assignment of rights delegation

§ 28:2–210. Delegation of performance; assignment of rights.

(1) A party may perform his duty through a delegate unless otherwise agreed or unless the other party has a substantial interest in having his original promisor perform or control the acts required by the contract. No delegation of performance relieves the party delegating of any duty to perform or any liability for breach.

(2) Except as otherwise provided in section 28:9-406, unless otherwise agreed all rights of either seller or buyer can be assigned except where the assignment would materially change the duty of the other party, or increase materially the burden or risk imposed on him by his contract, or impair materially his chance of obtaining return performance. A right to damages for breach of the whole contract or a right arising out of the assignor’s due performance of his entire obligation can be assigned despite agreement otherwise.

(2A) The creation, attachment, perfection, or enforcement of a security interest in the seller’s interest under a contract is not a transfer that materially changes the duty of or increases materially the burden or risk imposed on the buyer or impairs materially the buyer’s chance of obtaining return performance within the purview of subsection (2) unless, and then only to the extent that, enforcement actually results in a delegation of material performance of the seller. Even in that event, the creation, attachment, perfection, and enforcement of the security interest remain effective, but (a) the seller is liable to the buyer for damages caused by the delegation to the extent that the damages could not reasonably be prevented by the buyer; and (b) a court having jurisdiction may grant other appropriate relief, including cancellation of the contract for sale or an injunction against enforcement of the security interest or consummation of the enforcement.

(3) Unless the circumstances indicate the contrary a prohibition of assignment of “the contract” is to be construed as barring only the delegation to the assignee of the assignor’s performance.

(4) An assignment of “the contract” or of “all my rights under the contract” or an assignment in similar general terms is an assignment of rights and unless the language or the circumstances (as in an assignment for security) indicate the contrary, it is a delegation of performance of the duties of the assignor and its acceptance by the assignee constitutes a promise by him to perform those duties. This promise is enforceable by either the assignor or the other party to the original contract.

(5) The other party may treat any assignment which delegates performance as creating reasonable grounds for insecurity and may without prejudice to his rights against the assignor demand assurances from the assignee (section 28:2-609).

Assigning and Delegating: Transferring Your Contractual Rights and Duties

In the complex world of contracts, the concepts of assignment and delegation play a crucial role. These mechanisms allow for the transfer of contractual rights and duties from one party to another, offering flexibility and adaptability in business arrangements. This article explores the nuances of assigning and delegating in contracts, including their legal implications, differences, and best practices.

Understanding Assignment and Delegation

Contract assignment and delegation are methods of transferring contractual obligations and benefits. Assignment involves transferring rights under a contract, while delegation pertains to the transfer of duties.

Assignment of Rights

An assignment occurs when one party (the assignor) transfers their rights to receive benefits under a contract to another party (the assignee). This transfer does not relieve the assignor of their obligations under the contract unless explicitly agreed upon.

Delegation of Duties

Delegation involves one party (the delegator) transferring their contractual duties and obligations to a third party (the delegatee). The delegator remains liable for the performance of the contract unless the other original party to the contract agrees to release them.

Legal Implications

The ability to assign or delegate is governed by the terms of the contract and by law. Not all rights and duties can be transferred, and certain restrictions apply.

Restrictions on Assignment and Delegation

Contractual Restrictions : Some contracts expressly prohibit or limit assignment and delegation.
Nature of Duties : Personal duties, which are based on the unique skills or talents of a party, cannot typically be delegated.
Effect on Other Party : Rights and duties cannot be transferred if it significantly changes the duties of or risks to the other party in the contract.

Consent and Notice

In many cases, the consent of the other original party to the contract is required for a valid assignment or delegation. Even when consent is not required, it is generally advisable to notify the other party of any assignment or delegation.

Advantages of Assignment and Delegation

Flexibility : Allow parties to adapt to changing circumstances, such as changes in business strategy or capacity.
Continuity : Ensure that contractual obligations can still be fulfilled if a party is unable to continue with their original duties.
Risk Management : Enable the management of risks and responsibilities by transferring them to parties better suited to handle them.

Challenges and Considerations

Quality Control : Ensuring the delegatee maintains the quality of work or service expected can be challenging.
Liability Issues : The original party may remain liable if the delegatee fails to perform the contractual duties satisfactorily.
Relationship Management : Assignment and delegation can affect relationships with the other original party and stakeholders.

Best Practices in Assignment and Delegation

Clear Terms and Conditions

S pecify Rights and Responsibilities : Clearly outline what rights are being assigned and what duties are being delegated.
Detail the Process : Include how and when the assignment or delegation will take place, and any necessary conditions.

Assessing Suitability

Evaluate the Assignee/Delegatee : Ensure the chosen party is capable and reliable to fulfill the transferred rights or duties.
Understand the Implications : Consider how the transfer will affect the contract’s overall performance and the other party.

Legal Compliance and Documentation

Comply with Contract Terms and Laws : Ensure that the assignment or delegation adheres to the contractual terms and relevant laws.
Document the Transfer : Proper documentation of the assignment or delegation is essential for legal validity and clarity.

In international contracts, additional layers of complexity arise. Different jurisdictions may have varying laws governing assignment and delegation . It’s crucial to understand and comply with these laws to ensure valid and enforceable transfers.

The Role of Legal Counsel

Legal counsel plays a vital role in the process of assignment and delegation . They can provide guidance on the permissibility of the transfer, draft clear terms, and ensure compliance with all relevant laws and contractual provisions.

Assignment and delegation are powerful tools in contract management , offering flexibility and efficiency in fulfilling contractual obligations. However, they require careful consideration, clear terms, and often, the consent of all involved parties. By understanding the legal implications, adhering to best practices, and seeking appropriate legal counsel, parties can effectively navigate the complexities of transferring contractual rights and duties. As businesses evolve and contracts become increasingly dynamic, the ability to assign and delegate while maintaining contractual integrity and performance becomes ever more critical.

Did you find this Legitt article worthwhile? More engaging blogs about smart contracts on the blockchain, contract management software and electronic signatures can be found in the Legitt Blogs section. You may also contact Legitt to hire the best contract lifecycle management services and solutions.

FAQs on assignment and delegation

What is contract assignment.

Contract assignment is the transfer of one party's rights to receive benefits under a contract to another party, known as the assignee.

What does delegation in a contract mean?

Delegation in a contract refers to one party transferring their duties and obligations under the contract to a third party.

Are all contract rights and duties assignable or delegable?

Not all rights and duties are transferable. Restrictions may arise from the contract’s terms, the nature of the duties, or potential effects on the other party.

Do you need consent for assignment or delegation?

Often, consent from the other original party in the contract is required. Even if not required, notifying them is generally advisable.

What are the main advantages of assignment and delegation?

These processes offer flexibility, continuity in fulfilling obligations, and effective risk management by transferring duties to more suited parties.

What challenges come with assignment and delegation?

Challenges include maintaining quality control, managing liability issues, and handling changes in relationships with the other original party and stakeholders.

How can you ensure effective assignment or delegation?

Clearly outline rights and responsibilities, detail the process, evaluate the suitability of the new party, and ensure legal compliance.

Is the original party still liable after delegation?

Yes, the original party (delegator) often remains liable if the delegatee fails to perform the delegated duties satisfactorily.

How do international contracts affect assignment and delegation?

Different jurisdictions may have varying laws on assignment and delegation, making it crucial to understand and comply with these laws in international contracts.

Why is legal counsel important in assignment and delegation?

Legal counsel ensures that the transfer adheres to contractual terms, complies with relevant laws, and is documented properly for legal validity.

Contract Management Software

6.4: Assignment, Delegation, and Commonly Used Contracts Clauses

Last updated
Save as PDF
Page ID 24123

Learning Objectives

Learn about assignment and delegation.
Examine novation.
Explore restrictions on assignment, exculpatory clauses, noncompete clauses, mandatory arbitration clauses, acceleration clauses, and liquidated damages clauses.
Explore the parol evidence rule.

What if you formed a contract with a rock ’n’ roll band for its services? Specifically, you wanted the band to play at your nightclub, because you thought that your customers would enjoy the band enough to pay to see it perform. You hired this specific band because you heard that it drew large crowds of paying customers. Imagine your surprise when, as you anticipate the band’s performance, you discover that another band—one you have never heard of—has come to play instead of the original contracting band. On inquiry, you learn that the original band transferred its duties to perform to a lesser-known band. Can it do that?

Contract elements—the terms of the contract—are important. They may, among other things, foreclose your ability to bring a complaint in court, they may render you unable to be hired in your profession (at least within certain boundaries), or they may limit liability to a party that had a role in causing injury to you. If you are not aware of these elements, then you may face an unpleasant surprise if you act in a way contrary to the restrictions imposed by those terms. Likewise, contracts possess certain qualities that prohibit parties from acting in certain ways, unless those qualities are expressly waived. This section identifies common properties of contracts, as well as commonly used elements of contracts. If you are negotiating a contract and you do not like a term, then you should not agree to it. In law, there is a presumption that you have read, understood, and agreed to each and every term of any contract to which you are a party. Arguing that you did not understand or that you did not approve of a particular term in the contract will not be a valid excuse to performance. You should know what you can expect when you enter into a contract. Are you getting the band that you wanted to hire to play in your nightclub, or are you really getting any band that the original band happens to transfer its duties to?

