Example, a researcher might conduct a multiple-case study on several companies to explore the factors that contribute to their success or failure. The researcher collects data from each case, compares and contrasts the findings, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as comparative analysis or pattern-matching. The findings of a multiple-case study can be used to develop theories, inform policy or practice, or generate new research questions.

Exploratory Case Study

An exploratory case study is used to explore a new or understudied phenomenon. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to generate hypotheses or theories about the phenomenon.

For Example, a researcher might conduct an exploratory case study on a new technology to understand its potential impact on society. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as grounded theory or content analysis. The findings of an exploratory case study can be used to generate new research questions, develop theories, or inform policy or practice.

Descriptive Case Study

A descriptive case study is used to describe a particular phenomenon in detail. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to provide a comprehensive account of the phenomenon.

For Example, a researcher might conduct a descriptive case study on a particular community to understand its social and economic characteristics. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as content analysis or thematic analysis. The findings of a descriptive case study can be used to inform policy or practice or generate new research questions.

Instrumental Case Study

An instrumental case study is used to understand a particular phenomenon that is instrumental in achieving a particular goal. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to understand the role of the phenomenon in achieving the goal.

For Example, a researcher might conduct an instrumental case study on a particular policy to understand its impact on achieving a particular goal, such as reducing poverty. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as content analysis or thematic analysis. The findings of an instrumental case study can be used to inform policy or practice or generate new research questions.

Case Study Data Collection Methods

Here are some common data collection methods for case studies:

Interviews involve asking questions to individuals who have knowledge or experience relevant to the case study. Interviews can be structured (where the same questions are asked to all participants) or unstructured (where the interviewer follows up on the responses with further questions). Interviews can be conducted in person, over the phone, or through video conferencing.

Observations

Observations involve watching and recording the behavior and activities of individuals or groups relevant to the case study. Observations can be participant (where the researcher actively participates in the activities) or non-participant (where the researcher observes from a distance). Observations can be recorded using notes, audio or video recordings, or photographs.

Documents can be used as a source of information for case studies. Documents can include reports, memos, emails, letters, and other written materials related to the case study. Documents can be collected from the case study participants or from public sources.

Surveys involve asking a set of questions to a sample of individuals relevant to the case study. Surveys can be administered in person, over the phone, through mail or email, or online. Surveys can be used to gather information on attitudes, opinions, or behaviors related to the case study.

Artifacts are physical objects relevant to the case study. Artifacts can include tools, equipment, products, or other objects that provide insights into the case study phenomenon.

How to conduct Case Study Research

Conducting a case study research involves several steps that need to be followed to ensure the quality and rigor of the study. Here are the steps to conduct case study research:

• Define the research questions: The first step in conducting a case study research is to define the research questions. The research questions should be specific, measurable, and relevant to the case study phenomenon under investigation.
• Select the case: The next step is to select the case or cases to be studied. The case should be relevant to the research questions and should provide rich and diverse data that can be used to answer the research questions.
• Collect data: Data can be collected using various methods, such as interviews, observations, documents, surveys, and artifacts. The data collection method should be selected based on the research questions and the nature of the case study phenomenon.
• Analyze the data: The data collected from the case study should be analyzed using various techniques, such as content analysis, thematic analysis, or grounded theory. The analysis should be guided by the research questions and should aim to provide insights and conclusions relevant to the research questions.
• Draw conclusions: The conclusions drawn from the case study should be based on the data analysis and should be relevant to the research questions. The conclusions should be supported by evidence and should be clearly stated.
• Validate the findings: The findings of the case study should be validated by reviewing the data and the analysis with participants or other experts in the field. This helps to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings.
• Write the report: The final step is to write the report of the case study research. The report should provide a clear description of the case study phenomenon, the research questions, the data collection methods, the data analysis, the findings, and the conclusions. The report should be written in a clear and concise manner and should follow the guidelines for academic writing.

Examples of Case Study

Here are some examples of case study research:

• The Hawthorne Studies : Conducted between 1924 and 1932, the Hawthorne Studies were a series of case studies conducted by Elton Mayo and his colleagues to examine the impact of work environment on employee productivity. The studies were conducted at the Hawthorne Works plant of the Western Electric Company in Chicago and included interviews, observations, and experiments.
• The Stanford Prison Experiment: Conducted in 1971, the Stanford Prison Experiment was a case study conducted by Philip Zimbardo to examine the psychological effects of power and authority. The study involved simulating a prison environment and assigning participants to the role of guards or prisoners. The study was controversial due to the ethical issues it raised.
• The Challenger Disaster: The Challenger Disaster was a case study conducted to examine the causes of the Space Shuttle Challenger explosion in 1986. The study included interviews, observations, and analysis of data to identify the technical, organizational, and cultural factors that contributed to the disaster.
• The Enron Scandal: The Enron Scandal was a case study conducted to examine the causes of the Enron Corporation’s bankruptcy in 2001. The study included interviews, analysis of financial data, and review of documents to identify the accounting practices, corporate culture, and ethical issues that led to the company’s downfall.
• The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster : The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster was a case study conducted to examine the causes of the nuclear accident that occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan in 2011. The study included interviews, analysis of data, and review of documents to identify the technical, organizational, and cultural factors that contributed to the disaster.

Application of Case Study

Case studies have a wide range of applications across various fields and industries. Here are some examples:

Business and Management

Case studies are widely used in business and management to examine real-life situations and develop problem-solving skills. Case studies can help students and professionals to develop a deep understanding of business concepts, theories, and best practices.

Case studies are used in healthcare to examine patient care, treatment options, and outcomes. Case studies can help healthcare professionals to develop critical thinking skills, diagnose complex medical conditions, and develop effective treatment plans.

Case studies are used in education to examine teaching and learning practices. Case studies can help educators to develop effective teaching strategies, evaluate student progress, and identify areas for improvement.

Social Sciences

Case studies are widely used in social sciences to examine human behavior, social phenomena, and cultural practices. Case studies can help researchers to develop theories, test hypotheses, and gain insights into complex social issues.

Law and Ethics

Case studies are used in law and ethics to examine legal and ethical dilemmas. Case studies can help lawyers, policymakers, and ethical professionals to develop critical thinking skills, analyze complex cases, and make informed decisions.

Purpose of Case Study

The purpose of a case study is to provide a detailed analysis of a specific phenomenon, issue, or problem in its real-life context. A case study is a qualitative research method that involves the in-depth exploration and analysis of a particular case, which can be an individual, group, organization, event, or community.

The primary purpose of a case study is to generate a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the case, including its history, context, and dynamics. Case studies can help researchers to identify and examine the underlying factors, processes, and mechanisms that contribute to the case and its outcomes. This can help to develop a more accurate and detailed understanding of the case, which can inform future research, practice, or policy.

Case studies can also serve other purposes, including:

• Illustrating a theory or concept: Case studies can be used to illustrate and explain theoretical concepts and frameworks, providing concrete examples of how they can be applied in real-life situations.
• Developing hypotheses: Case studies can help to generate hypotheses about the causal relationships between different factors and outcomes, which can be tested through further research.
• Providing insight into complex issues: Case studies can provide insights into complex and multifaceted issues, which may be difficult to understand through other research methods.
• Informing practice or policy: Case studies can be used to inform practice or policy by identifying best practices, lessons learned, or areas for improvement.

Advantages of Case Study Research

There are several advantages of case study research, including:

• In-depth exploration: Case study research allows for a detailed exploration and analysis of a specific phenomenon, issue, or problem in its real-life context. This can provide a comprehensive understanding of the case and its dynamics, which may not be possible through other research methods.
• Rich data: Case study research can generate rich and detailed data, including qualitative data such as interviews, observations, and documents. This can provide a nuanced understanding of the case and its complexity.
• Holistic perspective: Case study research allows for a holistic perspective of the case, taking into account the various factors, processes, and mechanisms that contribute to the case and its outcomes. This can help to develop a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the case.
• Theory development: Case study research can help to develop and refine theories and concepts by providing empirical evidence and concrete examples of how they can be applied in real-life situations.
• Practical application: Case study research can inform practice or policy by identifying best practices, lessons learned, or areas for improvement.
• Contextualization: Case study research takes into account the specific context in which the case is situated, which can help to understand how the case is influenced by the social, cultural, and historical factors of its environment.

Limitations of Case Study Research

There are several limitations of case study research, including:

• Limited generalizability : Case studies are typically focused on a single case or a small number of cases, which limits the generalizability of the findings. The unique characteristics of the case may not be applicable to other contexts or populations, which may limit the external validity of the research.
• Biased sampling: Case studies may rely on purposive or convenience sampling, which can introduce bias into the sample selection process. This may limit the representativeness of the sample and the generalizability of the findings.
• Subjectivity: Case studies rely on the interpretation of the researcher, which can introduce subjectivity into the analysis. The researcher’s own biases, assumptions, and perspectives may influence the findings, which may limit the objectivity of the research.
• Limited control: Case studies are typically conducted in naturalistic settings, which limits the control that the researcher has over the environment and the variables being studied. This may limit the ability to establish causal relationships between variables.
• Time-consuming: Case studies can be time-consuming to conduct, as they typically involve a detailed exploration and analysis of a specific case. This may limit the feasibility of conducting multiple case studies or conducting case studies in a timely manner.
• Resource-intensive: Case studies may require significant resources, including time, funding, and expertise. This may limit the ability of researchers to conduct case studies in resource-constrained settings.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Exploratory Research – Types, Methods and...

Explanatory Research – Types, Methods, Guide

Quasi-Experimental Research Design – Types...

Applied Research – Types, Methods and Examples

Research Methods – Types, Examples and Guide

Correlational Research – Methods, Types and...

• Usability testing

Run remote usability tests on any digital product to deep dive into your key user flows

• Product analytics

Learn how users are behaving on your website in real time and uncover points of frustration

• Research repository

A tool for collaborative analysis of qualitative data and for building your research repository and database.

• Trymata Blog

How-to articles, expert tips, and the latest news in user testing & user experience

• Knowledge Hub

Detailed explainers of Trymata’s features & plans, and UX research terms & topics

• Plans & Pricing

Get paid to test

• User Experience (UX) testing
• User Interface (UI) testing
• Ecommerce testing
• Remote usability testing
• Plans & Pricing
• Customer Stories

How do you want to use Trymata?

Conduct user testing, desktop usability video.

You’re on a business trip in Oakland, CA. You've been working late in downtown and now you're looking for a place nearby to grab a late dinner. You decided to check Zomato to try and find somewhere to eat. (Don't begin searching yet).

• Look around on the home page. Does anything seem interesting to you?
• How would you go about finding a place to eat near you in Downtown Oakland? You want something kind of quick, open late, not too expensive, and with a good rating.
• What do the reviews say about the restaurant you've chosen?
• What was the most important factor for you in choosing this spot?
• You're currently close to the 19th St Bart station, and it's 9PM. How would you get to this restaurant? Do you think you'll be able to make it before closing time?
• Your friend recommended you to check out a place called Belly while you're in Oakland. Try to find where it is, when it's open, and what kind of food options they have.
• Now go to any restaurant's page and try to leave a review (don't actually submit it).

What was the worst thing about your experience?

It was hard to find the bart station. The collections not being able to be sorted was a bit of a bummer

What other aspects of the experience could be improved?

Feedback from the owners would be nice

What did you like about the website?

The flow was good, lots of bright photos

What other comments do you have for the owner of the website?

I like that you can sort by what you are looking for and i like the idea of collections

You're going on a vacation to Italy next month, and you want to learn some basic Italian for getting around while there. You decided to try Duolingo.

• Please begin by downloading the app to your device.
• Choose Italian and get started with the first lesson (stop once you reach the first question).
• Now go all the way through the rest of the first lesson, describing your thoughts as you go.
• Get your profile set up, then view your account page. What information and options are there? Do you feel that these are useful? Why or why not?
• After a week in Italy, you're going to spend a few days in Austria. How would you take German lessons on Duolingo?
• What other languages does the app offer? Do any of them interest you?

I felt like there could have been a little more of an instructional component to the lesson.

It would be cool if there were some feature that could allow two learners studying the same language to take lessons together. I imagine that their screens would be synced and they could go through lessons together and chat along the way.

Overall, the app was very intuitive to use and visually appealing. I also liked the option to connect with others.

Overall, the app seemed very helpful and easy to use. I feel like it makes learning a new language fun and almost like a game. It would be nice, however, if it contained more of an instructional portion.

All accounts, tests, and data have been migrated to our new & improved system!

Use the same email and password to log in:

Legacy login: Our legacy system is still available in view-only mode, login here >

What’s the new system about? Read more about our transition & what it-->

What is a Case Study? Definition, Research Methods, Sampling and Examples

What is a Case Study?

A case study is defined as an in-depth analysis of a particular subject, often a real-world situation, individual, group, or organization. 

It is a research method that involves the comprehensive examination of a specific instance to gain a better understanding of its complexities, dynamics, and context. 

Case studies are commonly used in various fields such as business, psychology, medicine, and education to explore and illustrate phenomena, theories, or practical applications.

In a typical case study, researchers collect and analyze a rich array of qualitative and/or quantitative data, including interviews, observations, documents, and other relevant sources. The goal is to provide a nuanced and holistic perspective on the subject under investigation.

The information gathered here is used to generate insights, draw conclusions, and often to inform broader theories or practices within the respective field.

Case studies offer a valuable method for researchers to explore real-world phenomena in their natural settings, providing an opportunity to delve deeply into the intricacies of a particular case. They are particularly useful when studying complex, multifaceted situations where various factors interact. 

Additionally, case studies can be instrumental in generating hypotheses, testing theories, and offering practical insights that can be applied to similar situations. Overall, the comprehensive nature of case studies makes them a powerful tool for gaining a thorough understanding of specific instances within the broader context of academic and professional inquiry.

Key Characteristics of Case Study

Case studies are characterized by several key features that distinguish them from other research methods. Here are some essential characteristics of case studies:

• In-depth Exploration: Case studies involve a thorough and detailed examination of a specific case or instance. Researchers aim to explore the complexities and nuances of the subject under investigation, often using multiple data sources and methods to gather comprehensive information.
• Contextual Analysis: Case studies emphasize the importance of understanding the context in which the case unfolds. Researchers seek to examine the unique circumstances, background, and environmental factors that contribute to the dynamics of the case. Contextual analysis is crucial for drawing meaningful conclusions and generalizing findings to similar situations.
• Holistic Perspective: Rather than focusing on isolated variables, case studies take a holistic approach to studying a phenomenon. Researchers consider a wide range of factors and their interrelationships, aiming to capture the richness and complexity of the case. This holistic perspective helps in providing a more complete understanding of the subject.
• Qualitative and/or Quantitative Data: Case studies can incorporate both qualitative and quantitative data, depending on the research question and objectives. Qualitative data often include interviews, observations, and document analysis, while quantitative data may involve statistical measures or numerical information. The combination of these data types enhances the depth and validity of the study.
• Longitudinal or Retrospective Design: Case studies can be designed as longitudinal studies, where the researcher follows the case over an extended period, or retrospective studies, where the focus is on examining past events. This temporal dimension allows researchers to capture changes and developments within the case.
• Unique and Unpredictable Nature: Each case study is unique, and the findings may not be easily generalized to other situations. The unpredictable nature of real-world cases adds a layer of authenticity to the study, making it an effective method for exploring complex and dynamic phenomena.
• Theory Building or Testing: Case studies can serve different purposes, including theory building or theory testing. In some cases, researchers use case studies to develop new theories or refine existing ones. In others, they may test existing theories by applying them to real-world situations and assessing their explanatory power.

Understanding these key characteristics is essential for researchers and practitioners using case studies as a methodological approach, as it helps guide the design, implementation, and analysis of the study.

Key Components of a Case Study

A well-constructed case study typically consists of several key components that collectively provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject under investigation. Here are the key components of a case study:

• Provide an overview of the context and background information relevant to the case. This may include the history, industry, or setting in which the case is situated.
• Clearly state the purpose and objectives of the case study. Define what the study aims to achieve and the questions it seeks to answer.
• Clearly identify the subject of the case study. This could be an individual, a group, an organization, or a specific event.
• Define the boundaries and scope of the case study. Specify what aspects will be included and excluded from the investigation.
• Provide a brief review of relevant theories or concepts that will guide the analysis. This helps place the case study within the broader theoretical context.
• Summarize existing literature related to the subject, highlighting key findings and gaps in knowledge. This establishes the context for the current case study.
• Describe the research design chosen for the case study (e.g., exploratory, explanatory, descriptive). Justify why this design is appropriate for the research objectives.
• Specify the methods used to gather data, whether through interviews, observations, document analysis, surveys, or a combination of these. Detail the procedures followed to ensure data validity and reliability.
• Explain the criteria for selecting the case and any sampling considerations. Discuss why the chosen case is representative or relevant to the research questions.
• Describe how the collected data will be coded and categorized. Discuss the analytical framework or approach used to identify patterns, themes, or trends.
• If multiple data sources or methods are used, explain how they complement each other to enhance the credibility and validity of the findings.
• Present the key findings in a clear and organized manner. Use tables, charts, or quotes from participants to illustrate the results.
• Interpret the results in the context of the research objectives and theoretical framework. Discuss any unexpected findings and their implications.
• Provide a thorough interpretation of the results, connecting them to the research questions and relevant literature.
• Acknowledge the limitations of the study, such as constraints in data collection, sample size, or generalizability.
• Highlight the contributions of the case study to the existing body of knowledge and identify potential avenues for future research.
• Summarize the key findings and their significance in relation to the research objectives.
• Conclude with a concise summary of the case study, its implications, and potential practical applications.
• Provide a complete list of all the sources cited in the case study, following a consistent citation style.
• Include any additional materials or supplementary information, such as interview transcripts, survey instruments, or supporting documents.

By including these key components, a case study becomes a comprehensive and well-rounded exploration of a specific subject, offering valuable insights and contributing to the body of knowledge in the respective field.

Sampling in a Case Study Research

Sampling in case study research involves selecting a subset of cases or individuals from a larger population to study in depth. Unlike quantitative research where random sampling is often employed, case study sampling is typically purposeful and driven by the specific objectives of the study. Here are some key considerations for sampling in case study research:

• Criterion Sampling: Cases are selected based on specific criteria relevant to the research questions. For example, if studying successful business strategies, cases may be selected based on their demonstrated success.
• Maximum Variation Sampling: Cases are chosen to represent a broad range of variations related to key characteristics. This approach helps capture diversity within the sample.
• Selecting Cases with Rich Information: Researchers aim to choose cases that are information-rich and provide insights into the phenomenon under investigation. These cases should offer a depth of detail and variation relevant to the research objectives.
• Single Case vs. Multiple Cases: Decide whether the study will focus on a single case (single-case study) or multiple cases (multiple-case study). The choice depends on the research objectives, the complexity of the phenomenon, and the depth of understanding required.
• Emergent Nature of Sampling: In some case studies, the sampling strategy may evolve as the study progresses. This is known as theoretical sampling, where new cases are selected based on emerging findings and theoretical insights from earlier analysis.
• Data Saturation: Sampling may continue until data saturation is achieved, meaning that collecting additional cases or data does not yield new insights or information. Saturation indicates that the researcher has adequately explored the phenomenon.
• Defining Case Boundaries: Clearly define the boundaries of the case to ensure consistency and avoid ambiguity. Consider what is included and excluded from the case study, and justify these decisions.
• Practical Considerations: Assess the feasibility of accessing the selected cases. Consider factors such as availability, willingness to participate, and the practicality of data collection methods.
• Informed Consent: Obtain informed consent from participants, ensuring that they understand the purpose of the study and the ways in which their information will be used. Protect the confidentiality and anonymity of participants as needed.
• Pilot Testing the Sampling Strategy: Before conducting the full study, consider pilot testing the sampling strategy to identify potential challenges and refine the approach. This can help ensure the effectiveness of the sampling method.
• Transparent Reporting: Clearly document the sampling process in the research methodology section. Provide a rationale for the chosen sampling strategy and discuss any adjustments made during the study.

Sampling in case study research is a critical step that influences the depth and richness of the study’s findings. By carefully selecting cases based on specific criteria and considering the unique characteristics of the phenomenon under investigation, researchers can enhance the relevance and validity of their case study.

Case Study Research Methods With Examples

• Interviews:
• Interviews involve engaging with participants to gather detailed information, opinions, and insights. In a case study, interviews are often semi-structured, allowing flexibility in questioning.
• Example: A case study on workplace culture might involve conducting interviews with employees at different levels to understand their perceptions, experiences, and attitudes.
• Observations:
• Observations entail direct examination and recording of behavior, activities, or events in their natural setting. This method is valuable for understanding behaviors in context.
• Example: A case study investigating customer interactions at a retail store may involve observing and documenting customer behavior, staff interactions, and overall dynamics.
• Document Analysis:
• Document analysis involves reviewing and interpreting written or recorded materials, such as reports, memos, emails, and other relevant documents.
• Example: In a case study on organizational change, researchers may analyze internal documents, such as communication memos or strategic plans, to trace the evolution of the change process.
• Surveys and Questionnaires:
• Surveys and questionnaires collect structured data from a sample of participants. While less common in case studies, they can be used to supplement other methods.
• Example: A case study on the impact of a health intervention might include a survey to gather quantitative data on participants’ health outcomes.
• Focus Groups:
• Focus groups involve a facilitated discussion among a group of participants to explore their perceptions, attitudes, and experiences.
• Example: In a case study on community development, a focus group might be conducted with residents to discuss their views on recent initiatives and their impact.
• Archival Research:
• Archival research involves examining existing records, historical documents, or artifacts to gain insights into a particular phenomenon.
• Example: A case study on the history of a landmark building may involve archival research, exploring construction records, historical photos, and maintenance logs.
• Longitudinal Studies:
• Longitudinal studies involve the collection of data over an extended period to observe changes and developments.
• Example: A case study tracking the career progression of employees in a company may involve longitudinal interviews and document analysis over several years.
• Cross-Case Analysis:
• Cross-case analysis compares and contrasts multiple cases to identify patterns, similarities, and differences.
• Example: A comparative case study of different educational institutions may involve analyzing common challenges and successful strategies across various cases.
• Ethnography:
• Ethnography involves immersive, in-depth exploration within a cultural or social setting to understand the behaviors and perspectives of participants.
• Example: A case study using ethnographic methods might involve spending an extended period within a community to understand its social dynamics and cultural practices.
• Experimental Designs (Rare):
• While less common, experimental designs involve manipulating variables to observe their effects. In case studies, this might be applied in specific contexts.
• Example: A case study exploring the impact of a new teaching method might involve implementing the method in one classroom while comparing it to a traditional method in another.

These case study research methods offer a versatile toolkit for researchers to investigate and gain insights into complex phenomena across various disciplines. The choice of methods depends on the research questions, the nature of the case, and the desired depth of understanding.

Best Practices for a Case Study in 2024

Creating a high-quality case study involves adhering to best practices that ensure rigor, relevance, and credibility. Here are some key best practices for conducting and presenting a case study:

• Clearly articulate the purpose and objectives of the case study. Define the research questions or problems you aim to address, ensuring a focused and purposeful approach.
• Choose a case that aligns with the research objectives and provides the depth and richness needed for the study. Consider the uniqueness of the case and its relevance to the research questions.
• Develop a robust research design that aligns with the nature of the case study (single-case or multiple-case) and integrates appropriate research methods. Ensure the chosen design is suitable for exploring the complexities of the phenomenon.
• Use a variety of data sources to enhance the validity and reliability of the study. Combine methods such as interviews, observations, document analysis, and surveys to provide a comprehensive understanding of the case.
• Clearly document and describe the procedures for data collection to enhance transparency. Include details on participant selection, sampling strategy, and data collection methods to facilitate replication and evaluation.
• Implement measures to ensure the validity and reliability of the data. Triangulate information from different sources to cross-verify findings and strengthen the credibility of the study.
• Clearly define the boundaries of the case to avoid scope creep and maintain focus. Specify what is included and excluded from the study, providing a clear framework for analysis.
• Include perspectives from various stakeholders within the case to capture a holistic view. This might involve interviewing individuals at different organizational levels, customers, or community members, depending on the context.
• Adhere to ethical principles in research, including obtaining informed consent from participants, ensuring confidentiality, and addressing any potential conflicts of interest.
• Conduct a rigorous analysis of the data, using appropriate analytical techniques. Interpret the findings in the context of the research questions, theoretical framework, and relevant literature.
• Offer detailed and rich descriptions of the case, including the context, key events, and participant perspectives. This helps readers understand the intricacies of the case and supports the generalization of findings.
• Communicate findings in a clear and accessible manner. Avoid jargon and technical language that may hinder understanding. Use visuals, such as charts or graphs, to enhance clarity.
• Seek feedback from colleagues or experts in the field through peer review. This helps ensure the rigor and credibility of the case study and provides valuable insights for improvement.
• Connect the case study findings to existing theories or concepts, contributing to the theoretical understanding of the phenomenon. Discuss practical implications and potential applications in relevant contexts.
• Recognize that case study research is often an iterative process. Be open to revisiting and refining research questions, methods, or analysis as the study progresses. Practice reflexivity by acknowledging and addressing potential biases or preconceptions.

By incorporating these best practices, researchers can enhance the quality and impact of their case studies, making valuable contributions to the academic and practical understanding of complex phenomena.

Interested in learning more about the fields of product, research, and design? Search our articles here for helpful information spanning a wide range of topics!

15 User Acceptance Testing Tools for Quality & Satisfaction

Mobile usability test: from preparation to execution & more, ux research process: a step-by-step guide for you, usability testing questions for improving user’s experience.

Educational resources and simple solutions for your research journey

What is a Case Study in Research? Definition, Methods, and Examples

Case study methodology offers researchers an exciting opportunity to explore intricate phenomena within specific contexts using a wide range of data sources and collection methods. It is highly pertinent in health and social sciences, environmental studies, social work, education, and business studies. Its diverse applications, such as advancing theory, program evaluation, and intervention development, make it an invaluable tool for driving meaningful research and fostering positive change.[ 1]  

Table of Contents

What is a Case Study?  

A case study method involves a detailed examination of a single subject, such as an individual, group, organization, event, or community, to explore and understand complex issues in real-life contexts. By focusing on one specific case, researchers can gain a deep understanding of the factors and dynamics at play, understanding their complex relationships, which might be missed in broader, more quantitative studies.  

When to do a Case Study?  

A case study design is useful when you want to explore a phenomenon in-depth and in its natural context. Here are some examples of when to use a case study :[ 2]  

• Exploratory Research: When you want to explore a new topic or phenomenon, a case study can help you understand the subject deeply. For example , a researcher studying a newly discovered plant species might use a case study to document its characteristics and behavior.  
• Descriptive Research: If you want to describe a complex phenomenon or process, a case study can provide a detailed and comprehensive description. For instance, a case study design   could describe the experiences of a group of individuals living with a rare disease.  
• Explanatory Research: When you want to understand why a particular phenomenon occurs, a case study can help you identify causal relationships. A case study design could investigate the reasons behind the success or failure of a particular business strategy.  
• Theory Building: Case studies can also be used to develop or refine theories. By systematically analyzing a series of cases, researchers can identify patterns and relationships that can contribute to developing new theories or refining existing ones.  
• Critical Instance: Sometimes, a single case can be used to study a rare or unusual phenomenon, but it is important for theoretical or practical reasons. For example , the case of Phineas Gage, a man who survived a severe brain injury, has been widely studied to understand the relationship between the brain and behavior.  
• Comparative Analysis: Case studies can also compare different cases or contexts. A case study example involves comparing the implementation of a particular policy in different countries to understand its effectiveness and identifying best practices.  

How to Create a Case Study – Step by Step  

Step 1: select a case  .

Careful case selection ensures relevance, insight, and meaningful contribution to existing knowledge in your field. Here’s how you can choose a case study design :[ 3]  

• Define Your Objectives: Clarify the purpose of your case study and what you hope to achieve. Do you want to provide new insights, challenge existing theories, propose solutions to a problem, or explore new research directions?  
• Consider Unusual or Outlying Cases: Focus on unusual, neglected, or outlying cases that can provide unique insights.  
• Choose a Representative Case: Alternatively, select a common or representative case to exemplify a particular category, experience, or phenomenon.   
• Avoid Bias: Ensure your selection process is unbiased using random or criteria-based selection.  
• Be Clear and Specific: Clearly define the boundaries of your study design , including the scope, timeframe, and key stakeholders.   
• Ethical Considerations: Consider ethical issues, such as confidentiality and informed consent.  

Step 2: Build a Theoretical Framework  

To ensure your case study has a solid academic foundation, it’s important to build a theoretical framework:   

• Conduct a Literature Review: Identify key concepts and theories relevant to your case study .  
• Establish Connections with Theory: Connect your case study with existing theories in the field.  
• Guide Your Analysis and Interpretation: Use your theoretical framework to guide your analysis, ensuring your findings are grounded in established theories and concepts.   

Step 3: Collect Your Data  

To conduct a comprehensive case study , you can use various research methods. These include interviews, observations, primary and secondary sources analysis, surveys, and a mixed methods approach. The aim is to gather rich and diverse data to enable a detailed analysis of your case study .  

Step 4: Describe and Analyze the Case  

How you report your findings will depend on the type of research you’re conducting. Here are two approaches:   

• Structured Approach: Follows a scientific paper format, making it easier for readers to follow your argument.  
• Narrative Approach: A more exploratory style aiming to analyze meanings and implications.  

Regardless of the approach you choose, it’s important to include the following elements in your case study :   

• Contextual Details: Provide background information about the case, including relevant historical, cultural, and social factors that may have influenced the outcome.  
• Literature and Theory: Connect your case study to existing literature and theory in the field. Discuss how your findings contribute to or challenge existing knowledge.  
• Wider Patterns or Debates: Consider how your case study fits into wider patterns or debates within the field. Discuss any implications your findings may have for future research or practice.  

What Are the Benefits of a Case Study   

Case studies offer a range of benefits , making them a powerful tool in research.  

1. In-Depth Analysis  

• Comprehensive Understanding: Case studies allow researchers to thoroughly explore a subject, understanding the complexities and nuances involved.  
• Rich Data: They offer rich qualitative and sometimes quantitative data, capturing the intricacies of real-life contexts.  

2. Contextual Insight  

• Real-World Application: Case studies provide insights into real-world applications, making the findings highly relevant and practical.  
• Context-Specific: They highlight how various factors interact within a specific context, offering a detailed picture of the situation.  

3. Flexibility  

• Methodological Diversity: Case studies can use various data collection methods, including interviews, observations, document analysis, and surveys.  
• Adaptability: Researchers can adapt the case study approach to fit the specific needs and circumstances of the research.  

4. Practical Solutions  

• Actionable Insights: The detailed findings from case studies can inform practical solutions and recommendations for practitioners and policymakers.  
• Problem-Solving: They help understand the root causes of problems and devise effective strategies to address them.  

5. Unique Cases  

• Rare Phenomena: Case studies are particularly valuable for studying rare or unique cases that other research methods may not capture.  
• Detailed Documentation: They document and preserve detailed information about specific instances that might otherwise be overlooked.  

What Are the Limitations of a Case Study   

While case studies offer valuable insights and a detailed understanding of complex issues, they have several limitations .  

1. Limited Generalizability  

• Specific Context: Case studies often focus on a single case or a small number of cases, which may limit the generalization of findings to broader populations or different contexts.  
• Unique Situations: The unique characteristics of the case may not be representative of other situations, reducing the applicability of the results.  

2. Subjectivity  

• Researcher Bias: The researcher’s perspectives and interpretations can influence the analysis and conclusions, potentially introducing bias.  
• Participant Bias: Participants’ responses and behaviors may be influenced by their awareness of being studied, known as the Hawthorne effect.  

3. Time-Consuming  

• Data Collection and Analysis: Gathering detailed, in-depth data requires significant time and effort, making case studies more time-consuming than other research methods.  
• Longitudinal Studies: If the case study observes changes over time, it can become even more prolonged.  

4. Resource Intensive  

• Financial and Human Resources: Conducting comprehensive case studies may require significant financial investment and human resources, including trained researchers and participant access.  
• Access to Data: Accessing relevant and reliable data sources can be challenging, particularly in sensitive or proprietary contexts.  

5. Replication Difficulties  

• Unique Contexts: A case study’s specific and detailed context makes it difficult to replicate the study exactly, limiting the ability to validate findings through repetition.  
• Variability: Differences in contexts, researchers, and methodologies can lead to variations in findings, complicating efforts to achieve consistent results.  

By acknowledging and addressing these limitations , researchers can enhance the rigor and reliability of their case study findings.  

Key Takeaways  

Case studies are valuable in research because they provide an in-depth, contextual analysis of a single subject, event, or organization. They allow researchers to explore complex issues in real-world settings, capturing detailed qualitative and quantitative data. This method is useful for generating insights, developing theories, and offering practical solutions to problems. They are versatile, applicable in diverse fields such as business, education, and health, and can complement other research methods by providing rich, contextual evidence. However, their findings may have limited generalizability due to the focus on a specific case.  

Frequently Asked Questions  

Q: What is a case study in research?  

A case study in research is an impactful tool for gaining a deep understanding of complex issues within their real-life context. It combines various data collection methods and provides rich, detailed insights that can inform theory development and practical applications.  

Q: What are the advantages of using case studies in research?  

Case studies are a powerful research method, offering advantages such as in-depth analysis, contextual insights, flexibility, rich data, and the ability to handle complex issues. They are particularly valuable for exploring new areas, generating hypotheses, and providing detailed, illustrative examples that can inform theory and practice.  

Q: Can case studies be used in quantitative research?  

While case studies are predominantly associated with qualitative research, they can effectively incorporate quantitative methods to provide a more comprehensive analysis. A mixed-methods approach leverages qualitative and quantitative research strengths, offering a powerful tool for exploring complex issues in a real-world context. For example , a new medical treatment case study can incorporate quantitative clinical outcomes (e.g., patient recovery rates and dosage levels) along with qualitative patient interviews.  

Q: What are the key components of a case study?  

