Disadvantages
A search for articles on dental MRI was performed using the PubMed electronic databases. The following keywords (Magnetic Resonance Imaging, MRI, Implantology, Endodontics, Periapical Lesions, Anatomy, Artifacts, Maxillary Sinus) combined with several Boolean operators were searched.
Five hundred and twenty-five articles were screened, and only 37 studies were included. According to the authors, only some articles about endodontics, conservative dentistry, implantology, and oral and craniofacial surgery that best represented the aim of this study were selected. The articles selected and not related to these branches of dentistry were considered only for the technical specifications and considerations on the functioning of MRI. Original research articles on gnathology and joint disorders, orthodontics, and prosthetics not concerning the topics listed above were excluded.
All the included articles showed that MRI can obtain well-defined images, which can be applied in operative dentistry. The studies’ selection flow-chart is represented in Figure 2 ; studies that passed the inclusion criteria and were considered for review are shown in Table 2 . In the right conditions, with proper attention to teeth, bone, and the tissues of the maxillofacial region, MRI can offer very important information not easily obtainable with other diagnostic exams. Dental MRI can also recognize pathological endodontic conditions such as decay, microcracks, and necrotic pulp tissues. Moreover, it can diagnose periapical granulomas from a cystic lesion and can represent an important aid in maxillary sinus conditions diagnosis and in implant surgery planning.
Selection process for the studies included (following PRISMA Statement) [ 21 ].
Studies included in the review.
Title | Possible Applications | Year |
---|---|---|
Magnetic resonance imaging based computer-guided dental implant surgery—A clinical pilot study | Implantology | 2020 |
Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnostic purposes in operative dentistry—a systematic review | Endodontics, conservative dentistry, and anatomy | 2019 |
Virtual implant planning and fully guided implant surgery using magnetic resonance imaging—Proof of principle | Implantology | 2020 |
Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts produced by dental implants with different geometries | Implantology | 2020 |
Magnetic resonance imaging in endodontics: a literature review | Endodontics | 2017 |
Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments | Orthodontics (artefacts) | 2015 |
Human tooth and root canal morphology reconstruction using magnetic resonance imaging | Endodontics, anatomy | 2015 |
MRI for Dental Applications | Endodontics, oral surgery, anatomy | 2018 |
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Endodontics: A Review | Endodontics, conservative denstistry, anatomy, oral surgery | 2018 |
Magnetic resonance imaging in zirconia-based dental implantology | Implantology | 2014 |
High-resolution dental MRI for planning palatal graft surgery—a clinical pilot study | Surgery | 2018 |
Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and cone-beam computed tomography for maxillary sinus graft assessment | Surgery, maxillary sinus, implantology | 2020 |
Differentiation of periapical granulomas and cysts by using dental MRI: a pilot study | Surgery, endodontics | 2018 |
Assessment of signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio in 3 T magnetic resonance imaging in the presence of zirconium, titanium, and titanium-zirconium alloy implants | Surgery, implantology | 2019 |
Dental Materials and Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Artefacts | 1991 |
Differential diagnosis between a granuloma and radicular cyst: Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | Surgery, endodontics | 2018 |
Unwanted effects due to interactions between dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging: a review of the literature | Artefacts | 2018 |
Accuracy and Reliability of Root Crack and Fracture Detection in Teeth Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Endodontics, conservative dentistry | 2019 |
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Endodontic Treatment Prediction | Endodontics | 2010 |
The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient calculated from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images in the differentiation of maxillary sinus infiammatory diseases | Maxillary sinus | 2018 |
Season, Age and Sex-Related Differences in Incidental Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Paranasal Sinuses in Adults | Maxillary sinus | 2019 |
Anatomical variation in maxillary sinus ostium positioning: implications for nasal-sinus disease | Maxillary sinus | 2018 |
Metal-induced artifacts in MRI | Artefacts | 2011 |
Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vul-nerability of Pulse Sequences | Artefacts | 2018 |
Influence of magnetic susceptibility and volume on MRI artifacts produced by low magnetic susceptibility Zr-14Nb alloy and dental alloys | Artefacts | 2019 |
Dental MRI using a dedicated RF-coil at 3 Tesla | Artefacts | 2015 |
Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography caused by dental materials | Artefacts | 2012 |
Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers-an in vitro study | Artefacts, | 2012 |
Artifact Properties of Dental Ceramic and Titanium Implants in MRI | Artefacts | 2018 |
PETRA, MSVAT-SPACE and SEMAC sequences for metal artefact reduction in dental MR imaging | Artefacts | 2017 |
Magnetic resonance imaging in zirconia-based dental implantology | Artefacts, implantology | 2015 |
Assessment of apical periodontitis by MRI: a feasibility study | Surgery, endodontics | 2015 |
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Endodontic Treatment Prediction | Endodontics | 2011 |
Ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI for the assessment of caries lesions | Endodontics, conservative dentistry | 2013 |
Reperfusion of autotransplanted teeth--comparison of clinical measurements by means of dental magnetic resonance im-aging | Endodontics, surgery | 2013 |
Early detection of pulp necrosis and dental vitality after traumatic dental injuries in children and adolescents by 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging | Endodontics | 2015 |
Optimized 14 + 1 receive coil array and position system for 3D high-resolution MRI of dental and maxillomandibular structures | Endodontics | 2016 |
4.1. fundamental parameters in mri.
In dental MRI, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and resolution are two fundamental parameters to be considered; SNR is measured by calculating the ratio between the signal intensity in an area of interest and the standard deviation of the signal from the background [ 5 ]. The image resolution depends on the image voxel size. In MRI, the SNR can be improved by decreasing the matrix size, increasing the voxel size, increasing the field of view (FOV), reducing the bandwidth using surface coils, increasing the slice thickness, using an echo time (TE) of spin echo sequence as short as possible, and increasing the number of signal acquisitions (NA) [ 5 , 19 ].
The more the SNR is increased with the above-mentioned actions, the more the images’ definition decreases.
To reduce the FOV with the aim of increasing the resolution of the images without reducing SNR, it is necessary to use dedicated coils. The commonly used head or neck coils cannot reach an optimal resolution for being applied to improve dental diagnoses; intraoral positioning of the coil may increase both the resolution and the SNR, but it is very difficult to use due to anatomical limitations [ 9 , 19 ]. One of the most comfortable coil positions was proposed by Idiyatullin et al., with the advantages of using a loop coil, very similar to an impression tray, in the occlusal position for dental applications [ 22 ].
Despite the progress obtained so far, with the purpose of optimizing these parameters, the results (discussed below) are positive.
Regarding apical periodontitis, it is a chronic inflammatory disease of peri-radicular tissues, usually caused by a chronic bacterial infection of the root canal system near the bone. The pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the cause of endodontic failure have been extensively reviewed by Siqueira and by Nair: the main role is played by bacteria (mainly obligate anaerobes and fungi), depending on the relationship with the host’s immune system [ 23 , 24 ]. Endo-osseous development of these conditions prevents the arrival of immunity cells and antibiotic molecules through the bloodstream. In order to be radiographically visible with bidimensional RX, a periapical radio-lucency should reach from 30% to 50% of bone mineral loss [ 25 ].
Sometimes these lesions heal spontaneously, sometimes they get worse, so much so that they enlarge and compress noble structures, or pour out as abscesses outside the bone [ 23 , 26 ].
The chronicity of these lesions makes them capable of corroding the bone in their proximity, visible radiographically as radiolucent lesions, although histological studies show that they can differ between granuloma or cyst [ 26 , 27 , 28 ].
Nair showed that up to 85% of all periapical lesions are granulomas [ 24 ].
Periapical granulomas contain granulomatous tissue, cell infiltrates, and a fibrous capsule, root cysts are considerably less frequent, and occur in two distinct histological categories: true apical cysts and pocket apical cysts [ 28 , 29 ]. True root cysts are entirely enclosed by the cyst wall epithelium, developed from the dormant epithelium, also known as epithelial rests of Malassez, after local inflammation stimuli. Periapical pocket cysts are lined by the epithelium but are open to the root canal, effectively isolating a pocket-like micro abscess from the periapical environment. This division is not merely histological, but has an important influence on the treatment, as the chances of recovery are very different from one to the other: granulomas and pocket cysts can heal after orthograde root canal therapy, while true cysts are self-sufficient and therefore less likely to be resolved with non-surgical treatment, hence, without removal of the cystic epithelium [ 26 , 28 ]. In the literature there are different opinions on this topic, not all authors agree about this definition [ 29 ]. Furthermore, larger lesions (more than 5 mm) are more likely to be root cysts associated with lower success rates for orthograde treatment [ 26 , 30 ].
From these considerations, the need for a diagnostic exam is highlighted, such as MRI, free from biological damage, unlike CBCT or CT, and able to evaluate in vivo the nature of the lesion and to orient the clinician towards the most appropriate treatment, whether it is surgical for true root cysts or endodontic, orthograde retreatment for periapical pocket cysts or granulomas [ 31 ].
One of the main advantages of MRI over CT and CBCT is the high soft tissue contrast and the ability to vary the contrast by changing the design of the MRI sequence, as well as the absence of ionizing radiation [ 30 ].
More specifically, MRI not only provides excellent soft tissue contrast but also allows for the evaluation of specific tissue components in different sequences.
Given these strengths, MRI has shown diagnostic superiority over CT techniques in various soft tissue associated pathologies in the head and neck region, in fact, MRI is the most suitable examination for the study of brain and solid tumors [ 9 ].
Therefore, surgical biopsy and subsequent histopathological evaluation remains the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis of different periapical lesions, but it obviously represents the most invasive technique considering the risk/benefit ratio. In this specific case, it is emphasized how this examination can simplify the diagnosis, having marked characteristics in evaluating lesions filled with liquid. Technical advances associated with the use of higher field strength, dedicated coil systems, and optimized sequencing techniques resulted in improved image quality, followed by increased interest in magnetic resonance imaging in dentistry [ 27 , 32 ].
To date, however, only Geibel and colleagues have systematically analyzed apical bone lesions with MRI; in a comparison between MRI and CBCT for the diagnosis of periapical lesions, they concluded that MRI is useful for the identification of fluids (hypointense T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images) and fibrous tissue (isointense on T1- and T2-weighted images) [ 32 ].