As a preliminary matter, it is important to realize that contracts are, by law, assignable and delegable. This means that the rights conveyed by the contract may be transferred to another party by assignment, unless an express restriction on assignment exists within the contract, or unless an assignment would violate public policy. Likewise, the duties imposed on a party may be transferred to another party by delegation, unless the contract expressly restricts delegation, or there is a substantial interest in personal performance by the original party to the contract, or if delegation would violate public policy. In the case of a band hired to perform at a nightclub, an argument could be made that the original band cannot delegate its duties under the contract because there was a substantial interest in personal performance by the original band. This would render the contract nondelegable. To be on the safe side, your contract with that band should have had a clause expressly prohibiting delegation.

Many students have seen restrictions on assignment in the form of no-sublease clauses in leases with landlords. Do you have a no-sublease clause in your lease? If so, that is a restriction on assignment. This clause is necessary to prevent you from assigning your rights under the lease—your rights to inhabit the premises—to another party. It is necessary for the landlord to include that provision expressly if she wishes to prevent you from subleasing the unit, because there is a presumption in law that assignment is permitted unless it is expressly prohibited by the contract or unless the assignment would violate public policy. Since it is unlikely that letting someone else live in your housing unit in your absence would violate public policy, then the landlord must expressly prohibit the assignment within the original contract if she wishes to prevent tenants from subleasing. A landlord may have a very good reason to wish to prevent subleasing; she may wish to ensure that each tenant is creditworthy prior to allowing the tenant to live in the property.

Note that in delegation and in assignment, the original contracting party is not “off the hook” if it transfers its duties or rights to another party. For instance, if subleasing was not prohibited, and the new tenant assumed the rights and duties imposed by the original contract, the original party to the contract is still liable for the payment of rent. If the subleasing tenant does not pay the rent, the original party to the lease is still liable. The way to excuse oneself from this liability is to form a three-way novation with the original party and the new party, thereby excusing the exiting party from future liability arising under the contract. A novation is essentially a new contract that transfers all rights and duties to the new party to the contract and releases the previous party from any further obligation arising from the original contract.

Restrictions on assignment or delegation are not the only common elements that can be found in contracts. For example, you have probably encountered exculpatory clauses. An exculpatory clause is an express limitation on potential or actual liability arising under the subject matter of the contract. In short, exculpatory clauses are often employed when risk of injury exists. They seek to limit one party’s liability to another. You most certainly have signed exculpatory agreements or contracts containing exculpatory clauses if you have participated in any potentially dangerous activity at a club or with an organized group that could incur liability from injuries suffered by its patrons or members. For example, if you join a kayaking club, you will most likely be asked to sign such an agreement to “hold harmless” the club in the event of any accident or injury. However, despite the existence of an exculpatory clause, liability will not be limited (that is, the liability limitations will be unenforceable) when the party who would benefit from the limitation on liability acted with gross negligence, committed an intentional tort, or possessed greatly unequal bargaining power, or if the limitation on liability violates public policy. Imagine that you signed an agreement to engage in kayaking activities with a kayaking group, but the leader of the group battered you with her oar because she was angry with you for mishandling your kayak. Since battery is an intentional tort, the exculpatory clause will not protect the kayaking organization from liability it incurred through the actions of its employee.

Another common contract element that you may have encountered is a noncompete clause. A noncompete clause attempts to restrict competition for a specified period of time, within a certain geographic region, and for specified activities. Noncomplete clauses are generally valid against the party who signed it if the time, place, and scope are reasonable. These are very common clauses in employment contracts, particularly where the duties involved in employment are likely to involve trade secrets or other proprietary information that the company wishes to protect.

A mandatory arbitration clause is very common in consumer contracts and employment contracts. You have certainly subjected yourself to the restrictions imposed by these clauses if you have signed a contract for a credit card. Mandatory arbitration clauses require parties to a contract that contains such a clause to submit to mandatory arbitration in the event of a dispute arising under the contract. Mandatory arbitration clauses frequently foreclose any possibility of appealing arbitration awards in court.

An acceleration clause commonly exists in contracts where periodic payments are contemplated by the agreement. For example, if you signed a lease for your housing unit, then you most likely pay rent on a month-to-month basis. If you breached your lease, you would still owe rent for each subsequent month contemplated by the lease agreement. This means that your landlord would have new injury every month that you did not pay. An acceleration clause accelerates all payments due under the contract on breach. This allows the injured party—in this case, the landlord—to sue for all damages due for unpaid rent under that contract at once, rather than having to bring a new suit each month to seek monthly unpaid rent.

A liquidated damages clause allows parties to set the amount of damages in the event of breach. Agreeing to a damage amount before any breach occurs can save money and time spent litigating. Providing that the liquidated damages clause does not look like a penalty, the clause will be valid and enforced by a court that hears a dispute arising under the contract. For example, imagine that you entered into a contract for the sale of your car. If the liquidated damages clause provided for two thousand dollars of damages in the event of breach, that will probably be a valid liquidated damages clause, providing that your car is an “average” car. However, if the liquidated damages clause provided for one million dollars of damages payable by the breaching party, then that would not be enforceable by the court because it looks like a penalty. The proposed liquidated damages far exceed the value of the car that is the subject of the agreement.

Of course, there are additional common elements to contracts. This is not an exhaustive study of possible provisions, though it is a list of commonly encountered elements. For example, time of performance is often included as a separate provision. However, time for performance is an essential element in common-law contract formation, and without it, the contract may fail due to lack of definite and certain terms in formation.

A major assumption made about a written contract is that it is integrated, which means that it contains the entire expression of the parties’ agreement. That means that any statements made before the parties signed the contract are not part of the contract, unless those statements are memorialized in the contract itself. In fact, any statements or actions that are not captured within the four corners of the contract are considered parol evidence, and they will not be used to interpret the meaning of the contract.

Key Takeaways

Parties to contracts must not only take care to form the agreement so that it is legally enforceable, but they must also be aware of the properties of contracts in general, as well as specific provisions contained within contracts to which they are a party. Properties of contracts include ability to assign, delegate, and exclude parol evidence. Several types of contracts clauses are commonly used to restrict rights and limit liability.

Exercise $\PageIndex{1}$

Think of an example of an exculpatory clause that you have signed. For what type of activity would you be unwilling to sign an exculpatory clause? If your refusal to sign the exculpatory clause or agreement prevented you from participating in that activity, would you still refuse to sign it?
Do you think that too many limitations and restrictions can be placed on parties in a contract? Should there be more government regulation and standardization of contract terms between private parties? Why or why not?

§ 2-210. Delegation of performance; assignment of rights

West's annotated code of maryland commercial law.

Assignment of Rights or Delegation of Duties?

Introduction

A single structured settlement often involves multiple areas of law – including tort, tax, contract, Social Security, insurance, to name just a few.

Sometimes laws impacting a structured settlement not only overlap but also conflict thereby creating potential problems and/or confusion. For example, although structured settlement periodic payments generally are excluded from federal income taxation under IRC Section 104(a)(2), they can be considered “ unearned income ” for purposes of Social Security unless paid into a special needs trust or pooled trust. As a result, structured settlement periodic payments can potentially disqualify a direct recipient from receiving “ means tested ” government benefits including Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Medicaid.

Other examples creating potential legal conflicts and confusion include: 1) “ qualified assignments, ” which involve both tax law and contract law; and 2) “ anti-assignment language ” which is currently the focus of a case, Cordero v. Transamerica Annuity Service Corp., n/k/a Wilton Re Annuity Service Annuity Corp., being argued before the New York Court of Appeals.

A prior Independent Life article – https://www.independent.life/anti-assignment-language/ discusses “ anti-assignment language .” This article explains the difference under contract law between “ assigning rights ” and “ delegating duties ” and highlights a related drafting mistake Congress made when it enacted the Periodic Payment Settlement Act of 1982.

IRC Section 130 Qualified Assignments

For tax purposes, a “ qualified assignment ” is defined in IRC Section 130(c). The tax definition includes the following language: “ the term ‘ qualified assignment ’ means any assignment of a liability to make periodic payments as damages (whether by suit or agreement), or as compensation under any workmen’s compensation act, on account of personal injury or sickness (in a case involving physical injury or physical sickness) ” plus several additional requirements.

For contract purposes, the National Structured Settlement Trade Association ( NSSTA ) has published Model Agreements (contracts) including a Model Qualified Assignment (Model QA) Agreement and a Model Qualified Assignment and Release (Model QAR) Agreement with Annotated versions of each.

Parties to a structured settlement most often utilize some variation of NSSTA’s Model QAR to accomplish a transfer of a structured settlement periodic payment obligation from one or more defendants, and/or their insurers, to an assignment company. The Model QAR closely follows the terms and conditions of IRC Section 130 including use of the term “ qualified assignment ” as well as the terms “ assignor ” and “ assignee ”.