A case study typically includes several key components:   

• Introductio n, which provides an overview and sets the context by presenting the problem statement and research objectives;  
• Literature review , which connects the study to existing theories and prior research;  
• Methodology , which details the case study design , data collection methods, and analysis techniques;   
• Findings , which present the data and results, including descriptions, patterns, and themes;   
• Discussion and conclusion , which interpret the findings, discuss their implications, and offer conclusions, practical applications, limitations, and suggestions for future research.  

Together, these components ensure a comprehensive, systematic, and insightful exploration of the case.  

References  

• de Vries, K. (2020). Case study methodology. In  Critical qualitative health research  (pp. 41-52). Routledge.  
• Fidel, R. (1984). The case study method: A case study.  Library and Information Science Research ,  6 (3), 273-288.  
• Thomas, G. (2021). How to do your case study.  How to do your case study , 1-320.  

Editage All Access is a subscription-based platform that unifies the best AI tools and services designed to speed up, simplify, and streamline every step of a researcher’s journey. The Editage All Access Pack is a one-of-a-kind subscription that unlocks full access to an AI writing assistant, literature recommender, journal finder, scientific illustration tool, and exclusive discounts on professional publication services from Editage.  

Based on 22+ years of experience in academia, Editage All Access empowers researchers to put their best research forward and move closer to success. Explore our top AI Tools pack, AI Tools + Publication Services pack, or Build Your Own Plan. Find everything a researcher needs to succeed, all in one place –  Get All Access now starting at just $14 a month !    

Related Posts

Back to School – Lock-in All Access Pack for a Year at the Best Price

Research Paper Appendix: Format and Examples

AI Detector

What is a Case Study?: Definition, Examples, & Methods

Published on July 9th, 2024

I. What is a Case Study?: Introduction

Case study definition.

A case study is a research method involving an in-depth examination of a single subject, group, event, or phenomenon within its real-world context. Widely used across various disciplines such as social sciences, business, law, medicine, and education, case studies provide comprehensive insights into complex issues that broader surveys or experimental research cannot capture. The essence of a case study is to explore and analyze real-life situations to uncover patterns, identify causes, and propose practical solutions. Case study examples illustrate how theoretical knowledge can be applied to practical scenarios, making them invaluable for both academic research and problem-solving.

Importance in Research and Business

Case studies are crucial in both research and business due to their ability to provide detailed and nuanced insights. In academic research, case studies enable in-depth analysis of complex issues, helping researchers understand the how and why of phenomena, and leading to the development of new theories or the refinement of existing ones. In business, case studies help understand market dynamics, consumer behavior, and the effectiveness of strategies. They showcase successes and failures, offering valuable lessons for future projects. In education, especially in business schools, case studies help students develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills by analyzing real-world scenarios.

Brief History of Case Study Methodology

The case study methodology has a rich history, originating in the early 20th century in sociology. The Chicago School of Sociology used case studies to explore urban life and social issues. This approach was later adopted in psychology by figures like Sigmund Freud, who used detailed case studies to develop his theories on psychoanalysis. By the mid-20th century, Harvard Business School had popularized case studies as a teaching tool, encouraging students to analyze real-world business scenarios. Over the years, standardized templates have been developed to ensure consistency in data collection and analysis.

In modern times, case studies have adapted to the digital age with advanced data analysis software and AI tools, which ensures the originality and accuracy of case study content. This evolution highlights the adaptability and enduring relevance of case studies as a powerful tool for gaining in-depth understanding and generating valuable insights across various fields.

II. Types of Case Studies

Let’s learn about the different types of case studies that help researchers choose the appropriate method to gain deep insights into their subject.

A. Explanatory Case Studies

Explanatory case studies are designed to explore cause-and-effect relationships. They aim to explain how and why certain events occur and what factors influence these outcomes. This type of case study is often used in social sciences, business, and policy research to test theories and develop new insights. For example, an explanatory case study might investigate how a specific business strategy led to increased market share or how a new policy affected public health outcomes. By focusing on detailed and comprehensive analysis, explanatory case studies help researchers define case study contexts and understand complex phenomena.

B. Exploratory Case Studies

Exploratory case studies are used to explore a topic or issue when there are no clear outcomes or established theories. They serve as a preliminary step that can help to identify research questions and hypotheses for further study. This type of case study is particularly useful when the subject matter is new or not well understood. For instance, researchers might conduct an exploratory case study to investigate the impact of emerging technologies on consumer behavior. Exploratory case studies are flexible and open-ended, allowing researchers to gather rich, qualitative data that can guide future research directions.

C. Descriptive Case Studies

Descriptive case studies provide a detailed account of a specific subject, event, or phenomenon. They aim to describe the context, characteristics, and outcomes without necessarily investigating causal relationships. This type of case study is useful for documenting and understanding the particulars of a situation. For example, a descriptive case study might provide an in-depth look at a company's organizational structure and culture. By offering a comprehensive overview, descriptive case studies help to illustrate and contextualize complex issues, making them easier to understand and analyze.

D. Multiple-Case Studies

Multiple-case studies, also known as comparative case studies, involve the analysis of several cases to understand similarities and differences. This type of case study allows researchers to compare and contrast different instances of a phenomenon, which can lead to more robust and generalizable findings. For example, a multiple-case study might examine several companies that have implemented similar business strategies to identify common factors that contribute to success. By analyzing multiple cases, researchers can draw broader conclusions and develop more nuanced insights.

E. Intrinsic Case Studies

Intrinsic case studies focus on a specific case because it is unique or interesting in its own right. The primary aim is to gain a deeper understanding of the case itself, rather than to generalize findings to other contexts. This type of case study is often used when the case has particular significance or offers unique insights. For example, an intrinsic case study might investigate a rare medical condition to understand its characteristics and implications. By delving deeply into the specifics of the case, intrinsic case studies provide valuable, detailed knowledge that can inform practice and theory.

F. Instrumental Case Studies

Instrumental case studies use a specific case to gain insights into a broader issue or to refine a theoretical concept. The case itself is of secondary interest; it serves as a means to understand something else. For example, a researcher might use an instrumental case study of a particular organization to explore general principles of organizational behavior. This type of case study is useful for developing and testing theories, as it allows researchers to apply and examine theoretical frameworks in real-world contexts.

G. Collective Case Studies

Collective case studies, also known as multiple-case studies, involve studying a group of cases simultaneously or sequentially. This approach aims to investigate a phenomenon, population, or general condition by analyzing multiple instances. Collective case studies are valuable for identifying patterns and trends across different cases. For instance, a collective case study might examine several educational programs across different schools to understand common factors that contribute to student success. By studying multiple cases, researchers can enhance the reliability and validity of their findings and develop a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.

Each type of case study offers unique advantages and serves different research purposes. Whether researchers aim to explain causal relationships, explore new topics, provide detailed descriptions, compare multiple instances, or gain insights into broader issues, case studies are versatile tools that can be tailored to fit various research needs. Using tools like case study templates and following a structured case study format can help ensure that the research is thorough and well-organized. By understanding the different types of case studies, researchers can choose the most appropriate method to achieve their objectives and generate meaningful insights.

Also read: Uncover the power of our recruitment automation through customer stories, read our customer stories .

III. The Structure of a Case Study

A well-structured case study is essential for effectively communicating the research findings and insights, ensuring clarity and comprehensiveness.

Title and Abstract : The title should be clear, concise, and reflective of the main focus of the case study. The abstract provides a summary, usually between 150-250 words, outlining the purpose, methodology, key findings, and conclusions of the study. This section helps readers quickly understand the essence of the case study.

B. Background Information

Background Information : This section sets the context for the case study by providing relevant information about the subject being studied. It includes details about the history, environment, and circumstances surrounding the case. For example, if the case study is about a business, the background information might cover the company’s history, industry context, and market conditions.

C. Introduction and Problem Statement

Introduction and Problem Statement : The introduction offers an overview of the case study’s purpose and scope. The problem statement clearly defines the specific issue or research question that the case study aims to address. This section explains why the problem is significant and warrants investigation. For example, a problem statement might highlight a decline in customer satisfaction at a company and the need to understand the underlying causes.

D. Methodology

Methodology : The methodology section details the research design and approach used to conduct the study. It includes the methods and procedures for data collection and analysis. This section should provide enough detail to allow replication of the study. Common methodologies include qualitative methods like interviews and observations, quantitative methods like surveys and statistical analysis, or a combination of both.

E. Data Collection and Analysis

Data Collection and Analysis : This section describes the specific techniques used to gather data and the process of analyzing it. It includes information on data sources, sampling methods, and data collection instruments. The analysis part explains how the data was processed and interpreted to arrive at the findings. For example, in a business case study, data collection might involve employee interviews and customer surveys, while analysis might involve thematic coding and statistical correlation.

F. Findings and Analysis

Findings and Analysis : The findings section presents the results of the study, detailing what the data revealed about the problem. The analysis interprets these findings, explaining their significance and implications. This section should be organized logically, often using headings and subheadings to guide the reader through different aspects of the findings. For instance, findings might show a correlation between employee training and customer satisfaction, with the analysis explaining how training improves service quality.

G. Proposed Solutions and Recommendations

Proposed Solutions and Recommendations : Based on the findings, this section suggests practical actions or strategies to address the identified problems. It outlines specific steps that stakeholders can take to implement these solutions. Recommendations should be feasible, backed by the data, and aligned with the study’s goals. For example, recommendations might include implementing a new training program for employees or adopting new customer service policies.

H. Conclusion

Conclusion : The conclusion summarizes the main findings and their implications. It reinforces the significance of the study and may suggest areas for further research. This section ties together the entire case study, providing a final perspective on the problem and the proposed solutions. The conclusion should leave the reader with a clear understanding of what was learned and why it matters.

I. References and Appendices

References and Appendices : The references section lists all the sources cited in the case study, following a standard citation format (e.g., APA, MLA). This ensures proper attribution and allows readers to locate the original sources. The appendices include supplementary materials that support the case study, such as raw data, detailed tables, questionnaires, or interview transcripts. These materials provide additional context and evidence for the study’s findings and conclusions.

By adhering to this comprehensive structure, researchers can ensure their case studies are thorough, and well-organized, and effectively communicate their findings and insights to the audience.

IV. The Case Study Process

The process of conducting a case study involves several systematic steps that ensure thorough and credible research.

A. Identifying the Research Question

The first step in the case study process is to define a clear and focused research question. This question should address a specific issue or problem that the case study aims to explore. The research question guides the entire study, helping to determine the scope and objectives. For instance, a business case study might pose the question, "How does employee training impact customer satisfaction in retail settings?"

B. Selecting the Case and Determining Data-Gathering Techniques

Once the research question is established, the next step is to select a case that provides the best opportunity to explore this question. The case can be an individual, group, organization, event, or phenomenon. The selection should be purposeful and based on specific criteria relevant to the research question. Additionally, researchers must determine the most appropriate data-gathering techniques, such as interviews, surveys, observations, or document analysis, to collect the necessary information.

C. Preparing to Collect Data

Before data collection begins, researchers must develop a detailed plan outlining the procedures and tools to be used. This preparation includes creating data collection instruments (e.g., interview guides, and survey questionnaires), obtaining necessary permissions and ethical approvals, and ensuring logistical arrangements are in place. Proper preparation ensures that data collection is systematic and consistent, minimizing potential biases and errors.

D. Collecting Data in the Field

Data collection involves gathering information directly from the selected case using predetermined techniques. This phase requires careful attention to detail and adherence to the planned methods. For example, conducting interviews requires skilled questioning and active listening, while observations necessitate systematic note-taking. Ensuring data quality and integrity is crucial during this phase to maintain the credibility of the study.

E. Evaluating and Analyzing the Data

After data collection, researchers must evaluate and analyze the gathered information to draw meaningful conclusions. This process involves organizing the data, coding for themes and patterns, and using analytical techniques to interpret the findings. Qualitative data might be analyzed through thematic analysis, while quantitative data could be subjected to statistical analysis. The goal is to identify key insights that address the research question and provide a deeper understanding of the case.

F. Reporting the Findings

The final step in the case study process is to compile the findings into a comprehensive report. This report should follow a structured format, including sections such as the introduction, methodology, findings, analysis, proposed solutions, and conclusion. The report should clearly communicate the research question, the process followed, the data collected, and the insights gained. Visual aids like charts, graphs, and tables can enhance the presentation of data. Additionally, the report should provide actionable recommendations based on the findings, and it should be tailored to the intended audience, whether academic, professional, or general readers.

By following these steps, researchers can ensure a rigorous and systematic approach to conducting case studies, resulting in credible and valuable insights that contribute to knowledge and practice in their respective fields.

V. Benefits of Case Studies

Case studies offer numerous benefits that make them a valuable research method in various fields.

A. In-depth Analysis of Complex Issues

In-depth Analysis of Complex Issues : Case studies allow researchers to conduct a thorough and detailed examination of complex issues. This method provides a deep understanding of the subject matter by exploring multiple facets and perspectives. For instance, a case study on a company’s turnaround strategy can delve into the financial, operational, and cultural changes that contributed to its success. This in-depth analysis is often impossible to achieve through other research methods that provide more generalized data.

B. Real-world Application of Theories

Real-world Application of Theories : Case studies bridge the gap between theory and practice by applying theoretical concepts to real-world scenarios. They demonstrate how abstract theories can be implemented and tested in practical situations. For example, a case study on leadership styles in crisis management can show how different theoretical approaches to leadership are applied in real-life crises, providing valuable insights for both academics and practitioners.

C. Generation of New Hypotheses

Generation of New Hypotheses : Through detailed investigation and observation, case studies often reveal new insights and patterns that can lead to the generation of new hypotheses. These hypotheses can then be tested in future research, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in the field. For example, a case study on consumer behavior might uncover new trends or factors influencing purchasing decisions, prompting further research into these areas.

D. Versatility Across Various Fields

Versatility Across Various Fields : Case studies are a versatile research method that can be applied in various fields, including business, education, medicine, law, and social sciences. They can be used to study a wide range of topics, from individual behaviors to organizational practices and societal phenomena. This versatility makes case studies a popular choice for researchers seeking to understand diverse and complex issues.

VI. Challenges in Conducting Case Studies

Despite their benefits, conducting case studies also presents several challenges that researchers need to be aware of and address.

A. Potential for Researcher Bias

Potential for Researcher Bias : One of the primary challenges of case studies is the potential for researcher bias. Since case studies often involve close interaction between the researcher and the subject, there is a risk that the researcher’s perspectives and preconceptions may influence the findings. To mitigate this, researchers must strive for objectivity, use multiple sources of evidence, and employ techniques like triangulation to validate their findings.

B. Limited Generalizability

Limited Generalizability : Case studies typically focus on a single case or a small number of cases, which can limit the generalizability of the findings. The insights gained from a specific case may not necessarily apply to other contexts or populations. To address this limitation, researchers should clearly define the scope of their study and acknowledge the extent to which their findings can be generalized.

C. Time-consuming Nature

Time-consuming Nature : Conducting a thorough case study can be time-consuming, requiring extensive data collection, analysis, and reporting. This can be a significant drawback, especially for researchers with limited time and resources. To manage this challenge, researchers should plan their study carefully, set realistic timelines, and ensure they have the necessary resources to complete the study effectively.

D. Ethical Considerations

Ethical Considerations : Case studies often involve collecting detailed information about individuals or organizations, which raises important ethical considerations. Researchers must ensure that they obtain informed consent from participants, protect their privacy and confidentiality, and avoid any potential harm. Adhering to ethical guidelines and obtaining necessary approvals from ethics committees are crucial steps in conducting ethical case study research.

By understanding and addressing these challenges, researchers can enhance the reliability and credibility of their case studies, ensuring that their findings provide valuable contributions to their respective fields.

VII. Case Studies in Different Fields

Case studies are a versatile research method that can be applied across a wide range of fields, each benefiting from the in-depth analysis and practical insights they provide.

Business and Management : In the field of business and management, case studies are widely used to analyze organizational strategies, market dynamics, leadership practices, and operational processes. They offer detailed insights into how companies address challenges, implement changes, and achieve success. 

For example, a business case study might explore how a company successfully navigated a financial crisis, providing lessons on crisis management, financial planning, and leadership. These case studies are valuable for both academic purposes and practical applications, helping managers and executives learn from real-world examples.

Psychology and Social Sciences : Case studies in psychology and social sciences provide an in-depth examination of individual or group behavior, social phenomena, and cultural practices. They are particularly useful for exploring complex psychological conditions, social interactions, and cultural contexts. 

For instance, a psychological case study might investigate the development and treatment of a specific mental health disorder in a patient, offering insights into therapeutic approaches and patient experiences. In social sciences, case studies can explore social issues such as poverty, education, and community development, contributing to a deeper understanding of societal challenges and potential solutions.

Medicine and Healthcare : In medicine and healthcare, case studies are essential for understanding unique medical conditions, treatment outcomes, and healthcare practices. They provide detailed accounts of patient histories, diagnoses, treatments, and responses, contributing to medical knowledge and practice. 

For example, a medical case study might document a rare disease, detailing the symptoms, diagnostic process, treatment plan, and patient recovery. These studies are valuable for medical education, helping practitioners learn from specific cases and improve patient care. They also play a crucial role in advancing medical research by highlighting unusual cases that can lead to new discoveries.

Law and Criminal Justice : Case studies in law and criminal justice offer comprehensive analyses of legal cases, criminal behavior, law enforcement practices, and judicial decisions. They help understand the intricacies of legal principles, the application of laws, and the effectiveness of criminal justice policies. 

For instance, a legal case study might analyze a landmark Supreme Court decision, examining the legal arguments, judicial reasoning, and broader implications for society. In criminal justice, case studies can explore crime patterns, investigative techniques, and rehabilitation programs, providing valuable insights for law enforcement and policy-making.

Education : In the field of education, case studies are used to explore teaching methods, learning outcomes, educational policies, and institutional practices. They provide detailed examinations of specific educational settings, programs, and student experiences. 

For example, an educational case study might investigate the implementation of a new teaching strategy in a classroom, analyzing its impact on student engagement and academic performance. These studies are valuable for educators, administrators, and policymakers, offering practical insights into effective educational practices and innovations. Case studies in education help identify best practices, address challenges, and improve the overall quality of education.

VIII. Tools and Techniques for Case Study Research

The effectiveness of case study research often hinges on the tools and techniques used for data collection and analysis. Here are some key methods and tools that enhance the quality and depth of case study research.

Interviews and Surveys : 

Interviews and surveys are fundamental techniques for gathering qualitative and quantitative data in case studies. Interviews allow for in-depth exploration of subjects' experiences, perspectives, and insights. They can be structured, semi-structured, or unstructured, depending on the research goals. Surveys, on the other hand, provide a means to collect data from a larger sample, offering quantifiable insights that can complement qualitative findings. For example, in a business case study, interviews with key stakeholders can reveal detailed insights into organizational culture, while surveys can gauge employee satisfaction across the company.

Observation Methods : 

Observation involves systematically recording behaviors, events, and interactions as they occur naturally. This method is particularly useful for understanding the context and dynamics of the case under study. Participant observation, where the researcher becomes part of the group being studied, and non-participant observation, where the researcher observes from a distance, are common techniques. For instance, in an educational case study, observing classroom interactions can provide valuable data on teaching methods and student engagement.

Document Analysis : 

Document analysis involves reviewing and interpreting existing documents related to the case. These documents can include reports, memos, letters, emails, meeting minutes, policy documents, and other records. Analyzing these documents can provide insights into the historical context, organizational processes, and key events relevant to the case. For example, in a legal case study, analyzing court documents, legal briefs, and case law can help understand the legal arguments and judicial decisions.

Data Analysis Software : 

Data analysis software helps researchers organize, code, and analyze qualitative and quantitative data efficiently. Tools like NVivo, ATLAS.ti, and MAXQDA are commonly used for qualitative data analysis, enabling researchers to code text, identify themes, and visualize relationships. For quantitative data, software like SPSS, Stata, and R can perform statistical analysis, providing detailed insights into data patterns and correlations. These tools enhance the rigor and reliability of the analysis, making it easier to manage large volumes of data and derive meaningful conclusions.

AI Tools like HireQuotient's AI Detector :

HireQuotient's AI Detector is an advanced tool designed to ensure the originality and integrity of written content. It uses artificial intelligence to detect plagiarism, analyze text for unique patterns, and verify the authenticity of research material.

How It Can Be Used in Case Study Research : In case study research, HireQuotient's AI Detector can be used to check the originality of the case study report, ensuring that the content is free from plagiarism. This tool can also help in verifying the authenticity of sources and data used in the case study, providing an additional layer of validation. By analyzing text for unique patterns, the AI Detector can assist researchers in maintaining the quality and credibility of their work.

Benefits of Using AI in Case Study Analysis : Using AI tools like HireQuotient's AI Detector in case study analysis offers several benefits. First, it enhances the credibility and reliability of the research by ensuring that all content is original and properly cited. Second, it saves time and effort in manually checking for plagiarism and verifying sources, allowing researchers to focus on more critical aspects of the study. Third, AI tools can process large volumes of data quickly and accurately, identifying patterns and insights that might be missed through manual analysis. Overall, integrating AI into case study research improves the efficiency, accuracy, and integrity of the research process.

By leveraging these tools and techniques, researchers can conduct comprehensive and rigorous case studies that provide valuable insights and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in their respective fields.

IX. Writing and Presenting Case Studies

Effectively writing and presenting case studies is crucial for conveying research findings in a clear and impactful manner. Here are key considerations for each aspect of this process.

A. Choosing a Compelling Narrative Style

The narrative style chosen for a case study can significantly influence its readability and engagement. A compelling narrative weaves facts and analysis into a cohesive story that captures the reader’s attention. Depending on the audience and purpose, the narrative style can be:

• Descriptive : Providing a detailed account of events and contexts, often used for educational purposes.
• Analytical : Focusing on the interpretation and implications of the findings, suitable for academic and research audiences.
• Persuasive : Aiming to convince the reader of a particular viewpoint or course of action, commonly used in business and policy-making contexts.
• Reflective : Incorporating personal insights and reflections, which can be effective in educational and professional development settings.

Selecting a narrative style that aligns with the objectives of the case study and the preferences of the target audience helps ensure that the message is conveyed effectively.

B. Structuring the Case Study Report

A well-structured case study report enhances clarity and coherence, making it easier for readers to follow the research process and understand the findings. A typical structure includes:

• Title and Abstract : Concise summary of the study’s focus and key findings.
• Introduction : Overview of the research question, objectives, and significance of the study.
• Background Information : Contextual information about the subject or case being studied.
• Problem Statement : Clear definition of the problem or issue addressed by the study.
• Methodology : Detailed description of the research methods and procedures used for data collection and analysis.
• Findings and Analysis : Presentation and interpretation of the research results.
• Proposed Solutions and Recommendations : Practical suggestions based on the findings.
• Conclusion : Summary of the main insights and their implications.
• References and Appendices : List of sources cited and supplementary materials.

Using headings and subheadings to organize these sections helps guide the reader through the report and ensures all key components are covered.

C. Using Visuals and Data Representation

Visual aids such as charts, graphs, tables, and diagrams can significantly enhance the presentation of data and findings in a case study. Effective use of visuals can:

• Clarify Complex Information : Simplifying complex data and relationships.
• Highlight Key Points : Drawing attention to important findings and trends.
• Enhance Engagement : Making the report more visually appealing and easier to digest.

When using visuals, it’s important to ensure they are clearly labeled, accurately represent the data, and are integrated seamlessly into the narrative. Visuals should complement and reinforce the textual content rather than distract from it.

D. Tailoring the Presentation to the Audience

The presentation of a case study should be tailored to the specific needs and preferences of the intended audience. Consider the following:

• Academic Audience : Focus on methodological rigor, theoretical contributions, and detailed analysis. Use formal language and provide extensive references.
• Business Audience : Emphasize practical implications, actionable recommendations, and real-world applications. Use clear, concise language and highlight key insights and solutions.
• General Audience : Make the content accessible and engaging by using simple language, storytelling techniques, and relatable examples. Avoid jargon and technical terms that may be unfamiliar.

By paying careful attention to narrative style, report structure, use of visuals, and audience tailoring, researchers can create compelling and impactful case studies that effectively convey their findings and insights.

X. Case Studies vs. Other Research Methods

Experimental research involves manipulating one or more variables to observe the effect on another variable, typically in a controlled environment. This method is highly effective for establishing cause-and-effect relationships and testing hypotheses. In contrast, case studies focus on the in-depth exploration of a single subject or small group within its real-life context. While experiments prioritize control and generalizability, case studies emphasize detailed understanding and contextual relevance. Case studies are particularly valuable when the research question requires exploring complex phenomena that cannot be easily isolated in an experimental setting.

Surveys and questionnaires are quantitative research methods designed to gather data from a large population, often through structured questions with predefined response options. These methods are useful for identifying trends, measuring attitudes, and making statistical generalizations. In contrast, case studies employ qualitative methods such as interviews and observations to provide rich, detailed insights into a specific case. While surveys and questionnaires offer breadth, case studies provide depth, allowing researchers to uncover nuanced information and develop a comprehensive understanding of the subject.

Ethnographic studies involve immersive, long-term fieldwork where researchers observe and interact with participants in their natural environment to understand cultural practices and social behaviors. Both ethnographic studies and case studies prioritize in-depth, qualitative analysis and contextual understanding. However, ethnography typically focuses on entire communities or cultures, while case studies concentrate on specific individuals, groups, or events. Case studies may use ethnographic techniques but are usually narrower in scope and duration.

Mixed methods research combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research problem. Case studies can be an integral part of mixed methods research by incorporating both qualitative data (e.g., interviews, observations) and quantitative data (e.g., surveys, statistical analysis). This integration allows researchers to explore the case in detail while also quantifying certain aspects, enhancing the robustness and validity of the findings. Mixed methods research benefits from the detailed insights of case studies and the generalizability of quantitative data.

XI. The Future of Case Study Research

Technological Advancements in Data Collection and Analysis : Advances in technology are revolutionizing the way data is collected and analyzed in case study research. Tools such as mobile apps, online surveys, and digital recording devices facilitate efficient and accurate data collection. Data analysis software like NVivo and ATLAS.ti enables researchers to organize, code, and interpret large volumes of qualitative data. Additionally, big data analytics and machine learning algorithms offer new possibilities for identifying patterns and insights from complex datasets, enhancing the depth and precision of case study analysis.

Increasing Focus on Cross-Cultural Case Studies : Globalization and interconnectedness have heightened the importance of understanding cultural differences and similarities. Cross-cultural case studies are gaining prominence as researchers seek to compare and contrast cases from different cultural contexts. These studies provide valuable insights into how cultural factors influence behaviors, practices, and outcomes. By examining cases from diverse settings, researchers can develop more comprehensive and culturally sensitive theories and solutions.

The Role of AI and Machine Learning in Case Study Research : AI and machine learning are transforming case study research by automating data analysis and enhancing accuracy. Tools like HireQuotient's AI Detector help ensure the originality and integrity of case study content by detecting plagiarism and verifying sources. AI algorithms can analyze large datasets quickly, identifying patterns and correlations that may be overlooked by human researchers. These technologies enable more efficient data processing, allowing researchers to focus on interpreting and applying the findings.

Emerging Trends in Case Study Methodology : New trends in case study methodology are shaping the future of research. One trend is the increasing use of digital ethnography, where researchers study online communities and virtual environments. Another trend is the emphasis on participatory case studies, involving stakeholders in the research process to ensure their perspectives are represented. Additionally, there is a growing interest in longitudinal case studies that track changes over time, providing deeper insights into dynamic processes and long-term outcomes.

XII. Conclusion

Case studies are a versatile and valuable research method that offers in-depth analysis, real-world applications, and the ability to generate new hypotheses. They differ from other research methods in their focus on detailed, contextual understanding.

Thus, undertake your own case studies, leveraging the tools and techniques discussed to explore complex issues and contribute to their fields. With advancements in technology and methodology, conducting case studies is more accessible and impactful than ever. Whether for academic research, business analysis, or personal interest, case studies offer a powerful means to gain deep, actionable insights.

Soujanya Varada

As a technical content writer and social media strategist, Soujanya develops and manages strategies at HireQuotient. With strong technical background and years of experience in content management, she looks for opportunities to flourish in the digital space. Soujanya is also a dance fanatic and believes in spreading light!

Hire the best without stress

Never Miss The Updates

We cover all recruitment, talent analytics, L&D, DEI, pre-employment, candidate screening, and hiring tools. Join our force & subscribe now!

Stay On Top Of Everything In HR

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology
• Case Study | Definition, Examples & Methods

Case Study | Definition, Examples & Methods

Published on 5 May 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on 30 January 2023.

A case study is a detailed study of a specific subject, such as a person, group, place, event, organisation, or phenomenon. Case studies are commonly used in social, educational, clinical, and business research.

A case study research design usually involves qualitative methods , but quantitative methods are sometimes also used. Case studies are good for describing , comparing, evaluating, and understanding different aspects of a research problem .

Table of contents

When to do a case study, step 1: select a case, step 2: build a theoretical framework, step 3: collect your data, step 4: describe and analyse the case.

A case study is an appropriate research design when you want to gain concrete, contextual, in-depth knowledge about a specific real-world subject. It allows you to explore the key characteristics, meanings, and implications of the case.

Case studies are often a good choice in a thesis or dissertation . They keep your project focused and manageable when you don’t have the time or resources to do large-scale research.

You might use just one complex case study where you explore a single subject in depth, or conduct multiple case studies to compare and illuminate different aspects of your research problem.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Once you have developed your problem statement and research questions , you should be ready to choose the specific case that you want to focus on. A good case study should have the potential to:

• Provide new or unexpected insights into the subject
• Challenge or complicate existing assumptions and theories
• Propose practical courses of action to resolve a problem
• Open up new directions for future research

Unlike quantitative or experimental research, a strong case study does not require a random or representative sample. In fact, case studies often deliberately focus on unusual, neglected, or outlying cases which may shed new light on the research problem.

If you find yourself aiming to simultaneously investigate and solve an issue, consider conducting action research . As its name suggests, action research conducts research and takes action at the same time, and is highly iterative and flexible. 

However, you can also choose a more common or representative case to exemplify a particular category, experience, or phenomenon.

While case studies focus more on concrete details than general theories, they should usually have some connection with theory in the field. This way the case study is not just an isolated description, but is integrated into existing knowledge about the topic. It might aim to:

• Exemplify a theory by showing how it explains the case under investigation
• Expand on a theory by uncovering new concepts and ideas that need to be incorporated
• Challenge a theory by exploring an outlier case that doesn’t fit with established assumptions

To ensure that your analysis of the case has a solid academic grounding, you should conduct a literature review of sources related to the topic and develop a theoretical framework . This means identifying key concepts and theories to guide your analysis and interpretation.

There are many different research methods you can use to collect data on your subject. Case studies tend to focus on qualitative data using methods such as interviews, observations, and analysis of primary and secondary sources (e.g., newspaper articles, photographs, official records). Sometimes a case study will also collect quantitative data .

The aim is to gain as thorough an understanding as possible of the case and its context.

In writing up the case study, you need to bring together all the relevant aspects to give as complete a picture as possible of the subject.

How you report your findings depends on the type of research you are doing. Some case studies are structured like a standard scientific paper or thesis, with separate sections or chapters for the methods , results , and discussion .

Others are written in a more narrative style, aiming to explore the case from various angles and analyse its meanings and implications (for example, by using textual analysis or discourse analysis ).

In all cases, though, make sure to give contextual details about the case, connect it back to the literature and theory, and discuss how it fits into wider patterns or debates.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, January 30). Case Study | Definition, Examples & Methods. Scribbr. Retrieved 30 August 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/case-studies/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, correlational research | guide, design & examples, a quick guide to experimental design | 5 steps & examples, descriptive research design | definition, methods & examples.

• Translators
• Graphic Designers

Please enter the email address you used for your account. Your sign in information will be sent to your email address after it has been verified.

Your Step-By-Step Guide To Writing a Case Study

Creating a case study is both an art and a science. It requires making an in-depth exploration of your chosen subject in order to extract meaningful insights and understand the dynamics that more general surveys or statistical research might not uncover. At the same time, your case study also needs to be a compelling read to ensure those insights get attention from other people!

Unsurprisingly, the prospect of crafting an effective case study can be daunting. It calls for strategic planning, careful organization, and clear communication, all of which can be challenging even for experienced researchers. That's why we've created this step-by-step guide, which breaks the process down into manageable steps, demystifying the journey from defining your research question to sharing your findings. Whether you're a seasoned researcher or a first-timer, this guide aims to equip you with the necessary tools and tips to create a case study that's not just informative, but also engaging and impactful.

Are you ready to unlock the potential of case studies? Let's dive in!

What is a case study?

First, it's important to understand what a case study is – and what it isn't.

A case study is a thorough exploration of a specific subject or event over a certain time frame. Case studies are utilized in numerous fields, including sociology, psychology, education, anthropology, business, and the health sciences, and employ various research techniques to shed light on complex issues.

A case study does not provide absolute proof or conclusions that can be universally applied. Because it concentrates on one particular case or just a few cases, the findings might not apply to different contexts or subjects. Case studies also aren't ideal for determining cause-and-effect relationships as they do not use controlled conditions to separate and measure the impacts of different factors. Lastly, it must be said that a case study isn't just a random assortment of facts or observations; it necessitates a clear research question, a methodical approach to data collection and analysis, and a thoughtful interpretation of the results.

Getting started

Now that we've established the definition and purpose of a case study, let's explore the process by which one is created. You can produce a case study by following these nine steps:

1. Define the purpose of your case study

Before you start writing a case study, you need to define its purpose clearly. Ask yourself: What is the research question or problem you aim to solve? What insights are you looking to uncover? Your goals will guide your research design and influence your choice of case. This initial stage of introspection and clarification is crucial as it acts as a roadmap for your study.

2. Select the case to study

Once you've defined your research objective, the next step is to choose a suitable case that can help answer your research question. This might be a unique, critical, or representative instance. Unique cases offer the opportunity to observe and analyze a situation that is unusual or not well-understood. In contrast, a representative or typical case is often chosen because it represents other cases or a broader phenomenon.