MRI has shown greater sensitivity in diagnosing periapical lesions than CBCT, in particular, when cystic fluid was present, thus excluding that it may be a vascularized lesion, such as a peri-apical granuloma. Moreover, it can more precisely diagnose the true dimensions of a lesion, and can provide a better estimation of the relationship between a lesion and critical structures, such as nerves and vessels [ 30 ].
Granulomas, on the other hand, are very heterogeneous due to the chronical infiltration of different immunity cells. Another important differentiation is represented by the wall of the lesion, with “thin-walled” cysts (mean: 1.6 mm) and “thick-walled” granulomas (mean: 4.6 mm), the latter also having poorly defined lesion margins in both MRI and in CBCT.
Moreover, the internal texture is very different; it is homogeneous in cysts, and inhomogeneous in granulomas [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Several authors postulated that dental MRI could detect inflammatory pathologies at an early stage, long before CBCT or conventional radiographs [ 14 , 30 , 32 ].
In many cases, the teeth on which these pathologies develop have already undergone primary endodontic treatment, and therefore the roots are reamed and filled with dense filling materials.
Geibel et al. believe it is very difficult to identify the root apex of the responsible tooth in these cases due to the presence of artifacts [ 32 ]. As previously stated, in the study of Chockattu et al., the same number of artifacts were not present with MRI, and when present, they appeared to produce undetectable distortions, unlike CBCT [ 9 ].
Therefore, it can be concluded that the MRI technique is essential for the analysis of periapical lesions, as these lesions must be adequately imaged with regard to resolution, contrast, signal-to-noise ratio, and susceptibility to artifacts.
Endodontically treated and incorrectly restored teeth, in addition to suffering more frequently from periapical infections, have a greater risk of fracturing [ 33 ].
Regarding dental fractures, MRI has the potential to help in determining the presence and extent of cracks and fractures in teeth due to good contrast, and especially without exposure to ionizing radiation as with CBCT, which is considered the current clinical standard [ 34 ].
In most cases, discontinuities cannot be definitively visualized in the absence of invasive measures such as CBCT imaging; in the study of Schuurmans et al., the aim was to develop MRI criteria for the identification of root cracks and fractures and to establish reliability and accuracy in their subsequent detection [ 5 , 34 ].
It is important to underline that these authors used in vivo MRI acquisition sequences on extracted teeth. A problem when evaluating these MRI studies is that in vitro sequences are frequently applied, with very long acquisition times, and they are impossible to be applied in vivo, and therefore are far from improving clinical practice. From the results of these studies, it is possible to highlight that MRI, thanks to the higher contrast, has allowed for better evaluation of cracks and fractures compared to CBCT imaging [ 34 ].
Part of these results is related to the reduced number of artifacts generated from radiopaque materials compared to CBCT imaging; this statement is very important because endodontically treated teeth that were root-filled are more prone to fracture if not correctly restored, due to tooth substance loss [ 9 , 10 , 33 ].
In conclusion, the advantages of contrast enhancement, and the absence or reduction of radiopaque material artifacts in MRI and comparable sensitivity and specificity measures with CBCT, suggest the importance of improvements in magnetic resonance quality, particularly in image acquisition and post-processing parameters. Always remembering the absence of ionizing radiation, and the continuous improvements that this imaging exam is obtaining, the next applications of dental MRI in detecting dental cracks or fractures may involve defining the minimum physical size for detection using advanced MRI sequences [ 12 , 18 , 19 ].
Regarding endodontic anatomy, while performing an endodontic treatment, it is extremely important to create a correct and accurate topographic image of the root canal system; knowing the anatomy well before starting endodontic treatment allows the clinician to use the most suitable instruments in the correct way, avoiding subjecting them to considerable stress that could lead to intracanal separation [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ].
Up to date, visualization of root canal topography and dental anatomy has been obtained by conventional bi-dimensional radiographs, and only in recent years has CBCT been increasingly applied, due to the reduction of the exposure dose, the increasing availability of the machinery in the private practice, and the reduced costs compared to the past or to other exams. MRI offers high-level tissue visibility, equal to or even greater than CT and CBCT, but it requires sufficient resolution that tends to be achieved only with much longer scan times, without, however, exposure to ionizing radiation.
Several articles have shown the usefulness of spin echo and gradient echo imaging, single point imaging, and SPRITE and STRAFI techniques for the visualization of tooth surface geometry, as well as for distinguishing between soft tissue and mineralized tissue in extracted teeth [ 38 ]. The high-intensity signal from water and the lack of signal from mineralized tissues produce a high contrast that allows for the recognition of the dental crown and the outline of the pulp chamber, root canals, and carious lesion [ 39 , 40 , 41 ].
Bracher et al. stated that carious tissues provide an intense signal, easily recognizable in the 3D reconstruction performed by the software.
In order for magnetic resonance imaging to be applied to endodontic clinical practice, it is necessary to scan at the microscopic level, with microscopy MRI defined as an MRI with voxel resolutions better than 100 mm 3 . Magnetic resonance microscopy chambers are generally small, typically less than 1 cm3. With a resolution of about 100–300 mm, magnetic resonance microscopy could lead to a better understanding of processes that occur inside the teeth.
The obtained microscopic images allow for adequate visualization of the pulp chamber, pulp, and root canals. Ploder et al. used a magnetic resonance exam as an imaging examination complementary to the electrical pulp test for the evaluation of pulp health and of pathological processes occurring within the dental pulp tissue [ 42 ].
After pulp health determination with the electrical test, healthy pulp could show a signal on T2-weighted images ranged between intermediate and high hyperintense values, which becomes shorter according to patient age, due to secondary dentin accumulation [ 41 , 42 ].
The characteristic of magnetic resonance represents tissues that are rich in water very well, for this reason, the inflammatory response, which develops edema, will be evaluated in an ideal way, and certainly better than dental necrosis, in which we expect a loss in the content of water in the pulp [ 42 ].
MRI can therefore be useful in evaluating reperfusion, for example, that concerning regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) and dental trauma [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ].
The application limit of this examination is that, to obtain a sufficient resolution for clinical evaluation in vivo, it takes up to 90 min. It is expected that, with technological development, the imaging time will be reduced in the future, making it fast enough to facilitate clinical use.
The visualization of hard tissues, such as enamel and dentin that do not have MRI signals, considering the low content of protons, remains the real technical challenge to be faced in making MRI a daily diagnostic exam in dentistry [ 46 ].
The presented results show the feasibility of using magnetic resonance microscopy to carefully visualize root canal anatomy, applicable for the planning of endodontic procedures while avoiding NiTi rotary instruments, intracanal separation, or other iatrogenic errors, without having an increase in radiation-related biological risks [ 39 , 47 ].
Regarding implantology, the aim of the study proposed by Probst et al. was to show whether computer-aided 3D implant planning with template-guided positioning of dental implants based on MRI data is a clinically valid procedure [ 48 ].
It is very important to point out that all cases in this study were performed by guided implant surgery, virtually planned based on MRI and intraorally transferred by static guides. It is necessary to underline that the authors have reported a deviation between the virtually planned implant position and the resulting final implant position, a deviation of occlusal surfaces between the digitized and occlusal plaster models derived from the MRI data, and the visualization of important anatomical structures that was completely acceptable for clinical application. It is, therefore, possible to define that MR images are sufficiently accurate to show all anatomical structures relevant to dental implant planning, free from ionizing radiation, with an excellent risk/benefit ratio.
In the typical MRI representation, hard dental tissues and bone tissue appear extremely dark due to the poor liquid composition. However, by inverting the dark signal values of the MR image datasets, it is possible to provide a bright or white color to the teeth and various bone structures, and so, an image more similar to CBCT is obtained [ 12 , 13 , 48 ].
The sequence parameters have been optimized considering the spatial resolution and total image acquisition time requirements; therefore, the longer the image acquisition time, the greater the chance of motion artifacts occurring.
The aforementioned authors suggest that the isotropic 3D size with a 0.6 mm3 voxel resulted in a reasonable acquisition time of just over 3:08 min.
In implantology it is very important to consider the anatomical limitations. For example, the mandibular canal position, an extremely important limitation in the posterior atrophic mandible, is excellently displayed with the use of the T1-weighted 3D sequence.
In the absence of the cortical bone lining the mandibular canal, or in the presence of metal restorations near the inferior alveolar nerve, artifacts can make its location very difficult. This unfortunate event occurs in both T1-weighted sequences and in CBCT imaging [ 9 , 48 ].
However, MR imaging offers a unique advantage and added value through the application of soft tissue contrast in specific sequences. While the T1-weighted sequence is practically a “bone sequence”, and therefore comparable to CBCT imaging, the T2-weighted STIR sequence can work as a “soft tissue and nerve sequence” during implant planning, which allows for direct nerve and blood vessel imaging [ 19 , 20 , 48 , 49 , 50 ].
With increasingly adequate programming software, it will be possible to obtain more information from both sequences in order to improve implant programming, always with an excellent risk/benefit ratio, considering the absence of exposure to ionizing radiation.
One of the most complex problems to be solved is represented by motion artifacts, which can compromise the overall image quality of MR imaging due to the significantly increased examination times compared to CT or CBCT, which represents the major limitation nowadays [ 5 , 7 , 9 , 48 ].
This problem could be solved by trying to reduce the examination time, increasing the stability of the patient’s head, and using more effective software to digitally correct these artifacts. However, there is always the problem of artifacts due to the presence of metallic materials, which can affect the representation of important structures when in proximity [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ].
Except for titanium plates and synthesis screws, artifacts due to the presence of metal dental restorations were limited to the occlusal plane area, and therefore minimally limit the implant treatment plan.
The presence of artifacts of the occlusal plane can represent a limit just when a tooth-supported template-guide is produced only from the MRI exam. Other anatomical structures such as bones, the maxillary sinus, and soft tissues were substantially unaffected, not compromising implant planning at all [ 48 ].
Artifacts also represent an important problem for CBCT and CT examinations, considering, moreover, the biological damage that these examinations generate.