With IRC Section 130 and NSSTA’s Model QAR and Annotated Model QAR as primary resources, the transfer of a structured settlement periodic payment obligation has become an established industry standard.

Viewed from the perspective of contract law, however, “ assignment ”, “ assignor ” and “ assignee ”, as those terms are used to define the transfer of a structured settlement periodic payment obligation, arguably misname, and therefore mischaracterize, structured settlement’s most fundamental transaction.

Under contract law, transfers of “ rights ”, such as a plaintiff’s “ right ” to receive future periodic payments, are “ assigned ”, whereas “ duties ”, such as a defendant’s obligation (duty) to make future periodic payments, are “ delegated .”

In retrospect, the use of the word “ assignment ” in IRC Section 130 presumably represents a Congressional mistake. Arguably, IRC Section 130 transfers should properly be designated as “ qualified delegations ” and the primary parties to a “ qualified delegation ” agreement should be named “ delegator ”(defendant) and “ delegatee” (assignment company).”

Under contract law, as summarized below, “ assignment of rights ” and “ delegation of duties ” are subject to different rules. Mischaracterizing a transactional agreement that represents a “ delegation of duties ” rather than an “ assignment of rights ” under contract law might not jeopardize the legal rights and duties of the parties. However, as the following discussion demonstrates, mischaracterizing a transaction can create potential confusion, and perhaps even legal issues, that could arise subsequently if and when parties attempt to define and/or dispute their rights and duties.

Restatement (Second) of Contracts

The remainder of this article discusses the differences between “ assignment of rights ” and “ delegation of duties ” as applicable to structured settlements using the Restatement (Second) of Contracts ( Restatement ) as a reference guide. Published by the American Law Institute, the Restatement is generally recognized as the leading legal authority about the general principles of contract common law . The Restatement is comprised of 16 Chapters each of which includes multiple Topics and Sections.

The most relevant sections of the Restatement applicable, or potentially applicable, to the transfer of a structured settlement periodic payment obligation are:

Section 280 Novation

Section 317 Assignment of a Right

Section 318 Delegation of Performance of Duty

Section 328 Interpretation of Words of Assignment; Effect of Acceptance of Assignment

This article reviews relevant portions of each section as this writer believes those sections might apply to a transfer of a structured settlement periodic payment right and/or obligation. In the excerpts that follow from each Restatement section, traditional structured settlement language is added [in brackets in bold print] . A “ Discussion ” following each Restatement Section includes this writer’s comments and analysis.

Section 317 provides in relevant part:

“ An assignment of a right [to receive periodic payments] is a manifestation of the assignor’s [structured settlement recipient’s] intention to transfer it [right to receive periodic payments] by virtue of which the assignor’s [structured settlement recipient’s] right to performance by the obligor [assignment company] is extinguished in whole or in part and the assignee [factoring company] acquires a right to such performance.
“ A contractual right [to receive periodic payments] can be assigned unless … (b) the assignment is forbidden by statute [IRC 5891 or state protection laws] or is otherwise inoperative on grounds of public policy, or (c) assignment is forbidden by contract [anti-assignment provisions].

Discussion: Section 317 appears in Chapter 15 of the Restatement (“ Assignment and Delegation ”) under Topic 1 (“ What Can Be Assigned or Delegated”).

Upon review, it appears impossible to effectively transpose alternative bracketed language to make Section 317 applicable to a Section 130 structured settlement periodic payment transfer.

In fact, as the bracketed language indicates, Section 317 more precisely describes what we know as a transfer (assignment) of periodic payment “ rights ” (i.e. factoring) by a structured settlement recipient (plaintiff). Under contract law, therefore, Restatement 317 clearly demonstrates “ assignment ” is the wrong word to describe the transfer of a structured settlement periodic payment obligation. Just to be certain, however, let’s also consider Restatement Section 328.

Section 328 provides in relevant part:

“ Unless the language or the circumstance indicate to the contrary, as in an assignment for security, an assignment of ’the contract’ [the settlement agreement] or of ‘all my rights under the contract’ [all my rights under the settlement agreement] or an assignment in similar general terms is an assignment of the assignor’s [plaintiff’s] rights and a delegation of his [plaintiff’s] unperformed duties under the contract.
“ Unless the language [of the settlement documents or transfer documents] or the circumstances [general structured settlement industry practices] indicate the contrary, the acceptance by an assignee [transfer company] of such an assignment [IRC 5891 Transfer] operates as a promise to the assignor [plaintiff] to perform the assignor’s [plaintiff’s] unperformed duties, and the obligor [defendant] of the assigned rights is an intended beneficiary of the promise.”

Discussion : Section 328 appears in Chapter 15 of the Restatement (“ Assignment and Delegation ”) under Topic 2 (“ Mode of Assignment or Delegation ”).

Some readers initially may attempt to substitute alternative structured settlement language in the brackets believing this Section might support assignment of duties. In fact, the only Comment to Section 328 is titled “ Assignment of duty .”

The Comment, however, reads in relevant part: “ A duty cannot be ‘ assigned ’ in the sense in which ‘ assignmen t’ is used in this Chapter. The parties to an assignment, however, may not distinguish between assignment of rights and delegation of duties. A purported ‘ assignment of duties’ may simply manifest an intention that the assignee shall be substituted for the assignor .”

A careful reading of Restatement Section 328, including the words “ an assignment of ‘the contract’ or of ‘all my rights under the contract’” as well as the Comment, therefore demonstrates this section is not applicable to a transfer of an IRC Section 130 transfer. As with Section 317, Section 328’s meaning more clearly applies to factoring transactions – transfers of periodic payment “ rights .”

Section 318 reads in its entirety:

“ An obligor [defendant] can properly delegate the performance of his duty [to pay periodic payments] to another [assignment company] unless the delegation is contrary to public policy [conditions set forth in IRC Section 130] or the terms of his promise [the terms of the settlement agreement] .
“ Unless otherwise agreed, a promise requires performance by a particular person [defendant] only to the extent that the obligee [plaintiff] has a substantial interest in having that person perform [pay the future periodic payments] or control the acts promised .”
“ Unless the Obligee [plaintiff] agrees otherwise, neither delegation of performance nor a contract to assume the duty made with the obligor [defendant] by the person delegated [assignment company] discharges any duty or liability of the delegating obligor [plaintiff]”.

Discussion : Section 318 appears in Chapter 15 of the Restatement (“ Assignment and Delegation ”) under Topic 1 (“ What Can be Assigned or Delegated ”).

A Comment titled “ Delegation and novation ” states in part: “ An obligor [defendant] is discharged [from the obligation to pay periodic payments] by the substitution of a new obligor [assignment company] only if the contract [assignment agreement] so provides or if the obligee [plaintiff] makes a binding manifestation of assent, forming a novation…. Otherwise, the obligee [plaintiff] retains his original right [to receive periodic payments] against the obligor [defendant], even though the obligor [defendant] manifests an intention to substitute another obligor [assignment company] in his [defendant’s] place and the other [assignment company] purports to assume the duty [obligation to pay the periodic payments] . ”

For purposes of IRC Section 130 Qualified Assignment nomenclature, Section 318 differentiates between a Qualified Assignment with and without a Release. To obtain a release for an obligor/defendant from the obligation to pay periodic payments, the parties must effectuate a “ novation .”

Section 280 reads in its entirety: “ A novation is a substituted contract [assignment agreement] that includes as a party one [assignment company] who is neither the obligor [defendant] nor the obligee [plaintiff] of the original duty [obligation to pay the periodic payments].”

Discussion : Section 280 appears in Chapter 12 of the Restatement (“ Discharge by Assent or Alteration ”) under Topic 2 (“ Substituted Performance, Substituted Contract, Accord and Account Stated ”).

The Comment to Section 280 adds in relevant part:

“ The effect of a novation is to discharge the original duty [defendant’s obligation to pay the periodic payments] , “ so that the breach of the new duty [assignment company’s duty] gives no right of action on the old duty [defendant’s duty]. ”
“ A novation is subject to the same requirements as any other contract, including that of consideration…. Consideration to support the discharge of the original [defendant’s] duty can usually be found in the [assignment company’s] promise to undertake a new duty .”
“ Assent of the obligee of the original duty [plaintiff] and of the obligor of the new duty [assignment company] is always necessary .”

Although NSSTA’s Model QAR Agreement uses IRC Section 130 “ assignment ” language, as it must to satisfy IRC Section 130, NSSTA’s Model QAR nonetheless appears to satisfy all of Restatement Section 280’s requirements for effectuating a novation.

When Congress enacted IRC Section 130 as part of the Periodic Payment Settlement Act of 1982, it codified the term “ Qualified Assignment ” instead of “ Qualified Delegation ”, the correct legal term under contract law. That decision describing the transfer of an obligation to pay periodic payments apparently was an unintentional mistake. NSSTA’s Model QA and Model QAR Agreements are consistent with IRC Section 130. These Model Agreements use the terms “ assignment ”, “ assignor ” and “ assignee ” without noting any conflict with contract law in their Annotated versions. To date, this writer is not aware of legal repercussions resulting from these conflicts.