In any case, be sure to justify your choice. Explain why the case is of interest and how it can contribute to the knowledge or understanding of the issue at hand. For instance, if you're studying the effects of corporate restructuring on employee morale, you might choose to focus on a company that recently underwent a significant restructure.

3. Conduct a thorough literature review

Performing a literature review involves a careful examination of relevant scholarly articles, books, and other sources related to your research question or problem. In the process, you identify gaps in the current knowledge and determine how your case study can address them. By critically examining existing research, you will not only gain a comprehensive understanding of your chosen topic but also be able to refine your research question or hypothesis, if necessary.

4. Choose a methodological approach

The methodological approach used in your case study will depend on your research objectives and the nature of the case. Methodologies that can be employed in case studies include qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods .

Qualitative methods are often used when the goal is to explore, understand, or interpret certain phenomena. These involve approaches like interviews, focus groups, or ethnography. Quantitative methods, on the other hand, are used when the goal is to test hypotheses or examine relationships between variables. Quantitative approaches often include experiments. Also, surveys may be either qualitative or quantitative depending on the question design.

You may choose to use a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods (mixed methods) if it suits your research objectives.

5. Collect and organize your data

Data collection should be systematic and organized to maintain the integrity and reliability of your research. You need to plan how you will record and store your data to ensure that it's accessible and usable.

If you're conducting interviews or observations, consider using recording devices (with participant consent) to capture the data accurately. In addition, you may want to transcribe the recorded material for easier analysis. If you're using documents or archival records, develop a system for coding and categorizing the data.

6. Analyze the data

Analysis involves interpreting your data to draw out meaningful insights; it is in this stage that your findings start to take shape. Depending on the nature of your data and your research question, you might use any of a variety of analysis methods. For qualitative data, you might employ thematic analysis to identify key themes or grounded theory to generate a new theoretical framework. For quantitative data, you might use statistical analysis to identify patterns or correlations.

Always be open to unexpected findings. Your initial hypotheses might not be supported, or you might uncover new insights that you hadn't initially considered. Remember that all data, whether they fit neatly into your analysis or not, provide valuable insights and contribute to the holistic understanding of your case.

7. Write the case study report

After analyzing the data, it's finally time to compose your case study. In terms of structure, a typical case study might consist of an introduction, background information, the collected data (results), analysis of that data, and the conclusion. Here's a brief breakdown of each section:

• Introduction: The introduction should be brief but engaging, providing a clear statement of the research question or problem, explaining why the case was chosen, and outlining what the case study will cover.
• Background: The background provides the context for your case. Describe the case, its history, and any relevant information that will help readers understand the situation.
• Results: This section should provide a comprehensive account of what you found, without interpretation or opinion. Present your findings in a clear, organized manner. Use visuals such as charts or graphs if they aid comprehension.
• Analysis: This section should provide your interpretations and arguments. Discuss the patterns, themes, or relationships you've identified in your data. Explain what these findings mean in relation to your research question.
• Conclusion: Finally, summarize the key insights from your case study along with their implications. Discuss the limitations of your study and propose avenues for future research.

8. Review and revise

The process of writing a case study doesn't actually end when the report is written; you also need to review your writing for coherence, clarity, and correctness. Don't underestimate the importance of this step! Make sure the information flows logically and that your arguments are well-supported. Check for any grammar or spelling errors. Having a peer or mentor review your work can be incredibly helpful as they provide a fresh perspective and can catch mistakes you might have missed.

9. Get approval if required

If your case study involves human subjects, you may need to obtain approval from an ethical review board. You'll also need to obtain informed consent from your subjects and ensure you respect their privacy and confidentiality throughout the research process. Always follow your institution's ethical guidelines and any other relevant legislation .

Practical tips for writing a compelling case study

Getting through all those steps can feel like a formidable challenge, but here are some practical tips to make the process more manageable:

Be systematic and organized

Given the importance of detail in case studies, it's vital to be systematic and organized from the get-go. This means keeping meticulous records of your data, your sources, and any changes to your research design. A good practice is to maintain a research journal or log where you can record your process, thoughts, and reflections.

In addition, use technology to your advantage. Digital tools like citation managers can help you keep track of your sources and make formatting references a breeze, while spreadsheet or database software can assist in managing and organizing your data. Developing a consistent system for labeling and storing information at the outset will save you time and effort later when you need to retrieve data for analysis.

Stay focused

One common pitfall in research and writing is loss of focus: getting sidetracked by interesting but ultimately irrelevant digressions, which can be very easy, especially when you're dealing with a rich and complex case. Always remember your research question and objectives, and let these guide your study at every step. It's perfectly acceptable – and in fact advisable – to delineate what your study will not cover. Setting clear boundaries can help you stay focused and manage the scope of your study effectively.

Use visual aids

Visual aids such as charts, diagrams, or photographs can greatly enhance your case study. They provide readers with a break from the monotony of text and can communicate complex data or relationships more easily. For instance, if you're presenting a lot of numerical data, consider using a chart or graph. If you're describing a process or sequence of events, portraying it in a flowchart or timeline might be useful. Remember, the goal is to aid comprehension, so make sure your visual aids are clear, well-labeled, and integrated into the text.

Include direct quotes

If your case study involves interviews, including direct quotes can add depth and a sense of the personal to your findings. They provide readers with a firsthand perspective and make your case study more engaging.

When using quotes, be sure to integrate them smoothly into your text. Provide enough context so readers understand the quote's relevance. Also, remember to adhere to ethical guidelines– always respect confidentiality and anonymity agreements.

Maintain ethical standards

Ethics is a fundamental consideration in all research, including case studies. Ensure you have proper consent from participants, respect their privacy, and accurately present your findings without manipulation.

Misrepresenting data or failing to respect participants' rights can lead to serious ethical violations. Always follow your institution's ethical guidelines and any other relevant legislation. If in doubt, seek advice from a supervisor or your institution's ethics committee.

Acknowledge limitations

Every research study has limitations, which could relate to the research design, data collection methods, or other aspects of the study. Being transparent about the limitations of your study can enhance its credibility; moreover, not only does identifying limitations demonstrate your critical thinking and honesty, but it also helps readers accurately interpret your findings.

Finally, acknowledging the limitations of your work helps to set the stage for further research. By identifying aspects that your study couldn't address, you provide other researchers with avenues for building on your findings.

Learn from examples

Before you start writing your case study, it can be helpful to review some published case studies in your field. Different fields may have different conventions, and familiarizing yourself with case studies in your own field can help guide your writing. Look at the structure, tone, and style. Pay attention to how the authors present and analyze data, and how they link their findings back to the research question. You can also learn a lot from the strengths and weaknesses of previously published works. However, remember to develop your own unique voice and perspective – don't just mimic what others have done.

Design for triangulation

Triangulation involves using multiple data sources or methods to gain a more comprehensive and balanced understanding of your research topic. By coming at your research question from multiple directions, such as by examining different datasets or using different methods, you can increase the validity of your results and gain more nuanced insights.

For example, if you're studying the impact of a new teaching method in a school, you might observe classes, interview teachers, and also survey students. Each method will provide a slightly different perspective, and together, they allow you to develop a more complete picture of the teaching method's impact.

Practice reflexivity

Reflexivity involves reflecting on how your assumptions, values, or experiences might influence your research process and interpretations. As a researcher, it's essential to be aware of your potential biases and how they might shape your study.

Consider keeping a reflexivity journal where you can note your thoughts, feelings, and reflections throughout the research process. This practice can help you stay aware of your biases and ensure your research is as objective and balanced as possible.

Write for your audience

Always make sure that your writing is on target for your intended audience. If you're writing for an academic audience, for example, you'll likely use a more formal tone and include more detailed methodological information. If you're writing for practitioners or a general audience, you might use a more accessible language and focus more on practical implications.

Remember to define any technical terms or jargon, and provide sufficient context so your readers can understand your research. The goal is to communicate your findings effectively, regardless of who your readers are.

Seek feedback

Feedback is valuable for improving your case study. Consider sharing drafts with your peers, mentors, or supervisors and asking for their input. Fresh eyes can provide different perspectives, catch errors, or suggest ways to strengthen your arguments.

Remember, feedback is not personal; it's about improving your work. Be open to critique and willing to revise your work based on the feedback you receive.

Writing a case study is a meticulous process that requires clear purpose, careful planning, systematic data collection, and thoughtful analysis. Although it can be time-consuming, the rich, detailed insights a well-executed case study can provide make this study design an invaluable tool in research.

By following this guide and adopting its practical tips, you will be well on your way to crafting a compelling case study that contributes meaningful insights to your chosen field. Good luck with your research journey!

Header image by Kateryna Hliznitsova .

• History & Society
• Science & Tech
• Biographies
• Animals & Nature
• Geography & Travel
• Arts & Culture
• Games & Quizzes
• On This Day
• One Good Fact
• New Articles
• Lifestyles & Social Issues
• Philosophy & Religion
• Politics, Law & Government
• World History
• Health & Medicine
• Browse Biographies
• Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
• Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
• Environment
• Fossils & Geologic Time
• Entertainment & Pop Culture
• Sports & Recreation
• Visual Arts
• Demystified
• Image Galleries
• Infographics
• Top Questions
• Britannica Kids
• Saving Earth
• Space Next 50
• Student Center
• Introduction

The case study creation process

Types of case studies, benefits and limitations.

• Where was science invented?
• When did science begin?

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

• Academia - Case Study
• Verywell Mind - What is a Case Study?
• Simply Psychology - Case Study Research Method in Psychology
• CORE - Case study as a research method
• National Center for Biotechnology Information - PubMed Central - The case study approach
• BMC Journals - Evidence-Based Nursing - What is a case study?
• Table Of Contents

case study , detailed description and assessment of a specific situation in the real world created for the purpose of deriving generalizations and other insights from it. A case study can be about an individual, a group of people, an organization, or an event, among other subjects.

By focusing on a specific subject in its natural setting, a case study can help improve understanding of the broader features and processes at work. Case studies are a research method used in multiple fields, including business, criminology , education , medicine and other forms of health care, anthropology , political science , psychology , and social work . Data in case studies can be both qualitative and quantitative. Unlike experiments, where researchers control and manipulate situations, case studies are considered to be “naturalistic” because subjects are studied in their natural context . ( See also natural experiment .)

The creation of a case study typically involves the following steps:

• The research question to be studied is defined, informed by existing literature and previous research. Researchers should clearly define the scope of the case, and they should compile a list of evidence to be collected as well as identify the nature of insights that they expect to gain from the case study.
• Once the case is identified, the research team is given access to the individual, organization, or situation being studied. Individuals are informed of risks associated with participation and must provide their consent , which may involve signing confidentiality or anonymity agreements.
• Researchers then collect evidence using multiple methods, which may include qualitative techniques, such as interviews, focus groups , and direct observations, as well as quantitative methods, such as surveys, questionnaires, and data audits. The collection procedures need to be well defined to ensure the relevance and accuracy of the evidence.
• The collected evidence is analyzed to come up with insights. Each data source must be reviewed carefully by itself and in the larger context of the case study so as to ensure continued relevance. At the same time, care must be taken not to force the analysis to fit (potentially preconceived) conclusions. While the eventual case study may serve as the basis for generalizations, these generalizations must be made cautiously to ensure that specific nuances are not lost in the averages.
• Finally, the case study is packaged for larger groups and publication. At this stage some information may be withheld, as in business case studies, to allow readers to draw their own conclusions. In scientific fields, the completed case study needs to be a coherent whole, with all findings and statistical relationships clearly documented.

Case studies have been used as a research method across multiple fields. They are particularly popular in the fields of law, business, and employee training; they typically focus on a problem that an individual or organization is facing. The situation is presented in considerable detail, often with supporting data, to discussion participants, who are asked to make recommendations that will solve the stated problem. The business case study as a method of instruction was made popular in the 1920s by instructors at Harvard Business School who adapted an approach used at Harvard Law School in which real-world cases were used in classroom discussions. Other business and law schools started compiling case studies as teaching aids for students. In a business school case study, students are not provided with the complete list of facts pertaining to the topic and are thus forced to discuss and compare their perspectives with those of their peers to recommend solutions.

In criminology , case studies typically focus on the lives of an individual or a group of individuals. These studies can provide particularly valuable insight into the personalities and motives of individual criminals, but they may suffer from a lack of objectivity on the part of the researchers (typically because of the researchers’ biases when working with people with a criminal history), and their findings may be difficult to generalize.

In sociology , the case-study method was developed by Frédéric Le Play in France during the 19th century. This approach involves a field worker staying with a family for a period of time, gathering data on the family members’ attitudes and interactions and on their income, expenditures, and physical possessions. Similar approaches have been used in anthropology . Such studies can sometimes continue for many years.

Case studies provide insight into situations that involve a specific entity or set of circumstances. They can be beneficial in helping to explain the causal relationships between quantitative indicators in a field of study, such as what drives a company’s market share. By introducing real-world examples, they also plunge the reader into an actual, concrete situation and make the concepts real rather than theoretical. They also help people study rare situations that they might not otherwise experience.

Because case studies are in a “naturalistic” environment , they are limited in terms of research design: researchers lack control over what they are studying, which means that the results often cannot be reproduced. Also, care must be taken to stay within the bounds of the research question on which the case study is focusing. Other limitations to case studies revolve around the data collected. It may be difficult, for instance, for researchers to organize the large volume of data that can emerge from the study, and their analysis of the data must be carefully thought through to produce scientifically valid insights. The research methodology used to generate these insights is as important as the insights themselves, for the latter need to be seen in the proper context. Taken out of context, they may lead to erroneous conclusions. Like all scientific studies, case studies need to be approached objectively; personal bias or opinion may skew the research methods as well as the results. ( See also confirmation bias .)

Business case studies in particular have been criticized for approaching a problem or situation from a narrow perspective. Students are expected to come up with solutions for a problem based on the data provided. However, in real life, the situation is typically reversed: business managers face a problem and must then look for data to help them solve it.

• Skip to secondary menu
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar

Statistics By Jim

Making statistics intuitive

What is a Case Study? Definition & Examples

By Jim Frost Leave a Comment

Case Study Definition

A case study is an in-depth investigation of a single person, group, event, or community. This research method involves intensively analyzing a subject to understand its complexity and context. The richness of a case study comes from its ability to capture detailed, qualitative data that can offer insights into a process or subject matter that other research methods might miss.

A case study strives for a holistic understanding of events or situations by examining all relevant variables. They are ideal for exploring ‘how’ or ‘why’ questions in contexts where the researcher has limited control over events in real-life settings. Unlike narrowly focused experiments, these projects seek a comprehensive understanding of events or situations.

In a case study, researchers gather data through various methods such as participant observation, interviews, tests, record examinations, and writing samples. Unlike statistically-based studies that seek only quantifiable data, a case study attempts to uncover new variables and pose questions for subsequent research.

A case study is particularly beneficial when your research:

• Requires a deep, contextual understanding of a specific case.
• Needs to explore or generate hypotheses rather than test them.
• Focuses on a contemporary phenomenon within a real-life context.

Learn more about Other Types of Experimental Design .

Case Study Examples

Various fields utilize case studies, including the following:

• Social sciences : For understanding complex social phenomena.
• Business : For analyzing corporate strategies and business decisions.
• Healthcare : For detailed patient studies and medical research.
• Education : For understanding educational methods and policies.
• Law : For in-depth analysis of legal cases.

For example, consider a case study in a business setting where a startup struggles to scale. Researchers might examine the startup’s strategies, market conditions, management decisions, and competition. Interviews with the CEO, employees, and customers, alongside an analysis of financial data, could offer insights into the challenges and potential solutions for the startup. This research could serve as a valuable lesson for other emerging businesses.

See below for other examples.

Types of Case Studies

Several standard types of case studies exist that vary based on the objectives and specific research needs.

Illustrative Case Study : Descriptive in nature, these studies use one or two instances to depict a situation, helping to familiarize the unfamiliar and establish a common understanding of the topic.

Exploratory Case Study : Conducted as precursors to large-scale investigations, they assist in raising relevant questions, choosing measurement types, and identifying hypotheses to test.

Cumulative Case Study : These studies compile information from various sources over time to enhance generalization without the need for costly, repetitive new studies.

Critical Instance Case Study : Focused on specific sites, they either explore unique situations with limited generalizability or challenge broad assertions, to identify potential cause-and-effect issues.

Pros and Cons

As with any research study, case studies have a set of benefits and drawbacks.

• Provides comprehensive and detailed data.
• Offers a real-life perspective.
• Flexible and can adapt to discoveries during the study.
• Enables investigation of scenarios that are hard to assess in laboratory settings.
• Facilitates studying rare or unique cases.
• Generates hypotheses for future experimental research.
• Time-consuming and may require a lot of resources.
• Hard to generalize findings to a broader context.
• Potential for researcher bias.
• Cannot establish causality .
• Lacks scientific rigor compared to more controlled research methods .

Crafting a Good Case Study: Methodology

While case studies emphasize specific details over broad theories, they should connect to theoretical frameworks in the field. This approach ensures that these projects contribute to the existing body of knowledge on the subject, rather than standing as an isolated entity.

The following are critical steps in developing a case study:

• Define the Research Questions : Clearly outline what you want to explore. Define specific, achievable objectives.
• Select the Case : Choose a case that best suits the research questions. Consider using a typical case for general understanding or an atypical subject for unique insights.
• Data Collection : Use a variety of data sources, such as interviews, observations, documents, and archival records, to provide multiple perspectives on the issue.
• Data Analysis : Identify patterns and themes in the data.
• Report Findings : Present the findings in a structured and clear manner.

Analysts typically use thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes within the data and compare different cases.

• Qualitative Analysis : Such as coding and thematic analysis for narrative data.
• Quantitative Analysis : In cases where numerical data is involved.
• Triangulation : Combining multiple methods or data sources to enhance accuracy.

A good case study requires a balanced approach, often using both qualitative and quantitative methods.

The researcher should constantly reflect on their biases and how they might influence the research. Documenting personal reflections can provide transparency.

Avoid over-generalization. One common mistake is to overstate the implications of a case study. Remember that these studies provide an in-depth insights into a specific case and might not be widely applicable.

Don’t ignore contradictory data. All data, even that which contradicts your hypothesis, is valuable. Ignoring it can lead to skewed results.

Finally, in the report, researchers provide comprehensive insight for a case study through “thick description,” which entails a detailed portrayal of the subject, its usage context, the attributes of involved individuals, and the community environment. Thick description extends to interpreting various data, including demographic details, cultural norms, societal values, prevailing attitudes, and underlying motivations. This approach ensures a nuanced and in-depth comprehension of the case in question.

Learn more about Qualitative Research and Qualitative vs. Quantitative Data .

Morland, J. & Feagin, Joe & Orum, Anthony & Sjoberg, Gideon. (1992). A Case for the Case Study . Social Forces. 71(1):240.

Share this:

Reader Interactions

Comments and questions cancel reply.

• Bipolar Disorder
• Therapy Center
• When To See a Therapist
• Types of Therapy
• Best Online Therapy
• Best Couples Therapy
• Managing Stress
• Sleep and Dreaming
• Understanding Emotions
• Self-Improvement
• Healthy Relationships
• Student Resources
• Personality Types
• Sweepstakes
• Guided Meditations
• Verywell Mind Insights
• 2024 Verywell Mind 25
• Mental Health in the Classroom
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Review Board
• Crisis Support

What Is a Case Study?

Weighing the pros and cons of this method of research

Verywell / Colleen Tighe

• Pros and Cons

What Types of Case Studies Are Out There?

Where do you find data for a case study, how do i write a psychology case study.

A case study is an in-depth study of one person, group, or event. In a case study, nearly every aspect of the subject's life and history is analyzed to seek patterns and causes of behavior. Case studies can be used in many different fields, including psychology, medicine, education, anthropology, political science, and social work.

The point of a case study is to learn as much as possible about an individual or group so that the information can be generalized to many others. Unfortunately, case studies tend to be highly subjective, and it is sometimes difficult to generalize results to a larger population.

While case studies focus on a single individual or group, they follow a format similar to other types of psychology writing. If you are writing a case study, we got you—here are some rules of APA format to reference.  

At a Glance

A case study, or an in-depth study of a person, group, or event, can be a useful research tool when used wisely. In many cases, case studies are best used in situations where it would be difficult or impossible for you to conduct an experiment. They are helpful for looking at unique situations and allow researchers to gather a lot of˜ information about a specific individual or group of people. However, it's important to be cautious of any bias we draw from them as they are highly subjective.

What Are the Benefits and Limitations of Case Studies?

A case study can have its strengths and weaknesses. Researchers must consider these pros and cons before deciding if this type of study is appropriate for their needs.

One of the greatest advantages of a case study is that it allows researchers to investigate things that are often difficult or impossible to replicate in a lab. Some other benefits of a case study:

• Allows researchers to capture information on the 'how,' 'what,' and 'why,' of something that's implemented
• Gives researchers the chance to collect information on why one strategy might be chosen over another
• Permits researchers to develop hypotheses that can be explored in experimental research

On the other hand, a case study can have some drawbacks:

• It cannot necessarily be generalized to the larger population
• Cannot demonstrate cause and effect
• It may not be scientifically rigorous
• It can lead to bias

Researchers may choose to perform a case study if they want to explore a unique or recently discovered phenomenon. Through their insights, researchers develop additional ideas and study questions that might be explored in future studies.

It's important to remember that the insights from case studies cannot be used to determine cause-and-effect relationships between variables. However, case studies may be used to develop hypotheses that can then be addressed in experimental research.

Case Study Examples

There have been a number of notable case studies in the history of psychology. Much of  Freud's work and theories were developed through individual case studies. Some great examples of case studies in psychology include:

• Anna O : Anna O. was a pseudonym of a woman named Bertha Pappenheim, a patient of a physician named Josef Breuer. While she was never a patient of Freud's, Freud and Breuer discussed her case extensively. The woman was experiencing symptoms of a condition that was then known as hysteria and found that talking about her problems helped relieve her symptoms. Her case played an important part in the development of talk therapy as an approach to mental health treatment.
• Phineas Gage : Phineas Gage was a railroad employee who experienced a terrible accident in which an explosion sent a metal rod through his skull, damaging important portions of his brain. Gage recovered from his accident but was left with serious changes in both personality and behavior.
• Genie : Genie was a young girl subjected to horrific abuse and isolation. The case study of Genie allowed researchers to study whether language learning was possible, even after missing critical periods for language development. Her case also served as an example of how scientific research may interfere with treatment and lead to further abuse of vulnerable individuals.

Such cases demonstrate how case research can be used to study things that researchers could not replicate in experimental settings. In Genie's case, her horrific abuse denied her the opportunity to learn a language at critical points in her development.

This is clearly not something researchers could ethically replicate, but conducting a case study on Genie allowed researchers to study phenomena that are otherwise impossible to reproduce.

There are a few different types of case studies that psychologists and other researchers might use:

• Collective case studies : These involve studying a group of individuals. Researchers might study a group of people in a certain setting or look at an entire community. For example, psychologists might explore how access to resources in a community has affected the collective mental well-being of those who live there.
• Descriptive case studies : These involve starting with a descriptive theory. The subjects are then observed, and the information gathered is compared to the pre-existing theory.
• Explanatory case studies : These   are often used to do causal investigations. In other words, researchers are interested in looking at factors that may have caused certain things to occur.
• Exploratory case studies : These are sometimes used as a prelude to further, more in-depth research. This allows researchers to gather more information before developing their research questions and hypotheses .
• Instrumental case studies : These occur when the individual or group allows researchers to understand more than what is initially obvious to observers.
• Intrinsic case studies : This type of case study is when the researcher has a personal interest in the case. Jean Piaget's observations of his own children are good examples of how an intrinsic case study can contribute to the development of a psychological theory.

The three main case study types often used are intrinsic, instrumental, and collective. Intrinsic case studies are useful for learning about unique cases. Instrumental case studies help look at an individual to learn more about a broader issue. A collective case study can be useful for looking at several cases simultaneously.

The type of case study that psychology researchers use depends on the unique characteristics of the situation and the case itself.

There are a number of different sources and methods that researchers can use to gather information about an individual or group. Six major sources that have been identified by researchers are:

• Archival records : Census records, survey records, and name lists are examples of archival records.
• Direct observation : This strategy involves observing the subject, often in a natural setting . While an individual observer is sometimes used, it is more common to utilize a group of observers.
• Documents : Letters, newspaper articles, administrative records, etc., are the types of documents often used as sources.
• Interviews : Interviews are one of the most important methods for gathering information in case studies. An interview can involve structured survey questions or more open-ended questions.
• Participant observation : When the researcher serves as a participant in events and observes the actions and outcomes, it is called participant observation.
• Physical artifacts : Tools, objects, instruments, and other artifacts are often observed during a direct observation of the subject.

If you have been directed to write a case study for a psychology course, be sure to check with your instructor for any specific guidelines you need to follow. If you are writing your case study for a professional publication, check with the publisher for their specific guidelines for submitting a case study.

Here is a general outline of what should be included in a case study.

Section 1: A Case History

This section will have the following structure and content:

Background information : The first section of your paper will present your client's background. Include factors such as age, gender, work, health status, family mental health history, family and social relationships, drug and alcohol history, life difficulties, goals, and coping skills and weaknesses.

Description of the presenting problem : In the next section of your case study, you will describe the problem or symptoms that the client presented with.

Describe any physical, emotional, or sensory symptoms reported by the client. Thoughts, feelings, and perceptions related to the symptoms should also be noted. Any screening or diagnostic assessments that are used should also be described in detail and all scores reported.

Your diagnosis : Provide your diagnosis and give the appropriate Diagnostic and Statistical Manual code. Explain how you reached your diagnosis, how the client's symptoms fit the diagnostic criteria for the disorder(s), or any possible difficulties in reaching a diagnosis.

Section 2: Treatment Plan

This portion of the paper will address the chosen treatment for the condition. This might also include the theoretical basis for the chosen treatment or any other evidence that might exist to support why this approach was chosen.

• Cognitive behavioral approach : Explain how a cognitive behavioral therapist would approach treatment. Offer background information on cognitive behavioral therapy and describe the treatment sessions, client response, and outcome of this type of treatment. Make note of any difficulties or successes encountered by your client during treatment.
• Humanistic approach : Describe a humanistic approach that could be used to treat your client, such as client-centered therapy . Provide information on the type of treatment you chose, the client's reaction to the treatment, and the end result of this approach. Explain why the treatment was successful or unsuccessful.
• Psychoanalytic approach : Describe how a psychoanalytic therapist would view the client's problem. Provide some background on the psychoanalytic approach and cite relevant references. Explain how psychoanalytic therapy would be used to treat the client, how the client would respond to therapy, and the effectiveness of this treatment approach.
• Pharmacological approach : If treatment primarily involves the use of medications, explain which medications were used and why. Provide background on the effectiveness of these medications and how monotherapy may compare with an approach that combines medications with therapy or other treatments.

This section of a case study should also include information about the treatment goals, process, and outcomes.

When you are writing a case study, you should also include a section where you discuss the case study itself, including the strengths and limitiations of the study. You should note how the findings of your case study might support previous research. 

In your discussion section, you should also describe some of the implications of your case study. What ideas or findings might require further exploration? How might researchers go about exploring some of these questions in additional studies?

Need More Tips?

Here are a few additional pointers to keep in mind when formatting your case study:

• Never refer to the subject of your case study as "the client." Instead, use their name or a pseudonym.
• Read examples of case studies to gain an idea about the style and format.
• Remember to use APA format when citing references .

Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A, Sheikh A. The case study approach .  BMC Med Res Methodol . 2011;11:100.

Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A, Sheikh A. The case study approach . BMC Med Res Methodol . 2011 Jun 27;11:100. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

Gagnon, Yves-Chantal.  The Case Study as Research Method: A Practical Handbook . Canada, Chicago Review Press Incorporated DBA Independent Pub Group, 2010.

Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods . United States, SAGE Publications, 2017.

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

Case Study Mastery: Examples & Step-by-Step Templates

Master case study: Uncover key strategies to conduct & present findings that influence decisions charachters.

February 9, 2024

What's Inside?

Understanding and sharing success stories in the business management world is crucial for grasping the growth journey of a business.

In this article, we will delve into the concept of a business management case study, exploring its definition, benefits, limitations, step-by-step process, types, and essential elements.

What is a Case Study?

A case study research is a detailed analysis of a particular subject, often a real-world situation or scenario, to draw insights and conclusions. It serves as a valuable tool for learning from successful strategies, identifying challenges, and making informed decisions.

Key Characteristics of a Case Study:

Specific Focus: Case studies concentrate on a particular subject, narrowing down the scope to delve deeply into specific aspects.

Real-world Context: Unlike theoretical studies, case studies are grounded in the real world. They often involve the examination of actual events, circumstances, or challenges.

Comprehensive Exploration: Case studies involve a thorough investigation of multiple facets of the chosen subject. This may include collecting and analyzing data, conducting interviews, and reviewing relevant documents.

Contextualization: Each case study is set within a context, providing background information to help readers or viewers understand the circumstances surrounding the case.

Problem-Solving Orientation: While exploring the intricacies of a case, case studies often aim to identify problems, challenges, or opportunities. They can be used as tools for problem-solving and decision-making.

In-depth Analysis: The analysis in a case study goes beyond surface-level observations. It involves a detailed examination of factors contributing to the situation, allowing for a nuanced understanding.

Presentation of Findings: A case study concludes with the presentation of findings, insights, and conclusions. Leveraging a visually compelling presentation plays a vital role for a case study to speak out.

Why You Should Write a Case Study?

Writing a case study offers several compelling reasons for individuals and businesses alike:

Demonstrate Success: A case study allows you to showcase your achievements and successes. It provides tangible evidence of your capabilities, helping build trust and credibility with potential clients, customers, or collaborators.

Educate and Inform: Use case studies to share valuable insights, lessons learned, and best practices. By documenting your experiences, you contribute to the collective knowledge within your industry, positioning yourself as an authority and resource.

Problem-Solving Showcase: If your case study revolves around overcoming challenges, it highlights your problem-solving abilities. This can be particularly impactful in industries where complex issues require innovative solutions.

Engage Your Audience: Well-crafted case studies are engaging and resonate with your audience. They tell a story, making information more relatable and memorable. This storytelling aspect can captivate readers and enhance their understanding of your work.

Build Brand Awareness: Case studies provide an opportunity to promote your brand in a context that goes beyond traditional marketing. Through real-world examples, you can reinforce your brand message and values.

Attract New Opportunities: A compelling case study can attract new opportunities, whether it be clients, partnerships , or collaborations. It serves as a powerful marketing tool, showcasing your expertise and capabilities to a wider audience.

Validate Your Methods: For businesses, case studies serve as a validation of their methods and strategies. Employing a robust case study methodology is a way to demonstrate the effectiveness of your products, services, or approaches to potential clients or customers through a thorough research process.

Internal Learning: Writing a case study requires reflection on your processes and approach case outcomes. This internal learning process can contribute to continuous improvement within your organization , fostering a culture of innovation and adaptability.

SEO Benefits: Case studies can be optimized for search engines, contributing to your online visibility. Including relevant keywords and internal links in your case studies can improve your website's SEO , attracting more organic traffic.

Differentiation: In competitive industries, a well crafted case study sets you apart from the competition. It allows you to highlight what makes your approach unique and why clients or customers should choose your products or services.

Benefits and Limitations of Case Studies

Benefits of Case Studies:

• Evident Success Stories: Case studies serve as tangible evidence of a business's success, allowing them to showcase real-world achievements and build credibility with potential clients or customers.
• Effective Marketing Tool: They function as powerful marketing tools by providing in depth insights into a business's capabilities , differentiating it from competitors, and influencing the decision making process of potential clients.
• Client Relationship Building: Through detailed case studies, businesses can strengthen relationships with existing clients by demonstrating their commitment, problem solving abilities, and delivering measurable results.
• Versatile Content: Case studies offer versatile content that can be repurposed across various marketing channels, including websites, social media, presentations, and promotional materials.
• Educational Value: Businesses can use case studies to educate their target audience about their industry, innovative solutions, and best practices, positioning themselves as thought leaders.

Limitations of Case Studies:

• Resource Intensive: Creating comprehensive case studies demands significant resources, including time, effort, and potential costs, making them resource-intensive for businesses.
• Limited Generalization: Findings from a specific case study may not be universally applicable, limiting their generalizability to other scenarios or industries.
• Potential Bias: There is a risk of bias in the selection and presentation of information, as businesses may be inclined to emphasize positive outcomes and downplay challenges.
• Confidentiality Concerns: Businesses may face challenges in sharing detailed information, especially if it involves sensitive data or strategies, raising concerns about confidentiality.
• Difficulty in Replication: The unique circumstances of a case study may make it challenging to replicate the same success in different contexts, limiting the broader applicability of the insights gained.

How to Conduct a Case Analysis: Step-by-step

1. define the objective:.

• Clearly outline the purpose of the case study. What do you aim to achieve or understand through this analysis?

2. Select the Case:

• Identify a relevant and specific case that aligns with your objective. For an important case study this could be a real-world situation, event, or phenomenon.

3. Background Research:

• Gather background information about the case. This may include historical context, key players involved, and any existing literature on the subject.

4. Identify Key Issues or Questions:

• Formulate specific research questions or highlight key issues you want to address through the case study.

5. Choose the Research Method:

• Decide on the case study method or approach for data collection. A case study research method could involve qualitative methods such as interviews, observations, or document analysis.

6. Develop Data Collection Plan:

• Outline a detailed plan for collecting data. Specify sources, methods, and tools you will use to gather relevant information.

7. Data Collection:

• Execute the data collection plan. Conduct interviews , observe events, and analyze documents to accumulate necessary data.

8. Data Analysis:

• Apply appropriate analytical techniques to interpret the gathered data. This may involve coding, categorizing, and identifying patterns or themes.