However, while some materials such as stainless steel and cobalt–chromium alloy are responsible for pronounced artifacts, both in CBCT and in MRI, that may no longer allow for a reasonable diagnosis, the majority of dental materials such as zirconia, amalgams, gold alloys, gold–ceramic crowns, titanium alloys, some composites, and nickel–titanium cause artifacts in a minor way [ 9 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ].
An interesting evaluation regarding the article of Probst et al. is that the tooth-supported templates were obtained exclusively with images from MRI, and not from intraoral scanners or other types of imaging or impressions, thus representing a valid alternative, with excellent clinical results.
The 3D comparisons of deviations between MRI reconstructed and scan-derived tooth surfaces, carried out for further evaluation of the methodology, showed acceptable values for clinical application [ 20 , 48 ].
The study emphasizes that these results were achieved with a maximum number of 5–6 metal restorations per jaw [ 48 ].
It must be considered, however, that a tooth that has undergone artifacts can be excluded from the template, placing it on all available nearby ones.
In addition, MRI can provide added diagnostic value due to the excellent soft tissue contrast, which allows, for example, a direct image of peripheral nerve tissue, such as the inferior alveolar nerve, useful for implant planning, as demonstrated in this study [ 24 , 49 , 50 ].
In radiographic imaging, the problem of artefacts is always present, but peri-implant bone defect evaluation, or studies about bone morphology near the implant, are still being carried out [ 51 ].
Moreover, radiographic imaging is used for patient follow-up, but always with exposure to a certain dose of ionizing radiation. Precisely from this perspective, magnetic resonance imaging can become an easily repeatable diagnostic test with an excellent risk/benefit ratio.
In the context of implant surgery, magnetic resonance imaging allows for the detailed measurement of mucosal thickness and can aid in the planning of palatal tissue harvesting to obtain soft tissue augmentation [ 52 ].
Despite the various disadvantages that characterize this method, the possibility of being able to perform an examination with a very low risk/benefit ratio is of truly unparalleled value, which must lead to a greater interest in the development of this diagnostic exam.
Regarding the maxillary sinus, the evaluations made by Aktuna Belgin et al. and Dong et al. underlined its importance, showing how it is a structure that can be well studied by MRI, as also pointed out by Panou et al. and Özdemir et al. [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ].
Successful treatment of sino-nasal disorders, complete knowledge, and correct visualization of the anatomical conditions of the osteomeatal complex and paranasal sinuses is fundamental in head, neck, and oral-maxillofacial surgery. The maxillary sinuses are very interesting in dental clinical practice, and very frequently studied for atrophic jaw rehabilitation [ 53 ]. For this reason, it is possible to affirm that they represent both a limitation and a frequent rehabilitation possibility. Knowledge of the anatomical variables of the maxillary sinus is precious to prevent possible accidents and complications in maxillofacial surgery, as well as in the preoperative evaluation in dental implant treatment or in more complex bone regenerations.
Previous studies have also examined volumetric changes in the maxillary sinus; relationships with tooth position; and orthodontic treatment-induced changes such as rapid expansion, septal deviation, and sinus pathologies, as well as examining the differences in the size and anatomy of the maxillary sinus based on age, sex, and race [ 53 , 56 , 57 ].
Published studies on maxillary sinus volume have produced differing results. Rani et al. found no significant differences in volume (MSV) between the left and right maxillary sinus, and reported that MSV was significantly higher in males than in females [ 57 ].
This finding corroborates the findings of the study of Aktuna Belgin et al.; Özdemir et al. and Butaric et al. stated that maxillary sinus development continues into the second and third decade of life in females and males, respectively, with an age-associated decrease in volume occurring after development is completed. All these results have been confirmed by Rani et al. [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ].
Compared to CT and CBCT, MRI has fewer metallic artifacts, but with longer exam execution times, and can be used with 3D medical imaging software, allowing for the examination of images obtained in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes, showing images very similar to that of CBCT, also by the use of specific filters, to increase the contrast between different structures [ 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].
In maxillary sinus surgery for implant placement, it is important to know and visualize the state of the Schneiderian membrane and any reactive thickening phenomena [ 59 , 60 ]. CBCT allows for visualizing the three-dimensional bone morphology, but the mucosa is poorly defined, despite exposure to ionizing radiation [ 2 , 4 , 5 ].
In this evaluation, MRI is positioned as a very interesting exam with great margins for improvement, having also demonstrated its usefulness in complete implant planning and in defining the state of health of the maxillary sinus and the Schneiderian membrane for any bone regeneration [ 60 , 61 ].
Moreover, it is necessary to consider that many imaging systems are undergoing considerable changes due to the continuous development of methods that exploit artificial intelligence (AI).
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has proven to be successful in many research fields of medical imaging and various applications of robotic surgery. It can be extremely useful in recognizing landmarks in MRI and optimizing the image produced. In the near future, as with many kinds of software, we expect applications of these technologies to magnetic resonance too, in order to improve and make the use of this interesting diagnostic exam, free from ionizing radiation, more suitable for clinical dental practice [ 62 , 63 , 64 ].
With the development of technology, as happened to CT and CBCT in the past, software programs that perform three-dimensional modelling have been introduced in MRI.
As pointed out, the three-dimensional modelling can be excellently applied in the measurement of maxillary sinus volume and Schneiderian membrane thickness, to decide which rehabilitation is the most suitable.
Moreover, MRI-based computer-assisted implant surgery is demonstrated to be a feasible and accurate procedure, eliminating radiation exposure.
In addition, MRI, compared to the CBCT, better allows for the diagnostic visualization of soft tissues such as the alveolar inferior nerve, which is the most important limitation in the context of posterior mandible rehabilitation.
MRI could become a more common diagnostic exam, both in research and clinical endodontics, providing the possibility to evaluate decay extensions, vitality, and vascularization of the pulp after trauma or after regenerative endodontics; the presence of soft tissue remnants after endodontic procedures or the early detection of missing canals, cracks, and fractures; and precise follow-up of periapical lesions, with the great advantage of avoiding the risk of ionizing radiation damage.
The development of this method can really allow for an improvement in the diagnosis and prognosis of periapical bone lesions.
The main disadvantages of this examination remain the difficult visualization of tissues poor in water, which, however, has proven to be correctable by dedicated software, and can lead to excellent results. Patients suffering from claustrophobia, the presence of devices that prevent the examination from taking place, artifacts from materials and movements, the cost, the lack of availability, and the long examination time represent the disadvantages that will need to be improved in the future.
The results analyzed in this review highlight the potential of MRI for diagnosis in dental clinical practice, without the risk of biological damage from continuous ionizing radiation exposure.
Conceptualization, R.R. and A.Z.; methodology, A.C.; validation, D.D.N.; formal analysis, L.T.; investigation, R.R.; resources, A.M.; data curation, A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.R.; writing—review and editing, R.R. and A.Z.; visualization, L.T.; supervision, L.T.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research received no external funding.
Informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Breast Cancer Research volume 25 , Article number: 87 ( 2023 ) Cite this article
11k Accesses
15 Citations
1 Altmetric
Metrics details
Deep learning analysis of radiological images has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy of breast cancer, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes. This paper systematically reviewed the current literature on deep learning detection of breast cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The literature search was performed from 2015 to Dec 31, 2022, using Pubmed. Other database included Semantic Scholar, ACM Digital Library, Google search, Google Scholar, and pre-print depositories (such as Research Square). Articles that were not deep learning (such as texture analysis) were excluded. PRISMA guidelines for reporting were used. We analyzed different deep learning algorithms, methods of analysis, experimental design, MRI image types, types of ground truths, sample sizes, numbers of benign and malignant lesions, and performance in the literature. We discussed lessons learned, challenges to broad deployment in clinical practice and suggested future research directions.
Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in women. One in eight American women (13%) will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime, and one in 39 women (3%) will die from breast cancer (American Cancer Society Statistics, 2023). The American Cancer Society recommends yearly screening mammography for early detection of breast cancer for women, which may begin at age 40 [ 1 ]. About 2%–5% of women in the general population in the US have a lifetime risk of breast cancer of 20% or higher [ 1 ], although it can vary depending on the population being studied and the risk assessment method used. The ACS recommends yearly breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in addition to mammography for women with 20–25% or greater lifetime risk [ 1 ]. Early detection and treatment are likely to result in better patient outcomes.
MRI is generally more sensitive and offers more detailed pathophysiological information but is less cost effective compared to mammography for population-based screening [ 2 , 3 ]. Breast MRI utilizes high-powered magnets and radio waves to generate 3D images. Cancer yield from MRI alone averages 22 cancers for every 1000 women screened, a rate of cancer detection roughly 10 times that achieved with screening mammography in average-risk women, and roughly twice the yield achieved with screening mammography in high-risk women [ 4 ]. Many recent studies have established contrast-enhanced breast MRI as a screening modality for women with a hereditary or familial increased risk for the development of breast cancer [ 5 ].
Interpretation of breast cancer on MRI relies on the expertise of radiologists. The growing demand for breast MRI and the shortage of radiologists has resulted in increased workload for radiologists [ 6 , 7 ], leading to long wait times and delays in diagnosis [ 8 , 9 ]. Machine learning methods show promise in assisting radiologists, in improving accuracy with the interpretation of breast MRI images and supporting clinical decision-making and improving patient outcomes [ 10 , 11 ]. By analyzing large datasets of MRIs, machine learning algorithms can learn to identify and classify suspicious areas, potentially reducing the number of false positives and false negatives [ 11 , 12 ] and thus improving diagnostic accuracy. A few studies have shown that machine learning can outperform radiologists in detecting breast cancer on MRIs [ 13 ]. Machine learning could also help to prioritize worklists in a radiology department.