The Congressional mistake, however, does impact a critical structured settlement Internal Revenue Code section as well as the structured settlement industry’s most important legal documents. Discussion of the potential issues this legal conflict creates has been largely unexamined within the structured settlement industry – as least as part of its educational programs. The reasons these issues have not been discussed appear to be less purposeful than insular. Optimistically, this article might stimulate more creative/courageous thinking about other topics that have been largely overlooked by structured settlement educational planners.

For examples, with a surfeit of educational programs addressing tax law and factoring, what about other areas of law impacting structured settlements and emerging structured settlement products? When structured settlement “ industry standards ” conflict with, or fall short of, competing industry standards, such as “ best interest ” product suitability or “ compensation disclosure ”, shouldn’t those issues represent priority industry educational topics? With three national trade associations (NSSTA, AASC and SSP) again offering in person educational conferences, and with NSSTA revitalizing its CSSC/MSSC programs, multiple educational options are now available to explore emerging industry issues and to selectively re-examine existing practices and standards.

Turbocharge your firm with our free resources

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Deep expertise combined with unparalleled access. Market-leading underwriting and pricing, plus turnaround times that redefine industry benchmarks. Innovative solutions that challenge convention. Impressive credentials plus best-in-class partners to back it all up.

Testimonials
Qualified Settlements
Non-Qualified Settlements
Attorney Fee Structures
Payee Protection Policy
iStructure Annuity

P.O. Box 679053 Dallas, Texas 75267-9053

Any discussion of taxes herein is for general informational purposes only and does not purport to be complete or cover every situation. Independent Life, its affiliates, its distributors, and its and their respective representatives do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice. You should confer with your qualified legal, tax and accounting advisors based on your particular circumstances. All guarantees are obligations of Independent Life Insurance Company.

What Is the Difference Between Assignment and Delegation?

The difference between assignment and delegation is that an assignment can't increase another party's obligations. 3 min read updated on February 01, 2023

Updated October 20, 2020

The difference between assignment and delegation is that an assignment can't increase another party's obligations. Delegation, on the other hand, is a method of using a contract to transfer one party's obligations to another party. Assigning rights is usually easier than delegating, and fewer restrictions are in place.

The Process of Assignment

With a contract, each party involved holds certain rights. When the party referred to as the assignor gives his or her rights to the party known as the assignee, this is called the process of assignment. For example, if you are a contractor doing house repairs and have agreed to perform a job for a specific amount of pay, you can assign your right to receive that specific amount of pay to another person. If you do this, it means your rights under the contract have been assigned, by you, to that other person.

When You Can't Assign Contractual Obligations

Most of the time, the parties involved in a contract are able to freely assign their rights, but there are times when that isn't an option. One example is if a company enters into an enforceable agreement , also called a contract, to provide a specific amount of merchandise to a store or boutique. The store or boutique can't have the products delivered to a location that's farther away because that would increase the original company's obligation and delivery costs without their permission or agreement. Contracts are also sometimes written to prohibit assignment.

Defining Delegation

When you transfer duties, you have contractually agreed to perform, that's the delegation of your obligations, with the difference between delegation and assignment being that you aren't transferring rights, you're delegating obligations to a different party. Delegating duties you have contractually agreed to is typically permitted, but there are times when delegation isn't allowed.

When the delegation of obligations would alter the scope of the agreement, it isn't allowed.
A promise to repay a debt usually can't be delegated.
Delegation isn't allowed if the parties involved in the contract draft that into the agreement.

Is Third-Party Consent Required for Assignment and Delegation?

Third-party consent isn't a requirement for a contractual assignment, which is linked to rights in an enforceable agreement. A delegation, however, does require that the person being assigned the task be not only aware, but they must explicitly accept the responsibility being assigned. The term for this type of delegation is the delegation of the performance of a duty . While the consequences of assignment and delegation aren't the same, the terms can be used in an interchangeable manner when consequences aren't involved.

Consequences of Assignment

Consequences of assignments include:

The assignee's right to file a suit against the obligor if performance falls short.
The obligor gets the same protection against the assignee the assignor gets.
The obligor's payments to the assignor stay in effect until the obligor knows about the assignment.
A contractual modification set up between the obligor and assignor remains in effect if the obligor was unaware of the assignment.

Consequences of Delegation

Delegation's consequences include:

The liability falls to the party delegating the obligation to another party.
The delegatee only has an obligation to the Obligees when consideration, or some form of payment, is received from the delegating party.

Assignments and delegation can only happen if the boundaries set by the contract allow it. Businesses often restrict the ability to assign rights or delegate duties because of not being sure who the rights or duties might be assigned to if not stopped contractually. This especially applies to delegation.

Delegation of Performance

No delegation of performance is able to relieve the delegating party's obligation to perform as contracted, and it doesn't remove liability for breach of contract. The right to receive damages in the event of a breach of contract can, however, be assigned regardless of an agreement that states otherwise. If the other party in the agreement designates performance as a factor that creates a sense of insecurity, they can then treat an assignment as a reason to demand assurances from the assignee. The original promise to perform is then enforceable by the assignor to the other party who was part of the original agreement.

If you need help with the difference between assignment and delegation, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.

Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees

Content Approved by UpCounsel

Delegation vs Assignment
Delegation Law
Assignment of Rights and Obligations Under a Contract
Assignment Legal Definition
Assignment Contract Law
Assignment Law
Legal Assignment
Delegation of Duties
Assignment of Rights Example
What Is the Definition of Assigns

Primary tabs

Assign is the act of transferring rights , property , or other benefits to another party (the assignee ) from the party who holds such benefits under contract (the assignor). This concept is used in both contract and property law .

Contract Law

Under contract law, when one party assigns a contract , the assignment represents both: (1) an assignment of rights; and (2) a delegation of duties .

For example, if A contracts with B to teach B guitar for $50, A can assign this contract to C.
Here, A has both: (1) assigned A’s rights under the contract to the $50; and (2) delegated A’s duty to teach guitar, to C.
In this example, A is both the “assignor” and the “delegee” who delegates the duties to another (C), C is known as the “ obligor ” who must perform the obligations to the assignee , and B is the assignee who is owed duties and is liable to the obligor.

Assigning of Rights/Duties Under Contract Law

There are a few notable rules regarding assignments under contract law.

First, if an individual has not yet secured the contract to perform duties to another, they cannot assign their future right to an assignee.

That is, if A has not yet contracted with B to teach B guitar, A cannot assign their rights to C.

Second, rights cannot be assigned when they materially change the obligor’s duty and rights.

Third, the obligor can sue the assignee directly if the assignee does not pay them.

Following the previous example, this means that C ( obligor ) can sue B ( assignee ) if C teaches guitar to B, but B does not pay C $50 in return.

Delegation of Duties

If the promised performance requires a rare genius or skill, then the delegee cannot delegate it to the obligor. It can only be delegated if the promised performance is more commonplace. Further, an obligee can sue if the assignee does not perform. However, the delegee is secondarily liable unless there has been an express release of the delegee.

Meaning if B does want C to teach guitar but C refuses to, then B can sue C. If C still refuses to perform, then B can compel A to fulfill the duties under secondary liability.

Lastly, a related concept is novation , which is when a new obligor substitutes and releases an old obligor. If novation occurs, then the original obligor’s duties are wiped out. Novation requires an original obligee’s consent .

Property Law

Under property law , assignment typically arises in landlord-tenant situations.

For example, A might be renting from landlord B but wants another party (C) to take over the property.
In this scenario, A might choose between assigning and subleasing the property to C.
If assigning , A would give C the entire balance of the term , with no reversion to anyone; whereas if subleasing , A would give C the property for a limited period of the remaining term.
Under assignment, C would have privity of estate with the landlord while under a sublease, C would not.

[Last updated in June of 2022 by the Wex Definitions Team ]

business law
property & real estate law
business sectors
commercial transactions
property law
wex articles
wex definitions

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Publications
Account settings
Browse Titles

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

StatPearls [Internet].

Five rights of nursing delegation.

Jennifer M. Barrow ; Sandeep Sharma .

Affiliations

Last Update: July 24, 2023 .

Introduction

Many definitions for delegation exist in professional literature. One of the most commonly cited definitions of the word was jointly established by the American Nurses Association and the National Council of State Boards of Nursing. These groups describe delegation as the process for a nurse to direct another person to perform nursing tasks and activities. Delegation involves at least two individuals: the delegator, and the delegatee. The delegator is a registered nurse who distributes a portion of patient care to the delegatee.

Essential Components of Delegation

Responsibility

Based on individual states’ nurse practice acts, registered nurses have a professional duty to perform patient care tasks dependably and reliably.

Authority refers to an individual’s ability to complete duties within a specific role. This authority derives from nurse practice acts and organizational policies and job descriptions.

Accountability

Accountability within the nursing context refers to nursing professionals’ legal liability for their actions related to patient care. During delegation, delegators transfer responsibility and authority for completing a task to the delegatee; however, the delegator always maintains accountability for the task's completion. The registered nurse is always accountable for the overall outcome of delegated tasks based on each state's nurse practice act provisions.