9. Construct the Case Study Narrative:

• Organize the findings into a coherent and structured narrative. Develop sections that cover the introduction, background, analysis, and conclusion.

10. Draw Conclusions:

• Based on your analysis, after you conduct case study , draw conclusions that address the research questions or objectives. Consider the implications of your findings.

11. Peer Review or Feedback:

• Seek feedback from colleagues, mentors, or peers to ensure the validity and reliability of your case study.

12. Finalize the Case Study:

• Incorporate feedback and make necessary revisions. Finalize the case study, ensuring clarity, coherence, and adherence to ethical guidelines.

13. Document and Share:

• Prepare the case study for publication or presentation and take advantage of Decktopus AI, a user-friendly and efficient presentation generator powered by AI. Easily convert your case study insights into a visually compelling deck.

• Decktopus ensures your case studies are presented in a format that engages your audience, making your narratives more impactful and memorable. Explore the benefits of Decktopus AI to elevate your case study presentations effortlessly.

What are the Components of a Case Study

The format of a case study typically comprises several key components to present information in a structured and comprehensive manner. While variations may exist based on the context and purpose, a standard case study format often includes the following elements:

1. Introduction:

Provide a brief overview of the case and set the stage for the reader. Outline the main objectives and establish the context of the study.

2. Background:

Present relevant background information about the subject of the case. This may include the history, industry context, or any pertinent details necessary for understanding the situation.

3. Problem Statement or Objectives:

Clearly state the problem or the main objectives of the case study. Define the issues or challenges that the study aims to address.

4. Analysis:

Dive into the analysis of the case. This section often comprises multiple sub-sections, each exploring different aspects such as market conditions, internal factors, external influences, etc.

5. Solution or Action:

Propose solutions or actions to address the identified problems. Detail the steps taken or recommended strategies based on the analysis.

6. Results:

Present the outcomes of the solutions or actions taken. Include any measurable results, impacts, or changes observed.

7. Conclusion:

Summarize the key points, outcomes, and lessons learned. Revisit the problem statement and emphasize the significance of the study, highlighting how the research design shaped the results.

Types of Case Studies

Case Study Examples

1. marketing case study template.

The Marketing Case Study Template is tailored for marketers, highlighting successful marketing strategies . Uncover the methods employed, target audience engagement, and measurable outcomes.

Ideal for marketing professionals seeking insights into effective campaign executions. With Decktopus AI , spending your precious time perpetually recreating your product's presentation has become an ancient practice.

Along with our collection of case-study templates, with our one-click platform, you can easily create beautiful presentations for yourself or your clients.

Also check out: creative marketing case study template .

2. Sales Case Study Template

The Sales Case Study Template is designed for salespeople to present and discuss case studies in sales meetings. With its professional look and engaging layout, your clients will be impressed with the level of detail you put into your analysis.

This professionally designed template is easy to use and easy to customize, making it the perfect way to show off your small business expertise.

So whether you're looking to wow potential clients or just need a little more confidence in your sales meetings, our client case study template will help you make an impact.

Also check-out: case study template for sales teams .

3. Design Case Study Example: UI Case Study Template

The UI Case Study Template is specifically designed for UI designers, making it easy to discuss your design process and findings. Present your design case studies like a pro with our target-spesific case study templates. With our design case study template , you'll be able to showcase your work in a clear, professional manner.

Looking to create a stunning case study presentation for your next client meeting? Look no further than our case study templates! Our professional and easy-to-use templates are perfect for designers of all experience levels, and will help you showcase your work in a clear and concise way.

Also check out: Art Case Study Template .

Explore More Case Study Templates

Discover a vast collection of case study templates from various fields, including marketing, sales, and design, in our dedicated Case Study Examples Blog. Gain insights into diverse business scenarios and find inspiration for your own projects.

Case Study Presentation Creation with Decktopus AI

Streamlining the creation of engaging visual case studies has never been easier than with Decktopus AI . This innovative platform offers a seamless experiencensimply write your input, and Decktopus takes care of the rest, ensuring that your templates not only boast a polished visual appeal but also integrate relevant and impactful content effortlessly.

Discover how easy it is to create engaging case study templates using Decktopus AI . Our platform ensures your templates look great and contain relevant content. With the help of our AI assistant, you not only get support during presentations but also receive tips, facilitate Q&A, and increase overall engagement.

Explore the unique storytelling format that Decktopus offers, making your case studies more relatable. For a step-by-guide on how to easily create a visually stunning case study with Decktopus, see our case study examples blog.

This approach allows you to present information in a narrative style, connecting better with your audience. Find practical tips for smoother case study presentations, from effective storytelling to engaging your audience. Improve your presentation experience with Decktopus AI , where simplicity meets interactivity and storytelling for effective communication.

It features, practical design, mobilizing easy principles of marketing ecosystem platform design. Making it by far the easiest thing to use in your daily practice of mobilizing marketing ecosystems through platform strategies.

Frequently Asked Questions

1) what is a marketing case study.

A marketing case study is a concise analysis of a business's marketing strategy, showcasing its objectives, challenges, tactics, and outcomes. It offers practical insights into real-world marketing applications, serving as a valuable learning tool for understanding successful practices and lessons learned in achieving specific marketing goals.

2) What is a case study?

A case study, or case report, is a concise examination of a specific subject, often real-world situations or problems, providing detailed insights and analysis for learning or decision-making purposes.

3) How should you write a case study?

To create an impactful case study, define objectives, choose a relevant case, gather key information, and use Decktopus for a polished presentation. Employ data analysis, construct a clear narrative, and offer actionable recommendations.

Validate findings and consider broader implications. Decktopus streamlines this process, providing a user-friendly platform for creating compelling case study presentations effortlessly.

Latest Articles

August 28, 2024

The Ultimate Guide: How Sales Ops Can Use AI to Supercharge Their Reporting

Unlock the power of AI for your sales ops and supercharge reporting accuracy and efficiency! Use artificial intelligence to elevate your reporting!

August 26, 2024

Unlock Market Insights: What Is Segmentation Analysis?

Discover how segmentation analysis uncovers customer insights for targeted market strategies Master your segments now!

Drive Growth: Definition of Demographics in Marketing

Mastering demographics in marketing is key to growth Get the definition, insights, and segmentation strategies!

Don't waste your time designing your presentations by yourself!

Type your content and let our platform design your presentations automatically. No more wasting time for your presentations. Use hundreds of presentation templates to impress your audience. This is the only tool you need to prepare presentations. Try our Presentation Builder today >>

Don’t waste your time by trying to make a website for all your content

Place your content links and let our platform design your bio link automatically. No more wasting time for your social content distribution. Use hundreds of presentation biolink to impress your audience. This is the only tool you need to prepare good-looking bio links. Try our Bio Link Builder today >>

Do You Want To Create a Presentation?

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up-to-date on the latest news and tips from Decktopus.

Let’s create a form here to get visitors’ email addresses.

Ready to dive in? Start your free trial today.

What is the Case Study Method?

Simply put, the case method is a discussion of real-life situations that business executives have faced.

On average, you'll attend three to four different classes a day, for a total of about six hours of class time (schedules vary). To prepare, you'll work through problems with your peers.

How the Case Method Creates Value

Often, executives are surprised to discover that the objective of the case study is not to reach consensus, but to understand how different people use the same information to arrive at diverse conclusions. When you begin to understand the context, you can appreciate the reasons why those decisions were made. You can prepare for case discussions in several ways.

Case Discussion Preparation Details

In self-reflection.

The time you spend here is deeply introspective. You're not only working with case materials and assignments, but also taking on the role of the case protagonist—the person who's supposed to make those tough decisions. How would you react in those situations? We put people in a variety of contexts, and they start by addressing that specific problem.

In a small group setting

The discussion group is a critical component of the HBS experience. You're working in close quarters with a group of seven or eight very accomplished peers in diverse functions, industries, and geographies. Because they bring unique experience to play you begin to see that there are many different ways to wrestle with a problem—and that’s very enriching.

In the classroom

The faculty guides you in examining and resolving the issues—but the beauty here is that they don't provide you with the answers. You're interacting in the classroom with other executives—debating the issue, presenting new viewpoints, countering positions, and building on one another's ideas. And that leads to the next stage of learning.

Beyond the classroom

Once you leave the classroom, the learning continues and amplifies as you get to know people in different settings—over meals, at social gatherings, in the fitness center, or as you are walking to class. You begin to distill the takeaways that you want to bring back and apply in your organization to ensure that the decisions you make will create more value for your firm.

How Cases Unfold In the Classroom

Pioneered by HBS faculty, the case method puts you in the role of the chief decision maker as you explore the challenges facing leading companies across the globe. Learning to think fast on your feet with limited information sharpens your analytical skills and empowers you to make critical decisions in real time.

To get the most out of each case, it's important to read and reflect, and then meet with your discussion group to share your insights. You and your peers will explore the underlying issues, compare alternatives, and suggest various ways of resolving the problem.

How to Prepare for Case Discussions

There's more than one way to prepare for a case discussion, but these general guidelines can help you develop a method that works for you.

Preparation Guidelines

Read the professor's assignment or discussion questions.

The assignment and discussion questions help you focus on the key aspects of the case. Ask yourself: What are the most important issues being raised?

Read the first few paragraphs and then skim the case

Each case begins with a text description followed by exhibits. Ask yourself: What is the case generally about, and what information do I need to analyze?

Reread the case, underline text, and make margin notes

Put yourself in the shoes of the case protagonist, and own that person's problems. Ask yourself: What basic problem is this executive trying to resolve?

Note the key problems on a pad of paper and go through the case again

Sort out relevant considerations and do the quantitative or qualitative analysis. Ask yourself: What recommendations should I make based on my case data analysis?

Case Study Best Practices

The key to being an active listener and participant in case discussions—and to getting the most out of the learning experience—is thorough individual preparation.

We've set aside formal time for you to discuss the case with your group. These sessions will help you to become more confident about sharing your views in the classroom discussion.

Participate

Actively express your views and challenge others. Don't be afraid to share related "war stories" that will heighten the relevance and enrich the discussion.

If the content doesn't seem to relate to your business, don't tune out. You can learn a lot about marketing insurance from a case on marketing razor blades!

Actively apply what you're learning to your own specific management situations, both past and future. This will magnify the relevance to your business.

People with diverse backgrounds, experiences, skills, and styles will take away different things. Be sure to note what resonates with you, not your peers.

Being exposed to so many different approaches to a given situation will put you in a better position to enhance your management style.

Frequently Asked Questions

What can i expect on the first day, what happens in class if nobody talks, does everyone take part in "role-playing".

Case Study Research Method in Psychology

Saul McLeod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

Case studies are in-depth investigations of a person, group, event, or community. Typically, data is gathered from various sources using several methods (e.g., observations & interviews).

The case study research method originated in clinical medicine (the case history, i.e., the patient’s personal history). In psychology, case studies are often confined to the study of a particular individual.

The information is mainly biographical and relates to events in the individual’s past (i.e., retrospective), as well as to significant events that are currently occurring in his or her everyday life.

The case study is not a research method, but researchers select methods of data collection and analysis that will generate material suitable for case studies.

Freud (1909a, 1909b) conducted very detailed investigations into the private lives of his patients in an attempt to both understand and help them overcome their illnesses.

This makes it clear that the case study is a method that should only be used by a psychologist, therapist, or psychiatrist, i.e., someone with a professional qualification.

There is an ethical issue of competence. Only someone qualified to diagnose and treat a person can conduct a formal case study relating to atypical (i.e., abnormal) behavior or atypical development.

 Famous Case Studies

• Anna O – One of the most famous case studies, documenting psychoanalyst Josef Breuer’s treatment of “Anna O” (real name Bertha Pappenheim) for hysteria in the late 1800s using early psychoanalytic theory.
• Little Hans – A child psychoanalysis case study published by Sigmund Freud in 1909 analyzing his five-year-old patient Herbert Graf’s house phobia as related to the Oedipus complex.
• Bruce/Brenda – Gender identity case of the boy (Bruce) whose botched circumcision led psychologist John Money to advise gender reassignment and raise him as a girl (Brenda) in the 1960s.
• Genie Wiley – Linguistics/psychological development case of the victim of extreme isolation abuse who was studied in 1970s California for effects of early language deprivation on acquiring speech later in life.
• Phineas Gage – One of the most famous neuropsychology case studies analyzes personality changes in railroad worker Phineas Gage after an 1848 brain injury involving a tamping iron piercing his skull.

Clinical Case Studies

• Studying the effectiveness of psychotherapy approaches with an individual patient
• Assessing and treating mental illnesses like depression, anxiety disorders, PTSD
• Neuropsychological cases investigating brain injuries or disorders

Child Psychology Case Studies

• Studying psychological development from birth through adolescence
• Cases of learning disabilities, autism spectrum disorders, ADHD
• Effects of trauma, abuse, deprivation on development

Types of Case Studies

• Explanatory case studies : Used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles. Helpful for doing qualitative analysis to explain presumed causal links.
• Exploratory case studies : Used to explore situations where an intervention being evaluated has no clear set of outcomes. It helps define questions and hypotheses for future research.
• Descriptive case studies : Describe an intervention or phenomenon and the real-life context in which it occurred. It is helpful for illustrating certain topics within an evaluation.
• Multiple-case studies : Used to explore differences between cases and replicate findings across cases. Helpful for comparing and contrasting specific cases.
• Intrinsic : Used to gain a better understanding of a particular case. Helpful for capturing the complexity of a single case.
• Collective : Used to explore a general phenomenon using multiple case studies. Helpful for jointly studying a group of cases in order to inquire into the phenomenon.

Where Do You Find Data for a Case Study?

There are several places to find data for a case study. The key is to gather data from multiple sources to get a complete picture of the case and corroborate facts or findings through triangulation of evidence. Most of this information is likely qualitative (i.e., verbal description rather than measurement), but the psychologist might also collect numerical data.

1. Primary sources

• Interviews – Interviewing key people related to the case to get their perspectives and insights. The interview is an extremely effective procedure for obtaining information about an individual, and it may be used to collect comments from the person’s friends, parents, employer, workmates, and others who have a good knowledge of the person, as well as to obtain facts from the person him or herself.
• Observations – Observing behaviors, interactions, processes, etc., related to the case as they unfold in real-time.
• Documents & Records – Reviewing private documents, diaries, public records, correspondence, meeting minutes, etc., relevant to the case.

2. Secondary sources

• News/Media – News coverage of events related to the case study.
• Academic articles – Journal articles, dissertations etc. that discuss the case.
• Government reports – Official data and records related to the case context.
• Books/films – Books, documentaries or films discussing the case.

3. Archival records

Searching historical archives, museum collections and databases to find relevant documents, visual/audio records related to the case history and context.

Public archives like newspapers, organizational records, photographic collections could all include potentially relevant pieces of information to shed light on attitudes, cultural perspectives, common practices and historical contexts related to psychology.

4. Organizational records

Organizational records offer the advantage of often having large datasets collected over time that can reveal or confirm psychological insights.

Of course, privacy and ethical concerns regarding confidential data must be navigated carefully.

However, with proper protocols, organizational records can provide invaluable context and empirical depth to qualitative case studies exploring the intersection of psychology and organizations.

• Organizational/industrial psychology research : Organizational records like employee surveys, turnover/retention data, policies, incident reports etc. may provide insight into topics like job satisfaction, workplace culture and dynamics, leadership issues, employee behaviors etc.
• Clinical psychology : Therapists/hospitals may grant access to anonymized medical records to study aspects like assessments, diagnoses, treatment plans etc. This could shed light on clinical practices.
• School psychology : Studies could utilize anonymized student records like test scores, grades, disciplinary issues, and counseling referrals to study child development, learning barriers, effectiveness of support programs, and more.

How do I Write a Case Study in Psychology?

Follow specified case study guidelines provided by a journal or your psychology tutor. General components of clinical case studies include: background, symptoms, assessments, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Interpreting the information means the researcher decides what to include or leave out. A good case study should always clarify which information is the factual description and which is an inference or the researcher’s opinion.

1. Introduction

• Provide background on the case context and why it is of interest, presenting background information like demographics, relevant history, and presenting problem.
• Compare briefly to similar published cases if applicable. Clearly state the focus/importance of the case.

2. Case Presentation

• Describe the presenting problem in detail, including symptoms, duration,and impact on daily life.
• Include client demographics like age and gender, information about social relationships, and mental health history.
• Describe all physical, emotional, and/or sensory symptoms reported by the client.
• Use patient quotes to describe the initial complaint verbatim. Follow with full-sentence summaries of relevant history details gathered, including key components that led to a working diagnosis.
• Summarize clinical exam results, namely orthopedic/neurological tests, imaging, lab tests, etc. Note actual results rather than subjective conclusions. Provide images if clearly reproducible/anonymized.
• Clearly state the working diagnosis or clinical impression before transitioning to management.

3. Management and Outcome

• Indicate the total duration of care and number of treatments given over what timeframe. Use specific names/descriptions for any therapies/interventions applied.
• Present the results of the intervention,including any quantitative or qualitative data collected.
• For outcomes, utilize visual analog scales for pain, medication usage logs, etc., if possible. Include patient self-reports of improvement/worsening of symptoms. Note the reason for discharge/end of care.

4. Discussion

• Analyze the case, exploring contributing factors, limitations of the study, and connections to existing research.
• Analyze the effectiveness of the intervention,considering factors like participant adherence, limitations of the study, and potential alternative explanations for the results.
• Identify any questions raised in the case analysis and relate insights to established theories and current research if applicable. Avoid definitive claims about physiological explanations.
• Offer clinical implications, and suggest future research directions.

5. Additional Items

• Thank specific assistants for writing support only. No patient acknowledgments.
• References should directly support any key claims or quotes included.
• Use tables/figures/images only if substantially informative. Include permissions and legends/explanatory notes.
• Provides detailed (rich qualitative) information.
• Provides insight for further research.
• Permitting investigation of otherwise impractical (or unethical) situations.

Case studies allow a researcher to investigate a topic in far more detail than might be possible if they were trying to deal with a large number of research participants (nomothetic approach) with the aim of ‘averaging’.

Because of their in-depth, multi-sided approach, case studies often shed light on aspects of human thinking and behavior that would be unethical or impractical to study in other ways.

Research that only looks into the measurable aspects of human behavior is not likely to give us insights into the subjective dimension of experience, which is important to psychoanalytic and humanistic psychologists.

Case studies are often used in exploratory research. They can help us generate new ideas (that might be tested by other methods). They are an important way of illustrating theories and can help show how different aspects of a person’s life are related to each other.

The method is, therefore, important for psychologists who adopt a holistic point of view (i.e., humanistic psychologists ).

Limitations

• Lacking scientific rigor and providing little basis for generalization of results to the wider population.
• Researchers’ own subjective feelings may influence the case study (researcher bias).
• Difficult to replicate.
• Time-consuming and expensive.
• The volume of data, together with the time restrictions in place, impacted the depth of analysis that was possible within the available resources.

Because a case study deals with only one person/event/group, we can never be sure if the case study investigated is representative of the wider body of “similar” instances. This means the conclusions drawn from a particular case may not be transferable to other settings.

Because case studies are based on the analysis of qualitative (i.e., descriptive) data , a lot depends on the psychologist’s interpretation of the information she has acquired.

This means that there is a lot of scope for Anna O , and it could be that the subjective opinions of the psychologist intrude in the assessment of what the data means.

For example, Freud has been criticized for producing case studies in which the information was sometimes distorted to fit particular behavioral theories (e.g., Little Hans ).

This is also true of Money’s interpretation of the Bruce/Brenda case study (Diamond, 1997) when he ignored evidence that went against his theory.

Breuer, J., & Freud, S. (1895).  Studies on hysteria . Standard Edition 2: London.

Curtiss, S. (1981). Genie: The case of a modern wild child .

Diamond, M., & Sigmundson, K. (1997). Sex Reassignment at Birth: Long-term Review and Clinical Implications. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine , 151(3), 298-304

Freud, S. (1909a). Analysis of a phobia of a five year old boy. In The Pelican Freud Library (1977), Vol 8, Case Histories 1, pages 169-306

Freud, S. (1909b). Bemerkungen über einen Fall von Zwangsneurose (Der “Rattenmann”). Jb. psychoanal. psychopathol. Forsch ., I, p. 357-421; GW, VII, p. 379-463; Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis, SE , 10: 151-318.

Harlow J. M. (1848). Passage of an iron rod through the head.  Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, 39 , 389–393.

Harlow, J. M. (1868).  Recovery from the Passage of an Iron Bar through the Head .  Publications of the Massachusetts Medical Society. 2  (3), 327-347.

Money, J., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (1972).  Man & Woman, Boy & Girl : The Differentiation and Dimorphism of Gender Identity from Conception to Maturity. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Money, J., & Tucker, P. (1975). Sexual signatures: On being a man or a woman.

Further Information

• Case Study Approach
• Case Study Method
• Enhancing the Quality of Case Studies in Health Services Research
• “We do things together” A case study of “couplehood” in dementia
• Using mixed methods for evaluating an integrative approach to cancer care: a case study

Transcription Service for Your Academic Paper

Start Transcription now

Editing & Proofreading for Your Research Paper

Get it proofread now

Online Printing & Binding with Free Express Delivery

Configure binding now

• Academic essay overview
• The writing process
• Structuring academic essays
• Types of academic essays
• Academic writing overview
• Sentence structure
• Academic writing process
• Improving your academic writing
• Titles and headings
• APA style overview
• APA citation & referencing
• APA structure & sections
• Citation & referencing
• Structure and sections
• APA examples overview
• Commonly used citations
• Other examples
• British English vs. American English
• Chicago style overview
• Chicago citation & referencing
• Chicago structure & sections
• Chicago style examples
• Citing sources overview
• Citation format
• Citation examples
• College essay overview
• Application
• How to write a college essay
• Types of college essays
• Commonly confused words
• Definitions
• Dissertation overview
• Dissertation structure & sections
• Dissertation writing process
• Graduate school overview
• Application & admission
• Study abroad
• Master degree
• Harvard referencing overview
• Language rules overview
• Grammatical rules & structures
• Parts of speech
• Punctuation
• Methodology overview
• Analyzing data
• Experiments
• Observations
• Inductive vs. Deductive
• Qualitative vs. Quantitative
• Types of validity
• Types of reliability
• Sampling methods
• Theories & Concepts
• Types of research studies
• Types of variables
• MLA style overview
• MLA examples
• MLA citation & referencing
• MLA structure & sections
• Plagiarism overview
• Plagiarism checker
• Types of plagiarism
• Printing production overview
• Research bias overview
• Types of research bias
• Example sections
• Types of research papers
• Research process overview
• Problem statement
• Research proposal
• Research topic
• Statistics overview
• Levels of measurment
• Frequency distribution
• Measures of central tendency
• Measures of variability
• Hypothesis testing
• Parameters & test statistics
• Types of distributions
• Correlation
• Effect size
• Hypothesis testing assumptions
• Types of ANOVAs
• Types of chi-square
• Statistical data
• Statistical models
• Spelling mistakes
• Tips overview
• Academic writing tips
• Dissertation tips
• Sources tips
• Working with sources overview
• Evaluating sources
• Finding sources
• Including sources
• Types of sources

Your Step to Success

Transcription Service for Your Paper

Printing & Binding with 3D Live Preview

Case Study – Definition, Types & Examples

How do you like this article cancel reply.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

A case study is a research method that delves deeply into a specific instance to analyze its complexities and draw broader insights applicable to similar situations. Through a structured methodology , encompassing data collection, analysis, and interpretation, case studies offer a comprehensive understanding of real-life phenomena within their natural contexts. This approach allows researchers to explore intricate details, uncover patterns, and derive valuable implications.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

• 1 Case study in a nutshell
• 2 Definition: Case study
• 3 Types of case studies
• 4 When to perform a case study
• 5 Conducting a case study
• 6 Pros and cons

Case study in a nutshell

A case study is a detailed examination of a particular project, event, individual, or organization over a defined period. It focuses on the complexities and outcomes of real-life situations, providing an in-depth understanding of the factors leading to successes or failures.

Definition: Case study

A case study is a research methodology that involves an in-depth, detailed examination of a case or cases within a real-life context. It is used across various disciplines, including psychology, sociology, education, business, and law. The purpose of a case study is to explore and understand complex issues, processes, or behaviors by analyzing them from multiple angles and using multiple sources of evidence. Case studies are particularly useful for investigating phenomena that cannot be studied through experimental methods, offering insights into aspects of the subject that might be overlooked by other research methodologies.

Case studies are valuable for generating hypotheses that can be tested with other methods, developing theories, and providing practical solutions to real-world problems. They are particularly effective in capturing the nuances and complexities of situations that are too complex for more straightforward research designs . The following outlines the key characteristics of case studies.

Depth and detail

Contextual analysis, qualitative (and quantitative) data, multiple sources of evidence, specificity, flexibility.

Case studies provide a thorough understanding of the case in question, including its historical background, current situation, and the various factors influencing it.

They consider the subject’s context, recognizing that behaviors, decisions, and outcomes are often deeply influenced by environmental, social, and historical factors.

A mixed-methods case study approach relies on qualitative data like interviews , observations, and document analysis, and also includes quantitative data to support findings.

Case studies typically draw on various data sources, such as documents, archival records, interviews, direct observation, participant observation, and physical artifacts, to provide a comprehensive view of the overall case.

They focus on a specific case, event, individual, or organization, allowing for a detailed examination that might not be feasible with broader research methods.

Case study research is flexible, allowing researchers to adapt their approaches as new insights emerge during the investigation.

The goal is to gain insights and a deeper understanding of the case and its broader implications, rather than to generalize findings to all cases.

Types of case studies

Case studies vary widely in focus and purpose, adapting to the needs of different academic disciplines and professional fields. Each type of case study serves a different purpose and can be chosen based on the specific objectives of the research, the nature of the subject being studied, and the available resources. They are a powerful tool for researchers and practitioners alike, offering detailed insights and a deep understanding of complex phenomena, behaviors, and processes within their real-life contexts. Despite this diversity, they can generally be categorized into several main types based on their intent and approach.

Collective case studies

A collective case study also referred to as a multiple case study, involves the detailed examination and analysis of several cases simultaneously or sequentially to investigate a phenomenon, condition, or situation. These cases are chosen because they are expected to exhibit particular features or outcomes significant to the research question or hypothesis. By studying multiple cases, researchers aim to gain a deeper, more comprehensive understanding of the issue at hand, identifying patterns, variations, and insights that might not be evident when conducting single case study research alone.

Characteristics

• Involves multiple cases, allowing for a comparison to identify similarities between different instances of the phenomenon.
• The cases are purposefully selected based on their ability and extent to provide insight into the research question of the case.
• Aims to understand the phenomenon within its real-life context, recognizing the influence of various complex factors.
• Data are individually and in aggregate analyzed, allowing researchers to identify overarching patterns across cases.
• Variability by acknowledging and exploring the differences between cases to understand the spectrum of possible outcomes.
• Enhances generalizability: Examining multiple cases, allows researchers to test the finding of one case against others, enhancing the generalizability of the observations.
• Rich insights: Collective case studies provide rich, multifaceted, contextual insights into the studied phenomenon, ensuring the possibility to investigate the complexity of real-life situations.
• Theory development: These studies are particularly useful for developing theories, allowing researchers to refine and build upon existing ones based on the findings.

Topic: Patient experiences with telehealth services

• Objective: Exploring patient satisfaction and challenges faced when using telehealth services across various demographics.
• Cases: Patients from different age groups, health conditions, and regions who have used telehealth services for at least six months.
• Result: A comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing patient satisfaction with telehealth, including technological literacy, communication quality, and access to care, informing improvements in telehealth practices.

Comparative case studies

A comparative case study is a research approach that involves the detailed analysis and comparison of two or more cases, which can be organizations, communities, individuals, events, etc. It aims to investigate and explore similarities, contrasts, and pattern variations across cases to gain a deeper understanding of the studied topic and why certain phenomena vary under different conditions.

• Systematically examines the differences and similarities between cases to draw insights that may not emerge from one case.
• Serves as a cornerstone for developing, testing, or refining existing theories or generating new theories and concepts.
• The cases are carefully selected based on the variations in dimensions to understand the influence of different conditions.
• Does not sacrifice the depth of understanding each case individually, allowing researchers to consider the contribution of contextual factors.
• This type of case study includes qualitative and quantitative methods and approaches for collecting and analyzing data.
• Rich insights: They provide contextual and detailed insights into the dynamics of each case, which is crucial for understanding complex phenomena.
• Theory development: Comparative case studies are conducive to testing existing theories in different contexts and building new theories based on observed patterns.
• Flexibility: Methods and approaches can be adapted as the study progresses, allowing for the exploration of unexpected findings or new research questions.

Topic: Impact of socioeconomic factors on academic achievement

• Objective: Exploring how socioeconomic status (SES) influences academic achievement in primary schools.
• Case A: Primary school located in an affluent neighborhood with high-income families.
• Case B: Primary school located in an area with primarily low-income families.
• Result: Emphasis on the importance of addressing disparities in resources, support systems, and community factors to ensure equitable educational opportunities for all the students.

Critical instance case studies

A critical instance case study entails focused research that investigates one or two instances to understand one occurrence rather than generalizing the situation. It explores a unique, unusual, or particularly informative phenomenon. These cases are typically chosen because they are expected to provide insight into an area of interest or to challenge or refine existing theoretical concepts and assumptions. The goal of this method is to understand the complexity and uniqueness of critical cases and how they inform broader understandings and generalizations about a topic.

• Dives into a specific case(s) to uncover the intricacies that contribute to its unique characteristics.
• Useful for examining phenomena that are too complex or rare to be captured through broader studies.
• Cases are selected for their potential to provide insight into an issue or to challenge universal opinions.
• A detailed qualitative analysis, but quantitative methods can also complement the examination.
• Creates a balance between the uniqueness of the case and the potential for making broader inferences.
• In-depth understanding: Critical instance case studies aim to provide an in-depth and nuanced understanding of a specific case or cases, underscoring the contextual factors that influence outcomes.
• Theory development: By focusing on cases that are expected to challenge or refine theoretical assumptions, this type of study contributes to developing and refining theories.
• Flexibility: The methods used can be adapted to the specific demands of the case, allowing for a comprehensive exploration of the unique aspects of the critical instance.

Topic: Impact of innovative teaching methods on student engagement in a rural school

• Objective: Investigating how the implementation of project-based learning in a rural primary school affects student engagement and learning outcomes.
• Case: A primary school in a rural area that has recently implemented project-based learning across all grades.
• Result: Detailed analysis of the challenges and successes of implementing innovative teaching methods in a resource-constrained environment, highlighting the role of community support and teacher adaptability in fostering positive educational outcomes and results.

Cumulative case studies

A cumulative case study involves aggregating information from several sites collected at different times. The goal is to collect past studies to increase generalization without costing more time or money on new, possibly repetitive studies. It synthesizes findings from multiple cases over adequate time to understand a broader phenomenon or to identify patterns and trends. These studies are chosen because their cumulative evidence can provide a more convincing and comprehensive insight into a subject of interest, supporting or contradicting theoretical assumptions through a wider lens of observation.

• Aggregates findings from different cases and existing sources to uncover common themes.
• Specifically, valuable for integrating and comparing data from already studied situations.
• Case selection based on whether they can compare and contrast multiple instances.
• Employs both qualitative and quantitative methods, facilitating a more comprehensive analysis.
• Strike a balance between diversity and the potential for generalization.
• Comprehensive synthesis: This approach aims to synthesize data across multiple instances, offering a broader perspective on the subject matter that highlights commonalities and differences.
• Pattern identification: By examining various cases collectively, this approach seeks to identify underlying patterns, trends, and themes that might not be apparent in single case study research.
• Cost-effectiveness: Accumulating evidence from existing studies, allows for a more resource-efficient way to gain a wide-ranging understanding. Thereby, the expenses and time of conducting new, individual studies can also be avoided.

Topic: Effectiveness of remote learning across different socio-economic backgrounds

• Objective: Analyzing how remote learning during school closures impacted students’ academic performance across various socio-economic backgrounds.
• Cases: Multiple schools from diverse socio-economic areas that implemented remote learning during the same period.
• Result: A comparative analysis revealing patterns of engagement, accessibility issues, and academic outcomes, highlighting the importance of addressing equity in access to technology and learning resources.

Descriptive case studies

A descriptive case study, a process-oriented case study, is a research approach focused on providing a detailed account and analysis of a specific case (or cases) within its real-life context. Unlike other types of case studies that might seek to test hypotheses or understand causal relationships, descriptive research aims to document the unique characteristics, conditions, processes, and outcomes of the case in question. The primary goal is to describe the phenomenon in depth and detail, offering a comprehensive understanding of the context and variables involved.

• Captures the nuances, providing a rich, detailed description that covers various aspects.
• Considers the environment of the case, recognizing the context’s significant influences.
• Employs a mixed-methods case study approach using qualitative and quantitative data.
• Identifies patterns that may inform future research, like hypotheses for causal research or theories.
• Illustrates a particular phenomenon within its real-world context, providing valuable insights.
• Comprehensive documentation: It provides an exhaustive description of a case, which involves documenting contexts, processes, and results, aiming to capture complexities.
• Insightful understanding: Descriptive case studies shed light on how and why things happen under specific circumstances through detailed examination. Their detailed outcomes help to inform practice, policy, or further research.
• Pattern identification: While not primarily focusing on hypothesis testing or theory development, descriptive research often suggests areas for further research by identifying patterns.

Topic: The role of community gardens in urban food security

• Objective: Exploring the impact of community gardens on food security in urban areas extensively, seeking to understand how the gardens contribute to the availability and accessibility of fresh produce for residents.
• Cases: Three community gardens that are located in different urban neighborhoods, each with varying levels of access to supermarkets or fresh food markets.
• Result: Detailed description and comparison of each garden’s operation, community involvement, challenges faced, and the benefits realized in terms of food security, emphasizing the importance of community leadership, support from local organizations, and adaptability of garden practices to local needs.