In recent years, deep learning (DL) methods have revolutionized the field of computer vision with wide range of applications, from image classification and object detection to semantic segmentation and medical image analysis [ 14 ]. Deep learning is superior to traditional machine learning because of its ability to learn from unstructured or unlabeled data [ 14 ]. Unlike traditional machine algorithms which require time-consuming data labeling, deep learning algorithms are more flexible and adaptable as they can learn from data that are not labeled or structured [ 15 ]. There have been a few reviews on deep learning breast cancer detection. Oza et al. reviewed detection and classification on mammography [ 16 ]. Saba et al. [ 17 ] presented a compendium of state-of-the-art techniques for diagnosing breast cancers and other cancers. Hu et al. [ 18 ] provided a broad overview on the research and development of artificial intelligence systems for clinical breast cancer image analysis, discussing the clinical role of artificial intelligence in risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response assessment. Mahoro et al. [ 10 ] reviewed the applications of deep learning to breast cancer diagnosis across multiple imaging modalities. Sechopoulos et al. [ 19 ] discussed the advances of AI in the realm of mammography and digital tomosynthesis. AI-based workflows integrating multiple datastreams, including breast imaging, can support clinical decision-making and help facilitate personalized medicine [ 20 ]. To our knowledge, there is currently no review that systematically compares different deep learning studies of breast cancer detection using MRI. Such a review would be important because it could help to delineate the path forward.
Figure 1 shows a graphic representation of a deep learning workflow. The input layer represents the breast cancer image that serves as input to the CNN. The multiple convolutional layers are stacked on top of the input layer. Each convolutional layer applies filters or kernels to extract specific features from the input image. These filters learn to detect patterns such as edges, textures, or other relevant features related to breast cancer. After each convolutional layer, activation functions like rectified linear unit (ReLU) are typically applied to introduce nonlinearity into the network. Following some of the convolutional layers, pooling layers are used to downsample the spatial dimensions of the feature maps. Common pooling techniques include max-pooling or average pooling. Pooling helps reduce the computational complexity and extract the most salient features. After the convolutional and pooling layers, fully connected layers are employed. These layers connect all the neurons from the previous layers to the subsequent layers. Fully connected layers enable the network to learn complex relationships between features. The final layer is the output layer, which provides the classification or prediction. In the case of breast cancer detection, it might output the probability or prediction of malignancy or benignity.
The input layer represents the breast cancer image that serves as input to the CNN. The multiple convolutional layers are stacked on top of the input layer. Pooling layers are used to downsample the spatial dimensions of the feature maps. Fully connected layers are then employed to connect all the neurons from the previous layers to the subsequent layers. The final layer is the output layer, which provides the classification
The goal of this study was to review the current literature on deep learning detection of breast cancer using breast MRI. We included literature in which DL was used for both primary screening setting and as a supplemental detection tool. We compared different deep learning algorithms, methods of analysis, types of ground truths, sample size, numbers of benign and malignant lesions, MRI image types, and performance indices, among others. We also discussed lessons learned, challenges of deployment in clinical practice and suggested future research directions.
No ethics committee approval was required for this review.
PRISMA guidelines for reporting were adopted in our systematic review. The literature search was performed from 2017 to Dec 31, 2022, using the following key words: “breast MRI,” “breast magnetic resonance imaging,” “deep learning,” “breast cancer detection,” and “breast cancer screening.” The database included Pubmed, Semantic Scholar, ACM Digital Library, Google search, Google Scholar, and pre-print depositories (such as Research Square). We noted that many of the computing or machine learning journals were found on sites other than Pubmed. Some were full-length peer-reviewed conference papers, in contrast with small conference abstracts. Articles that were not deep learning (such as texture analysis) were excluded. Only original articles written in English were selected. Figure 2 shows the flowchart demonstrating how articles were included and excluded for our review. The search and initial screening for eligibility were performed by RA and independently verified by KD and/or TD. This study did not review DL prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy which has recently been reviewed [ 21 ].
PRISMA selection flowchart
Pubmed search yielded 59 articles, of which 22 were review articles, 30 were not related to breast cancer detection on MRI, and two had unclear/unconventional methodologies. Five articles were found in Pubmed search after exclusion (Fig. 2 ). In addition, 13 articles were found on different databases outside of Pubmed, because many computing and machine learning journals were not indexed by Pubmed. A total of 18 articles were included in our study (Table 1 ). Two of the studies stated that the patient populations were moderate/high risk [ 22 , 23 ] or high risk [ 23 ], while the remaining papers do not state whether the dataset was from screening or supplemental MRI.
In this review, we first summarized individual papers and followed by generalization of lessons learned. We then discussed challenges of deployment in the clinics and suggested future research directions.
Adachi et al. [ 13 ] performed a retrospective study using RetinaNet as a CNN architecture to analyze and detect breast cancer in MIPs of DCE fat-suppressed MRI images. Images of breast lesions were annotated with a rectangular region-of-interest (ROI) and labeled as “benign” or “malignant” by an experienced breast radiologist. The AUCs, sensitivities, and specificities of four readers were also evaluated as well as those of readers combined with CNN. RetinaNet alone had a higher area under the curve (AUC) and sensitivity (0.925 and 0.926, respectively) than any of the readers. In two cases, the AI system misdiagnosed normal breast as malignancy, which may be the result of variations in normal breast tissue. Invasive ductal carcinoma near the axilla was missed by AI, possibly due to confusion for normal axillary lymph node. Wider variety of data and larger datasets for training could alleviate these problems.
Antropova et al. [ 24 ] compared MIP derived from the second post-contrast subtraction T1-weighted image to the central slice of the second post-contrast image with and without subtraction. The ground truth was ROIs based on radiology assessment with biopsy-proven malignancy. MIP images showed the highest AUC. Feature extraction and classifier training for each slice for DCE-MRI sequences, with slices in the hundreds, would have been computationally expensive at the time. MIP images, in widespread use clinically, contain enhancement information throughout the tumor volume. MIP images, which represent a volume data, avoid using a plethora of slices, and are, therefore, faster and computationally less intensive and less expensive. MIP (AUC = 0.88) outperformed one-slice DCE image, and subtracted DCE image (AUC = 0.83) outperformed single-slice DCE image (AUC = 0.80). The subtracted DCE image is derived from 2 timepoints, the pre-contrast image subtracted from the post-contrast image, which produces a higher AUC. Using multiple slices and/or multiple timepoints could further increase the AUC with DCE images, possibly even exceeding that of the MIP image (0.88). This would be an area for further exploration.
Ayatollahi et al. [ 22 ] performed a retrospective study using 3D RetinaNet as a CNN architecture to analyze and detect breast cancer in ultrafast TWIST DCE-MRI images. They used 572 images (365 malignant and 207 benign) taken from 462 patients. Bounding boxes drawn around the lesion in the images were used as ground truth. They found a detection rate of 0.90 and a sensitivity of 0.95 with tenfold cross validation.
Feng et al. [ 23 ] implemented the Knowledge-Driven Feature Learning and Integration model (KFLI) using DWI and DCE-MRI data from 100 high-risk female patients with 32 benign and 68 malignant lesions, segmented by two experienced radiologists. They reported 0.85 accuracy. The model formulated a sequence division module and adaptive weighting module. The sequence division module based on lesion characteristics is proposed for feature learning, and the adaptive weighting module proposed is used for automatic feature integration while improving the performance of cooperative diagnosis. This model provides the contribution of sub-sequences and guides the radiologists to focus on characteristic-related sequences with high contribution to lesion diagnosis. This can save time for the radiologists and helps them to better understand the output results of the deep networks. As such, it can extract sufficient and effective features from each sub-sequence for a comprehensive diagnosis of breast cancer. This model is a deep network and domain knowledge ensemble that achieved high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.
Fujioka et al. [ 25 ] used 3D MIP projection from early phase (1–2 min) of dynamic contrast-enhanced axial fat-suppressed DCE mages, with performance of CNN models compared to two human readers (Reader 1 = breast surgeon with 5 years of experience and Reader 2 = radiologist with 20 years of experience) in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions. The highest AUC achieved with deep learning was with InceptionResNetV2 CNN model, at 0.895. Mean AUC across the different CNN models was 0.830, and range was 0.750–0.895, performing comparably to human readers. False-positive masses tended to be relatively large with fast pattern of strong enhancement, and false-negative masses tended to be relatively small with medium to slow pattern of enhancement. One false positive and one false negative for non-mass enhancing lesion that was observed were also incorrectly diagnosed by the human readers. The main limitation of their study was small sample size.
Haarburger et al. [ 26 ] performed an analysis of 3D whole-volume images on a larger cohort ( N = 408 patients), yielding an AUC of up to 0.89 and accuracy of 0.81, further establishing the feasibility of using 3D DCE whole images. Their method involved feeding DCE images from 5 timepoints (before contrast and 4 times post-contrast) and T2-weighted images to the algorithms. The multicurriculum ensemble consisted of a 3D CNN that generates feature maps and a classification component that performs classification based on the aggregated feature maps made by the previous components. AUC range of 0.50–0.89 was produced depending on the CNN models used. Multiscale curriculum training improved simple 3D ResNet18 from an AUC of 0.50 to an AUC of 0.89 (ResNet18 curriculum). A radiologist with 2 years of experience demonstrated AUC of 0.93 and accuracy of 0.93. An advantage of the multicurriculum ensemble is the elimination of the need for pixelwise segmentation for individual lesions, as only coarse localization coordinates for Stage 1 training (performed in 3D in this case) and one global label per breast for Stage 2 training is needed, where Stage 2 involved predictions of whole images in 3D in this study. The high performance of this model can be attributed to the high amount of context and global information provided. Their 3D data use whole breast volumes without time-consuming and cost prohibitive lesion segmentation. A major drawback of 3D images is the requirement of more RAM and many patients required to train the model.
Herent et al. [ 27 ] used T1-weighted fat-suppressed post-contrast MRI in a CNN model that detected and then characterized lesions ( N = 335). Lesion characterization consisted of diagnosing malignancy and lesion classification. Their model, therefore, performed three tasks and thereby was a multitask technique, which limits overfitting. ResNET50 neural network performed feature extraction from images, and images were processed by the algorithm’s attention block which learned to detect abnormalities. Images were fed into a second branch where features were averaged over the selected regions, then fitted to a logistic regression to produce the output. On an independent test set of 168 images, a weighted mean AUC of 0.816 was achieved. The training dataset consisted of 17 different histopathologies, of which most were represented as very small percentages of the whole dataset of 335. Several of the listed lesion types represented less than 1% of the training dataset. This leads to the problem of overfitting. The authors mention that validation of the algorithm by applying it to 3D images in an independent dataset, rather than using the single 2D images as they did, would show if the model is generalizable. The authors state that training on larger databases and with multiparametric MRI would likely increase accuracy. This study shows good performance of a supervised attention model with deep learning for breast MRI.