Possible legal and ethical constraints arise regarding delegation in nursing. Therefore, the American Nurses Association developed the five rights of delegation to assist nurses in making safe decisions.

Five Rights of Delegation

Right circumstance

Right person

Right supervision
Right direction and communication [1]
Issues of Concern

Five Rights of Delegation Case Study Approach

Mark is a new graduate registered nurse who has recently completed nursing orientation. He is now on his second week of non-precepted practice on a busy medical-surgical unit. During the middle of his busy night shift, Mark has several tasks that need to be completed quickly. These tasks include a linen change for a patient who just vomited, an assessment of a possibly infiltrated intravenous line, and the administration of intravenous pain medication for a patient who rates her pain 10 out of 10. Mark also needs to make hourly rounds within the next few minutes, and he is very behind on his charting. He knows he must delegate some of the tasks to his coworkers. However, Mark is unsure what he can delegate and to whom. He decides to use the five rights of delegation to help with his delegation decisions.

Right tasks

First, Mark needs to determine which tasks are right to delegate. Some questions he may ask at this time would include (1) which tasks are legally appropriate to delegate and (2) can I delegate these tasks based on this organization’s policies and procedures? Correctly answering these questions will require familiarity with institutional and nurse practice act guidance. Generally, registered nurses are responsible for assessment, planning, and evaluation within the nursing process. These actions should not be delegated to someone who is not a registered nurse. [2]

Right circumstances

After determining the right tasks for delegation, Mark considers the right circumstances of delegation. In so doing, Mark may ask the following questions: (1) are appropriate equipment and resources available to perform the task, (2) does the delegatee have the right supervision to accomplish the task, and (3) is the environment favorable for delegation in this situation? To appropriately answer these questions, it is imperative that Mark completes an assessment on each client. Patients who are or may become unstable and cases with unpredictable outcomes are not good candidates for delegation. For example, it may be appropriate for unlicensed assistive personnel to feed patients requiring assistance with the activities of daily living. However, if a patient has a high risk for aspiration and a complicated specialty diet, delegation of feeding to unlicensed assistive personnel may not be safe.

If a task and circumstance are right for delegation, the next “right” of delegation is the right person. Mark needs to consider if the potential delegatees have the requisite knowledge and experience to complete delegated tasks safely, especially concerning the assessed patient acuity. Before delegating a task, the registered nurse must know the delegatee’s job description and previous training. Mark may be unsure about his potential delegatee’s qualifications. Therefore, he might ask the following questions before delegating a task: (1) have you received training to perform this task, (2) have you ever performed this task with a patient, (3) have you ever completed this task without supervision, and (4) what problems have you encountered in performing this task in the past?

Right supervision

The right supervision must be available in all delegation situations. Nurse practice acts require the registered nurse to provide appropriate supervision for all delegated tasks. In the case study, Mark must be sure that the delegatee will provide feedback after the task is complete. Following task completion, Mark is responsible for evaluating the outcome of the task with the patient. Registered nurses are accountable for evaluation and the overall patient outcomes.

Right direction and communication

Finally, the delegator must give the right direction and communication to the delegatee. All delegators must communicate performance expectations precisely and directly. [3] Mark should not assume that his delegatee knows what to do and how to do it, even for routine tasks. Mark must consider whether the delegatee understood the assigned task, directions, patient limitations, and expected outcomes before the delegatee assumes responsibility for it. The delegatee also must comprehend what, how, and when to report back after the delegated task is complete. Delegatees also need a deadline for task completion for time-sensitive tasks. [4]

Using the five rights of delegation, Mark appropriately took care of his patients’ needs. Mark delegated the linen change to trained unlicensed assistive personnel, and he entrusted his hourly rounds to his shift charge nurse. Mark opted to assess the patient with a possibly infiltrated intravenous site first. Upon finding the site infiltrated, he assessed his patient, removed the intravenous line, and placed a warm compress on the patient’s elevated extremity. He then administered another patient’s requested pain medications after delegating new intravenous catheter placement to an intravenous-certified coworker for the patient with the infiltration. Mark was able to complete all his documentation requirements by the end of his shift.

Clinical Significance

Reasons Delegation is Necessary for the Modern Health Care Environment

If delegation decisions are so challenging and legally charged, why should nurses delegate? Fiscal constraints, nursing shortages, and increases in patient care complexity have cultivated an environment in which delegation is necessary. If appropriately used, delegation can significantly improve patient care outcomes.

Improper Delegation

Improper delegation can negatively impact patient care while also potentially exposing the delegator to legal action. [5] All members of the health care team have valuable contributions to make toward safe, effective patient care.

Essentials of Communication

While employing the five rights of delegation in nursing practice, it is important to remember that the way the delegator asks the delegatee to perform a task can make a big difference. The delegator must use direct, honest, open, closed-loop communication to encourage teamwork and safe task performance. [6] Of the five rights of delegation, the right communication and direction are arguably the most important in ensuring good quality and safety outcomes. [7] Common delegation deficiencies for registered nurses occur when delegating tasks to unlicensed assistive personnel. These include unclear delegation directions from the registered nurse, a lack of retained accountability and follow-through, and the failure of the registered nurse to obtain the agreement of the unlicensed assistive personnel. [8]

Review Questions
Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
Comment on this article.

Disclosure: Jennifer Barrow declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Sandeep Sharma declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.

Cite this Page Barrow JM, Sharma S. Five Rights of Nursing Delegation. [Updated 2023 Jul 24]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

In this Page

Bulk download.

Bulk download StatPearls data from FTP

Related information

PubMed Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

Five Rights of Nursing Delegation - StatPearls Five Rights of Nursing Delegation - StatPearls

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Connect with NLM

National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894

Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure

Help Accessibility Careers

Assignment Of Rights Agreement

Jump to section, what is an assignment of rights agreement.

An assignment of rights agreement is a written document in which one party, the assignor, assigns to another party all or part of their rights under an existing contract. The most common example of this would be when someone wants to sell their shares of stock in a company.

When you buy shares from someone else (the seller), they agree to transfer them over and give up any control they had on that share. This way, another party can take ownership without going through the trouble of trying to buy the whole company themselves.

Common Sections in Assignment Of Rights Agreements

Below is a list of common sections included in Assignment Of Rights Agreements. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.

Assignment Of Rights Agreement Sample

Reference : Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-99.(H)(7) 5 dex99h7.htm FORM OF ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT , Viewed December 20, 2021, View Source on SEC .

Who Helps With Assignment Of Rights Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on assignment of rights agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with an assignment of rights agreement?

Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate assignment of rights agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

Meet some of our Assignment Of Rights Agreement Lawyers

I have been practicing law since 2018. I used to be a litigator at a nationwide practice before going in-house at a fintech company. I have experience drafting NDAs, SaaS contracts, service agreements, and stock purchase agreements.

Jared Fields is an experienced business lawyer and litigator with experience in diverse industries and practice areas. Prior to launching his own practice, he served as the chief legal officer for a group of privately-owned companies, including a real estate development group, construction companies, multiple franchisees, and a professional soccer team. As a result, he is experienced in real estate transactions, commercial agreements of varying degrees of sophistication, employment matters, and litigation, as well as general business legal advice. He was also an in-house attorney for a renewable energy company, where he was responsible for litigation, investigations, enforcement actions, and related securities filing disclosures. Mr. Fields also spent many years as a litigator in private practice, representing clients in matters ranging from securities litigation, to breach of contract, to cases involving real estate and financial services. Mr. Fields has particular experience in legal matters that may involve complex financial, accounting, valuation, and other quantitative issues.

V. Yvette S.

I am a highly skilled attorney, fluent in English and Spanish with 20 years of legal experience and 8 additional years of real estate, project finance, banking, financial, securities, and start-up company experience. I worked 6 years with 2 international law firms and handled extremely complex work for all types of clients, 3 years with a Federal Government Regulator, and 5 years in various compliance management positions at national and international financial institutions. I am licensed in New York and North Carolina. I will handle federal litigation on a non-contingency basis. I also practice Appellate Advocacy for constitutional, employment, consumer, and corporate laws. I am skilled in many different NY and NC laws. I have successfully represented clients with state and federal regulatory investigations. I can help you with the FDA, SEC, OCC, CFPB, FDIC, FR and certain state regulators.

Bradford T.

I have been practicing law for almost 23 years.

Born in Cleveland, Ohio - 9/15/1974 Lived in Cleveland all my life went to college at Ohio Wesleyan University - graduated in 1996 went to law school at Cleveland Marshall College of Law - graduated in 2001 passed the OH bar exam in 2003 worked at the OH Atty General's office, at cuyahoga county prosecutor office and as a solo practitioner

I am a Swiss-American lawyer based in Florida and specialize in business, investments, and other civil matters. I have won many cases in both state and federal litigation, and arbitration. Before litigation or arbitration, however, I like to prevent these legal disputes by ensuring my clients base their business on strong concrete contracts that will protect them even decades down the road. My clients are my top priority, which is why they get my personal cell and can reach me anytime. My firm is also established on the extremely high standards of professionalism, transparent itemized billing, fast turnaround times and more. For more information, visit: https://www.transnationalmatters.com/

I am a Partner at Kashyap Partners (operating in California, New York and New Jersey), along with it's sister firm in India. I have been working as a technology, transactional and data privacy lawyer for 5 years with a specialisation in start-up law.