Explanatory case studies

Similar to the descriptive type, an explanatory case study is also a process-oriented case study, that seeks to explain the underlying mechanisms or reasons behind a particular phenomenon or set of outcomes within its real-life context. Unlike descriptive case studies, which focus primarily on providing a detailed account of a specific case, explanatory case studies aim to uncover how and why certain events occur, offering insights into causal pathways and processes leading to a particular outcome.

• Process-oriented case study that explores the causal mechanisms that lead to certain outcomes.
• Allows researchers to examine complex real-life contexts in their natural setting.
• Uses multiple sources of evidence, like qualitative data and sometimes quantitative data.
• Frequently employs existing theoretical framework to guide their analysis and explain findings.
• Contributes to the development and refinement of theoretical concepts, offering practical insights.
• Uncovering causal relationships: It explores the causal mechanisms that lead to certain outcomes within a case or across cases, seeking to elucidate the processes and factors that contribute to the studied topic.
• Theory development: This type of case study can be employed to test existing theories in new contexts or to refine and develop new theoretical frameworks based on its findings.
• Informing policy and practice: Provides valuable insights that can inform policy-making, strategy, and practical interventions, emphasizing its applicability to real-world challenges.

Topic: Impact of remote work on employee productivity and well-being

• Objective: Aiming to explain the causal relationships between remote work and its effects on employee productivity and well-being, seeking to uncover the mechanisms through which remote work influences these outcomes and to identify the conditions under which the effects are most pronounced.
• Cases: Examining three companies in different industries, technology, finance, and education, that implemented long-term remote work arrangements as a response to external factors like the global pandemic.
• Result: The comparative analysis reveals that the presence of supportive digital infrastructure, degree of flexibility in work arrangements, and opportunities for informal interactions are critical factors influencing the outcome of remote work policies, suggesting that it can enhance the productivity and well-being of employees.

Exploratory case studies

Exploratory case studies are qualitative research methods used to conduct preliminary projects for little-understood phenomena to develop hypotheses and establish research priorities. Unlike explanatory or descriptive case studies that aim to explain the aspects of specific cases, exploratory case studies are often conducted when a problem is not clearly defined, and there is a need for further investigation to understand the context.

• Serves as an initial step in researching a new area, gathering as much information as possible.
• Flexible research design, allowing for adjustments as new insights are gained in the process.
• Generates hypotheses or theories that can be applied and tested in further research.
• Relies on qualitative data collection methods to gain an understanding of the case in real-life context.
• Foundation for explanatory studies, experimental designs , or large-scale quantitative research.
• Comprehensive understanding : Aims to gain a clear understanding of the studied phenomenon, especially when it is new, complex, or not well defined.
• Generating hypotheses: Through detailed observation, data collection, and analysis, it is geared towards generating hypotheses or theories about the phenomenon.
• Research priorities: Determines which aspects of the case merit further research by uncovering the most significant issues, challenges, or opportunities in association.

Topic: The adoption of virtual reality (VR) technologies in higher education

• Objective: Aiming to explore how and why higher education institutions are adopting VR technologies for teaching and learning purposes. The study seeks to understand the motivations, processes, challenges, and initial impacts of VR adoption on pedagogical practices and student engagement.
• Cases: Examining three universities that have recently integrated VR technologies into their curriculum, each representing a different approach such as for enhancing engineering and architecture courses, medical and healthcare training, and art and history courses.
• Result: The exploratory research uncovers various motivations, such as the desire to enhance student learning experiences, improve student engagement, and prepare students for future technological landscapes. Challenges identified across the cases include technical issues, high costs or implementation, and the need for faculty training and support.

Illustrative case studies

An illustrative case study primarily describes and demonstrates a particular phenomenon in a detailed and understandable way. It utilizes a descriptive approach, aiming to make the unfamiliar familiar by providing concrete examples that illuminate broader themes or issues. This type of case study is primarily used to provide insight into and highlight specific aspects of a research problem, helping to convey the complexities of real-life situations through the detailed examination of one or more instances.

• Provides a comprehensive description of the phenomenon that occurs within the case(s) being studied.
• Used as educational tools in various fields to help visualize complex theories and concepts.
• Simplifies particular points within a larger analysis, supporting the understanding of broader principles.
• Presents complex issues in a clear and accessible manner by focusing on specific instances.
• Primarily descriptive research, but also serves as a preliminary step towards further research.
• Clarification of complex phenomena: Aims to break down complex processes, making them more understandable by providing a detailed view.
• Introduction of issues: Introduces common and uncommon issues through detailed storytelling, shedding light on specific challenges or successes.
• Theory development: Enhances theoretical knowledge by providing concrete examples that support or exemplify theoretical concepts or frameworks.

Topic: Digital transformation in small businesses during the Covid-19 pandemic

• Objective: Aiming to illustrate the strategies and challenges small businesses faced while undergoing digital transformation due to the pandemic by highlighting how these businesses adapted to the sudden need for digital operations, the impact of these changes on their operations, and the lessons learned throughout.
• Case A: A family-owned restaurant that transitioned to online orders and delivery.
• Case B: A local bookstore that implemented an e-commerce platform for online sales and virtual book clubs.
• Case C: A small fitness studio that shifted to offering online workout classes.
• Result: The collective insights from these cases demonstrate the critical role of digital literacy, the need for flexible business models, and the importance of maintaining customer relationships during the transition. Conclusively, the study findings underscore the potential of digital transformation to not only sustain small businesses during crises but also to catalyze growth and innovation.

Instrumental case studies

An instrumental case study is an individual case study, focusing on a single subject to gain a broader understanding of a phenomenon. In contrast to other types of case studies that aim to describe or explain the case in great detail, instrumental case studies use the particular case as an instrument to understand something else. In other words, the case merely plays a supportive role in facilitating insight into larger issues or refining theoretical concepts.

• The case allows for thorough exploration and understanding of the broader phenomenon at hand.
• Instrumental case studies aim to extend findings beyond the case to address a broader issue.
• The research questions are framed to explore the broader phenomenon rather than just the specifics.
• Uses multiple sources of data and data collection methods within a real-life context.
• Develops theories by examining the representation of the broader issues in the specific case.
• Broader insights into particular issues: Uses the specific case as a vehicle to explain a broader phenomenon, contributing to refining theoretical frameworks.
• Informs policy or practice: Provides valuable insights that can guide decision-making processes that address the complexities of real-world situations.
• Identifies patterns: Explores the case in-depth to identify patterns that may apply to similar contexts by a detailed assessment of the case as a representative instance.

Topic: Integration of technology in high school education

• Objective: Aiming to explore the effect of integrating technology into high school education on student engagement and academic performance to understand how the use of technology and digital platforms can enhance the learning experience, foster engagement, and improve outcomes in high school settings.
• Cases: Examining three specific classrooms, such as science, literature, and mathematics, within the same high school that is known for integrating technology across all subject areas.
• Result: The study findings reveal that technology integration, when effectively implemented, significantly enhances student engagement and academic performance across the various subject areas. Thereby, it underscores the importance of strategic planning, professional development for teachers, and the selection of appropriate technological tools that align with educational objectives.

Intrinsic case studies

As opposed to instrumental case studies that aim to understand a broader phenomenon beyond the case, an intrinsic case study primarily focuses on the case itself. An intrinsic case study is selected not because it is representative of other cases, but because it presents a unique phenomenon that is worth exploring thoroughly on its own merits. In other words, an intrinsic case study is used when a case is revealing, distinctive, or intriguing in a way that warrants detailed examination.

• An intrinsic case study focuses on the idiosyncrasies and specifics of a case due to its uniqueness.
• Captures the essence with a profound description of the case’s contexts, processes, and outcomes.
• The insights gained from intrinsic case studies can be primarily applied to the case itself.
• Understanding the case from various perspectives, involving a flexible research process.
• Intrinsic case studies primarily use qualitative research methods to gather rich and contextual data.
• Insight into the particular case: Aims to gain a deep understanding of the case for its own sake by focusing on the uniqueness and complexities of the case.
• Explorative and interpretative: Delves into outstanding features, challenges, conditions, and opportunities of the case to uncover its distinct intricacies.
• Contribution to theories: Through the detailed study of the case, patterns may be determined that offer insights, resonating with wider concepts or theories.

Topic: Transformation of a historic library into a community hub

• Objective: Aiming to explore the transformation of a historic library in a small town into a vibrant community hub by focusing on this particular library due to its unique position in the community’s history, architectural heritage, and the innovative approach it has taken to evolve beyond traditional library services.
• Case: It revolves around the Elmwood Library, built in the early 1900s and known for its architectural significance and deep-rooted place in the town’s history. Over time, its role and relevance faced challenges due to digitalization and the change in community needs. Thus, the study examines the redefinition of becoming a community hub of the library, focusing on digital access, community engagement, and preservation of historical essence.
• Result: The study findings uncover the multifaceted impact of Elmwood Library’s transformation by highlighting the successful navigation of its historical preservation alongside modernization to meet current community needs. Key outcomes include increased community engagement, enhanced digital literacy, and the library’s role in fostering a sense of communal identity.

When to perform a case study

A case study is the right research method for examining and gaining precise, contextual insights about a real-world problem or scenario. It gives researchers a method of studying the main characteristics, definitions, and inferences about a specific individual, group, event, or organization. The decision whether to perform a case study should be driven by the nature of the research question, objectives, and the value of gaining a contextualized understanding of the issues at hand.  The following illustrates a few scenarios and research objectives that typically warrant the use of a case study.

Complex phenomenon

Rare & unique cases, testing & generating theories.

When the goal is to explore a complex phenomenon in detail, particularly within its real-life context, case studies serve as ideal methods for investigating and explaining multifaceted issues thoroughly.

Case study research is also relevant to conduct to examine rare or unique conditions that are not easily replicated or found in larger populations. Examples are studying a rare disease, unique institution, or significant event.

When you test theoretical models or hypotheses within real-life contexts, case studies allow you to observe how theoretical principles play out in practice, providing valuable insights into the applicability and limitations of these theories. Case studies also assist in generating new theories because existing theories do not adequately explain a phenomenon. They can identify patterns and relationships that lead to the formulation of new theoretical propositions through elaborate analysis.

Teaching and policy development

Prospective case studies, multifaceted approach.

Case studies are often relevant to use in educational settings to provide real-life examples for students to analyze. They are particularly valuable for policymakers and practitioners seeking an in-depth understanding of a scenario to inform decision-making processes.

Prospective case studies have the main objective of observing changes over an adequate time period within a specific context or group. Thus, prospective case studies are suitable for conducting research over extended periods to track developments, understand cause-and-effect relationships, and observe the impact of interventions.

Case studies are also relevant for research that benefits from a multi-perspective analysis, as they enable the use of multiple data sources and methods such as interviews, observations, and document analysis to provide a comprehensive view of the studied subject.

Conducting a case study

The process of conducting a case study can be divided into five crucial stages such as defining the case(s), selecting the case(s), collecting and analysis of data, interpreting data, and reporting the findings.

Defining the case(s)

Defining the case(s) for a case study involves specifying the unit of analysis or the main entity that you are investigating. This stage is crucial as it sets the boundaries of what is to be studied, guiding the focus of the research, and shaping the research questions, data collection, and analysis. A well-defined case is essential for ensuring the research is manageable, coherent, and capable of addressing the objectives effectively. It also requires a clear understanding of the purpose of the study research, context, and perspectives from which it will be explored.

In terms of the nature of the case, you must clarify whether the case is a group, organization, individual, event, or geographical unit. This in turn will affect the type of data and evidence that will be collected and further affect the interpretation of results. In addition to this, the scope of the case determines the time period and geographical boundaries.

Selecting the case

Selecting the case is a crucial stage, as it significantly influences the research questions, problem statement , depth of the research, and potential contribution to existing knowledge. Thus, it is imperative to choose a specific focus to ground your research. Key considerations in selecting the case are:

• Clearly define what you want to achieve with your case study; What are the research objectives?
• Determine the type of case study, as this will influence the type of case you select.
• Develop criteria that the case must meet to ensure it is suitable for your study.
• Identify cases that may have rich potential for contributing to your research objectives.
• Assess the potential cases against your selection criteria by considering the pros and cons.
• Offer the potential to answer your research questions, meet the aims, and ensure access to data.
• Justify how the case meets your selection criteria and how it will assist in reaching the research objectives.
• Ensure the case adheres to ethical considerations , like consent and confidentiality.
• Consider the feasibility of conducting the case such as resources, adequate time, and access to information.

Case studies usually focus on outliers rather than deliberate sampling techniques. Thus, they often do not require representative cases or random samples before research.

Collecting and analysis of data

For a case study approach, data is typically collected systematically, gathering detailed and comprehensive information that will support the analysis and conclusion of the study. This stage of the process is essential, as the relevance of the data impacts the depth and internal validity of the case study findings.

Case studies often employ multiple data sources or methods (data triangulation) that are primarily qualitative. Common methods include semi-structured interviews or structured interviews , direct observations , analyzing relevant documents, focus groups , or audiovisual materials. These types of qualitative methods can undergo thematic analysis , coding, or narrative analysis , depending on their relevance.

In some cases, quantitative methods are used to complement qualitative data to provide a broader understanding of the case study and enhance internal validity. These methods involve surveys and questionnaires or existing data sets that are relevant to the study for secondary data analysis. For these, you can employ, e.g., statistical analysis or trend analysis. Utilizing a mixed-methods case study approach offers the opportunity to provide a deeper and elaborate overview of the study.

Theoretical framework and interpreting data

Case studies overlook general theories in favor of specific details. A theoretical framework serves as the foundation that navigates every aspect of the study, ranging from data collection to data analysis and assists in interpreting findings within a broader context. Understanding its application in interpreting data is crucial for creating meaningful and impactful research.

The theoretical framework entails a variety of interrelated concepts and theories that guide your research, determining what will be measured and what statistical relationships may be looked for. It provides a general set of principles, explanations, and definitions that help organize the entire research process. A theoretical framework can be used to:

• Challenge an existing theory by investigating deviance that is not considered in the universal assumptions.
• Expand on established theories by proposing new ideas that should be included.
• Exemplify a given theory by showing the relationship between the case and the theory.
• Explain the theory for your research, grounding your study in a conceptual context.
• Guide the research question , influencing the research design, including what data to collect and interpret.
• Assist in identifying the limits to those generalizations your study can and cannot make.
• Provide a rationale for your research, indicating why it is a worthwhile contribution to knowledge.

Reporting findings

Reporting the findings of your case study poses one of the last crucial stages of finalizing your study. It involves presenting your data and analyses in a structured and compelling way and requires careful consideration of your audience, whether they are academics, industry professionals, or other stakeholders. This section is the heart of your report and should be given careful attention. Here is a short overview of the structure of reporting findings.

• Organize by theme or research question
• Support the findings with evidence from your data
• Incorporate tables, graphs, and charts to visualize data
• Present detailed narratives of events and processes clearly

For effective reporting, aim for clear and concise expression, explaining complex concepts clearly, and avoiding unnecessary jargon. Also, maintaining consistency in terms of formatting and presentation style throughout the report is vital to keeping academic integrity. Keep in mind that the goal fo your case study report is not just to present your findings, but to communicate their significance and implications effectively. Thus, tailoring your report to your audience in an engaging manner, will draw the reader into the study and thereby, enhance its impact and value.

Pros and cons

Case studies can take on the shapes of at least four research designs and can be associated with an array of types, each leading to different applications. Nonetheless, understanding their unique epistemological and ontological assumptions is important for the substantial methodological differences, they entail. The following table outlines the general benefits and limitations of using a case study for your research.

What are the four key sections of a case study?

A case study entails at least four sections:

• Introduction
• Body: background information, explaining the purpose, presenting the findings

What is the case study method in research?

The case study method is an in-depth investigation of a research subject, individual, or group. It is a focused research method that analyzes the causes and consequences of a specific phenomenon. A case study facilitates the exploration of a real-life issues within a defined context, using multiple date sources.

What are the types of case study?

Here is a list of the types of case studies:

• Comparative
• Critical instance
• Descriptive
• Explanatory
• Exploratory
• Illustrative
• Instrumental

What are examples of case studies?

Case studies are widely used in psychology and clinical contexts, analyzing rare or unique conditions. Popular ones are:

• Phineas Gage (the man who hat a railway spike through his head) – John Martin Marlow
• Little Hans and The Rat Man – Sigmund Freud

What is a case study in psychology?

In psychology, it is typically an individual case study, focusing on a single person, community, or event that relies on data in clinical contexts drawn from psychometric testing, observations, interviews, experiments, and existing case studies.

What are the limitations of a case study?

Case studies are often criticized for their subjectivity, bias, or lack of rigor, as they typically rely heavily on the researcher’s interpretations and selection of data, which is often influences by personal views, preferences, or assumptions.

They did such an excellent job printing my dissertation! I got it fast and...

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential, while others help us to improve this website and your experience.

• External Media

Individual Privacy Preferences

Cookie Details Privacy Policy Imprint

Here you will find an overview of all cookies used. You can give your consent to whole categories or display further information and select certain cookies.

Accept all Save

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.

Show Cookie Information Hide Cookie Information

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.

Content from video platforms and social media platforms is blocked by default. If External Media cookies are accepted, access to those contents no longer requires manual consent.

Privacy Policy Imprint

What Is The Purpose Of A Case Study?

A case study serves the purpose of deeply examining a specific subject or phenomenon within its real-life context. By meticulously analyzing a single case in detail, researchers aim to gain a comprehensive understanding of the complexities, nuances, and dynamics involved in the subject matter under investigation. Case studies offer a unique opportunity to explore and elucidate how various factors interact and influence outcomes, providing valuable insights that can inform theories, practices, and decision-making processes within academic disciplines and professional fields alike. They offer a means to investigate rare or exceptional situations, shed light on causal processes, and generate rich empirical data, all of which contribute to the advancement of knowledge and understanding.

Table of Contents

Definition of a case study

A case study is a research strategy that involves an in-depth examination of a particular individual, group, organization, or event. It aims to provide comprehensive and detailed insights into the chosen subject of study, delving into the complexities of real-life situations. A case study typically involves multiple data sources, including interviews, observations, documents, and other relevant materials. The findings of a case study can be used to generate insights, develop solutions, and inform decision-making processes.

Importance of case studies

Case studies hold significant importance in various academic fields, including psychology, sociology, business, and medicine, among others. They provide researchers with a unique opportunity to explore complex phenomena in their natural settings, allowing for a thorough understanding of real-life situations. Furthermore, case studies enable researchers to test and refine theories, explore new perspectives, and generate knowledge that can be applied in practical contexts. They also help bridge the gap between theory and practice, offering practitioners valuable insights and lessons learned.

Understanding the Problem

Identifying the research question.

Before embarking on a case study, it is crucial to identify a clear research question that will guide the investigation. The research question should be specific, focused, and relevant to the field of study. It should address an existing knowledge gap or seek to uncover new insights. The research question will serve as a compass throughout the case study, ensuring that the investigation remains focused and coherent.

Exploring the background and context

To fully understand the problem at hand, it is essential to explore the background and context surrounding the chosen case study subject. This involves gathering information about the historical, social, economic, and cultural factors that may influence the subject. By comprehensively examining the context, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the complexities and dynamics involved, allowing for a more nuanced analysis of the case.

Research Design

Choosing the case study approach.

When designing a case study, researchers must choose the appropriate approach that aligns with the research question and objectives. There are several types of case study approaches, including exploratory, explanatory, and descriptive. Exploratory case studies aim to generate hypotheses and explore new areas of research. Explanatory case studies seek to determine cause-and-effect relationships. Descriptive case studies aim to provide a detailed account of a specific phenomenon. The chosen approach will shape the overall research design and methodology.

Selecting the appropriate case

Selecting the appropriate case for study is a critical decision that impacts the validity and generalizability of the findings. Researchers must consider various factors when selecting a case, such as relevance, uniqueness, and feasibility. The case should be relevant to the research question and offer valuable insights into the phenomena of interest. It should also possess unique characteristics or features that make it worthy of investigation. Additionally, the feasibility of accessing data and conducting the study should be carefully evaluated.

Data Collection

Determining data sources.

Data sources play a crucial role in case study research. These sources can include interviews, observations, documents, archival records, and other relevant materials. Typically, a combination of primary and secondary data sources is used to provide a comprehensive understanding of the case. Primary data sources involve firsthand information collected directly from participants or through direct observations. Secondary data sources involve pre-existing information that is analyzed in relation to the case study.

Collecting primary data

Collecting primary data involves engaging with participants or observing the case firsthand. This can be achieved through various methods, such as interviews, focus groups, surveys, or participant observation. Interviews allow researchers to gather detailed information and explore participants’ perspectives, experiences, and motivations. Focus groups provide a platform for participants to engage in group discussions and share insights. Surveys offer a structured way to collect data from a larger sample. Participant observation involves immersing oneself in the case study environment to directly observe and record behaviors and interactions.

Gathering secondary data

Secondary data sources complement primary data and enhance the richness of the case study. These sources include existing documents, archival records, scholarly articles, industry reports, and other relevant materials. Researchers must carefully select and analyze secondary data, ensuring it aligns with the research question and complements the primary data. A thorough examination of secondary data can contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the case and provide historical or background contextual information.

Data Analysis

Applying data analysis techniques.

Data analysis is a crucial step in case study research and involves transforming raw data into meaningful insights. Various data analysis techniques can be employed, including thematic analysis, content analysis, narrative analysis, and statistical analysis, among others. Thematic analysis involves identifying and categorizing themes or patterns within the data. Content analysis focuses on identifying and analyzing specific words, phrases, or concepts within the data. Narrative analysis seeks to uncover the underlying stories and narratives that emerge from the data. Statistical analysis involves quantifying and analyzing numerical data.

Identifying patterns and themes

During the data analysis process, researchers must carefully examine the data to identify patterns, themes, and relationships. This involves organizing and categorizing the data based on recurring ideas, concepts, or patterns that emerge. By identifying these patterns and themes, researchers can gain insights into the relationships and dynamics present in the case study. It allows for a deeper understanding of the complexities and nuances within the data and supports the generation of meaningful conclusions.

Generating Insights

Linking findings to research question.

The findings derived from the data analysis should be linked back to the research question and objectives of the case study. It is essential to establish the relevance and significance of the findings in relation to the original research question. By establishing this link, researchers can validate the findings and ensure their alignment with the objectives of the study. This step is crucial for generating insights that contribute to the existing knowledge base and address the research question effectively.

Drawing meaningful conclusions

Drawing meaningful conclusions from the case study involves synthesizing the key findings and deriving insights from the analysis. Researchers must critically evaluate the findings, considering their strengths and limitations, and interpret them in light of the research question and relevant literature. The conclusions should be justified and supported by empirical evidence. Meaningful conclusions will contribute to a deeper understanding of the case, provide practical implications, and pave the way for further research or the development of solutions.

Developing Solutions

Identifying potential solutions.

Based on the insights generated from the case study, researchers can identify potential solutions to the problem at hand. These solutions should be grounded in empirical evidence and address the key issues identified through the research. It is crucial to consider multiple perspectives and approaches when identifying potential solutions, evaluating their feasibility, effectiveness, and ethical implications. The solutions should align with the objectives of the case study and offer practical recommendations for addressing the problem.

Evaluating feasibility and effectiveness

After identifying potential solutions, it is important to evaluate their feasibility and effectiveness. This involves considering the resources, constraints, and practical implications associated with implementing the proposed solutions. Feasibility assessment involves evaluating whether the proposed solutions can be realistically implemented within the given context, timeframe, and available resources. Effectiveness evaluation involves assessing the potential impact of the solutions and their ability to address the identified problem.

Knowledge Application

Informing decision-making.

The findings and insights derived from a case study can be instrumental in informing decision-making processes. Decision-makers can draw upon the knowledge generated through the case study to make informed choices and develop strategies. The detailed analysis of the case, combined with the empirical evidence and practical implications, provides decision-makers with valuable insights and evidence-based recommendations. By utilizing the knowledge gained from case studies, decision-makers can optimize outcomes and enhance the effectiveness of their decisions.

Sharing lessons learned

Case studies also serve as a valuable source of knowledge dissemination. Sharing the lessons learned from a case study can benefit researchers, practitioners, academics, and other stakeholders in the field. By presenting the findings, insights, and recommendations, case studies contribute to the existing knowledge base, spark further discussions, and inspire new research. Sharing lessons learned facilitates the exchange of ideas, promotes collaboration, and supports ongoing learning and development within the respective field.

Strengths and Limitations

Highlighting advantages of case studies.

Case studies offer various advantages as a research method. They provide researchers with the opportunity to explore real-life phenomena in their natural context, offering a deep understanding of complex situations. Case studies can generate rich and detailed data, allowing for in-depth analysis and insights. They also provide a holistic perspective, considering multiple factors and variables. Case studies are particularly useful for exploring complex and dynamic phenomena that cannot be easily captured through quantitative methods.

Addressing potential biases

Like any research method, case studies are not without limitations. One potential limitation is the presence of biases in the data collection and analysis process. Researchers must be aware of their own biases and take steps to minimize their influence on the findings. To address this limitation, researchers can engage in reflexivity, seeking to critically evaluate their own perspectives and assumptions throughout the research process. Additionally, triangulation, the use of multiple data sources and perspectives, can help mitigate potential biases and enhance the validity of the findings.

Promoting Further Research

Building on existing knowledge.

Case studies often uncover new areas of research and generate additional questions for further investigation. Researchers can build on existing knowledge by exploring gaps identified through the case study and proposing new research avenues. The in-depth analysis and insights gained from the case study can inform the development of hypotheses or theories, which can then be tested through quantitative research methods. By building on existing knowledge, researchers contribute to the advancement of the field and foster ongoing exploration and discovery.

Exploring new perspectives

Case studies provide an opportunity to explore new perspectives and alternative approaches to understanding a phenomenon. Researchers can use the detailed analysis and insights gained from a case study to challenge existing theories or assumptions and propose new perspectives. This exploration of new perspectives can lead to innovative insights and alternative explanations for complex phenomena. By embracing diverse perspectives and exploring new avenues, researchers can push the boundaries of knowledge and stimulate new lines of inquiry.

In conclusion, case studies serve as a valuable research strategy for gaining an in-depth understanding of complex phenomena. By employing a systematic approach for each stage of the case study process, researchers can ensure rigor, validity, and relevance to the research question. Case studies have the potential to generate rich insights, inform decision-making, and contribute to the existing knowledge base within various academic fields. However, it is important to acknowledge the strengths and limitations of case studies and continually strive to promote further research and exploration of new perspectives.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Open access
• Published: 27 June 2011

The case study approach

• Sarah Crowe 1 ,
• Kathrin Cresswell 2 ,
• Ann Robertson 2 ,
• Guro Huby 3 ,
• Anthony Avery 1 &
• Aziz Sheikh 2  

BMC Medical Research Methodology volume  11 , Article number:  100 ( 2011 ) Cite this article

796k Accesses

1111 Citations

42 Altmetric

Metrics details

The case study approach allows in-depth, multi-faceted explorations of complex issues in their real-life settings. The value of the case study approach is well recognised in the fields of business, law and policy, but somewhat less so in health services research. Based on our experiences of conducting several health-related case studies, we reflect on the different types of case study design, the specific research questions this approach can help answer, the data sources that tend to be used, and the particular advantages and disadvantages of employing this methodological approach. The paper concludes with key pointers to aid those designing and appraising proposals for conducting case study research, and a checklist to help readers assess the quality of case study reports.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The case study approach is particularly useful to employ when there is a need to obtain an in-depth appreciation of an issue, event or phenomenon of interest, in its natural real-life context. Our aim in writing this piece is to provide insights into when to consider employing this approach and an overview of key methodological considerations in relation to the design, planning, analysis, interpretation and reporting of case studies.

The illustrative 'grand round', 'case report' and 'case series' have a long tradition in clinical practice and research. Presenting detailed critiques, typically of one or more patients, aims to provide insights into aspects of the clinical case and, in doing so, illustrate broader lessons that may be learnt. In research, the conceptually-related case study approach can be used, for example, to describe in detail a patient's episode of care, explore professional attitudes to and experiences of a new policy initiative or service development or more generally to 'investigate contemporary phenomena within its real-life context' [ 1 ]. Based on our experiences of conducting a range of case studies, we reflect on when to consider using this approach, discuss the key steps involved and illustrate, with examples, some of the practical challenges of attaining an in-depth understanding of a 'case' as an integrated whole. In keeping with previously published work, we acknowledge the importance of theory to underpin the design, selection, conduct and interpretation of case studies[ 2 ]. In so doing, we make passing reference to the different epistemological approaches used in case study research by key theoreticians and methodologists in this field of enquiry.

This paper is structured around the following main questions: What is a case study? What are case studies used for? How are case studies conducted? What are the potential pitfalls and how can these be avoided? We draw in particular on four of our own recently published examples of case studies (see Tables 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 ) and those of others to illustrate our discussion[ 3 – 7 ].

What is a case study?

A case study is a research approach that is used to generate an in-depth, multi-faceted understanding of a complex issue in its real-life context. It is an established research design that is used extensively in a wide variety of disciplines, particularly in the social sciences. A case study can be defined in a variety of ways (Table 5 ), the central tenet being the need to explore an event or phenomenon in depth and in its natural context. It is for this reason sometimes referred to as a "naturalistic" design; this is in contrast to an "experimental" design (such as a randomised controlled trial) in which the investigator seeks to exert control over and manipulate the variable(s) of interest.

Stake's work has been particularly influential in defining the case study approach to scientific enquiry. He has helpfully characterised three main types of case study: intrinsic , instrumental and collective [ 8 ]. An intrinsic case study is typically undertaken to learn about a unique phenomenon. The researcher should define the uniqueness of the phenomenon, which distinguishes it from all others. In contrast, the instrumental case study uses a particular case (some of which may be better than others) to gain a broader appreciation of an issue or phenomenon. The collective case study involves studying multiple cases simultaneously or sequentially in an attempt to generate a still broader appreciation of a particular issue.

These are however not necessarily mutually exclusive categories. In the first of our examples (Table 1 ), we undertook an intrinsic case study to investigate the issue of recruitment of minority ethnic people into the specific context of asthma research studies, but it developed into a instrumental case study through seeking to understand the issue of recruitment of these marginalised populations more generally, generating a number of the findings that are potentially transferable to other disease contexts[ 3 ]. In contrast, the other three examples (see Tables 2 , 3 and 4 ) employed collective case study designs to study the introduction of workforce reconfiguration in primary care, the implementation of electronic health records into hospitals, and to understand the ways in which healthcare students learn about patient safety considerations[ 4 – 6 ]. Although our study focusing on the introduction of General Practitioners with Specialist Interests (Table 2 ) was explicitly collective in design (four contrasting primary care organisations were studied), is was also instrumental in that this particular professional group was studied as an exemplar of the more general phenomenon of workforce redesign[ 4 ].

What are case studies used for?

According to Yin, case studies can be used to explain, describe or explore events or phenomena in the everyday contexts in which they occur[ 1 ]. These can, for example, help to understand and explain causal links and pathways resulting from a new policy initiative or service development (see Tables 2 and 3 , for example)[ 1 ]. In contrast to experimental designs, which seek to test a specific hypothesis through deliberately manipulating the environment (like, for example, in a randomised controlled trial giving a new drug to randomly selected individuals and then comparing outcomes with controls),[ 9 ] the case study approach lends itself well to capturing information on more explanatory ' how ', 'what' and ' why ' questions, such as ' how is the intervention being implemented and received on the ground?'. The case study approach can offer additional insights into what gaps exist in its delivery or why one implementation strategy might be chosen over another. This in turn can help develop or refine theory, as shown in our study of the teaching of patient safety in undergraduate curricula (Table 4 )[ 6 , 10 ]. Key questions to consider when selecting the most appropriate study design are whether it is desirable or indeed possible to undertake a formal experimental investigation in which individuals and/or organisations are allocated to an intervention or control arm? Or whether the wish is to obtain a more naturalistic understanding of an issue? The former is ideally studied using a controlled experimental design, whereas the latter is more appropriately studied using a case study design.

Case studies may be approached in different ways depending on the epistemological standpoint of the researcher, that is, whether they take a critical (questioning one's own and others' assumptions), interpretivist (trying to understand individual and shared social meanings) or positivist approach (orientating towards the criteria of natural sciences, such as focusing on generalisability considerations) (Table 6 ). Whilst such a schema can be conceptually helpful, it may be appropriate to draw on more than one approach in any case study, particularly in the context of conducting health services research. Doolin has, for example, noted that in the context of undertaking interpretative case studies, researchers can usefully draw on a critical, reflective perspective which seeks to take into account the wider social and political environment that has shaped the case[ 11 ].

How are case studies conducted?

Here, we focus on the main stages of research activity when planning and undertaking a case study; the crucial stages are: defining the case; selecting the case(s); collecting and analysing the data; interpreting data; and reporting the findings.

Defining the case

Carefully formulated research question(s), informed by the existing literature and a prior appreciation of the theoretical issues and setting(s), are all important in appropriately and succinctly defining the case[ 8 , 12 ]. Crucially, each case should have a pre-defined boundary which clarifies the nature and time period covered by the case study (i.e. its scope, beginning and end), the relevant social group, organisation or geographical area of interest to the investigator, the types of evidence to be collected, and the priorities for data collection and analysis (see Table 7 )[ 1 ]. A theory driven approach to defining the case may help generate knowledge that is potentially transferable to a range of clinical contexts and behaviours; using theory is also likely to result in a more informed appreciation of, for example, how and why interventions have succeeded or failed[ 13 ].

For example, in our evaluation of the introduction of electronic health records in English hospitals (Table 3 ), we defined our cases as the NHS Trusts that were receiving the new technology[ 5 ]. Our focus was on how the technology was being implemented. However, if the primary research interest had been on the social and organisational dimensions of implementation, we might have defined our case differently as a grouping of healthcare professionals (e.g. doctors and/or nurses). The precise beginning and end of the case may however prove difficult to define. Pursuing this same example, when does the process of implementation and adoption of an electronic health record system really begin or end? Such judgements will inevitably be influenced by a range of factors, including the research question, theory of interest, the scope and richness of the gathered data and the resources available to the research team.