Hu et al. [ 28 ] used multiparametric MR images (DCE-MRI sequence and a T2-weighted MRI sequence) in a CNN model including 616 patients with 927 unique breast lesions, 728 of which were malignant. A pre-trained CNN extracted features from both DCE and T2w sequences depicting lesions that were classified as benign or malignant by support vector machine classifiers. Sequences were integrated at different levels using image fusion, feature fusion, and classifier fusion. Feature fusion from multiparametric sequences outperformed DCE-MRI alone. The feature fusion model had an AUC of 0.87, sensitivity of 0.78, and specificity of 0.79. CNN models that used separate T2w and DCE images into combined RBG images or aggregates of the probability of malignancy output from DCE and T2w classifiers both did not perform significantly better than the CNN model using DCE-alone. Although other studies have demonstrated that single-sequence MRI is sufficient for high CNN performance, this study demonstrates that multiparametric MRI (as fusion of features from DCE-MRI and T2-weighted MRI) offers enough information to outperform single-sequence MRI.
Li et al. [ 29 ] used 3D CNNs in DCE-MR images to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors from 143 patients. In 2D and 3D DCE-MRI, a region-of-interest (ROI) and volume-of-interest (VOI) were segmented, and enhancement ratios for each MR series were calculated. The AUC value of 0.801 for the 3D CNN was higher than the value of 0.739 for 2D CNN. Furthermore, the 3D CNN achieved higher accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values of 0.781, 0.744, and 0.823, respectively. The DCE-MRI enhancement maps had higher accuracy by using more information to diagnose breast cancer. The high values demonstrate that 3D CNN in breast cancer MR imaging can be used for the detection of breast cancer and reduce manual feature extraction.
Liu et al. [ 30 ] used CNN to analyze and detect breast cancer on T1 DCE-MRI images from 438 patients, 131 from I-SPY clinical trials and 307 from Columbia University. Segmentation was performed through an automated process involving fuzzy C-method after seed points were manually indicated. This study included analysis of commonly excluded image features such as background parenchymal enhancement, slice images of breast MRI, and axilla/axillary lymph node involvement. The methods also minimized annotations done at pixel level, to maximize automation of visual interpretation. These objectives increased efficiency, decreased subjective bias, and allowed for complete evaluation of the whole image. Obtaining images with multiple timepoints from multiple institutions made the algorithm more generalizable. The CNN model achieved AUC of 0.92, accuracy of 0.94, sensitivity of 0.74, and specificity of 0.95.
Marrone et al. [ 31 ] used CNN to evaluate 42 malignant and 25 benign lesions in 42 women. ROIs were obtained by an experienced radiologist, and manual segmentation was performed. Accuracy of up to 0.76 was achieved. AUC as high as 0.76 was seen on pre-trained AlexNet versus 0.73 on fine-tuning of pre-trained AlexNet where the last trained layers were replaced by untrained layers. The latter method could allow reduced number of training images needed. The training from scratch AlexNet model is accomplished when AlexNet pre-trained on the ImageNet database is used to extract a feature vector from the last internal CNN layer, and a new supervised training is employed, which yielded the lowest AUC of 0.68 and accuracy of 0.55.
Rasti et al. [ 32 ] analyzed DCE-MRI subtraction images from MRI studies ( N = 112) using a multi-ensemble CNN (ME-CNN) functioning as a CAD system to distinguish benign from malignant masses, producing 0.96 accuracy with their method. The ME-CNN is a modular and image-based ensemble, which can stochastically partition the high-dimensional image space through simultaneous and competitive learning of its modules. It also has the advantages of fast execution time in both training and testing and a compact structure with a small number of free parameters. Among several promising directions, one could extend the ME-CNN approach to the pre-processing stage, by combining ME-CNN with recent advances in fully autonomous CNNs for semantic segmentation.
Truhn et al. [ 33 ] used T2-weighted images with one pre-contrast and four post-contrast DCE images in 447 patients with 1294 enhancing lesions (787 malignant and 507 benign) manually segmented by a breast radiologist. Deep learning with CNN demonstrated an AUC of 0.88 which was inferior to prospective interpretation by one of the three breast radiologists (7–25 years of experience) reading cases in equal proportion (0.98). When only half of the dataset was used for training ( n = 647), the AUC was 0.83. The authors speculate that with increased training on a greater number of cases that their model could improve its performance.
Wu et al. [ 34 ] trained a CNN model to analyze and detect lesions from DCE T1-weighted images from 130 patients, 71 of which had malignant lesions and 59 had benign tumors. Fuzzy C-means clustering-based algorithm automatically segmented 3D tumor volumes from DCE images after rectangular region-of-interest were placed by an expert radiologist. An objective of the study was to demonstrate that single-sequence MRI at multiple timepoints provides sufficient information for CNN models to accurately classify lesions.
Yurtakkal et al. [ 35 ] utilized DCE images of 98 benign and 102 malignant lesions, producing 0.98 accuracy, 1.00 sensitivity, and 0.96 specificity. The multi-layer CNN architecture utilized consisted of six groups of convolutional, batch normalization, rectified linear activation function layers, and five max-pooling followed by one dropout layer, one fully connected layer, and one softmax layer.
Zheng et al. [ 36 ] used a dense convolutional long short-term memory (DC-LSTM) on a dataset of lesions obtained through a university hospital ( N = 72). The method was inspired by DenseNet and built on convolutional LSTM. It first uses a three-layer convolutional LSTM to encode DCE-MRI as sequential data and extract time-intensity information then adds a simplified dense block to reduce the amount of information being processed and improve feature reuse. This lowered the variance and improved accuracy in the results. Compared to a ResNet-50 model trained only on the main task, the combined model of DC-LSTM + ResNet improved the accuracy from 0.625 to 0.847 on the same dataset. Additionally, the authors proposed a latent attributes method to efficiently use the information in diagnostic reports and accelerate the convergence of the network.
Jiejie Zhou et al. [ 37 ] evaluated 133 lesions (91 malignant and 62 benign) using ResNET50, which is similar to ResNET18 used by Truhn et al. [ 33 ] and Haarburger et al . [ 26 ]. Their investigation demonstrated that deep learning produced higher accuracy compared to ROI-based and radiomics-based models in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. They compared the metrics resulting from using five different bounding boxes. They found that using the tumor alone and smaller bounding boxes yielded the highest AUC of 0.97–0.99. They also found that the inclusion of a small amount of peritumoral tissue improved accuracy compared to smaller boxes that did not include peritumoral tissue (tumor alone boxes) or larger input boxes (that include tissue more remote from peritumoral tissue), with accuracy of 0.91 in the testing dataset. The tumor microenvironment influences tumor growth, and the tumor itself can alter its microenvironment to become more supportive of tumor growth. Therefore, the immediate peritumoral tissue, which would include the tumor microenvironment, was important in guiding the CNN to accurately differentiate between benign and malignant tumors. This dynamic peritumoral ecosystem can be influenced by the tumor directing heterogeneous cells to aggregate and promote angiogenesis, chronic inflammation, tumor growth, and invasion. Recognizing features displayed by biomarkers of the tumor microenvironment may help to identify and grade the aggressiveness of a lesion. This complex interaction between the tumor and its microenvironment may potentially be a predictor of outcomes as well and should be included in DL models that require segmentation. In DL models using whole images without segmentation of any sort, the peritumoral tissue would already be included, which would preclude the need for precise bounding boxes.
Juan Zhou et al. [ 38 ] used 3D deep learning models to classify and localize malignancy from cases ( N = 1537) of MRIs. The deep 3D densely connected networks were utilized under image-level supervision (weakly supervised). Since 3D weakly supervised approach was not well studied compared to 2D methods, the purpose of this study was to develop a 3D deep learning model that could identify malignant cancer from benign lesions and could localize the cancer. The model configurations of global average pooling (GAP) and global max-pooling (GMP) that were used both achieved over 0.80 accuracy with AUC of 0.856 (GMP) and 0.858 (GAP) which demonstrated the effectiveness of the 3D DenseNet deep learning method in MRI scans to diagnose breast cancer. The model ensemble achieved AUC of 0.859.
Most studies were single-center studies, but they came from around the world, with the majority coming from the US, Asia, and Europe. All studies except one [ 33 ] were retrospective studies. The sample size of each study ranged from 42 to 690 patients, generally small for DL analysis. Sample sizes for patients with benign and malignant lesions were comparable and were not skewed toward either normal or malignant lesions, suggesting that these datasets were not from high-risk screening patients because high-risk screening dataset would have consisted of very low (i.e., typically < 5%) positive cases.
Most studies used private datasets as their image source. ISPY-1 data were the only public dataset noted ( https://wiki.cancerimagingarchive.net/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=20643859 ). Most studies involved DCE data acquisition, but most analysis include only a single post-contrast MRI. For those that used multiple post-contrast MRI dynamics, most fed each dynamic into each separate independent channel, which does not optimally make use of the relationships between imaging dynamics. Some studies used subtraction of post- and pre-contrast or signal enhancement ratio (SER) [ 24 , 32 , 35 ]. Three studies utilized MIP DCE images to minimize computation cost [ 13 , 24 , 25 ]. However, collapsing images by MIP has drawbacks (i.e., collapse enhanced vascular structures into a single plane may be mistaken as cancer). There were only five studies [ 23 , 26 , 28 , 33 , 36 ] that utilized multiparametric data types (i.e., DCE, T2-weighted, and DWI). Although combining multiple types of MRIs should improve performance, this has not been conclusively demonstrated in practice.
RetinaNet and KFLi are optimized for object detection, while VGGNet, InceptionResNet, and AlexNet are designed for image classification (see review [ 16 , 17 , 39 ]). LSTM is used for time-series modeling. DenseNet, on the other hand, can be used for a wide range of tasks, including image classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation. Ensemble methods, which combine multiple models, are useful for boosting the overall performance of a system. U-Net and R-Net are specialized deep learning models for semantic segmentation tasks in medical image analysis. U-Net uses an encoder–decoder architecture to segment images into multiple classes, while R-Net is a residual network that improves the accuracy and efficiency of the segmentation task.