Find the best lawyer for your project

How it works.

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Business lawyers by top cities

Austin Business Lawyers
Boston Business Lawyers
Chicago Business Lawyers
Dallas Business Lawyers
Denver Business Lawyers
Houston Business Lawyers
Los Angeles Business Lawyers
New York Business Lawyers
Phoenix Business Lawyers
San Diego Business Lawyers
Tampa Business Lawyers

Assignment Of Rights Agreement lawyers by city

Austin Assignment Of Rights Agreement Lawyers
Boston Assignment Of Rights Agreement Lawyers
Chicago Assignment Of Rights Agreement Lawyers
Dallas Assignment Of Rights Agreement Lawyers
Denver Assignment Of Rights Agreement Lawyers
Houston Assignment Of Rights Agreement Lawyers
Los Angeles Assignment Of Rights Agreement Lawyers
New York Assignment Of Rights Agreement Lawyers
Phoenix Assignment Of Rights Agreement Lawyers
San Diego Assignment Of Rights Agreement Lawyers
Tampa Assignment Of Rights Agreement Lawyers

related contracts

93a Demand Letter
Accounting Services Agreement
Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement
Ad Agency Contract
Adhesion Contract
Advertising Services Agreement
Agency Agreement
Agency Contract

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

The Assignment Of Litigation Rights And Champerty

It is not often that we examine a case involving the doctrine of champerty. The last time we did so was on March 8, 2023 ( here ). We also examined the champerty doctrine in 2021 ( here ), 2020 ( here ), and 2016 ( here ).

Today, we examine the champerty doctrine in our discussion of IKB Intl. S.A. v. Morgan Stanley , 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 01675 (1st Dept. Mar. 26, 2024) ( here ).

Champerty is the prohibited practice of purchasing claims for the purpose of commencing litigation. It has been described as “a venerable doctrine developed hundreds of years ago to prevent or curtail the commercialization of or trading in litigation.” 1

The doctrine of champerty is codified in New York within Judiciary Law § 489. 2 Under Judiciary Law § 489, no corporation “shall solicit, buy or take an assignment of … a bond, promissory note, bill of exchange, book debt, or other thing in action, or any claim or demand, with the intent and for the purpose of bringing an action or proceeding thereon.” However, for an assignment of a claim to be void for champerty, the assignee must have made the purchase “for the very purpose of bringing such suit” to the “exclusion of any other purpose.” 3 Thus, while assignments “for the primary purpose of obtaining costs or [harassment]” are void as champertous, 4 assignments are not champertous where the intent to bring a suit is merely “incidental and contingent” to other rights. 5

Moreover, champerty does not apply where the assignee had a “preexisting proprietary interest” in the subject matter. 6

IKB began in the years immediately prior to the financial crisis of 2007-2008. Plaintiff IKB International S.A. (“IKB S.A.”) was a commercial bank incorporated in Luxembourg.

IKB S.A. purchased a number of certificates (“Certificates”) for residential mortgage-backed securities from Morgan Stanley, allegedly in reliance on misrepresentations that Morgan Stanley made in its offering documents. In particular, Morgan Stanley allegedly made misrepresentations to IKB S.A.’s investment managers, Standish Mellon and BlackRock, including misrepresentations regarding loan-to-value and combined loan-to-value statistics, owner-occupancy status of borrowers, and adherence to the originators’ underwriting guidelines. The contemporary value of the Certificates collapsed during the onset of the financial crisis as the poor quality of the underlying loans and resulting increased credit risk became apparent. Ultimately, IKB S.A. was placed into liquidation as part of the German government’s bailout of IKB S.A.’s parent, IKB A.G.

In November 2008, IKB S.A. sold the Certificates to IKB A.G. Two weeks later, IKB A.G. sold the Certificates to Rio Debt Holdings (Ireland) Limited (“Rio”), a newly created Irish special purpose vehicle. As part of the sale of Certificates to Rio, IKB A.G. became a junior lender to Rio and also became a portfolio administrator to Rio.

IKB A.G. and Rio subsequently executed an assignment on May 9, 2012 (the “2012 Assignment”) in which Rio assigned to IKB A.G. “all the rights of action and claims against any other party with respect to the Securities it may have obtained in connection with its purchase of the Securities from IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG … except rights of action and claims for the receipt of interest and principal on the Securities.” In exchange, IKB A.G. agreed to provide to Rio “a sum equal to the proceeds of any recovery stemming from a resolution of claims relating to the Assigned Rights, net of all agreed costs, taxes and expenses, which shall be set out and governed by a separate agreement to be executed by the Parties.”

IKB A.G. maintained that under a supplementary deed (the “Supplementary Deed”) and other governing documents, the parties agreed that 80% of the net litigation proceeds would revert to IKB A.G. Rio and IKB A.G. executed the Supplementary Deed on January 11, 2013—after Plaintiffs filed the summons in the action—but gave it retroactive effect from May 9, 2012.

IKB A.G. filed the summons in November 2012 and later filed the complaint on May 17, 2013. The complaint alleged causes of action for fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, and negligent misrepresentation. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, in part for lack of standing, arguing that the 2012 Assignment of the fraud claims back to IKB A.G. was void as champertous. The motion court denied the motion, finding that Defendants had not shown that “IKB AG’s primary or sole purpose [for the assignment] was not to enforce a legitimate claim, or that the claim was not acquired as part of a larger transaction or for leverage in other disputes between the parties.” The motion court determined that IKB A.G.’s intent in the 2012 Assignment was a factual question that required further development of the record. However, the motion court dismissed the causes of action for fraudulent concealment and negligent misrepresentation.

On summary judgment, Defendants again sought dismissal on the basis of champerty. The motion court held that the 2012 Assignment was not champertous “because IKB AG had a preexisting proprietary interest in the subject matter.” The motion court explained that

In order to finance the initial assignment of the Certificates to Rio in 2008, IKB AG and Rio entered into a loan agreement. Pursuant to the 2008 loan agreement between IKB AG and Rio, IKB AG as junior lender was entitled to 80% of the profits from the assets. While Defendants are correct that the loan has since been paid down to one dollar, this does not change the fact that, unlike other champertous assignments, the 2012 Assignment indisputably did not involve a “stranger” to the transaction, but a party with a prior interest. 7

The motion court also held that Defendants “failed to establish that the sole purpose for the 2012 Assignment was to profit off of litigation, to the exclusion of all other purposes.” The motion court explained that “[a]n assignment is not champertous merely because the parties enter into the assignment ‘for the purpose of collecting damages, by means of a lawsuit.’” 8 “Rather,” said the motion court, “there is a key distinction between ‘acquir[ing] a right in order to make money from litigating it [champertous] and … acquir[ing] a right in order to enforce it [not champertous].’” 9

The motion court found that Plaintiffs “provided evidence that they [were] still entitled to 80% of the future cash flows under the 2008 loan agreement with Rio because the loan was not paid off entirely—even though it was paid down almost in its entirety.” “Therefore,” concluded the motion court, “regardless of whether or not the 2012 Assignment’s primary purpose was litigation, Defendants [had] not provided sufficient evidence to establish that the sole purpose, to the exclusion of all other purposes, was to profit off of litigation.” “As such,” said the motion court, “Defendants have failed to establish that the 2012 Assignment is void as champertous.”

The Appellate Division, First Department unanimously affirmed.

As an initial mater, the Court rejected Defendants’ argument (as the Court framed it) that “any assignment of litigation claims — even when fashioned to protect an independent litigation right of the assignee — must necessarily be void,” stating that such a formulation was “not the law.” 10 “Rather,” explained the Court, “the champerty doctrine is intended to prevent opportunistic parties from profiting from litigation claims that otherwise would not have been brought — not preventing the assignment of legitimate claims to a party holding a beneficial interest in those claims to enforce its own rights.” 11 “The critical distinction,” noted the Court, was “‘between acquiring a thing in action in order to obtain costs and acquiring it in order to protect an independent right of the assignee.’” 12

The Court also held that the motion court “correctly found that champerty only prohibits the acquisition of a cause of action by a ‘stranger’ to the underlying dispute.” 13 The Court found that the evidence “establishe[d] that plaintiff IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. had an independent interest in pursuing the claims, and was not a stranger to the action.” 14 “IKB A.G. owns 100% of plaintiff IKB International, S.A., the original purchaser of the assets, and was the assignor’s junior lender beginning in November 2008,” said the Court. “Defendants’ reading of Justinian [did] not compel a different result,” concluded the Court. 15