Selecting the case(s)

The decision on how to select the case(s) to study is a very important one that merits some reflection. In an intrinsic case study, the case is selected on its own merits[ 8 ]. The case is selected not because it is representative of other cases, but because of its uniqueness, which is of genuine interest to the researchers. This was, for example, the case in our study of the recruitment of minority ethnic participants into asthma research (Table 1 ) as our earlier work had demonstrated the marginalisation of minority ethnic people with asthma, despite evidence of disproportionate asthma morbidity[ 14 , 15 ]. In another example of an intrinsic case study, Hellstrom et al.[ 16 ] studied an elderly married couple living with dementia to explore how dementia had impacted on their understanding of home, their everyday life and their relationships.

For an instrumental case study, selecting a "typical" case can work well[ 8 ]. In contrast to the intrinsic case study, the particular case which is chosen is of less importance than selecting a case that allows the researcher to investigate an issue or phenomenon. For example, in order to gain an understanding of doctors' responses to health policy initiatives, Som undertook an instrumental case study interviewing clinicians who had a range of responsibilities for clinical governance in one NHS acute hospital trust[ 17 ]. Sampling a "deviant" or "atypical" case may however prove even more informative, potentially enabling the researcher to identify causal processes, generate hypotheses and develop theory.

In collective or multiple case studies, a number of cases are carefully selected. This offers the advantage of allowing comparisons to be made across several cases and/or replication. Choosing a "typical" case may enable the findings to be generalised to theory (i.e. analytical generalisation) or to test theory by replicating the findings in a second or even a third case (i.e. replication logic)[ 1 ]. Yin suggests two or three literal replications (i.e. predicting similar results) if the theory is straightforward and five or more if the theory is more subtle. However, critics might argue that selecting 'cases' in this way is insufficiently reflexive and ill-suited to the complexities of contemporary healthcare organisations.

The selected case study site(s) should allow the research team access to the group of individuals, the organisation, the processes or whatever else constitutes the chosen unit of analysis for the study. Access is therefore a central consideration; the researcher needs to come to know the case study site(s) well and to work cooperatively with them. Selected cases need to be not only interesting but also hospitable to the inquiry [ 8 ] if they are to be informative and answer the research question(s). Case study sites may also be pre-selected for the researcher, with decisions being influenced by key stakeholders. For example, our selection of case study sites in the evaluation of the implementation and adoption of electronic health record systems (see Table 3 ) was heavily influenced by NHS Connecting for Health, the government agency that was responsible for overseeing the National Programme for Information Technology (NPfIT)[ 5 ]. This prominent stakeholder had already selected the NHS sites (through a competitive bidding process) to be early adopters of the electronic health record systems and had negotiated contracts that detailed the deployment timelines.

It is also important to consider in advance the likely burden and risks associated with participation for those who (or the site(s) which) comprise the case study. Of particular importance is the obligation for the researcher to think through the ethical implications of the study (e.g. the risk of inadvertently breaching anonymity or confidentiality) and to ensure that potential participants/participating sites are provided with sufficient information to make an informed choice about joining the study. The outcome of providing this information might be that the emotive burden associated with participation, or the organisational disruption associated with supporting the fieldwork, is considered so high that the individuals or sites decide against participation.

In our example of evaluating implementations of electronic health record systems, given the restricted number of early adopter sites available to us, we sought purposively to select a diverse range of implementation cases among those that were available[ 5 ]. We chose a mixture of teaching, non-teaching and Foundation Trust hospitals, and examples of each of the three electronic health record systems procured centrally by the NPfIT. At one recruited site, it quickly became apparent that access was problematic because of competing demands on that organisation. Recognising the importance of full access and co-operative working for generating rich data, the research team decided not to pursue work at that site and instead to focus on other recruited sites.

Collecting the data

In order to develop a thorough understanding of the case, the case study approach usually involves the collection of multiple sources of evidence, using a range of quantitative (e.g. questionnaires, audits and analysis of routinely collected healthcare data) and more commonly qualitative techniques (e.g. interviews, focus groups and observations). The use of multiple sources of data (data triangulation) has been advocated as a way of increasing the internal validity of a study (i.e. the extent to which the method is appropriate to answer the research question)[ 8 , 18 – 21 ]. An underlying assumption is that data collected in different ways should lead to similar conclusions, and approaching the same issue from different angles can help develop a holistic picture of the phenomenon (Table 2 )[ 4 ].

Brazier and colleagues used a mixed-methods case study approach to investigate the impact of a cancer care programme[ 22 ]. Here, quantitative measures were collected with questionnaires before, and five months after, the start of the intervention which did not yield any statistically significant results. Qualitative interviews with patients however helped provide an insight into potentially beneficial process-related aspects of the programme, such as greater, perceived patient involvement in care. The authors reported how this case study approach provided a number of contextual factors likely to influence the effectiveness of the intervention and which were not likely to have been obtained from quantitative methods alone.

In collective or multiple case studies, data collection needs to be flexible enough to allow a detailed description of each individual case to be developed (e.g. the nature of different cancer care programmes), before considering the emerging similarities and differences in cross-case comparisons (e.g. to explore why one programme is more effective than another). It is important that data sources from different cases are, where possible, broadly comparable for this purpose even though they may vary in nature and depth.

Analysing, interpreting and reporting case studies

Making sense and offering a coherent interpretation of the typically disparate sources of data (whether qualitative alone or together with quantitative) is far from straightforward. Repeated reviewing and sorting of the voluminous and detail-rich data are integral to the process of analysis. In collective case studies, it is helpful to analyse data relating to the individual component cases first, before making comparisons across cases. Attention needs to be paid to variations within each case and, where relevant, the relationship between different causes, effects and outcomes[ 23 ]. Data will need to be organised and coded to allow the key issues, both derived from the literature and emerging from the dataset, to be easily retrieved at a later stage. An initial coding frame can help capture these issues and can be applied systematically to the whole dataset with the aid of a qualitative data analysis software package.

The Framework approach is a practical approach, comprising of five stages (familiarisation; identifying a thematic framework; indexing; charting; mapping and interpretation) , to managing and analysing large datasets particularly if time is limited, as was the case in our study of recruitment of South Asians into asthma research (Table 1 )[ 3 , 24 ]. Theoretical frameworks may also play an important role in integrating different sources of data and examining emerging themes. For example, we drew on a socio-technical framework to help explain the connections between different elements - technology; people; and the organisational settings within which they worked - in our study of the introduction of electronic health record systems (Table 3 )[ 5 ]. Our study of patient safety in undergraduate curricula drew on an evaluation-based approach to design and analysis, which emphasised the importance of the academic, organisational and practice contexts through which students learn (Table 4 )[ 6 ].

Case study findings can have implications both for theory development and theory testing. They may establish, strengthen or weaken historical explanations of a case and, in certain circumstances, allow theoretical (as opposed to statistical) generalisation beyond the particular cases studied[ 12 ]. These theoretical lenses should not, however, constitute a strait-jacket and the cases should not be "forced to fit" the particular theoretical framework that is being employed.

When reporting findings, it is important to provide the reader with enough contextual information to understand the processes that were followed and how the conclusions were reached. In a collective case study, researchers may choose to present the findings from individual cases separately before amalgamating across cases. Care must be taken to ensure the anonymity of both case sites and individual participants (if agreed in advance) by allocating appropriate codes or withholding descriptors. In the example given in Table 3 , we decided against providing detailed information on the NHS sites and individual participants in order to avoid the risk of inadvertent disclosure of identities[ 5 , 25 ].

What are the potential pitfalls and how can these be avoided?

The case study approach is, as with all research, not without its limitations. When investigating the formal and informal ways undergraduate students learn about patient safety (Table 4 ), for example, we rapidly accumulated a large quantity of data. The volume of data, together with the time restrictions in place, impacted on the depth of analysis that was possible within the available resources. This highlights a more general point of the importance of avoiding the temptation to collect as much data as possible; adequate time also needs to be set aside for data analysis and interpretation of what are often highly complex datasets.

Case study research has sometimes been criticised for lacking scientific rigour and providing little basis for generalisation (i.e. producing findings that may be transferable to other settings)[ 1 ]. There are several ways to address these concerns, including: the use of theoretical sampling (i.e. drawing on a particular conceptual framework); respondent validation (i.e. participants checking emerging findings and the researcher's interpretation, and providing an opinion as to whether they feel these are accurate); and transparency throughout the research process (see Table 8 )[ 8 , 18 – 21 , 23 , 26 ]. Transparency can be achieved by describing in detail the steps involved in case selection, data collection, the reasons for the particular methods chosen, and the researcher's background and level of involvement (i.e. being explicit about how the researcher has influenced data collection and interpretation). Seeking potential, alternative explanations, and being explicit about how interpretations and conclusions were reached, help readers to judge the trustworthiness of the case study report. Stake provides a critique checklist for a case study report (Table 9 )[ 8 ].

Conclusions

The case study approach allows, amongst other things, critical events, interventions, policy developments and programme-based service reforms to be studied in detail in a real-life context. It should therefore be considered when an experimental design is either inappropriate to answer the research questions posed or impossible to undertake. Considering the frequency with which implementations of innovations are now taking place in healthcare settings and how well the case study approach lends itself to in-depth, complex health service research, we believe this approach should be more widely considered by researchers. Though inherently challenging, the research case study can, if carefully conceptualised and thoughtfully undertaken and reported, yield powerful insights into many important aspects of health and healthcare delivery.

Yin RK: Case study research, design and method. 2009, London: Sage Publications Ltd., 4

Google Scholar  

Keen J, Packwood T: Qualitative research; case study evaluation. BMJ. 1995, 311: 444-446.

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Sheikh A, Halani L, Bhopal R, Netuveli G, Partridge M, Car J, et al: Facilitating the Recruitment of Minority Ethnic People into Research: Qualitative Case Study of South Asians and Asthma. PLoS Med. 2009, 6 (10): 1-11.

Article   Google Scholar  

Pinnock H, Huby G, Powell A, Kielmann T, Price D, Williams S, et al: The process of planning, development and implementation of a General Practitioner with a Special Interest service in Primary Care Organisations in England and Wales: a comparative prospective case study. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO). 2008, [ http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/files/project/99-final-report.pdf ]

Robertson A, Cresswell K, Takian A, Petrakaki D, Crowe S, Cornford T, et al: Prospective evaluation of the implementation and adoption of NHS Connecting for Health's national electronic health record in secondary care in England: interim findings. BMJ. 2010, 41: c4564-

Pearson P, Steven A, Howe A, Sheikh A, Ashcroft D, Smith P, the Patient Safety Education Study Group: Learning about patient safety: organisational context and culture in the education of healthcare professionals. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010, 15: 4-10. 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009052.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

van Harten WH, Casparie TF, Fisscher OA: The evaluation of the introduction of a quality management system: a process-oriented case study in a large rehabilitation hospital. Health Policy. 2002, 60 (1): 17-37. 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00187-7.

Stake RE: The art of case study research. 1995, London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Sheikh A, Smeeth L, Ashcroft R: Randomised controlled trials in primary care: scope and application. Br J Gen Pract. 2002, 52 (482): 746-51.

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

King G, Keohane R, Verba S: Designing Social Inquiry. 1996, Princeton: Princeton University Press

Doolin B: Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretative research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology. 1998, 13: 301-311. 10.1057/jit.1998.8.

George AL, Bennett A: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. 2005, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Eccles M, the Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG): Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implementation Science. 2006, 1: 1-8. 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1.

Article   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Netuveli G, Hurwitz B, Levy M, Fletcher M, Barnes G, Durham SR, Sheikh A: Ethnic variations in UK asthma frequency, morbidity, and health-service use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2005, 365 (9456): 312-7.

Sheikh A, Panesar SS, Lasserson T, Netuveli G: Recruitment of ethnic minorities to asthma studies. Thorax. 2004, 59 (7): 634-

CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Hellström I, Nolan M, Lundh U: 'We do things together': A case study of 'couplehood' in dementia. Dementia. 2005, 4: 7-22. 10.1177/1471301205049188.

Som CV: Nothing seems to have changed, nothing seems to be changing and perhaps nothing will change in the NHS: doctors' response to clinical governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2005, 18: 463-477. 10.1108/09513550510608903.

Lincoln Y, Guba E: Naturalistic inquiry. 1985, Newbury Park: Sage Publications

Barbour RS: Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. BMJ. 2001, 322: 1115-1117. 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.

Mays N, Pope C: Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000, 320: 50-52. 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50.

Mason J: Qualitative researching. 2002, London: Sage

Brazier A, Cooke K, Moravan V: Using Mixed Methods for Evaluating an Integrative Approach to Cancer Care: A Case Study. Integr Cancer Ther. 2008, 7: 5-17. 10.1177/1534735407313395.

Miles MB, Huberman M: Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 1994, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 2

Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N: Analysing qualitative data. Qualitative research in health care. BMJ. 2000, 320: 114-116. 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.

Cresswell KM, Worth A, Sheikh A: Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010, 10 (1): 67-10.1186/1472-6947-10-67.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001, 358: 483-488. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Yin R: Case study research: design and methods. 1994, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing, 2

Yin R: Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. Health Serv Res. 1999, 34: 1209-1224.

Green J, Thorogood N: Qualitative methods for health research. 2009, Los Angeles: Sage, 2

Howcroft D, Trauth E: Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research, Theory and Application. 2005, Cheltenham, UK: Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar

Book   Google Scholar  

Blakie N: Approaches to Social Enquiry. 1993, Cambridge: Polity Press

Doolin B: Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system. Info Systems J. 2004, 14: 343-362. 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00176.x.

Bloomfield BP, Best A: Management consultants: systems development, power and the translation of problems. Sociological Review. 1992, 40: 533-560.

Shanks G, Parr A: Positivist, single case study research in information systems: A critical analysis. Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems. 2003, Naples

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/100/prepub

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the participants and colleagues who contributed to the individual case studies that we have drawn on. This work received no direct funding, but it has been informed by projects funded by Asthma UK, the NHS Service Delivery Organisation, NHS Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme, and Patient Safety Research Portfolio. We would also like to thank the expert reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback. Our thanks are also due to Dr. Allison Worth who commented on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Division of Primary Care, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Sarah Crowe & Anthony Avery

Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Kathrin Cresswell, Ann Robertson & Aziz Sheikh

School of Health in Social Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Crowe .

Additional information

Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AS conceived this article. SC, KC and AR wrote this paper with GH, AA and AS all commenting on various drafts. SC and AS are guarantors.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A. et al. The case study approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 11 , 100 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

Download citation

Received : 29 November 2010

Accepted : 27 June 2011

Published : 27 June 2011

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Case Study Approach
• Electronic Health Record System
• Case Study Design
• Case Study Site
• Case Study Report

BMC Medical Research Methodology

ISSN: 1471-2288

• General enquiries: [email protected]

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here .

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Process accident prediction using Bayesian network based on IT2Fs and Z-number: A case study of spherical tanks

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation School of Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Roles Formal analysis, Methodology

Affiliation Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Medical Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft

* E-mail: [email protected]

• Mostafa Mirzaei Aliabadi, 
• Rouzbeh Abbassi, 
• Omid Kalatpour, 
• Omran Ahmadi, 
• Vahid Ahmadi Moshiran

• Published: August 29, 2024
• https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883
• Reader Comments

This study aimed to propose a novel method for dynamic risk assessment using a Bayesian network (BN) based on fuzzy data to decrease uncertainty compared to traditional methods by integrating Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets (IT2FS) and Z-numbers. A bow-tie diagram was constructed by employing the System Hazard Identification, Prediction, and Prevention (SHIPP) approach, the Top Event Fault Tree, and the Barriers Failure Fault Tree. The experts then provided their opinions and confidence levels on the prior probabilities of the basic events, which were then quantified utilizing the IT2FS and combined using the Z-number to reduce the uncertainty of the prior probability. The posterior probability of the critical basic events (CBEs) was obtained using the beta distribution based on recorded data on their requirements and failure rates over five years. This information was then fed into the BN. Updating the BN allowed calculating the posterior probability of barrier failure and consequences. Spherical tanks were used as a case study to demonstrate and confirm the significant benefits of the methodology. The results indicated that the overall posterior probability of Consequences after the failure probability of barriers displayed an upward trend over the 5-year period. This rise in IT2FS-Z calculation outcomes exhibited a shallower slope compared to the IT2FS mode, attributed to the impact of experts’ confidence levels in the IT2FS-Z mode. These differences became more evident by considering the 10 −4 variance compared to the 10 −5 . This study offers industry managers a more comprehensive and reliable understanding of achieving the most effective accident prevention performance.

Citation: Aliabadi MM, Abbassi R, Kalatpour O, Ahmadi O, Moshiran VA (2024) Process accident prediction using Bayesian network based on IT2Fs and Z-number: A case study of spherical tanks. PLoS ONE 19(8): e0307883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883

Editor: Muhammet Gul, Istanbul University: Istanbul Universitesi, TÜRKIYE

Received: May 31, 2024; Accepted: July 12, 2024; Published: August 29, 2024

Copyright: © 2024 Aliabadi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All required data titled "Analyzing Bayesian Network Data, Beta Distribution, and IT2F-Z" is available through the link and DOI below. URL: https://zenodo.org/records/12657074 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12657073 .

Funding: This research is supported by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (Grant No: 140107266216). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

1. Introduction

Spherical tanks currently have a significant function in the oil and gas industries [ 1 ]. They serve as a widely used storage option for various gases and fluids, like LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) and LNG (liquefied natural gas), owing to the advantageous characteristics linked to their form [ 2 , 3 ]. However, in recent years, as this type of tank has increased in various sectors, several accidents have been involving them, including fires and explosions, resulting in significant human and financial losses [ 1 , 4 ]. Here are some accidents related to spherical tanks in the past years. In 1984, a spherical LPG tank explosion in Mexico City devastated 270 houses spread across an area measuring 100,000 square meters. Tragically, the accident claimed 500 lives and caused injuries to an additional 4,000 individuals [ 5 – 7 ]. Similarly, at a Texas refinery in 1978, a BLEVE incident led to the rupture and explosion of three spherical tanks, five horizontal tanks, and four vertical tanks, resulting in the loss of at least seven lives [ 8 ]. 1966 the Feyzin refinery accident in France caused 18 fatalities and 81 injuries [ 8 , 9 ]. Furthermore, in Montreal, Canada 1957, a defective level gauge led to a fatality caused by BLEVE spherical tanks [ 8 ]. Lastly, the Visakhapatnam refinery incident in India in 1997 resulted in 56 deaths and approximately $15 million in damages [ 10 ].

These events indicate that despite the low probability of spherical tank accidents, the potential consequences can be significant. Moreover, the absence of a proportional risk assessment framework may contribute to disastrous accidents [ 2 , 11 ]. As a result, it is crucial to develop a dynamic risk assessment method that can take into account changes in the process and help prevent accidents related to spherical tanks [ 2 , 12 ]. Dynamic risk assessment adjusts the initial risk rating based on factors such as the reliability of safety systems, maintenance and inspection procedures, human behavior, and operational processes [ 11 , 13 ].

The development of studies on dynamic risk assessment in process facilities is ongoing. Zarei et al. (2021) employed a BN using the best-worst method (BWM) and D-number theory in the dynamic risk assessment of hydrogen infrastructures, aiming to minimize uncertainty in determining the prior probability of BEs [ 14 ]. Using the temporal evolution of escalation vectors with the Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) approach was the method used by Zeng et al. to estimate the exact dynamic probabilities of domino effects in chemical industrial areas [ 15 ]. Kamil et al. (2019) presented the Stochastic Petri-net model for studying the probability and propagation pattern of domino events to evaluate the dynamic risk associated with domino effects [ 16 ]. Luan et al. (2023) analyzed the factors influencing the dynamic risk assessment for road tanker accidents using a fuzzy Bayesian network (FBN) and binary logistic regression model combined with a bow-tie model [ 17 ]. In other research, Bhandari et al. (2016) combined a dynamic risk-based strategy with a maintenance-optimizing technique to develop a maintenance plan [ 18 ]. Zhou et al. (2023) conducted a risk assessment study of an oil storage tank using the bowtie model. They used expert judgment and fuzzy sets to obtain prior probabilities of basic incidents. They then used new evidence and posterior probabilities of basic incidents to calculate posterior probabilities of storage tank consequences [ 19 ]. As a quantitative risk assessment technique to assess safety at each stage of the accident sequence analysis, Rathnayaka et al. introduced SHIPP (System Hazard Identification, Prediction, and Prevention) [ 20 , 21 ]. This method presents a structured approach to recognize, evaluate, and model accidents during processes, foresee their probability and implement measures to prevent them [ 22 ]. By comprehending accidents within intricate systems, this model transcends the constraints of traditional accident models. It estimates the likelihood of accidents happening based on historical accident data and has the ability to adapt the probability of accidents occurring [ 2 ]. To connect cause and effect in this model, the fault and event tree are combined, and Bayesian inference is employed to deal with data uncertainty [ 22 ].

The usefulness of this technique for modeling accidents has been supported by numerous studies in the process industries. Pouyakian et al. (2021) used the combination of SHIPP and HAZOP techniques to investigate managerial, organizational, human, and process factors to provide a thorough approach based on FBN for modeling and reducing the uncertainty of parameters as well as an accurate analysis of the risk of release of hazardous substances in Storage tanks with a floating roof [ 23 ]. Sarvestani et al. (2021) conducted a study using the MIMAH and SHIPP methods to model the occurrence process of accidents in LPG storage tanks [ 2 ]. In another study, the combination of SHIPP with HFACS, FBWM, and FBN methods was offered as a novel model for overcoming the limitations of other studies in the analysis of human and organizational aspects in the occurrence of accidents related to ethylene storage tanks and their consequences [ 22 ]. Due to the accident scenario being displayed from causes to consequences, BT is a popular technique in the risk assessment of process systems. This model can help determine and evaluate the root cause of system failure and its potential consequences. It improves FT and ET’s capabilities by combining them into a single approach [ 24 , 25 ]. However, due to the static nature of FTA and ETA in its structure, it is limited in the dynamic risk assessment. Additionally, BT cannot demonstrate conditional reliance. These limitations are overcome by the BN [ 26 ]. Moreover, studies have demonstrated the flexible framework of BN in effectively analyzing various accident scenarios for dynamic safety assessment [ 26 – 28 ]. Khakzad et al. (2013) presented an approach that combines the bowtie technique with the Bayesian network framework. They aimed to create a dynamic tool that effectively addresses uncertainties by leveraging the Bayes theorem [ 26 , 29 ]. BN analysis is favored due to several critical factors compared to traditional techniques like FT and ET. One primary advantage lies in its capacity to simulate intricate systems while diminishing parametric uncertainty by the assimilation of additional evidence. Moreover, its user-friendly and concise graphical approach is highly valued. Furthermore, BN enables probability updating and sequential learning [ 18 , 30 ].

Zerouali et al. (2019) used FBN to predict the risk of storage tank fire and explosion. They mapped the Bowtie in BN to quantify the probabilities of events [ 31 ]. Sun et al. (2022) addressed the challenge of safety assessment in complex, dynamic process systems. They propose a method that combines Catastrophe Theory for quantifying disruption intensity with a Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) to model system performance response. This framework offers a resilience metric for evaluating a system’s ability to absorb, adapt, and recover from disruptions [ 28 ]. Yazdi and Kabir (2018) proposed a methodology for process systems risk assessment to Highlight the limitations of traditional QRA. Their approach integrated Bayesian Networks, Fuzzy Set Theory, and Evidence Theory to address data uncertainty, expert opinion subjectivity, and model limitations [ 32 ].

The data quantity and knowledge limitations result in vague and imprecise information used in the suggested frameworks, irrespective of whether BN is utilized. Employing fuzzy logic can resolve this imprecision effectively [ 33 ]. It is challenging to use a comprehensive database to cover all systems since the probability of a basic event occurring in various industries is dependent on local conditions. As a result, the primary data inputs for probability estimation are expert judgments. But these opinions frequently contain ambiguity and imprecision. Thus, Zadeh presented a Type-I fuzzy set theory to solve this problem [ 19 , 34 ].

Several research used FTA with the Fuzzy type-1 set in various industries [ 35 – 39 ]. However, this quantification approach based on experts’ opinions cannot show the uncertainties related to the membership functions [ 37 , 40 ]. Therefore, a type two fuzzy set (T2FS) is developed for more accurate risk quantification [ 24 , 41 ].

Different individuals assign distinct interpretations to identical words; hence, Zadeh (1975) introduced T2FSs to capture experts’ subjective and imprecise judgment in real-world operations [ 41 ]. In other words, each element of T2FSs, unlike a T1FS, which presents the degree of membership as a crisp number in [0,1], is an interval in [0, 1] [ 42 ]. Three-dimensional T2FS membership functions provide more degrees of freedom for dealing with uncertainties and direct modeling [ 43 ].

Mendel and John (2002) put forward the interval type-2 fuzzy set (IT2FS) as a specific form of T2FSs, which has gained popularity due to its simplicity and widespread application [ 44 ]. In some studies, different methods like IT2FTOPSIS, IT2FAHP, IT2FDEMATEL, IT2FVIKOR, IT2FFMEA, and T2FS with D-S evidence theory were used [ 45 – 49 ]. Z-number is a novel idea a more remarkable ability to express human understanding. It has a simple framework with reliability and restrictions that makes it easy to express and manage the confidence of uncertain information [ 50 ].

This study proposes a novel approach to address these limitations. It leverages Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets (IT2FS) and Z-numbers within a Bayesian Network framework. With the IT2FS combination and the Z-number, this approach provides reliable quantitative values for input for calculations in the Bayesian network and beta distribution, increasing the reliability of predicting process accidents.

IT2FS and Z-numbers (IT2FS-Z) integration within a BN framework has received limited attention in the existing literature. By incorporating Z-numbers, we move beyond traditional fuzzy logic approaches (Level 2) and exact number calculations (Level 1) to a more nuanced representation of uncertainty that is closer to real-world human decision-making (Level 3) [ 51 , 52 ]. This allows for a more reliable and realistic risk assessment, particularly in scenarios with limited data and subjective expert opinions.

After reviewing previous research, only two studies were found that used the combination of z-number and IT2FS. In one of these studies, Zamri et al. used Z-number, IT2FS, and TOPSIS to deal with decision uncertainty [ 49 ]. In another study, Azman et al. improved IT2FVIKOR with Z-numbers to determine the best strategy for water supply security in Malaysia [ 53 ]. These researchers attempted to use the IT2FS and Z number (IT2FS-Z) to reduce decision uncertainty. However, no studies using the beta distribution based on the prior probability obtained using IT2FS-Z to calculate the posterior probability of barrier failure and consequences were identified.

In this regard, the present study aims to provide a method to improve the confidence level in dynamic risk assessment by combining IT2FS-Z and beta distribution in the BN platform to reduce the uncertainty in determining the posterior probability of accident occurrence.

2. Theoretical background

2.1. interval type-2 fuzzy sets.

The definitions and arithmetic operations of BN, Z-numbers, power average operators, and IT2FS are introduced in this section. It is worth noting that a trapezoidal membership function (TrMF) was employed throughout the study since it can yield results that are more accurate than those produced by triangular MF [ 54 ].

Definition 1 [ 55 ].

Definition 2.

Definition 3.

• PPT PowerPoint slide
• PNG larger image
• TIFF original image

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g001

Definition 4.

2.2. The power average operator

The Power Average (PA) operator is widely recognized as an effective method for combining individual preferences to derive group preference values that accurately represent the correlation between risk assessments. It is described as follows.

Definition 6.

The PA operator, with a dimension of n, is a mapping (PA) that takes Rn to R. This can be represented by Eq 12 [ 58 ].

The following are the characteristics of the sup( a i , a j ), which expresses the degree that a j supports the a i :

• sup( a i , a j ) ∈ [0, 1]
• sup( a i , a j ) = sup( a j , a i )
• sup( a i , a j ) ≥ Sup π (x, y), if d ( a i , a j ) < d (x, y)

2.3. Z-number

(a: related to opinion b: related to confidence).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g002

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.t001

2.4. Bayesian network

Definition 7..

Conditional Probability Tables (CPTs) are employed in the BN model to determine the probability of BEs. Using these tables, the probability of an intermediate node can be calculated based on its conditional dependencies with related root nodes.

2.5. Beta distribution

Definition 8..

The discrete value of the BE failure probabilities (FPs) can be explained by the mean ( μ ) of the distribution, where α and β are the factors defined as the success and failure of equipment in response to demand in the beta distribution. This means that the discrete value of the FPs can be expressed as a continuous value.

3. Proposed methodology for assessing dynamic risks

In this section, the steps of implementing the research method are explained. Fig 3 illustrates the step-by-step process of the proposed methodology.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g003

3.1. Hazards identification

3.1.1. combining the bow-tie with the shipp approach..

In stage one, the Bes impacting the top event were identified, and a fault tree was also formed for the obstacles. Then, the bow-tie diagram was created using the SHIPP approach. The SHIPP approach follows a specific order and hierarchy of event consequences, which closely resemble the structural development of an event tree. The consequences are Respectively as follows. Near miss, mishap, incident, accident. In reality, the occurrence of an end event can potentially escalate in any sequence. For instance, a near miss could potentially turn into an accident ( Fig 4 ) [ 65 ].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g004

Safety barrier has been categorized in the SHIPP approach for accident prevention techniques after release factor; 1. Release Prevention Barrier (RPB), 2. Dispersion Prevention Barrier (DPB), 3. Ignition Prevention Barrier (IPB), 4. Escalation Prevention Barrier (EPB), 5. Human Factor Barrier (HFB), 6. Management and Organizational Barrier (MOB) [ 20 ].

The bow-tie diagram, which can be observed conceptually in Fig 4 , was drawn based on this approach and considering the series of consequences, including near miss, mishap, incident, and accident. Fig 4 illustrates the improved predictive accuracy of presented model, clearly showing how it outperforms existing models during the simulated accident scenarios.

3.2. Aggregating stage

3.2.1. weight of expert judgment..

Twenty experts’ opinions and confidence levels on the prior probability of BEs were obtained. Their linguistic terms were then quantified and combined using IT2FS and Z-number. It is important to note that the experts’ involvement was solely intended to assist the researchers in gaining a comprehensive understanding of the industrial process under investigation and to estimate the probability of BE occurrences and obstacle failure probabilities. Written informed consent was obtained from all twenty participating industry specialists before their involvement in the study, conducted between January 15 th and April 23 rd , 2023. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. Details of Ethical approval are available in the Acknowledgments section.

It is remarkable that when integrating the views of many experts, it is important to consider the weight of the experts in order to make the evaluation results more scientific and objective. The Linguistic terms given by them were employed for the probability of BEs occurrence and corresponding confidence level, which fall into (“VL”, “L”, “ML”, “M”, “MH”, “H”, “VH”) and (“NS”, “QS”, “S”, “VS”), respectively ( Table 1 ). Table 2 , presents data on the age(A), education level (EL), job title (JT), and related experience (RE) of each expert.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.t002

A score is assigned to each expert based on this information. Using the experts’ weight scores and weight factors, Eqs ( 28 ) and ( 29 ) calculate this score ( Table 3 ).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.t003

3.2.2. Expert opinion aggregation using the power average operator.

Although widely used data aggregation methods like average, median, and mode, they sometimes fail to convey the complexity via the aggregated statistic. Considering the links between the variables being combined would help to make these integrating mechanisms intelligent [ 58 ].

Due to the experts’ varying experiences, knowledge, and preferences, the assessment information provided by the experts may vary throughout the entire assessment procedure. As a result, in this research, a group decision matrix was created using an aggregation method to take into consideration of individual assessment data. By applying the power average operator (PA) in the aggregation process in risk assessment, lower weight is given to bigger or smaller evaluation values. Therefore, the opinions of the group’s experts become closer and create more reliable results. Therefore, the issue of combining expert views is solved using the PA-IT2FS-Z operator which is based on the PA operator theory [ 67 ].

3.3. The integration of IT2F and Z-number

The method developed by Kahraman et al. is used in this research for defuzzification since it takes fewer calculations than other methods [ 56 ].

Let IT2FS-Z

Like Eq 31 , the first part of the Z-number was also defuzzified and the FPS value for part A ( FPS A ) obtained. A simple example is provided considering four experts in S1 Appendix to clarify the above explanations.

3.4. Converting FPS into FFP

The Onisawa method only holds in some circumstances. In this study, a more effective calculation method is proposed ( Eq 35 ), along with the conversion of FPS to FFP by DNV standards.

3.5. Mapping bow-tie in BN

The probability of the BEs derived using the IT2FS-Z technique were taken into account as the probabilities of root nodes occurrences in order to quantify the model. The bow-tie model was mapped in BN using a technique developed by Khakzad et al. Because BN is used as a dynamic tool for updating the probability of barriers and consequences in the next steps [ 26 ]. Each construction step meticulously addresses uncertainty to enhance the robustness and reliability of the Bayesian network. This is achieved through rigorous data validation procedures, ensuring the transparency and traceability of information at every stage. Each network layer demonstrably contributes to its overall predictive accuracy by reducing uncertainty and maintaining transparency. GeNIe 3.0 academic software was used to create and assess the Bayesian model. The BEs, intermediate, and top events in the BT are the BN model’s root, middle, and top nodes, respectively.

3.6. Sensitivity analysis in BN (CBEs identification)

The primary objective of the sensitivity analysis in this study is to pinpoint the critical basic events (CBEs) within the bow-tie model. CBEs represent the basic events (BEs) that most influence triggering the top event (TE) in the bow-tie model. Identifying CBEs is crucial for prioritizing risk mitigation strategies by honing in on the most impactful factors. The sensitivity analysis leverages a Bayesian network (BN) framework to evaluate the individual BEs’ impact on the TE.

To uncover sensitive nodes (CBEs), the sensitivity analysis employs the best and worst-case scenarios for each node in the BN as input. By applying these scenarios to specific BEs, the evidence (success/failure) for each BE is updated within the BN, considering the established prior probabilities and interrelations with other BEs in the network.