The most used algorithm is CNN or CNN-based. There is no consensus that certain algorithms are better than others. Given the fact that different algorithms were tested on different datasets, it is not possible to conclude that a particular DL architecture performs better than others. Careful comparison of multiple algorithms on the same datasets is needed. Thus, we only discussed potential advantages and disadvantages of each DL architecture. Performance indices could be misleading.
Although each model has its own unique architecture and design principles, most of the above-mentioned methods utilized convolutional layers, pooling layers, activation functions, and regularization techniques (such as dropout and batch normalization) for model optimization. Additionally, the use of pre-trained models and transfer learning has become increasingly popular, allowing leverage of knowledge learned from large datasets such as ImageNet to improve the performance of their models on smaller, specialized datasets. However, the literature on transfer learning in breast cancer MRI detection is limited. A relatively new deep learning method known as transformer has found exciting applications in medical imaging [ 40 , 41 ].
Ground truths were either based on pathology (i.e., benign versus malignant cancer), radiology reports, radiologist annotation (ROI contoured on images), or a bounding box, with reference to pathology or clinical follow-up (i.e., absence of a positive clinical diagnosis). While the gold standard is pathology, imaging or clinical follow-up without adverse change over a prescribed period has been used as empiric evidence of non-malignancy. This is an acceptable form of ground truth.
Only four out of 18 studies provided heatmaps of the regions that the DL algorithms consider important. Heatmaps enable data to be presented visually in color showing whether the area of activity makes sense anatomically or if it is artifactual (i.e., biopsy clip, motion artifact, or outside of the breast). Heatmaps are important for interpretability and explainability of DL outputs.
All studies include some performance indices, and most include AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. AUC ranged from 0.5 to 1.0, with the majority around 0.8–0.9. Other metrics also varied over a wide range. DL training methods varied, and they included leave-one-out method, hold-out method, and splitting the dataset (such as 80%/20% training/testing) with cross validation. Most studies utilized five- or tenfold cross validation for performance evaluation but some used a single hold-out method, and some did not include cross validation. Cross validation is important to avoid unintentional skewing of data due to partition for training and testing. Different training methods could affect performance. Interpretation of these metrics needs to be made with caution as there could be study reporting bias, small sample size, and overfitting, among others. High-performance indices of the DL algorithm performance are necessary for adoption in clinical use. However, good performance indices alone are not sufficient. Other measures such as heatmaps and experience to gain trust are needed for widespread clinical adoption of DL algorithms.
Accurate assessment of the axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients is also essential for prognosis and treatment planning [ 42 , 43 ]. Current radiological staging of nodal metastasis has poor accuracy. DL detection of lymph node involvement is challenging because of their small sizes and difficulty in getting ground truths. Only a few studies have reported the use of DL to detect lymph node involvement [ 44 , 45 , 46 ].
Although deep learning is a promising tool in the diagnosis of breast cancer, there are several challenges that need to be addressed before routine clinical applications can be broadly realized.
Data availability: One of the major challenges in medical image diagnosis (and breast cancer MRI in particular) is the availability of large, diverse, and well-annotated datasets. Deep learning models require a large amount of high-quality data to learn from, but, in many cases, medical datasets are small and imbalanced. In medical image diagnosis, it is important to have high-quality annotations of images, which can be time-consuming and costly to obtain. Annotating medical images requires specialized expertise, and there may be inconsistencies between different experts. This can lead to challenges in building accurate and generalizable models. Medical image datasets can lack diversity, which can lead to biased models. For example, a model trained on images with inadequate representation of racial or ethnicity subgroups may not be broadly generalizable. Private medical datasets obtained from one institution could be non-representative of certain racial or ethnic subgroups and, therefore, may not be generalizable. Publicly available data are unfortunately limited, one of which can be found on cancerimagingarchive.net. Collaborative learning facilitating training of DL models by sharing data without breaching privacy can be accomplished with federated learning [ 47 ].
Interpretability , explainability, and generalizability [ 48 ]: Deep learning models are often seen as “black boxes” that can be difficult to interpret. This is especially problematic in medical image diagnosis, where it is important to understand why a particular diagnosis is made. Recent research has focused on developing methods to explain the decision-making process of deep learning models, such as using attention mechanisms or generating heatmaps to highlight relevant regions in the MRI image. While efforts have been made to develop methods to explain the decision-making process of deep learning models, the explainability of these models is still limited [ 49 ]. This can make it difficult for clinicians to understand the model's decision and to trust the model. Deep learning models may perform well on the datasets on which they were trained but may not generalize well to new datasets or to patients with different characteristics. This can lead to challenges in deploying the model in a real-world setting.
Ethical concerns: Deep learning models can be used to make life-or-death decisions, such as the diagnosis of cancer. This raises ethical concerns about the safety, responsibility, privacy, fairness, and transparency of these models [ 50 ]. There are also social implications (including but not limited to equity) of using artificial intelligence in health care. This needs to be addressed as we develop more and more powerful DL algorithms.
Artificial intelligence has the potential to revolutionize breast cancer screening and diagnosis, helping radiologists to be more efficient and more accurate, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes. It can also help to reduce the need for biopsy or unnecessary testing and treatment. However, some challenges exist that preclude broad deployment in clinical practice to date. There need to be large, diverse, and well-annotated images that are readily available for research. Deep learning results need to be more accurate, interpretable, explainable, and generalizable. A future research direction includes incorporation of other clinical data and risk factors into the model, such as age, family history, or genetic mutations, to improve diagnostic accuracy and enable personalized medicine. Another direction is to assess the impact of deep learning on health outcomes to enable more investment in hospital administrators and other stakeholders. Finally, it is important to address the ethical, legal, and social implications of using artificial intelligence.
Not applicable.
Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, Morris E, Pisano E, Schnall M, Sener S, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(2):75–89.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Feig S. Comparison of costs and benefits of breast cancer screening with mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2011;38(1):179–96.
Kumar NA, Schnall MD. MR imaging: its current and potential utility in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2000;8(4):715–28.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lehman CD, Smith RA. The role of MRI in breast cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7(10):1109–15.
Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Moy L. Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50(2):377–90.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Batchu S, Liu F, Amireh A, Waller J, Umair M. A review of applications of machine learning in mammography and future challenges. Oncology. 2021;99(8):483–90.
Wuni AR, Botwe BO, Akudjedu TN. Impact of artificial intelligence on clinical radiography practice: futuristic prospects in a low resource setting. Radiography (Lond). 2021;27(Suppl 1):S69–73.
Skegg D, Paul C, Benson-Cooper D, Chetwynd J, Clarke A, Fitzgerald N, Gray A, St George I, Simpson A. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: prospects for New Zealand. N Z Med J. 1988;101(852):531–3.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wood DA, Kafiabadi S, Busaidi AA, Guilhem E, Montvila A, Lynch J, Townend M, Agarwal S, Mazumder A, Barker GJ, et al. Deep learning models for triaging hospital head MRI examinations. Med Image Anal. 2022;78: 102391.
Mahoro E, Akhloufi MA. Applying deep learning for breast cancer detection in radiology. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(11):8767–93.
Deo RC, Nallamothu BK. Learning about machine learning: the promise and pitfalls of big data and the electronic health record. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9(6):618–20.
Meyer-Base A, Morra L, Tahmassebi A, Lobbes M, Meyer-Base U, Pinker K. AI-enhanced diagnosis of challenging lesions in breast mri: a methodology and application primer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;54(3):686–702.
Adachi M, Fujioka T, Mori M, Kubota K, Kikuchi Y, Xiaotong W, Oyama J, Kimura K, Oda G, Nakagawa T, et al. Detection and diagnosis of breast cancer using artificial intelligence based assessment of maximum intensity projection dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(5):330.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521(7553):436–44.
Koh DM, Papanikolaou N, Bick U, Illing R, Kahn CE Jr, Kalpathi-Cramer J, Matos C, Marti-Bonmati L, Miles A, Mun SK, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cancer imaging. Commun Med (Lond). 2022;2:133.
Oza P, Sharma P, Patel S, Bruno A. A bottom-up review of image analysis methods for suspicious region detection in mammograms. J Imaging. 2021;7(9):190.
Saba T. Recent advancement in cancer detection using machine learning: systematic survey of decades, comparisons and challenges. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(9):1274–89.
Hu Q, Giger ML. Clinical artificial intelligence applications: breast imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021;59(6):1027–43.
Sechopoulos I, Teuwen J, Mann R. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: state of the art. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021;72:214–25.
Sheth D, Giger ML. Artificial intelligence in the interpretation of breast cancer on MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;51(5):1310–24.
Khan N, Adam R, Huang P, Maldjian T, Duong TQ. Deep learning prediction of pathologic complete response in breast cancer using MRI and other clinical data: a systematic review. Tomography. 2022;8(6):2784–95.
Ayatollahi F, Shokouhi SB, Mann RM, Teuwen J. Automatic breast lesion detection in ultrafast DCE-MRI using deep learning. Med Phys. 2021;48(10):5897–907.
Feng H, Cao J, Wang H, Xie Y, Yang D, Feng J, Chen B. A knowledge-driven feature learning and integration method for breast cancer diagnosis on multi-sequence MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;69:40–8.
Antropova N, Abe H, Giger ML. Use of clinical MRI maximum intensity projections for improved breast lesion classification with deep convolutional neural networks. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018;5(1): 014503.
PubMed Google Scholar
Fujioka T, Yashima Y, Oyama J, Mori M, Kubota K, Katsuta L, Kimura K, Yamaga E, Oda G, Nakagawa T, et al. Deep-learning approach with convolutional neural network for classification of maximum intensity projections of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;75:1–8.
Haarburger C, Baumgartner M, Truhn D, Broeckmann M, Schneider H, Schrading S, Kuhl C, Merhof D: Multi scale curriculum CNN for context-aware breast mri malignancy classification. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI ; 2019: 495–503.