Bluebird Partners, L.P. v. First Fidelity Bank, N.A. , 94 N.Y.2d 726, 729 (2000).
Ehrlich v. Rebco Ins. Exchange, Ltd. , 225 A.D.2d 75, 77 (1st Dept. 1996).
See Richbell Information Servs., Inc. v. Jupiter Partners , 280 A.D.2d 208, 215 (1st Dept. 2001) (citing Moses v.McDivitt , 88 N.Y. 62 (1882)). In Justinian Capital SPC v. WestLB AG, N.Y. Branch , the New York Court of Appeals explained that to “constitute the offense [of champerty] the primary purpose of the purchase must be to enable [one] to bring suit, and the intent to bring a suit must not be merely incidental or contingent.” 28 N.Y.3d 160, 166 (2016) (internal quotation marks omitted).
See 71 Clinton St. Apts. LLC v. 71 Clinton Inc. , 114 A.D.3d 583, 585 (1st Dept. 2014); Trust For the Certificate Holders of Merrill Lynch Mortg. Investors, Inc. v. Love Funding Corp. , 13 N.Y.3d 190, 198 (2009).
New York Chinese TV Programs, Inc. v. U.E. Enterprises, Inc. , 1989 WL 22442, *13 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 1989).
See Love Funding , 13 N.Y.3d at 198.
Citing Jamaica Public Service Co., Ltd. v. La Interamericana Compania De Seguros Generales S.A. , 262 A.D.2d 73, 74 (1st Dept. 1999); In re Imax Sec. Litig. , 2011 WL 1487090, *6 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 15, 2011).
Quoting Universal Inv. Advisory SA v. Bakrie Telecom Pte., Ltd. , 154 A.D.3d 171, 180 (1st Dept. 2017).
Quoting id.
Slip Op. at *1.
Id. (citation omitted).
Id. (citing Justinian , 28 N.Y.3d at 167) (internal quotation marks omitted)).

Latest Posts

First Department Reminds Practitioners that “proofreading is an essential, indispensable tool in the drafting of contracts”
Fraud Claim Held Not Duplicative of a Single Page Contract
Second Department Holds That Material Term of Contract For Sale of Real Property (i.e., the Property Description) Was Too Indefinite To Enforce
Settlement Agreement Found To Be an Instrument for The Payment of Money Only Sufficient to Grant Summary Judgment In Lieu of Complaint

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

Refine your interests »

Written by:

Published In:

Freiberger haber llp on:.

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Understanding Assignment and Delegation in Contracts

Nov 24, 2023 | Contracts

Contracts serve as the backbone of countless interactions in our daily lives, from business agreements to personal arrangements. Within the intricate web of contractual relationships, two essential concepts play a pivotal role: assignment and delegation. In this comprehensive guide, we will delve into the depths of assignment and delegation in contracts, unraveling their definitions, implications, and the crucial distinctions between them.

I. Definition and Basics:

A. Assignment:

An assignment in the context of contracts refers to the transfer of one party’s rights or obligations under the agreement to another entity. This can involve the entire contract or specific rights within it. The original party is known as the “assignor,” the party receiving the rights is the “assignee,” and the other party to the original contract is the “obligor.”

B. Delegation:

Delegation, on the other hand, involves the transfer of one party’s duties or responsibilities under the contract to a third party. The party initially obligated is the “delegator,” the entity assuming the responsibilities is the “delegatee,” and the other party to the original contract remains the “obligee.”

II. Key Elements of Assignment:

Assignments often require notice to the obligor for legal effectiveness. This notice serves to inform the obligor that the rights under the contract have been transferred to another party. Failure to provide proper notice might result in the assignee’s inability to enforce the assigned rights against the obligor.

B. Consideration:

In many jurisdictions, a valid assignment requires consideration, meaning something of value must be exchanged between the assignor and assignee. This ensures that the assignment is a bona fide transaction rather than a gratuitous transfer.

C. Prohibited Assignments:

Certain contracts include provisions prohibiting assignment without the consent of all parties involved. If such a provision exists, attempting to assign the contract without consent could lead to a breach.

III. Key Elements of Delegation:

A. Responsibility vs. Performance:

Delegation involves the transfer of responsibilities, not performance. The delegator remains liable for the performance of the contract, and any failure on the part of the delegatee reflects directly on the delegator.

B. Consent:

Similar to assignments, some contracts explicitly state that delegation is not allowed without the consent of the other party. If a contract includes a non-delegation clause, attempting to delegate without consent may result in a breach.

C. Trust and Expertise:

Delegation is often used when the delegator believes that the delegatee possesses specific skills or expertise required for the performance of certain duties. However, trust remains paramount, as the delegator is ultimately responsible for the contract’s fulfillment.

IV. Legal Implications:

A. Third-Party Rights:

Assignments can create third-party rights, allowing the assignee to enforce the assigned rights directly against the obligor. This can lead to complex legal scenarios, especially when dealing with multiple layers of contractual relationships.

B. Breach of Contract:

Improper assignment or delegation can result in a breach of contract. Parties must adhere to the terms of the contract and applicable laws to avoid legal consequences.

C. Novation:

In some cases, parties may opt for novation, a process that involves the substitution of a new party for one of the original parties. Novation releases the original party from all obligations under the contract and replaces them with a new party.

V. Practical Considerations:

A. Drafting Clear Contracts:

To avoid confusion and potential disputes, parties should draft contracts with clear language regarding assignment and delegation. Clearly outlining the rights, obligations, and any restrictions on transfer helps prevent future complications.

B. Due Diligence:

Before entering into a contract, parties should conduct due diligence to understand the implications of assignment and delegation. This includes reviewing the contract terms, local laws, and potential impacts on the overall relationship.

C. Legal Assistance:

In complex contractual arrangements, seeking legal advice is crucial. Attorneys can provide guidance on the specific laws governing assignments and delegations in the relevant jurisdiction and help draft contracts that align with the parties’ intentions.

Conclusion:

Understanding assignment and delegation in contracts is paramount for anyone engaged in contractual relationships, be it in business or personal matters. By grasping the intricacies of these concepts, parties can navigate the legal landscape with confidence, fostering transparent and mutually beneficial agreements. As contracts continue to shape our interactions, a solid understanding of assignment and delegation remains an essential tool for individuals and businesses alike.

Kremlin dismisses report Russia behind 'Havana Syndrome'

The Russian Embassy, as President Biden announces new sanctions on Russia, in Washington

The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

Writing by Guy Faulconbridge. Additional reporting by Idrees Ali and Jonathan Landay in Washington; Editing by Andrew Cawthorne, Alexandra Hudson

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. , opens new tab

Aftermath of a Russian missile attack in Kyiv

Israeli strike kills foreign aid workers, Hamas-run media office says

At least five employees of the World Central Kitchen (WCK) non-governmental organisation, including foreigners, were killed in an Israeli airstrike on Gaza, the Hamas-run Gaza government media office said late on Monday.

The truce village of Panmunjom inside the demilitarized zone (DMZ) separating the two Koreas

Find a Lawyer
Ask a Lawyer
Research the Law
Law Schools
Laws & Regs
Newsletters
Justia Connect
Pro Membership
Basic Membership
Justia Lawyer Directory
Platinum Placements
Gold Placements
Justia Elevate
Justia Amplify
PPC Management
Google Business Profile
Social Media
Justia Onward Blog

2010 Tennessee Code Title 47 - Commercial Instruments And Transactions Chapter 2 - A Leases Part 2 - Form, Formation and Readjustment of Contract 47-2-210 - Delegation of performance Assignment of rights.

Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version. Tennessee may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.

Get free summaries of new opinions delivered to your inbox!

Bankruptcy Lawyers
Business Lawyers
Criminal Lawyers
Employment Lawyers
Estate Planning Lawyers
Family Lawyers
Personal Injury Lawyers
Estate Planning
Personal Injury
Business Formation
Business Operations
Intellectual Property
International Trade
Real Estate
Financial Aid
Course Outlines
Law Journals
US Constitution
Regulations
Supreme Court
Circuit Courts
District Courts
Dockets & Filings
State Constitutions
State Codes
State Case Law
Legal Blogs
Business Forms
Product Recalls
Justia Connect Membership
Justia Premium Placements
Justia Elevate (SEO, Websites)
Justia Amplify (PPC, GBP)
Testimonials

COMMENTS

§ 2-210. Delegation of Performance; Assignment of Rights
No delegation of performance relieves the party delegating of any duty to perform or any liability for breach. (2) ... An assignment of "the contract" or of "all my rights under the contract" or an assignment in similar general terms is an assignment of rights and unless the language or the circumstances (as in an assignment for security ...
Assignment of Rights Agreement: Everything You Need to Know
An assignment of rights agreement refers to a situation in which one party, known as the assignor, shifts contract rights to another party, known as assignee. ... A delegation is very similar to an assignment in terms of what it involves. A delegation takes place when a party moves his or her obligations (or liabilities) under an agreement to a ...
assignment
Under contract law, assignment of a contract is both: (1) an assignment of rights; and (2) a delegation of duties, in the absence of evidence otherwise. For example, if A contracts with B to teach B guitar for $50, A can assign this contract to C.
Contract Corner: Assignment and Delegation
An assignment and delegation provision is the clause that specifies a party's ability to assign its rights or delegate its duties under an agreement. It is a provision that is often placed in the "miscellaneous" or "general" sections of commercial contracts, but it should not be thought of as standard "boilerplate" language that never changes.
14.1: Assignment of Contract Rights
The one who makes the assignment is both an obligee and a transferor. The assignee acquires the right to receive the contractual obligations of the promisor, who is referred to as the obligor (see Figure 14.1 "Assignment of Rights" ). The assignor may assign any right unless (1) doing so would materially change the obligation of the obligor ...
Delegation vs Assignment
Delegation is not concerned with the transfer of contractual rights. An assignment occurs when the original party to a contract transfers the rights and duties of the contract to another party. Delegation and Assignment Overview. The clause in an agreement that indicates a party's ability to designate their duties or rights is known as an ...
10.6: Assignment, Delegation, and Third Party Beneficiaries
Third Party Beneficiaries. Contracts are by law assignable and delegable. This means that the rights conveyed by the contract may be transferred to another party by , unless an express restriction on assignment exists within the contract, or unless an assignment violates public policy. Likewise, the duties imposed on a party may be transferred ...
§ 28:2-210. Delegation of performance; assignment of rights
Code of the District of Columbia. § 28:2-210. Delegation of performance; assignment of rights. (1) A party may perform his duty through a delegate unless otherwise agreed or unless the other party has a substantial interest in having his original promisor perform or control the acts required by the contract.
Assignment and Delegation: Understanding and Restrictions
Restrictions on Assignment and Delegation. Contractual Restrictions: Some contracts expressly prohibit or limit assignment and delegation. Nature of Duties: Personal duties, which are based on the unique skills or talents of a party, cannot typically be delegated. Effect on Other Party: Rights and duties cannot be transferred if it ...
6.4: Assignment, Delegation, and Commonly Used Contracts Clauses
As a preliminary matter, it is important to realize that contracts are, by law, assignable and delegable. This means that the rights conveyed by the contract may be transferred to another party by assignment, unless an express restriction on assignment exists within the contract, or unless an assignment would violate public policy. Likewise ...
§ 2-210. Delegation of performance; assignment of rights
Delegation of performance; assignment of rights. (1) A party may perform his duty through a delegate unless otherwise agreed or unless the other party has a substantial interest in having his original promisor perform or control the acts required by the contract. No delegation of performance relieves the party delegating of any duty to perform ...
Assignment of Rights or Delegation of Duties?
Under contract law, transfers of " rights ", such as a plaintiff's " right " to receive future periodic payments, are " assigned ", whereas " duties ", such as a defendant's obligation (duty) to make future periodic payments, are " delegated .". In retrospect, the use of the word " assignment " in IRC Section 130 ...
What Is the Difference Between Assignment and Delegation?
The difference between assignment and delegation is that an assignment can't increase another party's obligations. Delegation, on the other hand, is a method of using a contract to transfer one party's obligations to another party. Assigning rights is usually easier than delegating, and fewer restrictions are in place.
assign
Assign is the act of transferring rights, property, or other benefits to another party (the assignee) from the party who holds such benefits under contract (the assignor). This concept is used in both contract and property law. Contract Law Under contract law, when one party assigns a contract, the assignment represents both: (1) an assignment of rights; and (2) a delegation of duties.
Five Rights of Nursing Delegation
Five Rights of Delegation Case Study Approach. Mark is a new graduate registered nurse who has recently completed nursing orientation. He is now on his second week of non-precepted practice on a busy medical-surgical unit. During the middle of his busy night shift, Mark has several tasks that need to be completed quickly. These tasks include a ...
Assignment Of Rights Agreement: Definition & Sample
An assignment of rights agreement is a written document in which one party, the assignor, assigns to another party all or part of their rights under an existing contract. ... JPMDS is willing to consent to the assignment of TMF's rights and the delegation of TMF's obligations under the Administrative Services Agreement to TMIG and the ...
The Assignment Of Litigation Rights And Champerty
IKB A.G. and Rio subsequently executed an assignment on May 9, 2012 (the "2012 Assignment") in which Rio assigned to IKB A.G. "all the rights of action and claims against any other party ...
Assignment of Rights or Delegation of Duties?
Under contract law, as summarized below, " assignment of rights " and " delegation of duties " are subject to different rules. Mischaracterizing a transactional agreement that represents a ...
§ 11-2-210
(5) An assignment of "the contract" or of "all my rights under the contract" or an assignment in similar general terms is an assignment of rights and unless the language or the circumstances (as in an assignment for security) indicate the contrary, it is a delegation of performance of the duties of the assignor and its acceptance by the ...
I. Assignments and Delegation in Business Contracts
The agreement should be clear regarding whether one or more duties under the contract may not be delegated or one or more contract rights may not be assigned, or whether both a delegation of duties and an assignment of rights are prohibited. E. Issues to Consider. Before drafting an assignment provision, counsel should answer the following ...
Section 2210
Section 2210 - Delegation of performance; assignment of rights (1) A party may perform his or her duty through a delegate unless otherwise agreed or unless the other party has a substantial interest in having his or her original promisor perform or control the acts required by the contract. No delegation of performance relieves the party delegating of any duty to perform or any liability for ...
II. ASSIGNMENT AND DELEGATION
The term "assignment" is sometimes used to refer to both assignment and delegation. Under both the Restatement (Second) of Contracts §328 (1981) and the Uniform Commercial Code (see Com C §§2210 (5), 10303 (e); see also §§7.43, 7.58), an assignment of "the contract" or of all of the assignor's "rights under the contract" or an assignment ...
Understanding Assignment and Delegation in Contracts
A. Assignment: An assignment in the context of contracts refers to the transfer of one party's rights or obligations under the agreement to another entity. This can involve the entire contract or specific rights within it. The original party is known as the "assignor," the party receiving the rights is the "assignee," and the other ...
Kremlin dismisses report Russia behind 'Havana Syndrome'
The Kremlin on Monday dismissed a report that Russian military intelligence may be behind the mysterious "Havana syndrome" ailment that has afflicted U.S. diplomats and spies globally.
§ 2-210. Delegation of performance; assignment of rights. :: 2016
(5) An assignment of "the contract" or of "all my rights under the contract" or an assignment in similar general terms is an assignment of rights and unless the language or the circumstances (as in an assignment for security) indicate the contrary, it is a delegation of performance of the duties of the assignor and its acceptance by the ...
47-2-210
(5) An assignment of the contract or of all my rights under the contract or an assignment in similar general terms is an assignment of rights and unless the language or the circumstances (as in an assignment for security) indicate the contrary, it is a delegation of performance of the duties of the assignor and its acceptance by the assignee ...

§ 28:2–210. Delegation of performance; assignment of rights.

Assigning and Delegating: Transferring Your Contractual Rights and Duties

Understanding Assignment and Delegation

Restrictions on Assignment and Delegation

Consent and Notice

Advantages of Assignment and Delegation

Challenges and Considerations

Best Practices in Assignment and Delegation

FAQs on assignment and delegation

What does delegation in a contract mean?

Are all contract rights and duties assignable or delegable?

Do you need consent for assignment or delegation?

What are the main advantages of assignment and delegation?

What challenges come with assignment and delegation?

How can you ensure effective assignment or delegation?

Is the original party still liable after delegation?

How do international contracts affect assignment and delegation?

Why is legal counsel important in assignment and delegation?

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

6.4: Assignment, Delegation, and Commonly Used Contracts Clauses

Learning Objectives

Key Takeaways

Exercise \(\PageIndex{1}\)

§ 2-210. Delegation of performance; assignment of rights

Assignment of Rights or Delegation of Duties?

Turbocharge your firm with our free resources

Deep expertise combined with unparalleled access. Market-leading underwriting and pricing, plus turnaround times that redefine industry benchmarks. Innovative solutions that challenge convention. Impressive credentials plus best-in-class partners to back it all up.

What Is the Difference Between Assignment and Delegation?

The Process of Assignment

When You Can't Assign Contractual Obligations

Defining Delegation

Is Third-Party Consent Required for Assignment and Delegation?

Consequences of Assignment

Consequences of Delegation

Delegation of Performance

Primary tabs

Contract Law

Assigning of Rights/Duties Under Contract Law

Delegation of Duties

Property Law

StatPearls [Internet].

Affiliations

In this Page

Related information

Similar articles in PubMed

Recent Activity

Assignment Of Rights Agreement

Common Sections in Assignment Of Rights Agreements

Assignment Of Rights Agreement Sample

Who Helps With Assignment Of Rights Agreements?

Meet some of our Assignment Of Rights Agreement Lawyers

V. Yvette S.

Bradford T.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Business lawyers by top cities

Assignment Of Rights Agreement lawyers by city

related contracts

other helpful articles

Want to speak to someone?

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

Latest Posts

Written by:

Published In:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Understanding Assignment and Delegation in Contracts

I. Definition and Basics:

II. Key Elements of Assignment:

III. Key Elements of Delegation:

IV. Legal Implications:

V. Practical Considerations:

Conclusion:

Recent Posts

Kremlin dismisses report Russia behind 'Havana Syndrome'

Israeli strike kills foreign aid workers, Hamas-run media office says

2010 Tennessee Code Title 47 - Commercial Instruments And Transactions Chapter 2 - A Leases Part 2 - Form, Formation and Readjustment of Contract 47-2-210 - Delegation of performance Assignment of rights.

COMMENTS