During the sensitivity analysis, all nodes except the BE under scrutiny remain unchanged, enabling a focused assessment of each BE’s influence on the TE’s probability. By monitoring the TE’s probability fluctuations following the evidence updates for each BE, we can identify the BEs causing the most significant changes. These identified BEs are designated as the critical basic events (CBEs). The sensitivity analysis yields valuable insights into the relative importance of BEs in shaping the overall risk profile of the system depicted by the bow-tie model.

3.7. Probability adapting

One of the most significant and beneficial uses of Bayesian networks is sequence learning, which can also be thought of as probability adaptation [ 69 ]. Due to this feature, the posterior probability of consequences was calculated taking into account the posterior probability of CBEs and their occurrences over the past five years.

The prior probability of the BEs in the bow-tie diagram, including the fault tree and the event tree, is known. These prior probabilities are assumed to follow the beta distribution and were obtained based on the technical knowledge of experts. Then, five years of data, including incidents, near misses, and accident reports, were analyzed to determine the frequency of success and failure of the primary safety barrier (BEs). According to this information, the posterior probability of CBEs is calculated using Eq 25 . This application updates probabilities based on new data received over time.

The updated probability of the CBEs enters the Bayesian network and replaces the prior probability of these events. Following this stage, the probability of failure of barriers (RPB, DPB, IPB, EPB, HFB, M&OB) and the probability of consequences, including near miss, mishap, incident, and accident, are updated.

This operation was calculated in IT2FS and IT2FS-Z modes and with different variances (10 −4 and 10 −5 ) to enable comparison of the results.

4. A case study of gas release from spherical tank

The method explained in Section 3 is utilized to conduct a dynamic risk evaluation of a spherical tank. This study was conducted in a refinery located in the northwest region of Iran in 2023. The refinery consists of four spherical tanks, each with 2,337 m 3 of raw materials for producing LPG, and one spherical tank with 635 m 3 of LPG.

4.1. Bow-tie

Gas release from the spherical tank is considered a Top Event (TE) to draw the fault tree. Intermediate events (IE)and basic events (BE) that caused the gas release are illustrated as a part of a fault tree in Fig 5 . Table 4 contains descriptions of the 70 basic events that were identified.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g005

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.t004

In the next step, near miss, mishap, incident, and accident were considered consequences of gas release. According to the SHIPP concept ( Fig 4 ), a fault tree was created to assess the failure probability of each barrier. The release prevention barrier (RPB) fault tree comprises 42 BEs (symbolized as R), the extended dispersion prevention barrier (DPB) fault tree comprises 16 BEs (symbolized as D), the ignition prevention barrier (IPB) fault tree encompasses 20 BEs (symbolized as IP), the escalation prevention barrier (EPB) fault tree contains 26 BEs (symbolized as E). Additionally, there are 22 BEs associated with the human factor barrier (HFB) fault tree (symbolized as H), and the fault tree for management and organization barrier (M&OB) incorporates 13 BEs (symbolized as M), as illustrated in Figs 6 to 10 . Detailed descriptions of these basic events are provided in Table 5 .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g006

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g007

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g008

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g009

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g010

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.t005

The IT2FS-Z and IT2FS methods were utilized to acquire the prior likelihood of BEs. The FFP, K, and FPS values obtained for the fault tree’s BEs associated with the TE are displayed in Tables 6 and 7 , respectively. Additionally, Tables 8 and 9 show the prior probability of the BEs linked to the failure of RPB, DPB, IPB, and EPB barriers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.t006

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.t007

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.t008

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.t009

These results are compared in Fig 11 . The BEs prior probabilities in Fig 11 shows a significant difference in the results when combining opinion and confidence using the Z-number. The results obtained from IT2FS-Z are notably lower than those from IT2FS, consistent with Kang et al.’s study (2016) and Aghaei et al.’s (2021) [ 50 , 61 ].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g011

Tables 8 and 9 show the prior probability of the BEs linked to the failure of RPB, DPB, IPB, and EPB barriers. The results of these tables were compared in Fig 12 , which, like Fig 11 , also shows the impact of using a z-number.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g012

4.2. SHIPP concept

The SHIPP concept was applied in this study to ensure that obstacles and outcomes were logically connected to one another. Based on this approach, the barriers (RPB, DPB, IPB, EPB) that impact the probability of the consequences were identified on the bow-tie model’s event tree. In order to assess the failure probability of these barriers with a high level of confidence, a fault tree was created for each of these barriers (Figs 6 – 10 were mapped according to Fig 13 in the Bayesian network.) based on the Fuzzy probability of BEs.

BN mapping from bow-tie (“a” is fault tree side of bowtie. “b” is event tree side with fault trees of barriers failure).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g013

One of the subtle and vital points in the SHIPP method is the relationship between HFB and M&OB with other obstacles and how they affect the results. Especially in BN, deciding whether HFB and M&OB, as a parent, are linked to other barriers and have an indirect effect on consequences or are directly linked to consequences can lead to different final values of the probability of consequences. It is also effective in detecting sensitive events to determine the posterior probability of barrier failure and consequences. So, based on the conceptual of SHIPP in the study by Samith Rathnayaka et al., who first used this method, HFB and M&OB in SHIPP have less of an effect on the outcomes than technical obstacles (RPB, DPB, IPB, EPB) [ 20 ]. Therefore, the impact of HFB and M&OB on outcomes was considered indirectly. For this purpose, HFB and M&OB were considered as parents and technical barriers as children in the BN. In the following, the technical barriers in the role of the parent were considered for the consequences, which can be observed in and the BN view in Fig 13 .

4.3. Experts’ opinions

This study employed the opinions of twenty experts from the studied refinery. Experts expressed their opinions and confidence level according to the Linguistic terms in Table 1 . These terms were quantified using the IT2FS ( Eq 31 ) and combined using the Z-number ( Eq 32 ) to reduce the uncertainty of the opinions.

4.4. Bayesian network

This section illustrates the bow-tie diagram of the spherical tank gas release shown in Fig 13 , where part ’a’ represents the fault tree and part ’b’ is the event tree. In part b, the consequences and barriers are marked in yellow and blue, respectively. Also, in Fig 13 , it is clear that each barrier has its fault tree.

Considering the prior probability of the BEs, the prior probability of barriers failure and consequences ( Table 10 ) was calculated based on the Bayesian network conditional tables. The comparison of the prior probability of barrier failure in Fig 14 shows that the highest probability of failure is associated with the RPB, with 1.596 × 10 −2 and 5.754 × 10 −2 ) in IT2FS-Z and IT2FS, respectively. The highest probability for consequences is near miss, with probabilities of 5.764 × 10 −4 in IT2FS-Z method and 5.784 × 10 −3 in IT2FS. This Figure shows a decreasing trend in the probability of barriers and consequences in the subsequent layer, consistent with the study by Sarvestani et al. [ 2 ]. This can be due to the layer effect in the barriers. This means that by passing through each layer, the number of the next layer is reduced, and this lack of obstacles in each layer reduces the probability of their failure.

a: Prior probability of barrier failure. b: Prior probability of consequences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g014

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.t010

Fig 14 demonstrates the significant impact of employing Z-number to combine expert opinions with their confidence levels. Fig 14B shows that the trend of the plots obtained by the IT2FS-Z and IT2FS methods are indistinguishable for the other consequences, as the initial consequence (near miss) has a significantly higher prior probability than the subsequent consequences. Table 10 presents a more precise distinction between IT2FS-Z and IT2FS conditions.

4.4.1. Sensitivity analysis in BN and identification of CBEs.

The explosion node was selected as the target node to determine the most critical BEs affecting the final consequence, and BN was used to do a sensitivity analysis. Then, fifteen events with the highest sensitivity were selected in the BN based on IT2FS-Z and IT2FS, depicted in Fig 15A and 15B , respectively. The probability values computed for the CBEs by the IT2FS-Z are different from those derived by the IT2FS technique, as shown by the Tornado diagram Fig 15A and 15B . Therefore, the rank of selected sensitive events using these two methods also differs. Therefore, IP12 (ventilation system works but is ineffective) with a prior probability of 2.286824 × 10 −3 and D10 (defective emergency shutdown sensor) with a prior probability of 5.264846 × 10 −3 are the most critical BEs in the tornado diagram derived from IT2FS-Z ( Fig 15A ) and IT2FS data ( Fig 15B ), respectively.

a: Tornado graph displaying the top fifteen CBEs in the IT2FS-Z BN. b: Tornado graph displaying the top fifteen CBEs in the IT2FS BN.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g015

Furthermore, the BEs in the two fuzzy approaches have different prior probabilities. Thus, a CBE may be among the first fifteen priorities in one calculation mode, but it may be out of this prioritization in another method. For example, D11 (Insufficient detector coverage) ranks 11 in IT2FS-Z calculation method and 23 in IT2F, and D13 (Sensor operation only at very high gas concentration) ranks 12 in IT2FS-Z and 21 in IT2F. On the other hand, while R06 (malfunctioning pressure gauge) ranked 10th in terms of significance and impact on the top event in the IT2FS-based calculations, it did not make it into the top 15 CBEs in the IT2FS-Z calculations.

These differences highlight the importance of considering the confidence level using the Z-number. This is because using the Z-number changes the ranking of CBEs in terms of importance. By bringing the results closer to the real world, the Z-number will help industry experts plan and allocate resources more effectively, leading to the most significant possible reduction in accident-related costs.

Secondly, given this study’s ultimate goal of predicting the posterior probability of event occurrence and barrier failure, using z-numbers to make CBE prior probabilities more accurate and realistic leads to more accurate predictions and better results in beta distribution calculations.

Thirdly, this sensitivity analysis using a Bayesian network is a dynamic method that allows managers and experts to be aware of the essential CBEs at all times, providing them greater flexibility in short-term planning.

4.5. Probability adapting

Due to incomplete Accident documentation in the industry studied, several hypothetical demands and failures related to CBEs were considered for the last five years; this stage of the study was conducted by a brainstorming session with the consultation of experts. These events can be seen in Table 11 .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.t011

4.5.1. Beta distribution.

By determining the incidents related to the CBEs over five years and using the likelihood values obtained from the experts’ opinions as the prior probability, it was possible to calculate the posterior probability of the CBEs. Notably, to reduce the uncertainty more in the study and based on previous studies, the value of variances of 10 −4 and 10 −5 was considered for beta distribution calculations.

S2A and S2B Tables in S1 Table show the values of α (the number of failures in demand associated with the CBEs) and β (the number of successes) in IT2FS-Z and IT2FS for years zero to five with variances of 10 −4 and 10 −5 . The likelihood obtained from the expert opinions is the probability of year zero.

Although the comparison between IT2FS-Z and IT2FS shows the difference in the posterior probabilities obtained, considering variances difference also helps reduce the uncertainty in the final results as much as possible. Ultimately, the posterior probabilities will be closer to reality with greater certainty.

4.5.2. Sensitivity analysis of methodology.

The sensitivity analysis validates and clarifies the performance of IT2FS and IT2FS-Z according to the information provided in Tables 12 – 14 . The amount of variation of the posterior probability compared to the prior probability in different fuzzy states and different variances is comparable, which is explained in detail in sections 4.5.3 and 4.5.4. This can facilitate the determination of the worst case in posterior probability and the decision-making process by considering multiple aspects.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.t012

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.t013

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.t014

4.5.3. Posterior probability of the basic events.

Calculating the posterior probability of CBEs for years zero to five ( Table 12 ) based on the β and α values shows that the overall trend in the posterior probability of CBEs over five years is upward ( Fig 16 ). This trend is consistent with the study by Ahmadi et al. [ 64 ].

(a: IT2FS. b: IT2FS-Z).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g016

According to Fig 16 , The comparison of results reveals that incorporating Z-numbers to integrate the confidence levels in experts’ opinions reduces both prior and posterior probabilities ( Fig 16B ). This reduction aligns the results more closely with real-world scenarios, enhancing the model’s predictive accuracy and reliability. Notably, when comparing the fuzzy calculations in IT2FS and IT2FS-Z, utilizing Z-numbers results in lower probabilities for both prior and posterior assessments, indicating a more cautious and conservative approach to risk estimation.

Furthermore, the calculations based on the beta distribution for predicting future events, considering variances of 10 −4 and 10 −5 , demonstrate that the variance of 10 −4 signifies a higher probability of the event occurring in the future ( Fig 16A and 16B ). This distinction underscores the significance of selecting appropriate parameters, such as variance values, to improve the precision and robustness of risk assessments in dynamic environments.

Fig 16 visually represents these findings, illustrating the trend in posterior probabilities of CBEs over five years. The comparison between IT2FS and IT2FS-Z with variances of 10 −4 and 10 −5 showcases the impact of variance selection on the probability estimations. Specifically, the higher posterior probabilities observed with the variance of 10 −4 in the IT2FS ( Fig 16A ) state highlight the increased confidence level in predicting critical events, while the lower probabilities associated with the variance of 10 −5 in the IT2FS-Z model ( Fig 16A ) emphasize a more conservative risk assessment approach.

By leveraging these insights and understanding the impact of Z-numbers and variance selection on probability estimations, industry professionals can make more informed decisions, proactively address potential risks, and enhance safety measures to ensure operational resilience and efficiency in real-world applications.

4.5.4. Posterior probability of barriers and consequences.

The posterior probability of CBEs for years one to five were entered separately into the BN, and the posterior probability of barriers failure and consequences for each year were calculated by updating the Bayesian network. The results of calculating the posterior probability of barrier failure in different fuzzy states with variances of 10 −4 and 10 −5 are shown in Table 13 . The results of this table were compared in Fig 17 .

(A: RPB. B: DPB. C: IPB. D: EPB).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g017

The overall comparison of the results in Fig 17 shows that combining Z-number with IT2F has led to significant changes in the posterior probability of barrier failure. In the IT2FS-Z mode, the posterior probability for both DPB ( Fig 17B ) and IPB ( Fig 17C ) has a significant difference in the variance of 10 −4 compared to the variance of 10 −5 , while this difference is not as great for RPB ( Fig 17D ) and EPB ( Fig 17A ). This is due to the high number of CBEs present in the fault tree of DPB (seven CBEs) and IPB (six CBEs), which clarifies the effect of the posterior probability of these basic events in the respective barrier. While in the IT2F method, a significant difference in posterior probability can be seen in RPB, in addition to DPB and IPB, during the five years, which can be due to not considering the level of certainty of experts in their opinions.

This issue shows the importance of reducing the uncertainty in the determination of the CBEs and in the planning for the control and prevention of accidents involving spherical tanks.

The results for the posterior probability of all four outcomes (A: near miss, B: mishap, C: incident, D: accident) are shown in Table 14 . The results of this Table were compared in Fig 18 . In the IT2F computation, the results obtained using the 10 −4 variance, in comparison to those obtained using the 10 −5 variance, indicate a worse case or the so-called higher posterior probability for barriers ( Fig 18 ). This difference in the value of posterior probabilities increases towards the final years. This indicates the impact of various factors, such as wear and tear of equipment, on the increase in the probability and severity of accidents over time.

(A: Near miss. B: mishap. C: Incident. D: Accident).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g018

For a better comparison of the results, in addition to Figs 18 and 19 has been drawn without the trend plot for near miss to show the difference between the plots for the other consequences. Accuracy in Fig 19 shows that plot ordering in Fig 19B (mishap) is not comparable to the scheme in Fig 17B (DPB). To explain this problem, it can be said that in addition to the DPB as a direct barrier, other barriers also indirectly affect the probability of the subsequent consequences. The same applies to the 19d (accident) and 17d (EPB) graphs.

The posterior probability of the consequences in different calculations, except for IT2FS(VAR = 10 −4 ) (A: Near miss. B: mishap. C: Incident. D: Accident).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.g019

In general, combining the experts’ confidence levels in their opinions using the Z-number has lowered the probability level in both prior and posterior cases compared to the point where only IT2FS was used. Yazdi et al. obtained results using type 1 fuzzy and Z-number in line with this study [ 60 ].

The trends in the posterior probability indicate that the method presented provides more reliable, realistic results over time. Irrespective of the difference between the different modes in the results, as seen in Figs 17 – 19 . With this method’s continuous learning principles, the general trend in predicting future years’ probabilities is incremental. This dynamic prediction helps industries prioritize the necessary preventive measures by analyzing the results and spending the least to achieve the most significant benefit in reducing spherical tank accidents.

Integrating IT2FS, Z-numbers, and Bayesian networks offers a more sophisticated and comprehensive approach to dynamic risk assessments than traditional methods. The model can better handle uncertainties and provide more accurate risk predictions by incorporating fuzzy logic and expert opinions through Z-numbers. Traditional methods like FTA, ETA, and bowtie are widely used for risk assessment in various industries [ 25 , 26 ]. While these methods provide a systematic approach to identifying potential failures and consequences, they may not effectively handle uncertainties and dynamic changes, while the introduced method Can overcome this limitation.

Another traditional method for risk assessment involves Monte Carlo simulation, which is useful for probabilistic analysis [ 70 ]. However, it may not capture the complexity of uncertainties and dependencies as comprehensively as the integrated IT2FS, Z-numbers, and Bayesian networks approach.

In conclusion, the integration of IT2FS, Z-numbers, and Bayesian networks not only improves the accuracy of dynamic risk assessments but also enhances the model’s real-world applicability by addressing uncertainties more effectively and providing valuable insights for decision-making in practical settings.

Despite these advantages, the present method does not separate the types of uncertainties. Future research could explore integrating techniques that account for both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties to enhance the current methodology and enable a more comprehensive risk assessment framework. Aleatory uncertainty is a natural variation, haphazardness, or incongruity of a physical system. uncertainty epistemic is based on ambiguity, vagueness, imperfection, ignorance, and deficiency in system behaviors [ 71 ]. This integration would enable a more comprehensive and robust risk assessment framework, capable of handling the complexities of both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. By incorporating these advancements, researchers can refine risk assessment models, leading to more informed decision-making and improved safety outcomes in industrial settings.

Another limitation of this study is that implementing this model in practice may pose challenges, mainly due to the complexity involved in interpreting and propagating uncertainty through the network’s layers. Moreover, although powerful, the fuzzy logic components might require additional effort for some industry practitioners to grasp and utilize effectively. To address this limitation and make this methodology more accessible to industry experts, developing an application or software tool based on the fuzzy logic and Bayesian network approach utilized in this study is suggested. This software application can serve as a user-friendly platform for practitioners to input their data, visualize the risk assessment process, and better understand how uncertainty propagates through the network. Additionally, the software can include tutorials and training modules to assist users in learning and applying the methodology effectively within their work environment.

Furthermore, to enhance the usability of this proposed methodology, it is suggested to incorporate a case study, like this study’s case about spherical tanks, or practical examples that demonstrate the step-by-step application of the fuzzy logic and Bayesian network approach in real-world scenarios. The aim of these practical illustrations is to bridge the gap between theoretical complexity and practical implementation, making it easier for industry practitioners to grasp and utilize this methodology effectively.

5. Conclusions

This study presents a method for dynamic risk assessment of spherical tanks in a refinery industry using a combination of interval type 2 fuzzy and Z-number (IT2FS-Z) along with the beta distribution’s mean and the SHIPP concept. The first step was to draw a fault tree as part of a bow-tie diagram to identify the events leading to the top event. Then the possible consequences that the top event could cause were defined.

Based on the SHIPP concept, barriers were defined for each consequence, and the Fault Tree associated with failing each barrier was drawn.

Next, the quantitative probability of the base event in both the top event and barrier fault trees was determined using expert opinion. The IT2FS method was used to reduce the uncertainty of the judgments, and the Z-number was used to increase the confidence in the opinions to make the judgments as close to reality as possible. In addition, the power average operator weighting method was used to reduce the conflict between the experts’ opinions.

The bow-tie diagram was mapped into the Bayesian network following the previous steps. The first step was to identify the number of the fifteen most sensitive BEs related to the failure of the barriers in the Bayesian network to determine the posterior probability of consequences and the barrier failure. This part was done using data from IT2FS and IT2FS-Z computations to allow a comparison of the results from both.

Then, the number of demands and failures related to CBEs in the last five years were recorded, and their posterior probability was calculated using the mean of the beta distribution. The posterior probability of the barriers and consequences for five consecutive years was obtained by updating the BN based on the posterior probability of CBEs.

Based on the results obtained, the overall posterior probability of consequences shows an increasing trend over five years. Comparing the results from IT2FS-Z and IT2FS shows differences due to the effect of expert confidence in the IT2FS-Z method. These differences are more evident in the 10 −4 variance than in the 10 −5 variance.

Implementing the integrated IT2FS-Z and Bayesian network model in industrial settings holds significant potential to substantially improve workplace safety and operational efficiency. By utilizing this model for dynamic risk assessment, industry professionals stand to make significant strides in reducing accident rates, thereby fortifying safety protocols and mitigating operational risks. The practical implications of embracing this model encompass more precise risk predictions, early detection of potential hazards, and informed decision-making to prioritize preventive measures effectively. Ultimately, integrating IT2FS-Z and Bayesian networks presents a practical and dependable approach for industry professionals to elevate safety performance and optimize risk management strategies in real-world scenarios.

Supporting information

S1 appendix. calculate the basic event (ip12) probability by aggregating four experts’ opinions..

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.s001

S1 Table. Containing the following: S2A Table.

α and β values were obtained based on IT2FS-Z for the first to fifth years. S2B Table. α and β values were obtained based on IT2FS for the first to fifth years.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307883.s002

Acknowledgments

This study is part of the Corresponding author’s Ph.D. thesis supported by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences with the research ethics certificate: IR.UMSHA.REC.1401.572. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Mohammad Yazdi for his guidance.

• View Article
• Google Scholar
• PubMed/NCBI
• 12. Patel P, Garaniya V, Baalisampang T, Arzaghi E, Mohammadpour J, Abbassi R, et al. Machine learning regression-CFD models for predicting hydrogen dispersion in a naturally ventilated area. InInternational Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 2023 Jun 11 (Vol. 86908, p. V008T09A019). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
• 49. Nurnadiah Z, Syibrah N, Lazim A, Binyamin Y. An introduction to Z-numbers with interval type-2 fuzzy TOPSIS.

Cookies on GOV.UK

We use some essential cookies to make this website work.

We’d like to set additional cookies to understand how you use GOV.UK, remember your settings and improve government services.

We also use cookies set by other sites to help us deliver content from their services.

You have accepted additional cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

You have rejected additional cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

Drivers of technological needs: Delphi, Government Office for Science

This case study, focusing on the Government Office for Science, illustrates how the office used the Delphi tool from the Futures Toolkit.

Drivers of technological needs project: Delphi

This case study used a modified Delphi process and involved a large group of experts to identify technical capabilities and assess their importance to achieving the strategic goals.

Read other futures tools and methods case studies .

Updates to this page

Sign up for emails or print this page, related content, is this page useful.

• Yes this page is useful
• No this page is not useful

Help us improve GOV.UK

Don’t include personal or financial information like your National Insurance number or credit card details.

To help us improve GOV.UK, we’d like to know more about your visit today. Please fill in this survey (opens in a new tab) .

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• BMC Med Res Methodol

The case study approach

Sarah crowe.

1 Division of Primary Care, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Kathrin Cresswell

2 Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Ann Robertson

3 School of Health in Social Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Anthony Avery

Aziz sheikh.

The case study approach allows in-depth, multi-faceted explorations of complex issues in their real-life settings. The value of the case study approach is well recognised in the fields of business, law and policy, but somewhat less so in health services research. Based on our experiences of conducting several health-related case studies, we reflect on the different types of case study design, the specific research questions this approach can help answer, the data sources that tend to be used, and the particular advantages and disadvantages of employing this methodological approach. The paper concludes with key pointers to aid those designing and appraising proposals for conducting case study research, and a checklist to help readers assess the quality of case study reports.

Introduction

The case study approach is particularly useful to employ when there is a need to obtain an in-depth appreciation of an issue, event or phenomenon of interest, in its natural real-life context. Our aim in writing this piece is to provide insights into when to consider employing this approach and an overview of key methodological considerations in relation to the design, planning, analysis, interpretation and reporting of case studies.

The illustrative 'grand round', 'case report' and 'case series' have a long tradition in clinical practice and research. Presenting detailed critiques, typically of one or more patients, aims to provide insights into aspects of the clinical case and, in doing so, illustrate broader lessons that may be learnt. In research, the conceptually-related case study approach can be used, for example, to describe in detail a patient's episode of care, explore professional attitudes to and experiences of a new policy initiative or service development or more generally to 'investigate contemporary phenomena within its real-life context' [ 1 ]. Based on our experiences of conducting a range of case studies, we reflect on when to consider using this approach, discuss the key steps involved and illustrate, with examples, some of the practical challenges of attaining an in-depth understanding of a 'case' as an integrated whole. In keeping with previously published work, we acknowledge the importance of theory to underpin the design, selection, conduct and interpretation of case studies[ 2 ]. In so doing, we make passing reference to the different epistemological approaches used in case study research by key theoreticians and methodologists in this field of enquiry.

This paper is structured around the following main questions: What is a case study? What are case studies used for? How are case studies conducted? What are the potential pitfalls and how can these be avoided? We draw in particular on four of our own recently published examples of case studies (see Tables ​ Tables1, 1 , ​ ,2, 2 , ​ ,3 3 and ​ and4) 4 ) and those of others to illustrate our discussion[ 3 - 7 ].

Example of a case study investigating the reasons for differences in recruitment rates of minority ethnic people in asthma research[ 3 ]

Example of a case study investigating the process of planning and implementing a service in Primary Care Organisations[ 4 ]

Example of a case study investigating the introduction of the electronic health records[ 5 ]

Example of a case study investigating the formal and informal ways students learn about patient safety[ 6 ]

What is a case study?

A case study is a research approach that is used to generate an in-depth, multi-faceted understanding of a complex issue in its real-life context. It is an established research design that is used extensively in a wide variety of disciplines, particularly in the social sciences. A case study can be defined in a variety of ways (Table ​ (Table5), 5 ), the central tenet being the need to explore an event or phenomenon in depth and in its natural context. It is for this reason sometimes referred to as a "naturalistic" design; this is in contrast to an "experimental" design (such as a randomised controlled trial) in which the investigator seeks to exert control over and manipulate the variable(s) of interest.

Definitions of a case study

Stake's work has been particularly influential in defining the case study approach to scientific enquiry. He has helpfully characterised three main types of case study: intrinsic , instrumental and collective [ 8 ]. An intrinsic case study is typically undertaken to learn about a unique phenomenon. The researcher should define the uniqueness of the phenomenon, which distinguishes it from all others. In contrast, the instrumental case study uses a particular case (some of which may be better than others) to gain a broader appreciation of an issue or phenomenon. The collective case study involves studying multiple cases simultaneously or sequentially in an attempt to generate a still broader appreciation of a particular issue.

These are however not necessarily mutually exclusive categories. In the first of our examples (Table ​ (Table1), 1 ), we undertook an intrinsic case study to investigate the issue of recruitment of minority ethnic people into the specific context of asthma research studies, but it developed into a instrumental case study through seeking to understand the issue of recruitment of these marginalised populations more generally, generating a number of the findings that are potentially transferable to other disease contexts[ 3 ]. In contrast, the other three examples (see Tables ​ Tables2, 2 , ​ ,3 3 and ​ and4) 4 ) employed collective case study designs to study the introduction of workforce reconfiguration in primary care, the implementation of electronic health records into hospitals, and to understand the ways in which healthcare students learn about patient safety considerations[ 4 - 6 ]. Although our study focusing on the introduction of General Practitioners with Specialist Interests (Table ​ (Table2) 2 ) was explicitly collective in design (four contrasting primary care organisations were studied), is was also instrumental in that this particular professional group was studied as an exemplar of the more general phenomenon of workforce redesign[ 4 ].

What are case studies used for?

According to Yin, case studies can be used to explain, describe or explore events or phenomena in the everyday contexts in which they occur[ 1 ]. These can, for example, help to understand and explain causal links and pathways resulting from a new policy initiative or service development (see Tables ​ Tables2 2 and ​ and3, 3 , for example)[ 1 ]. In contrast to experimental designs, which seek to test a specific hypothesis through deliberately manipulating the environment (like, for example, in a randomised controlled trial giving a new drug to randomly selected individuals and then comparing outcomes with controls),[ 9 ] the case study approach lends itself well to capturing information on more explanatory ' how ', 'what' and ' why ' questions, such as ' how is the intervention being implemented and received on the ground?'. The case study approach can offer additional insights into what gaps exist in its delivery or why one implementation strategy might be chosen over another. This in turn can help develop or refine theory, as shown in our study of the teaching of patient safety in undergraduate curricula (Table ​ (Table4 4 )[ 6 , 10 ]. Key questions to consider when selecting the most appropriate study design are whether it is desirable or indeed possible to undertake a formal experimental investigation in which individuals and/or organisations are allocated to an intervention or control arm? Or whether the wish is to obtain a more naturalistic understanding of an issue? The former is ideally studied using a controlled experimental design, whereas the latter is more appropriately studied using a case study design.

Case studies may be approached in different ways depending on the epistemological standpoint of the researcher, that is, whether they take a critical (questioning one's own and others' assumptions), interpretivist (trying to understand individual and shared social meanings) or positivist approach (orientating towards the criteria of natural sciences, such as focusing on generalisability considerations) (Table ​ (Table6). 6 ). Whilst such a schema can be conceptually helpful, it may be appropriate to draw on more than one approach in any case study, particularly in the context of conducting health services research. Doolin has, for example, noted that in the context of undertaking interpretative case studies, researchers can usefully draw on a critical, reflective perspective which seeks to take into account the wider social and political environment that has shaped the case[ 11 ].

Example of epistemological approaches that may be used in case study research

How are case studies conducted?

Here, we focus on the main stages of research activity when planning and undertaking a case study; the crucial stages are: defining the case; selecting the case(s); collecting and analysing the data; interpreting data; and reporting the findings.

Defining the case

Carefully formulated research question(s), informed by the existing literature and a prior appreciation of the theoretical issues and setting(s), are all important in appropriately and succinctly defining the case[ 8 , 12 ]. Crucially, each case should have a pre-defined boundary which clarifies the nature and time period covered by the case study (i.e. its scope, beginning and end), the relevant social group, organisation or geographical area of interest to the investigator, the types of evidence to be collected, and the priorities for data collection and analysis (see Table ​ Table7 7 )[ 1 ]. A theory driven approach to defining the case may help generate knowledge that is potentially transferable to a range of clinical contexts and behaviours; using theory is also likely to result in a more informed appreciation of, for example, how and why interventions have succeeded or failed[ 13 ].

Example of a checklist for rating a case study proposal[ 8 ]

For example, in our evaluation of the introduction of electronic health records in English hospitals (Table ​ (Table3), 3 ), we defined our cases as the NHS Trusts that were receiving the new technology[ 5 ]. Our focus was on how the technology was being implemented. However, if the primary research interest had been on the social and organisational dimensions of implementation, we might have defined our case differently as a grouping of healthcare professionals (e.g. doctors and/or nurses). The precise beginning and end of the case may however prove difficult to define. Pursuing this same example, when does the process of implementation and adoption of an electronic health record system really begin or end? Such judgements will inevitably be influenced by a range of factors, including the research question, theory of interest, the scope and richness of the gathered data and the resources available to the research team.

Selecting the case(s)

The decision on how to select the case(s) to study is a very important one that merits some reflection. In an intrinsic case study, the case is selected on its own merits[ 8 ]. The case is selected not because it is representative of other cases, but because of its uniqueness, which is of genuine interest to the researchers. This was, for example, the case in our study of the recruitment of minority ethnic participants into asthma research (Table ​ (Table1) 1 ) as our earlier work had demonstrated the marginalisation of minority ethnic people with asthma, despite evidence of disproportionate asthma morbidity[ 14 , 15 ]. In another example of an intrinsic case study, Hellstrom et al.[ 16 ] studied an elderly married couple living with dementia to explore how dementia had impacted on their understanding of home, their everyday life and their relationships.

For an instrumental case study, selecting a "typical" case can work well[ 8 ]. In contrast to the intrinsic case study, the particular case which is chosen is of less importance than selecting a case that allows the researcher to investigate an issue or phenomenon. For example, in order to gain an understanding of doctors' responses to health policy initiatives, Som undertook an instrumental case study interviewing clinicians who had a range of responsibilities for clinical governance in one NHS acute hospital trust[ 17 ]. Sampling a "deviant" or "atypical" case may however prove even more informative, potentially enabling the researcher to identify causal processes, generate hypotheses and develop theory.

In collective or multiple case studies, a number of cases are carefully selected. This offers the advantage of allowing comparisons to be made across several cases and/or replication. Choosing a "typical" case may enable the findings to be generalised to theory (i.e. analytical generalisation) or to test theory by replicating the findings in a second or even a third case (i.e. replication logic)[ 1 ]. Yin suggests two or three literal replications (i.e. predicting similar results) if the theory is straightforward and five or more if the theory is more subtle. However, critics might argue that selecting 'cases' in this way is insufficiently reflexive and ill-suited to the complexities of contemporary healthcare organisations.

The selected case study site(s) should allow the research team access to the group of individuals, the organisation, the processes or whatever else constitutes the chosen unit of analysis for the study. Access is therefore a central consideration; the researcher needs to come to know the case study site(s) well and to work cooperatively with them. Selected cases need to be not only interesting but also hospitable to the inquiry [ 8 ] if they are to be informative and answer the research question(s). Case study sites may also be pre-selected for the researcher, with decisions being influenced by key stakeholders. For example, our selection of case study sites in the evaluation of the implementation and adoption of electronic health record systems (see Table ​ Table3) 3 ) was heavily influenced by NHS Connecting for Health, the government agency that was responsible for overseeing the National Programme for Information Technology (NPfIT)[ 5 ]. This prominent stakeholder had already selected the NHS sites (through a competitive bidding process) to be early adopters of the electronic health record systems and had negotiated contracts that detailed the deployment timelines.