Herent P, Schmauch B, Jehanno P, Dehaene O, Saillard C, Balleyguier C, Arfi-Rouche J, Jegou S. Detection and characterization of MRI breast lesions using deep learning. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019;100(4):219–25.
Hu Q, Whitney HM, Giger ML. A deep learning methodology for improved breast cancer diagnosis using multiparametric MRI. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):10536.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li J, Fan M, Zhang J, Li L: Discriminating between benign and malignant breast tumors using 3D convolutional neural network in dynamic contrast enhanced-MR images. In: SPIE Medical Imaging : SPIE; 2017: 10138.
Liu MZ, Swintelski C, Sun S, Siddique M, Desperito E, Jambawalikar S, Ha R. Weakly supervised deep learning approach to breast mri assessment. Acad Radiol. 2022;29(Suppl 1):S166–72.
Marrone S, Piantadosi G, Fusco R, Petrillo A, Sansone M, Sansone C: An investigation of deep learning for lesions malignancy classification in breast DCE-MRI. In: International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing (ICIAP) 2017: 479–489.
Rasti R, Teshnehlab M, Phung SL. Breast cancer diagnosis in DCE-MRI using mixture ensemble of convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recogn. 2017;72:381–90.
Article Google Scholar
Truhn D, Schrading S, Haarburger C, Schneider H, Merhof D, Kuhl C. Radiomic versus convolutional neural networks analysis for classification of contrast-enhancing lesions at multiparametric breast MRI. Radiology. 2019;290(2):290–7.
Wu W, Wu J, Dou Y, Rubert N, Wang Y. A deep learning fusion model with evidence-based confidence level analysis for differentiation of malignant and benign breast tumors using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2022;72: 103319.
Yurttakal AH, Erbay H, İkizceli T, Karaçavuş S. Detection of breast cancer via deep convolution neural networks using MRI images. Multimed Tools Appl. 2020;79:15555–73.
Zheng H, Gu Y, Qin Y, Huang X, Yang J, Yang G-Z: Small lesion classification in dynamic contrast enhancement MRI for breast cancer early detection. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention; 2018.
Zhou J, Zhang Y, Chang KT, Lee KE, Wang O, Li J, Lin Y, Pan Z, Chang P, Chow D, et al. Diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions on DCE-MRI by using radiomics and deep learning with consideration of peritumor tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;51(3):798–809.
Zhou J, Luo LY, Dou Q, Chen H, Chen C, Li GJ, Jiang ZF, Heng PA. Weakly supervised 3D deep learning for breast cancer classification and localization of the lesions in MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50(4):1144–51.
Alzubaidi L, Zhang J, Humaidi AJ, Al-Dujaili A, Duan Y, Al-Shamma O, Santamaria J, Fadhel MA, Al-Amidie M, Farhan L. Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions. J Big Data. 2021;8(1):53.
Li J, Chen J, Tang Y, Wang C, Landman BA, Zhou SK. Transforming medical imaging with transformers? A comparative review of key properties, current progresses, and future perspectives. Med Image Anal. 2023;85: 102762.
Moutik O, Sekkat H, Tigani S, Chehri A, Saadane R, Tchakoucht TA, Paul A. Convolutional neural networks or vision transformers: Who will win the race for action recognitions in visual data? Sensors (Basel). 2023;23(2):734.
Chang JM, Leung JWT, Moy L, Ha SM, Moon WK. Axillary nodal evaluation in breast cancer: state of the art. Radiology. 2020;295(3):500–15.
Zhou P, Wei Y, Chen G, Guo L, Yan D, Wang Y. Axillary lymph node metastasis detection by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Thorac Cancer. 2018;9(8):989–96.
Ren T, Cattell R, Duanmu H, Huang P, Li H, Vanguri R, Liu MZ, Jambawalikar S, Ha R, Wang F, et al. Convolutional neural network detection of axillary lymph node metastasis using standard clinical breast MRI. Clin Breast Cancer. 2020;20(3):e301–8.
Ren T, Lin S, Huang P, Duong TQ. Convolutional neural network of multiparametric MRI accurately detects axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients with pre neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022;22(2):170–7.
Golden JA. Deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases from breast cancer: helping artificial intelligence be seen. JAMA. 2017;318(22):2184–6.
Gupta S, Kumar S, Chang K, Lu C, Singh P, Kalpathy-Cramer J. Collaborative privacy-preserving approaches for distributed deep learning using multi-institutional data. Radiographics. 2023;43(4): e220107.
Miotto R, Wang F, Wang S, Jiang X, Dudley JT. Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19(6):1236–46.
Holzinger A, Langs G, Denk H, Zatloukal K, Muller H. Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2019;9(4): e1312.
Smallman M. Multi scale ethics-why we need to consider the ethics of AI in healthcare at different scales. Sci Eng Ethics. 2022;28(6):63.
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and the Montefiore Medical Center, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
Richard Adam, Kevin Dell’Aquila, Laura Hodges, Takouhie Maldjian & Tim Q. Duong
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
RA performed literature search, analyzed data, and wrote paper. KD performed literature search, analyzed data, and edited paper. LH analyzed literature and edited paper. TM analyzed literature and edited paper. TQD wrote and edited paper, and supervised.
Correspondence to Tim Q. Duong .
Ethics approval and consent to participate, consent for publication, competing interests.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Adam, R., Dell’Aquila, K., Hodges, L. et al. Deep learning applications to breast cancer detection by magnetic resonance imaging: a literature review. Breast Cancer Res 25 , 87 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01687-4
Download citation
Received : 09 March 2023
Accepted : 11 July 2023
Published : 24 July 2023
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01687-4
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
ISSN: 1465-542X
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
An update of the possible applications of magnetic resonance imaging (mri) in dentistry: a literature review.
4. discussion, 4.1. fundamental parameters in mri, 4.2. apical periodontitis diagnosis, 4.3. evaluation of dental fractures, 4.4. endodontics, endodontic anatomy and conservative dentistry, 4.5. implantology, 4.6. maxillary sinus diagnosis and surgery, 5. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
Click here to enlarge figure
Materials | Artifacts and Disadvantages | |
---|---|---|
Orthodontics | NiTi arch wires | Major distortions |
Stainless-steel brackets | Major distortions | |
Endodontics | Resin-based sealer | No distortions |
Gutta-percha | No distortions | |
Implant and Prostheses | Implants | Major distortions |
Removable prostheses | Major distortions, and possibility of movement | |
Gold crowns | No distortions | |
Metal crowns | Minor distortions | |
Zirconia | Confilicting results | |
Ceramic | No distortions | |
Restorative Dentistry | Glass ionomer cements | Major distortions |
Composite resins | Major distortions | |
Polycarboxylate | Minor distortions | |
Zinc phosphate-based cement | Minor distortions | |
Modified dimethacrylates | Minor distortions | |
Amalgam | Minor distortions |
Title | Possible Applications | Year |
---|---|---|
Magnetic resonance imaging based computer-guided dental implant surgery—A clinical pilot study | Implantology | 2020 |
Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnostic purposes in operative dentistry—a systematic review | Endodontics, conservative dentistry, and anatomy | 2019 |
Virtual implant planning and fully guided implant surgery using magnetic resonance imaging—Proof of principle | Implantology | 2020 |
Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts produced by dental implants with different geometries | Implantology | 2020 |
Magnetic resonance imaging in endodontics: a literature review | Endodontics | 2017 |
Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments | Orthodontics (artefacts) | 2015 |
Human tooth and root canal morphology reconstruction using magnetic resonance imaging | Endodontics, anatomy | 2015 |
MRI for Dental Applications | Endodontics, oral surgery, anatomy | 2018 |
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Endodontics: A Review | Endodontics, conservative denstistry, anatomy, oral surgery | 2018 |
Magnetic resonance imaging in zirconia-based dental implantology | Implantology | 2014 |
High-resolution dental MRI for planning palatal graft surgery—a clinical pilot study | Surgery | 2018 |
Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and cone-beam computed tomography for maxillary sinus graft assessment | Surgery, maxillary sinus, implantology | 2020 |
Differentiation of periapical granulomas and cysts by using dental MRI: a pilot study | Surgery, endodontics | 2018 |
Assessment of signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio in 3 T magnetic resonance imaging in the presence of zirconium, titanium, and titanium-zirconium alloy implants | Surgery, implantology | 2019 |
Dental Materials and Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Artefacts | 1991 |
Differential diagnosis between a granuloma and radicular cyst: Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | Surgery, endodontics | 2018 |
Unwanted effects due to interactions between dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging: a review of the literature | Artefacts | 2018 |
Accuracy and Reliability of Root Crack and Fracture Detection in Teeth Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Endodontics, conservative dentistry | 2019 |
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Endodontic Treatment Prediction | Endodontics | 2010 |
The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient calculated from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images in the differentiation of maxillary sinus infiammatory diseases | Maxillary sinus | 2018 |
Season, Age and Sex-Related Differences in Incidental Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Paranasal Sinuses in Adults | Maxillary sinus | 2019 |
Anatomical variation in maxillary sinus ostium positioning: implications for nasal-sinus disease | Maxillary sinus | 2018 |
Metal-induced artifacts in MRI | Artefacts | 2011 |
Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vul-nerability of Pulse Sequences | Artefacts | 2018 |
Influence of magnetic susceptibility and volume on MRI artifacts produced by low magnetic susceptibility Zr-14Nb alloy and dental alloys | Artefacts | 2019 |
Dental MRI using a dedicated RF-coil at 3 Tesla | Artefacts | 2015 |
Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography caused by dental materials | Artefacts | 2012 |
Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers-an in vitro study | Artefacts, | 2012 |
Artifact Properties of Dental Ceramic and Titanium Implants in MRI | Artefacts | 2018 |
PETRA, MSVAT-SPACE and SEMAC sequences for metal artefact reduction in dental MR imaging | Artefacts | 2017 |
Magnetic resonance imaging in zirconia-based dental implantology | Artefacts, implantology | 2015 |
Assessment of apical periodontitis by MRI: a feasibility study | Surgery, endodontics | 2015 |
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Endodontic Treatment Prediction | Endodontics | 2011 |
Ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI for the assessment of caries lesions | Endodontics, conservative dentistry | 2013 |
Reperfusion of autotransplanted teeth--comparison of clinical measurements by means of dental magnetic resonance im-aging | Endodontics, surgery | 2013 |
Early detection of pulp necrosis and dental vitality after traumatic dental injuries in children and adolescents by 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging | Endodontics | 2015 |
Optimized 14 + 1 receive coil array and position system for 3D high-resolution MRI of dental and maxillomandibular structures | Endodontics | 2016 |
MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
Reda, R.; Zanza, A.; Mazzoni, A.; Cicconetti, A.; Testarelli, L.; Di Nardo, D. An Update of the Possible Applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Dentistry: A Literature Review. J. Imaging 2021 , 7 , 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7050075
Reda R, Zanza A, Mazzoni A, Cicconetti A, Testarelli L, Di Nardo D. An Update of the Possible Applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Dentistry: A Literature Review. Journal of Imaging . 2021; 7(5):75. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7050075
Reda, Rodolfo, Alessio Zanza, Alessandro Mazzoni, Andrea Cicconetti, Luca Testarelli, and Dario Di Nardo. 2021. "An Update of the Possible Applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Dentistry: A Literature Review" Journal of Imaging 7, no. 5: 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7050075
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often divided into structural MRI and functional MRI (fMRI). The former is a widely used imaging technique in research as well as in clinical practice. This review describes the more important developments in structural MRI in recent years, including high resolution imaging, T2 relaxation measurement, T2*-weighted imaging, T1 relaxation measurement, magnetisation transfer imaging, and diffusion imaging. The principles underlying these techniques, as well as their use in research and in clinical practice, will be discussed.
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2003.032714
Request permissions.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: none declared
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Email citation, add to collections.
Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.
Affiliations.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been a popular approach in brain research over the past 20 years. It offers a noninvasive method to probe the brain and uses blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal changes to access brain function. However, the BOLD signal only represents a small fraction of the total MR signal. System instability and various noise have a strong impact on the BOLD signal. Additionally, fMRI applies fast imaging technique to record brain cognitive process over time, requiring high temporal stability of MR scanners. Furthermore, data acquisition, image quality, processing, and statistical analysis methods also have a great effect on the results of fMRI studies. Quality assurance (QA) programs for fMRI can test the stability of MR scanners, evaluate the quality of fMRI and help to find errors during fMRI scanning, thereby greatly enhancing the success rate of fMRI. In this review, we focus on previous studies which developed QA programs and methods in SCI/SCIE citation peer-reviewed publications over the last 20 years, including topics on existing fMRI QA programs, QA phantoms, image QA metrics, quality evaluation of existing preprocessing pipelines and fMRI statistical analysis methods. The summarized studies were classified into four categories: QA of fMRI systems, QA of fMRI data, quality evaluation of data processing pipelines and statistical methods and QA of task-related fMRI. Summary tables and figures of QA programs and metrics have been developed based on the comprehensive review of the literature.
Keywords: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); phantom; quality assurance (QA); quality check.
PubMed Disclaimer
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Two types of functional magnetic…
Two types of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) quality assurance (QA) phantoms and…
Quality check of the fMRI…
Quality check of the fMRI data. (A) Quality assurance (QA) procedures of the…
Linkout - more resources, full text sources.
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Morton neuroma is a common cause of forefoot pain and sensory disturbances, but it is difficult to identify on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study was to verify the usefulness of a characteristic MRI finding (slug sign) for identifying Morton neuroma and to clarify the relationship between excised neuroma characteristics and ...
Assessment of Left Atrial Fibrosis by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ischemic Stroke Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis ... and the gray literature were also screened manually to identify additional studies for a comprehensive search. Contact with authors of included studies was made where ...
Key Points. Question What is the diagnostic and prognostic value of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) for the evaluation of stable chest pain?. Findings In this systematic review and meta-analysis pooling 74 470 patients with stable chest pain over 381 357 person-years of follow-up, stress CMR yielded high diagnostic accuracy and accurate risk stratification in patients ...
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international MRI journal publishing research related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance. The cartilaginous endplate (CEP) plays a pivotal role in facilitating the supply of nutrients and, transport of metabolic waste, as well as providing mechanical support for the ...
Magnetic resonance imaging for individual prediction of treatment response in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11:168.
The literature search was performed on March 1, 2020, in the following 5 databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, to identify studies dealing with hamstring injuries using a combination of key words: injuries or its synonyms (lesion, wounds, pain, tear, damage, strain, laceration, rip, rent ...
Patient summary: This systematic review examined if multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan can be used to reliably predict the absence of prostate cancer in patients suspected of having prostate cancer, thereby avoiding a prostate biopsy. The results suggest that whilst it is a promising tool, it is not accurate enough to replace ...
My Approach to Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Cardiac Pseudotumors: A Brief Review. Arq Bras Cardiol: Imagem cardiovasc. [online]. 2024, vol. 37, n. 3, [cited 2024-08-29], e20240044.
These features are important for the pathologic diagnosis of CDC, which shows low signal on magnetic resonance T2WI . On dynamic enhancement scans, most CDC tumors show relatively low density in the renal cortex and medulla. ... (Bellini) duct carcinoma in northern China: a case series and literature review. BMC Med Imaging. 2021;21(1):42 ...
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as a noninvasive and powerful method in modern diagnostics, has been advancing in leaps and bounds. Conventional methods to improve MRI based on increasing the ...
Cystoscopy revealed black, nonpapillary tumors, suggesting metastatic malignant melanoma. Because no apparent invasive growth to muscle layer was observed by magnetic resonance imaging, transurethral resection was performed. Pathological appearance was compatible with metastatic malignant melanoma.
A literature review of magnetic resonance imaging sequence advancements in visualizing functional neurosurgery targets J Neurosurg. 2021 Mar 26 ... Methods: The peer-reviewed literature on MRI visualization of the subthalamic nucleus, globus pallidus, and thalamus was obtained by searching MEDLINE. Publications examining direct MRI ...
The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) phenomenon was first described experimentally by both Bloch and Purcell in 1946, for which they were both awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1952. 1, 2 The technique has rapidly evolved since then, following the introduction of wide-bore superconducting magnets (approximately 30 years ago), allowing development of clinical applications.
This systematic review of 94 papers highlights increasing interest in merging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques with digital phenotyping data, reflected in growing publications since 2007. The diverse behaviors, MRI combinations, and sample characteristics studied signal a paradigm shift in brain research toward more naturalistic ...
Find methods information, sources, references or conduct a literature review on MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING Science topics: Medicine Radiology Diagnostic Radiology Diagnostic Imaging Magnetic ...
Magnetic imaging technology has two main types of scanners which are magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic particle imaging (MPI). Magnetic fields with radio frequency are used in MRI to scan body tissues and monitor body chemistry. The MRI is able to detect variations in the density of protons and the relaxation times of magnetic spin.
ABSTRACT. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FMRI) is a noninvasive test to analyze several medical ailments by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect the abnormalities in the active part of the brain and evaluate the minute changes in the blood flow, which cannot otherwise be accomplished with other imaging techniques.
Lastly, we review MR methods and associated developments impacting accessible MRI such as increasing/augmenting MR awareness and local expertise, incorporating hardware-cognizant methods, rapid quantitative imaging, and leveraging innovations from adjacent fields. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 6 J. Magn. Reson.
A literature review of magnetic resonance imaging sequence advancements in visualizing functional neurosurgery targets ... , 17 with the incorporation of modifications proposed by Levac et al. 18 The search strategy employed terms related to "magnetic resonance imaging" and "deep brain stimulation" and the most common ...
Abstract. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has progressed over 30 years from being a technique with. great potential to one that has become the primary diagnostic investigation for many clinical ...
Magnetic resonance (MR) relaxometry is a quantitative imaging method that measures tissue relaxation properties. This review discusses the state of the art of clinical proton MR relaxometry for glial brain tumors. ... Magnetic resonance relaxometry in quantitative imaging of brain gliomas: A literature review Neuroradiol J. 2024 Jun;37(3):267 ...
Nevertheless, the development of new MRI technologies such as diffusion-weighted imaging, proton spectroscopy and higher field strength 7.0 T imaging offer a new perspective in providing additional information in breast abnormalities. We conducted an expert literature review on the value of breast MRI in diagnosing and staging breast cancer, as ...
The purpose of this narrative review was to evaluate the current evidence for the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a radiation-free diagnostic exam, in some fields of dentistry. Radiographic imaging plays a significant role in the current first and second level of dental diagnostics and treatment planning [ 1 , 2 ].
Objectives: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has recently been used for the evaluation of dental pulp anatomy, vitality, and regeneration. This study reviewed the recent use of MRI in the endodontic field. Methods: Literature published from January 2000 to March 2017 was searched in PubMed using the following Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms: (1) MRI and (dental pulp anatomy or endodontic ...
Deep learning analysis of radiological images has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy of breast cancer, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes. This paper systematically reviewed the current literature on deep learning detection of breast cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The literature search was performed from 2015 to Dec 31, 2022, using Pubmed. Other database ...
This narrative review aims to evaluate the current evidence for the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a radiation-free diagnostic exam, in some fields of dentistry. Background: Radiographic imaging plays a significant role in current first and second level dental diagnostics and treatment planning. However, the main disadvantage is the high exposure to ionizing radiation for ...
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often divided into structural MRI and functional MRI (fMRI). The former is a widely used imaging technique in research as well as in clinical practice. This review describes the more important developments in structural MRI in recent years, including high resolution imaging, T2 relaxation measurement, T2*-weighted imaging, T1 relaxation measurement ...
Magnetic resonance (MR) relaxometry is a quantitative imaging method that measures tissue relaxation properties. This review discusses the state of the art of clinical proton MR relaxometry for glial brain tumors.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been a popular approach in brain research over the past 20 years. ... Summary tables and figures of QA programs and metrics have been developed based on the comprehensive review of the literature. Keywords: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); phantom; quality assurance (QA); quality ...
In this sense, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a technique that presents a complex relationship between the detected signal and the physical-chemical properties of its sourcing matter, allowing the generation of multiple image contrasts. ... followed by a more detailed review of the literature describing the use of HP agents to study: (5 ...