It is also important to consider in advance the likely burden and risks associated with participation for those who (or the site(s) which) comprise the case study. Of particular importance is the obligation for the researcher to think through the ethical implications of the study (e.g. the risk of inadvertently breaching anonymity or confidentiality) and to ensure that potential participants/participating sites are provided with sufficient information to make an informed choice about joining the study. The outcome of providing this information might be that the emotive burden associated with participation, or the organisational disruption associated with supporting the fieldwork, is considered so high that the individuals or sites decide against participation.

In our example of evaluating implementations of electronic health record systems, given the restricted number of early adopter sites available to us, we sought purposively to select a diverse range of implementation cases among those that were available[ 5 ]. We chose a mixture of teaching, non-teaching and Foundation Trust hospitals, and examples of each of the three electronic health record systems procured centrally by the NPfIT. At one recruited site, it quickly became apparent that access was problematic because of competing demands on that organisation. Recognising the importance of full access and co-operative working for generating rich data, the research team decided not to pursue work at that site and instead to focus on other recruited sites.

Collecting the data

In order to develop a thorough understanding of the case, the case study approach usually involves the collection of multiple sources of evidence, using a range of quantitative (e.g. questionnaires, audits and analysis of routinely collected healthcare data) and more commonly qualitative techniques (e.g. interviews, focus groups and observations). The use of multiple sources of data (data triangulation) has been advocated as a way of increasing the internal validity of a study (i.e. the extent to which the method is appropriate to answer the research question)[ 8 , 18 - 21 ]. An underlying assumption is that data collected in different ways should lead to similar conclusions, and approaching the same issue from different angles can help develop a holistic picture of the phenomenon (Table ​ (Table2 2 )[ 4 ].

Brazier and colleagues used a mixed-methods case study approach to investigate the impact of a cancer care programme[ 22 ]. Here, quantitative measures were collected with questionnaires before, and five months after, the start of the intervention which did not yield any statistically significant results. Qualitative interviews with patients however helped provide an insight into potentially beneficial process-related aspects of the programme, such as greater, perceived patient involvement in care. The authors reported how this case study approach provided a number of contextual factors likely to influence the effectiveness of the intervention and which were not likely to have been obtained from quantitative methods alone.

In collective or multiple case studies, data collection needs to be flexible enough to allow a detailed description of each individual case to be developed (e.g. the nature of different cancer care programmes), before considering the emerging similarities and differences in cross-case comparisons (e.g. to explore why one programme is more effective than another). It is important that data sources from different cases are, where possible, broadly comparable for this purpose even though they may vary in nature and depth.

Analysing, interpreting and reporting case studies

Making sense and offering a coherent interpretation of the typically disparate sources of data (whether qualitative alone or together with quantitative) is far from straightforward. Repeated reviewing and sorting of the voluminous and detail-rich data are integral to the process of analysis. In collective case studies, it is helpful to analyse data relating to the individual component cases first, before making comparisons across cases. Attention needs to be paid to variations within each case and, where relevant, the relationship between different causes, effects and outcomes[ 23 ]. Data will need to be organised and coded to allow the key issues, both derived from the literature and emerging from the dataset, to be easily retrieved at a later stage. An initial coding frame can help capture these issues and can be applied systematically to the whole dataset with the aid of a qualitative data analysis software package.

The Framework approach is a practical approach, comprising of five stages (familiarisation; identifying a thematic framework; indexing; charting; mapping and interpretation) , to managing and analysing large datasets particularly if time is limited, as was the case in our study of recruitment of South Asians into asthma research (Table ​ (Table1 1 )[ 3 , 24 ]. Theoretical frameworks may also play an important role in integrating different sources of data and examining emerging themes. For example, we drew on a socio-technical framework to help explain the connections between different elements - technology; people; and the organisational settings within which they worked - in our study of the introduction of electronic health record systems (Table ​ (Table3 3 )[ 5 ]. Our study of patient safety in undergraduate curricula drew on an evaluation-based approach to design and analysis, which emphasised the importance of the academic, organisational and practice contexts through which students learn (Table ​ (Table4 4 )[ 6 ].

Case study findings can have implications both for theory development and theory testing. They may establish, strengthen or weaken historical explanations of a case and, in certain circumstances, allow theoretical (as opposed to statistical) generalisation beyond the particular cases studied[ 12 ]. These theoretical lenses should not, however, constitute a strait-jacket and the cases should not be "forced to fit" the particular theoretical framework that is being employed.

When reporting findings, it is important to provide the reader with enough contextual information to understand the processes that were followed and how the conclusions were reached. In a collective case study, researchers may choose to present the findings from individual cases separately before amalgamating across cases. Care must be taken to ensure the anonymity of both case sites and individual participants (if agreed in advance) by allocating appropriate codes or withholding descriptors. In the example given in Table ​ Table3, 3 , we decided against providing detailed information on the NHS sites and individual participants in order to avoid the risk of inadvertent disclosure of identities[ 5 , 25 ].

What are the potential pitfalls and how can these be avoided?

The case study approach is, as with all research, not without its limitations. When investigating the formal and informal ways undergraduate students learn about patient safety (Table ​ (Table4), 4 ), for example, we rapidly accumulated a large quantity of data. The volume of data, together with the time restrictions in place, impacted on the depth of analysis that was possible within the available resources. This highlights a more general point of the importance of avoiding the temptation to collect as much data as possible; adequate time also needs to be set aside for data analysis and interpretation of what are often highly complex datasets.

Case study research has sometimes been criticised for lacking scientific rigour and providing little basis for generalisation (i.e. producing findings that may be transferable to other settings)[ 1 ]. There are several ways to address these concerns, including: the use of theoretical sampling (i.e. drawing on a particular conceptual framework); respondent validation (i.e. participants checking emerging findings and the researcher's interpretation, and providing an opinion as to whether they feel these are accurate); and transparency throughout the research process (see Table ​ Table8 8 )[ 8 , 18 - 21 , 23 , 26 ]. Transparency can be achieved by describing in detail the steps involved in case selection, data collection, the reasons for the particular methods chosen, and the researcher's background and level of involvement (i.e. being explicit about how the researcher has influenced data collection and interpretation). Seeking potential, alternative explanations, and being explicit about how interpretations and conclusions were reached, help readers to judge the trustworthiness of the case study report. Stake provides a critique checklist for a case study report (Table ​ (Table9 9 )[ 8 ].

Potential pitfalls and mitigating actions when undertaking case study research

Stake's checklist for assessing the quality of a case study report[ 8 ]

Conclusions

The case study approach allows, amongst other things, critical events, interventions, policy developments and programme-based service reforms to be studied in detail in a real-life context. It should therefore be considered when an experimental design is either inappropriate to answer the research questions posed or impossible to undertake. Considering the frequency with which implementations of innovations are now taking place in healthcare settings and how well the case study approach lends itself to in-depth, complex health service research, we believe this approach should be more widely considered by researchers. Though inherently challenging, the research case study can, if carefully conceptualised and thoughtfully undertaken and reported, yield powerful insights into many important aspects of health and healthcare delivery.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AS conceived this article. SC, KC and AR wrote this paper with GH, AA and AS all commenting on various drafts. SC and AS are guarantors.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/100/prepub

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the participants and colleagues who contributed to the individual case studies that we have drawn on. This work received no direct funding, but it has been informed by projects funded by Asthma UK, the NHS Service Delivery Organisation, NHS Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme, and Patient Safety Research Portfolio. We would also like to thank the expert reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback. Our thanks are also due to Dr. Allison Worth who commented on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

• Yin RK. Case study research, design and method. 4. London: Sage Publications Ltd.; 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Keen J, Packwood T. Qualitative research; case study evaluation. BMJ. 1995; 311 :444–446. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sheikh A, Halani L, Bhopal R, Netuveli G, Partridge M, Car J. et al. Facilitating the Recruitment of Minority Ethnic People into Research: Qualitative Case Study of South Asians and Asthma. PLoS Med. 2009; 6 (10):1–11. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pinnock H, Huby G, Powell A, Kielmann T, Price D, Williams S, The process of planning, development and implementation of a General Practitioner with a Special Interest service in Primary Care Organisations in England and Wales: a comparative prospective case study. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO) 2008. http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/files/project/99-final-report.pdf
• Robertson A, Cresswell K, Takian A, Petrakaki D, Crowe S, Cornford T. et al. Prospective evaluation of the implementation and adoption of NHS Connecting for Health's national electronic health record in secondary care in England: interim findings. BMJ. 2010; 41 :c4564. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pearson P, Steven A, Howe A, Sheikh A, Ashcroft D, Smith P. the Patient Safety Education Study Group. Learning about patient safety: organisational context and culture in the education of healthcare professionals. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010; 15 :4–10. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009052. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• van Harten WH, Casparie TF, Fisscher OA. The evaluation of the introduction of a quality management system: a process-oriented case study in a large rehabilitation hospital. Health Policy. 2002; 60 (1):17–37. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00187-7. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stake RE. The art of case study research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.; 1995. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sheikh A, Smeeth L, Ashcroft R. Randomised controlled trials in primary care: scope and application. Br J Gen Pract. 2002; 52 (482):746–51. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• King G, Keohane R, Verba S. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1996. [ Google Scholar ]
• Doolin B. Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretative research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology. 1998; 13 :301–311. doi: 10.1057/jit.1998.8. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• George AL, Bennett A. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
• Eccles M. the Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG) Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implementation Science. 2006; 1 :1–8. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Netuveli G, Hurwitz B, Levy M, Fletcher M, Barnes G, Durham SR, Sheikh A. Ethnic variations in UK asthma frequency, morbidity, and health-service use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2005; 365 (9456):312–7. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sheikh A, Panesar SS, Lasserson T, Netuveli G. Recruitment of ethnic minorities to asthma studies. Thorax. 2004; 59 (7):634. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hellström I, Nolan M, Lundh U. 'We do things together': A case study of 'couplehood' in dementia. Dementia. 2005; 4 :7–22. doi: 10.1177/1471301205049188. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Som CV. Nothing seems to have changed, nothing seems to be changing and perhaps nothing will change in the NHS: doctors' response to clinical governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2005; 18 :463–477. doi: 10.1108/09513550510608903. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1985. [ Google Scholar ]
• Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ. 2001; 322 :1115–1117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000; 320 :50–52. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mason J. Qualitative researching. London: Sage; 2002. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brazier A, Cooke K, Moravan V. Using Mixed Methods for Evaluating an Integrative Approach to Cancer Care: A Case Study. Integr Cancer Ther. 2008; 7 :5–17. doi: 10.1177/1534735407313395. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Miles MB, Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2. CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 1994. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. Qualitative research in health care. BMJ. 2000; 320 :114–116. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cresswell KM, Worth A, Sheikh A. Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010; 10 (1):67. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-67. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001; 358 :483–488. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yin R. Case study research: design and methods. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 1994. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yin R. Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. Health Serv Res. 1999; 34 :1209–1224. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. 2. Los Angeles: Sage; 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Howcroft D, Trauth E. Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research, Theory and Application. Cheltenham, UK: Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar; 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
• Blakie N. Approaches to Social Enquiry. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1993. [ Google Scholar ]
• Doolin B. Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system. Info Systems J. 2004; 14 :343–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00176.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bloomfield BP, Best A. Management consultants: systems development, power and the translation of problems. Sociological Review. 1992; 40 :533–560. [ Google Scholar ]
• Shanks G, Parr A. Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems. Naples; 2003. Positivist, single case study research in information systems: A critical analysis. [ Google Scholar ]

The production of bronze weapons in the Chu state: a case study of bronze arrowheads excavated from the Yuwan cemetery in Hubei, China

• Published: 27 August 2024
• Volume 16 , article number  152 , ( 2024 )

Cite this article

• Ke Zhang 1 ,
• Qiang Li 2 , 3 ,
• Bin Bai 3 ,
• Jian He 3 &
• Haichao Li 2 , 3  

10 Accesses

Explore all metrics

During the Eastern Zhou Dynasty (770–222 BC), a large number of bronze arrowheads were unearthed from the Chu tombs, which is of great significance to the study of bronze weapons in the Chu state. However, little is known about the production technology, mode, and provenance of the raw materials for bronze weapons in the Chu state. Therefore, we conducted archaeometallurgical analyses of 16 bronze arrowheads excavated from the Yuwan cemetery using metallographic microscopy, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy, and multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The results indicate that the arrowheads are all copper-tin–lead ternary alloys with a high tin content and adequate mechanical properties. The differences in the production process, lead–tin content, and copper groups indicate that bronze arrowheads were produced at a high rate and in multiple batches. Furthermore, comparative lead isotope studies of galena from different regions revealed that during the Warring States period, the Chu state possessed a strong supply network of metal resources, and after occupying regions with abundant metal resources, it was transported to the Chu state for bronze production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Scientific analysis of bronze objects of the first millennium to the second century BCE excavated from the Jiangkou Site, Pengshan, Sichuan

Improvement and integration: scientific analyses of willow-leaf shaped bronze swords excavated from the Shuangyuan Village Cemetery, Chengdu, China

Metallurgical and chemical characterization of bronze remains found at the houhe site in shanxi province, china, data availability.

Data supporting the findings of this study are available in the article.

Bai B, Wang Z, Tang J et al (2020) Excavation Report on the Chu Tombs at Yuwan in Shayang County of jingmen City, Hubei Province. Jianghan Archaeol 03:33–48

Google Scholar  

Chen D, Han Y, Wang Z et al (2021a) The prestigious tin-lead horse fittings in the Warring States Period: Evidence from funerary artifacts of a Warring States Tomb at Shouxian, Anhui. Archaeometry 63:1290–1305. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12673

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Chen D, Yang Y, Wang T et al (2021b) Imitation or importation: archaeometallurgical research on bronze dagger-axes from Shuangyuan Village Cemetery of the Shu State in the Eastern Zhou Dynasty. J Archaeol Sci-Rep 40:103218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103218

Article   Google Scholar  

Chen D, Qiao B, Luo W (2021c) Archaeometallurgical research on the manufacture of lead mingqi from Nanyang in Chu state during the Warring States period. Archaeometry 63:810–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12645

Chen D, Yang Y, Wang T et al (2022) Improvement and integration: scientific analyses of willow-leaf shaped bronze swords excavated from the Shuangyuan Village Cemetery, Chengdu. China Herit Sci 10:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00725-2

He T, Chen Y (1999) Scientific Analysis of Jiangling Warring States Bronzes. Stud History of Natural Sci 02:63–72+99.

Hsu YK, Benjamin JS (2019) A geochemical characterization of lead ores in China: an isotope database for provenancing archaeological material. PLoS ONE 14(4):e0215973. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215973

Lehner J (2017) Compositional analysis of copper alloys from the middle plateau excavations at Boğazköy. Walter De Gruyter Press, Berlin.

Li H, Zhou Z, Liu Y (2020b) Fighting and burial: the production of bronze weapons in the Shu state based on a case study of Xinghelu cemetery, Chengdu. China Herit Sci 8:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00379-y

Li H, Zuo Z, Cui J et al (2020c) Copper alloy production in the Warring States period (475–221 BCE) of the Shu state: a metallurgical study on copper alloy objects of the Baishoulu cemetery in Chengdu, China. Herit Sci 8:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00412-0

Li H, Zuo Z, Cui J et al (2020d) Bronze production in the Ancient Chengdu Plains: a diachronic metallurgical perspective on a separate cultural region. J Cult Herit 43:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.11.005

Li H, Cui J, Chen J et al (2020a) Verification and Application of 'Copper Groups' Method. Jianghan Archaeol. 02: 103–109+102.

Liao D (2017) The bows and arows unearthed from Chu Tombs of the Warring States and their related problems. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing University, Jiangsu.

Lin Y, Luo S, Xiao L et al (2022) Techniques and Traditions of Warring States Bronzes from the Southern Edge of the Chu Territory. Cultural Relics 05:188–197

Luo Z, Fan A, Jin Z et al (2022) Scientific analysis and research on the Warring States bronze mirrors unearthed from Changsha Chu cemetery, Hunan province. China Archaeometry 64(5):1187–1201. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12776

Luo Z, Jin Z, Hu G et al (2023a) Lead isotopes of Eastern Zhou Bronzes Unearthed from Shaoyang of Hunan. Jianghan Archaeol 03:125–133

Luo Z, Yang M, Liu J et al (2023b) Diversified manufacturing processes and multiple mineral sources: Features of Warring States bronze vessels excavated from Chutai Cemetery M1. Anhui Province Sci China Technol Sci 66:2297–2307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2363-y

Ma J, Wu X, Yan X (2023) Metal Trade and National Integration: bronze technology and metal resources of Yue Style Bronzes from Hunan (8–5 C. BCE). Herit Sci 11:128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-00973-w

Marcos MT, Li XJ, Bevan A et al (2014) Forty thousand arms for a single emperor: from chemical data to the labor organization behind the bronze arrows of the terracotta army. J Archaeol Method Theory 21:534–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-012-9158-z

Mu D, Luo W, Song G et al (2019) The features as a county of Chu state: Chemical and metallurgical characteristics of the bronze artifacts from the Bayilu site. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 3:1123–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-018-0596-8

Nan P (2018) Research on bronze technology of Jin Kingdom in spring and autumn period. PhD Thesis, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing.

Pollard AM, Bray P, Cuénod A, Hommel P, Hsu YK, Liu R, Perucchetti L, Pouncett J, Saunders M (2018) Beyond provenance new approaches to interpreting the chemistry of archaeological copper alloys. Leuven University Press, Leuven. https://doi.org/10.11116/9789461662668

Pollard AM, Liu R (2022) The six recipes of Zhou – a new perspective on Jin (金) and Xi (锡). Antiquity 96:1200–1213. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2022.81

Shi Y (2006) Researches on bronze arrows before Qin Dynasty in northern China. PhD Thesis, Jilin University, Jilin.

Sun S, Han R, Li X (2011) Microstructure Atlas of Ancient Chinese Metallic Materials-Nonferrous Metal Volume. Science Press, Beijing

The Museum of Hubei Province (1989) Tomb of Marquis Yi of Zeng State. Cultural Relics Press, Beijing

Wang Y (2007) An experimental study of the simulation of a long tang of bronze arrowheads. Cultural Relics 11:91–94+96.

Wen J, Ling X, Zhao CC et al (2013) Primary analysis on lead isotope characteristics in Chu State bronzes in Eastern Zhou Period unearthed from Luan District, Anhui Province. J Northwest Univ (nat Sci Ed) 43:1016–1020

Xiang M (2017) Archaeological perspective on Ba's and Shu's ancient histories-focusing on the graves of Ba-Shu culture from East Zhou to West Han periods. PhD Thesis, Jilin University, Jilin.

Yang Z, Jiang Z, Thonglith L et al (2024) New evidence of metal exchange in Southeast Asia during the Iron Age: scientific analysis of excavated bronze in Vilabouly. Laos Archaeol Anthropol Sci 16:26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-023-01933-y

Yang H (2015) A New Opinion on the "ji" of the "Liuji" (Six Formulae of Bronze Alloys). Relics Museol. 01: 35–38+70.

Yin X (2023) Archaeological findings and new evidence of musical instruments and weapons in Chuci . Master’s Thesis, Shandong Normal University, Shandong.

Yuan Y (2008) A Preliminary Study of Chu Arrowheads with a Flat-Tip. Jianghan Archaeol. 03:48–52+54+53.

Zhang H (2012) The production process of iron tang and bronze arrowheads in the Warring States period and its evolution. J Chifeng Univ (philosophy Soc Sci Chinese Edition) 33(05):21–23

Zhang J, Liang C, Wang Z et al (2019) Metallographic and Component Analysis of the Bronze Vessels xcavated from Yugang Cemetery at Xiangyang City. Jianghan Archaeol. 03:126–134+102.

Zhao F, Sun M, Li P et al (2024) Revealing the manufacturing and corrosion characteristics of Chinese archaeological metal arrows by non-destructive neutron techniques. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 16:50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-024-01957-y

Zhao B (2013) A study of the changes in the boundary of the State of Chu: geopolitics as a research perspective. PhD Thesis, Fudan University, Shanghai.

Zhao M (2019) Study on the function of arrowheads unearthed from the Tombs of the Nobles in the Eastern Zhou Dynasty. Master’s Thesis, Xiamen University, Fujian.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Xiaoyu Liu, Anhui University, for assistance with Figure 1.

This research was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 21AKG008).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

The Yuelu Academy, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China

Centre for Archaeological Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China

Qiang Li & Haichao Li

School of Archaeology and Museology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China

Qiang Li, Bin Bai, Jian He & Haichao Li

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

K. Zhang: conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis and investigation, and the writing of the original draft preparation.

Q. Li: conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis and investigation, and the writing of the original draft preparation.

J. He: resources, writing—review, and editing.

B. Bai: Methodology, formal analysis, writing the original draft, and project administration.

H.C. Li: Methodology, formal analysis, writing the original draft, and project administration.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bin Bai or Haichao Li .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Qiang Li is Co-first author.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1554 KB)

Rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Zhang, K., Li, Q., Bai, B. et al. The production of bronze weapons in the Chu state: a case study of bronze arrowheads excavated from the Yuwan cemetery in Hubei, China. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 16 , 152 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-024-02061-x

Download citation

Received : 08 April 2024

Accepted : 15 August 2024

Published : 27 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-024-02061-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Yuwan cemetery
• The Chu state
• Bronze weapons
• Elemental compositions
• Lead isotope ratios
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

A distributed coordination approach for enhancing protection system adaptability in active distribution networks.

1. Introduction

• Proposal of an adaptive communication-based protection scheme that leverages distributed coordination and under-voltage criteria. This scheme enhances the effectiveness of protection systems in active distribution networks.
• Despite its communication dependence, the proposed scheme only requires a one-byte data exchange of element information between neighboring agents to ensure coordinated operation. This significantly reduces bandwidth requirements.
• The scheme empowers non-adaptive protection equipment to exhibit adaptive characteristics. This is verified through real-time testing in a Controller Hardware-In-the-Loop (CHIL) experimental setup, considering the primary fault behavior of inverter-based resources (IBRs).

2. Background

2.1. fault behavior and modeling of inverter-based resources.

• Voltage support during fault events: IBRs are expected to remain connected to support voltage during fault events. For instance, in certain countries, inverters must adhere to the ride-through curves defined in IEEE 1547-2018 [ 26 ].
• Dynamic limitation of fault current: to ensure the safety of inverters due to their reduced thermal capabilities, a dynamic limitation of fault current is employed [ 27 ].

2.2. Fault Direction Estimation Algorithms

2.3. graph theory, 2.4. optimal protection coordination, 3. proposed protection scheme, 3.1. distributed protection coordination.

3.2. Fault Detection and Direction Estimation Algorithm

3.3. online coordination algorithm, 4. real-time simulation test bed, 4.1. experimental setup, 4.2. study cases, 5. test results and discussion, 6. conclusions, author contributions, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest, nomenclature.

• Hamanah, W.M.; Hossain, M.I.; Shafiullah, M.; Abido, M.A. AC Microgrid Protection Schemes: A Comprehensive Review. IEEE Access 2023 , 11 , 76842–76868. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Manson, S.; McCullough, E. Practical Microgrid Protection Solutions: Promises and Challenges. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 2021 , 19 , 58–69. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wong, J.Y.R.; Tan, C.K.; Bakar, A.H.A.; Che, H.S. Selectivity Problem in Adaptive Overcurrent Protection for Microgrid with Inverter-Based Distributed Generators (IBDG): Theoretical Investigation and HIL Verification. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2022 , 37 , 3313–3324. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Samadi, A.; Chabanloo, R.M. Adaptive coordination of overcurrent relays in active distribution networks based on independent change of relays’ setting groups. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2020 , 120 , 106026. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chandraratne, C.; Logenthiran, T.; Naayagi, R.T.; Woo, W.L. Overview of Adaptive Protection System for Modern Power Systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, ISGT Asia, Singapore, 22–25 May 2018. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aminifar, F.; Teimourzadeh, S.; Shahsavari, A.; Savaghebi, M.; Golsorkhi, M.S. Machine learning for protection of distribution networks and power electronics-interfaced systems. Electr. J. 2021 , 34 , 106886. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cao, H.; Zhang, D.; Yi, S. Real-Time Machine Learning-based fault Detection, Classification, and locating in large scale solar Energy-Based Systems: Digital twin simulation. Solar Energy 2023 , 251 , 77–85. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sadoughi, M.; Hojjat, M.; Abardeh, M.H. Smart overcurrent relay for operating in islanded and grid-connected modes of a micro-grid without needing communication systems. Energy Syst. 2022 , 13 , 31–51. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Marín-Quintero, J.; Orozco-Henao, C.; Velez, J.C.; Bretas, A. Micro grids decentralized hybrid data-driven cuckoo search based adaptive protection model. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021 , 130 , 106960. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, X.; Luan, K. Setting Optimization of Distribution Network Current Protection Based on Constrained Multi-Objectives Backbone Particle Swarm Optimization. IEEJ Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2024 , 19 , 318–326. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ataei, M.A.; Gitizadeh, M. A distributed adaptive protection scheme based on multi-agent system for distribution networks in the presence of distributed generations. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2022 , 16 , 1521–1540. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Barranco-Carlos, A.; Orozco-Henao, C.; Marín-Quintero, J.; Mora-Flórez, J.; Herrera-Orozco, A. Adaptive Protection for Active Distribution Networks: An Approach Based on Fuses and Relays with Multiple Setting Groups. IEEE Access 2023 , 11 , 31075–31091. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gutierrez-Rojas, D.; Nardelli, P.H.J.; Mendes, G.; Popovski, P. Review of the State of the Art on Adaptive Protection for Microgrids Based on Communications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2021 , 17 , 1539–1552. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eslami, R.; Hosseini, S.A. A Comprehensive Method for Fault Detection in AC/DC Hybrid Microgrid. Electr. Power Components Syst. 2022 , 50 , 38–51. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• dos Reis, F.B.; Pinto, J.O.C.; dos Reis, F.S.; Issicaba, D.; Rolim, J.G. Multi-agent dual strategy based adaptive protection for microgrids. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2021 , 27 , 100501. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dizioli, F.A.; Barra, P.H.; Menezes, T.S.; Lacerda, V.A.; Coury, D.V.; Fernandes, R.A. Multi-agent system-based microgrid protection using angular variation: An embedded approach. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2023 , 220 , 109324. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wan, H.; Li, K.K.; Wong, K.P. An Adaptive Multiagent Approach to Protection Relay Coordination With Distributed Generators in Industrial Power Distribution System. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2010 , 46 , 2118–2124. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zamani, M.A.; Yazdani, A.; Sidhu, T.S. A communication-assisted protection strategy for inverter-based medium-voltage microgrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2012 , 3 , 2088–2099. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, W.; Lu, Z. Cyber security in the Smart Grid: Survey and challenges. Comput. Netw. 2013 , 57 , 1344–1371. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lu, Z.; Wang, J.; Shahidehpour, M.; Bai, L.; Xiao, Y.; Li, H. Cooperative Operation of Distributed Energy Resources and Thermal Power Plant With a Carbon-Capture-Utilization-and-Storage System. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2024 , 39 , 1850–1866. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Duan, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, J. An initialization-free distributed algorithm for dynamic economic dispatch problems in microgrid: Modeling, optimization and analysis. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2023 , 34 , 101004. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Acevedo-Iles, M.; Romero-Quete, D.; Mojica-Nava, E.; Cortes, C.A. Distributed Protection Coordination Algorithm Applied to Overcurrent-Based Schemes. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Belgrade PowerTech, Belgrade, Serbia, 25–29 June 2023; pp. 1–6. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mahamedi, B.; Zhu, J.G.; Eskandari, M.; Li, L.; Mehrizi-Sani, A. Analysis of fault response of inverter-interfaced distributed generators in sequence networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (IAS), Portland, OR, USA, 23–27 September 2018. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nimpitiwan, N.; Heydt, G.T.; Ayyanar, R.; Suryanarayanan, S. Fault current contribution from synchronous machine and inverter based distributed generators. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2007 , 22 , 634–641. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Khan, M.A.U.; Hong, Q.; Egea-Àlvarez, A.; Dyśko, A.; Booth, C. A communication-free active unit protection scheme for inverter dominated islanded microgrids. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022 , 142 , 108125. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Association, I.S. IEEE Std. 1547-2018 ; Standard for Interconnection and Interoperability of Distributed Energy Resources with Associated Electric Power Systems Interfaces. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018.
• Rathnayake, D.B.; Akrami, M.; Phurailatpam, C.; Me, S.P.; Hadavi, S.; Jayasinghe, G.; Zabihi, S.; Bahrani, B. Grid Forming Inverter Modeling, Control, and Applications. IEEE Access 2021 , 9 , 114781–114807. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Furlaneto, R.; Kocar, I.; Grilo-Pavani, A.; Karaagac, U.; Haddadi, A.; Farantatos, E. Short circuit network equivalents of systems with inverter-based resources. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2021 , 199 , 107314. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pattabiraman, D.; Lasseter, R.H.; Jahns, T.M. Transient Stability Modeling of Droop-Controlled Grid-Forming Inverters with Fault Current Limiting. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), Montreal, QC, Canada, 2–6 August 2020; pp. 1–5. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Just, H. Modeling and Control of Power Converters in Weak and Unbalanced Electric Grids ; Universitätsverlag der Technischen Universität Berlin: Berlin, Germany, 2021. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kabiri, R.; Holmes, D.G.; McGrath, B.P. Control of Active and Reactive Power Ripple to Mitigate Unbalanced Grid Voltages. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2016 , 52 , 1660–1668. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Haddadi, A.; Zhao, M.; Kocar, I.; Farantatos, E.; Martinez, F. Impact of Inverter-Based Resources on Memory-Polarized Distance and Directional Protective Relay Elements. In Proceedings of the 2020 52nd North American Power Symposium, NAPS 2020, Tempe, AZ, USA, 11–13 April 2021. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Haddadi, A.; Kocar, I.; Mahseredjian, J.; Karaagac, U.; Farantatos, E. Performance of phase comparison line protection under inverter-based resources and impact of the german grid code. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2–6 August 2020. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rezaeieh, M.R.H.; Bolandi, T.G.; Jalalat, S.M. A novel approach for resilient protection of AC microgrid based on differential phase angle of superimposed complex power. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2023 , 34 , 101024. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mojica-Nava, E. Optimización y Control en Grafos ; Editorial UN: Bogotá, Colombia, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ellis-Monaghan, J.A.; Moffatt, I. Handbook of the Tutte Polynomial and Related Topics ; Chapman and Hall/CRC: London, UK, 2022. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• IEEE Std 242-2001 ; IEEE Recommended Practice for Protection and Coordination of Industrial and Commercial Power Systems (IEEE Buff Book). (Revision of IEEE Std 242-1986) [IEEE Buff Book]; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2001; pp. 1–710. [ CrossRef ]
• Kumar, P.; Rana, A.S. Review of optimization techniques for relay coordination in consideration with adaptive schemes of Microgrid. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2024 , 230 , 110240. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Biswal, S.; Samantaray, S.R. An Effective Protection Coordination Scheme for Networked Microgrids Based on Nonstandard Tripping Characteristics of DOCRs. IEEE Syst. J. 2023 , 17 , 6588–6599. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Boyd, S.; Parikh, N.; Chu, E.; Peleato, B.; Eckstein, J. Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2010 , 3 , 1–122. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Barra, P.; Lacerda, V.; Fernandes, R.; Coury, D. A hardware-in-the-loop testbed for microgrid protection considering non-standard curves. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2021 , 196 , 107242. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• IEC 61869-9 ; Instrument Transformers-Part 9: Digital Interface for Instrument Transformers. IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
• IEC 61850-8-1 ; Communication Networks and Systems for Power Utility Automation—Part 8-1: Specific Communication Service Mapping (SCSM)—Mappings to MMS (ISO 9506-1 and ISO 9506-2) and to ISO/IEC 8802-3. IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
• IEEE 1588 ; IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems. (Revision of IEEE Std 1588-2002); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2008.
• Zillgith, M. Libiec61850/Lib60870 Open Source Libraries for IEC 61850 and IEC 60870-5-101/104. Available online: https://libiec61850.com/ (accessed on 25 November 2023).
• Acevedo-Iles, M.; Romero-Quete, D.; Cortes, C.A. Open-Source Code of an Adaptive Protection Scheme Using LIBIEC61850. 2023. Available online: https://github.com/ManuAce9/Integral-Protection-Scheme (accessed on 15 December 2023).
• Conseil International Des Grands Réseaux Électriques. Benchmark Systems for Network Integration of Renewable and Distributed Energy Resources ; CIGRÉ: Paris, France, 2014; Available online: https://www.e-cigre.org/publications/detail/575-benchmark-systems-for-network-integration-of-renewable-and-distributed-energy-resources.html (accessed on 15 January 2023).
• IEEE Std C57.109-1993 ; IEEE Guide for Liquid-Immersed Transformers Through-Fault-Current Duration. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1993; pp. 1–125. [ CrossRef ]
• Marín-Quintero, J.; Orozco-Henao, C.; Percybrooks, W.S.; Vélez, J.C.; Montoya, O.D.; Gil-González, W. Toward an adaptive protection scheme in active distribution networks: Intelligent approach fault detector. Appl. Soft Comput. 2021 , 98 , 106839. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Huang, Z.; Dong, L.; Yao, X. Reversed trend comprehensive assessment-based inverter fault diagnosis under various complex interferences in microgrid. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 2024 , 228 , 114301. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Acevedo-Iles, M.; Romero-Quete, D.; Cortes, C.A. A Distributed Coordination Approach for Enhancing Protection System Adaptability in Active Distribution Networks. Energies 2024 , 17 , 4338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174338

Acevedo-Iles M, Romero-Quete D, Cortes CA. A Distributed Coordination Approach for Enhancing Protection System Adaptability in Active Distribution Networks. Energies . 2024; 17(17):4338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174338

Acevedo-Iles, Manuel, David Romero-Quete, and Camilo A. Cortes. 2024. "A Distributed Coordination Approach for Enhancing Protection System Adaptability in Active Distribution Networks" Energies 17, no. 17: 4338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174338

Article Metrics

Further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals