empirical research in business

• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer
• QuestionPro

• Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case NPS+ Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
• Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center

Home Market Research

Empirical Research: Definition, Methods, Types and Examples

Content Index

Empirical research: Definition

Empirical research: origin, quantitative research methods, qualitative research methods, steps for conducting empirical research, empirical research methodology cycle, advantages of empirical research, disadvantages of empirical research, why is there a need for empirical research.

Empirical research is defined as any research where conclusions of the study is strictly drawn from concretely empirical evidence, and therefore “verifiable” evidence.

This empirical evidence can be gathered using quantitative market research and  qualitative market research  methods.

For example: A research is being conducted to find out if listening to happy music in the workplace while working may promote creativity? An experiment is conducted by using a music website survey on a set of audience who are exposed to happy music and another set who are not listening to music at all, and the subjects are then observed. The results derived from such a research will give empirical evidence if it does promote creativity or not.

LEARN ABOUT: Behavioral Research

You must have heard the quote” I will not believe it unless I see it”. This came from the ancient empiricists, a fundamental understanding that powered the emergence of medieval science during the renaissance period and laid the foundation of modern science, as we know it today. The word itself has its roots in greek. It is derived from the greek word empeirikos which means “experienced”.

In today’s world, the word empirical refers to collection of data using evidence that is collected through observation or experience or by using calibrated scientific instruments. All of the above origins have one thing in common which is dependence of observation and experiments to collect data and test them to come up with conclusions.

LEARN ABOUT: Causal Research

Types and methodologies of empirical research

Empirical research can be conducted and analysed using qualitative or quantitative methods.

• Quantitative research : Quantitative research methods are used to gather information through numerical data. It is used to quantify opinions, behaviors or other defined variables . These are predetermined and are in a more structured format. Some of the commonly used methods are survey, longitudinal studies, polls, etc
• Qualitative research:   Qualitative research methods are used to gather non numerical data.  It is used to find meanings, opinions, or the underlying reasons from its subjects. These methods are unstructured or semi structured. The sample size for such a research is usually small and it is a conversational type of method to provide more insight or in-depth information about the problem Some of the most popular forms of methods are focus groups, experiments, interviews, etc.

Data collected from these will need to be analysed. Empirical evidence can also be analysed either quantitatively and qualitatively. Using this, the researcher can answer empirical questions which have to be clearly defined and answerable with the findings he has got. The type of research design used will vary depending on the field in which it is going to be used. Many of them might choose to do a collective research involving quantitative and qualitative method to better answer questions which cannot be studied in a laboratory setting.

LEARN ABOUT: Qualitative Research Questions and Questionnaires

Quantitative research methods aid in analyzing the empirical evidence gathered. By using these a researcher can find out if his hypothesis is supported or not.

• Survey research: Survey research generally involves a large audience to collect a large amount of data. This is a quantitative method having a predetermined set of closed questions which are pretty easy to answer. Because of the simplicity of such a method, high responses are achieved. It is one of the most commonly used methods for all kinds of research in today’s world.

Previously, surveys were taken face to face only with maybe a recorder. However, with advancement in technology and for ease, new mediums such as emails , or social media have emerged.

For example: Depletion of energy resources is a growing concern and hence there is a need for awareness about renewable energy. According to recent studies, fossil fuels still account for around 80% of energy consumption in the United States. Even though there is a rise in the use of green energy every year, there are certain parameters because of which the general population is still not opting for green energy. In order to understand why, a survey can be conducted to gather opinions of the general population about green energy and the factors that influence their choice of switching to renewable energy. Such a survey can help institutions or governing bodies to promote appropriate awareness and incentive schemes to push the use of greener energy.

Learn more: Renewable Energy Survey Template Descriptive Research vs Correlational Research

• Experimental research: In experimental research , an experiment is set up and a hypothesis is tested by creating a situation in which one of the variable is manipulated. This is also used to check cause and effect. It is tested to see what happens to the independent variable if the other one is removed or altered. The process for such a method is usually proposing a hypothesis, experimenting on it, analyzing the findings and reporting the findings to understand if it supports the theory or not.

For example: A particular product company is trying to find what is the reason for them to not be able to capture the market. So the organisation makes changes in each one of the processes like manufacturing, marketing, sales and operations. Through the experiment they understand that sales training directly impacts the market coverage for their product. If the person is trained well, then the product will have better coverage.

• Correlational research: Correlational research is used to find relation between two set of variables . Regression analysis is generally used to predict outcomes of such a method. It can be positive, negative or neutral correlation.

LEARN ABOUT: Level of Analysis

For example: Higher educated individuals will get higher paying jobs. This means higher education enables the individual to high paying job and less education will lead to lower paying jobs.

• Longitudinal study: Longitudinal study is used to understand the traits or behavior of a subject under observation after repeatedly testing the subject over a period of time. Data collected from such a method can be qualitative or quantitative in nature.

For example: A research to find out benefits of exercise. The target is asked to exercise everyday for a particular period of time and the results show higher endurance, stamina, and muscle growth. This supports the fact that exercise benefits an individual body.

• Cross sectional: Cross sectional study is an observational type of method, in which a set of audience is observed at a given point in time. In this type, the set of people are chosen in a fashion which depicts similarity in all the variables except the one which is being researched. This type does not enable the researcher to establish a cause and effect relationship as it is not observed for a continuous time period. It is majorly used by healthcare sector or the retail industry.

For example: A medical study to find the prevalence of under-nutrition disorders in kids of a given population. This will involve looking at a wide range of parameters like age, ethnicity, location, incomes  and social backgrounds. If a significant number of kids coming from poor families show under-nutrition disorders, the researcher can further investigate into it. Usually a cross sectional study is followed by a longitudinal study to find out the exact reason.

• Causal-Comparative research : This method is based on comparison. It is mainly used to find out cause-effect relationship between two variables or even multiple variables.

For example: A researcher measured the productivity of employees in a company which gave breaks to the employees during work and compared that to the employees of the company which did not give breaks at all.

LEARN ABOUT: Action Research

Some research questions need to be analysed qualitatively, as quantitative methods are not applicable there. In many cases, in-depth information is needed or a researcher may need to observe a target audience behavior, hence the results needed are in a descriptive analysis form. Qualitative research results will be descriptive rather than predictive. It enables the researcher to build or support theories for future potential quantitative research. In such a situation qualitative research methods are used to derive a conclusion to support the theory or hypothesis being studied.

LEARN ABOUT: Qualitative Interview

• Case study: Case study method is used to find more information through carefully analyzing existing cases. It is very often used for business research or to gather empirical evidence for investigation purpose. It is a method to investigate a problem within its real life context through existing cases. The researcher has to carefully analyse making sure the parameter and variables in the existing case are the same as to the case that is being investigated. Using the findings from the case study, conclusions can be drawn regarding the topic that is being studied.

For example: A report mentioning the solution provided by a company to its client. The challenges they faced during initiation and deployment, the findings of the case and solutions they offered for the problems. Such case studies are used by most companies as it forms an empirical evidence for the company to promote in order to get more business.

• Observational method:   Observational method is a process to observe and gather data from its target. Since it is a qualitative method it is time consuming and very personal. It can be said that observational research method is a part of ethnographic research which is also used to gather empirical evidence. This is usually a qualitative form of research, however in some cases it can be quantitative as well depending on what is being studied.

For example: setting up a research to observe a particular animal in the rain-forests of amazon. Such a research usually take a lot of time as observation has to be done for a set amount of time to study patterns or behavior of the subject. Another example used widely nowadays is to observe people shopping in a mall to figure out buying behavior of consumers.

• One-on-one interview: Such a method is purely qualitative and one of the most widely used. The reason being it enables a researcher get precise meaningful data if the right questions are asked. It is a conversational method where in-depth data can be gathered depending on where the conversation leads.

For example: A one-on-one interview with the finance minister to gather data on financial policies of the country and its implications on the public.

• Focus groups: Focus groups are used when a researcher wants to find answers to why, what and how questions. A small group is generally chosen for such a method and it is not necessary to interact with the group in person. A moderator is generally needed in case the group is being addressed in person. This is widely used by product companies to collect data about their brands and the product.

For example: A mobile phone manufacturer wanting to have a feedback on the dimensions of one of their models which is yet to be launched. Such studies help the company meet the demand of the customer and position their model appropriately in the market.

• Text analysis: Text analysis method is a little new compared to the other types. Such a method is used to analyse social life by going through images or words used by the individual. In today’s world, with social media playing a major part of everyone’s life, such a method enables the research to follow the pattern that relates to his study.

For example: A lot of companies ask for feedback from the customer in detail mentioning how satisfied are they with their customer support team. Such data enables the researcher to take appropriate decisions to make their support team better.

Sometimes a combination of the methods is also needed for some questions that cannot be answered using only one type of method especially when a researcher needs to gain a complete understanding of complex subject matter.

We recently published a blog that talks about examples of qualitative data in education ; why don’t you check it out for more ideas?

Since empirical research is based on observation and capturing experiences, it is important to plan the steps to conduct the experiment and how to analyse it. This will enable the researcher to resolve problems or obstacles which can occur during the experiment.

Step #1: Define the purpose of the research

This is the step where the researcher has to answer questions like what exactly do I want to find out? What is the problem statement? Are there any issues in terms of the availability of knowledge, data, time or resources. Will this research be more beneficial than what it will cost.

Before going ahead, a researcher has to clearly define his purpose for the research and set up a plan to carry out further tasks.

Step #2 : Supporting theories and relevant literature

The researcher needs to find out if there are theories which can be linked to his research problem . He has to figure out if any theory can help him support his findings. All kind of relevant literature will help the researcher to find if there are others who have researched this before, or what are the problems faced during this research. The researcher will also have to set up assumptions and also find out if there is any history regarding his research problem

Step #3: Creation of Hypothesis and measurement

Before beginning the actual research he needs to provide himself a working hypothesis or guess what will be the probable result. Researcher has to set up variables, decide the environment for the research and find out how can he relate between the variables.

Researcher will also need to define the units of measurements, tolerable degree for errors, and find out if the measurement chosen will be acceptable by others.

Step #4: Methodology, research design and data collection

In this step, the researcher has to define a strategy for conducting his research. He has to set up experiments to collect data which will enable him to propose the hypothesis. The researcher will decide whether he will need experimental or non experimental method for conducting the research. The type of research design will vary depending on the field in which the research is being conducted. Last but not the least, the researcher will have to find out parameters that will affect the validity of the research design. Data collection will need to be done by choosing appropriate samples depending on the research question. To carry out the research, he can use one of the many sampling techniques. Once data collection is complete, researcher will have empirical data which needs to be analysed.

LEARN ABOUT: Best Data Collection Tools

Step #5: Data Analysis and result

Data analysis can be done in two ways, qualitatively and quantitatively. Researcher will need to find out what qualitative method or quantitative method will be needed or will he need a combination of both. Depending on the unit of analysis of his data, he will know if his hypothesis is supported or rejected. Analyzing this data is the most important part to support his hypothesis.

Step #6: Conclusion

A report will need to be made with the findings of the research. The researcher can give the theories and literature that support his research. He can make suggestions or recommendations for further research on his topic.

A.D. de Groot, a famous dutch psychologist and a chess expert conducted some of the most notable experiments using chess in the 1940’s. During his study, he came up with a cycle which is consistent and now widely used to conduct empirical research. It consists of 5 phases with each phase being as important as the next one. The empirical cycle captures the process of coming up with hypothesis about how certain subjects work or behave and then testing these hypothesis against empirical data in a systematic and rigorous approach. It can be said that it characterizes the deductive approach to science. Following is the empirical cycle.

• Observation: At this phase an idea is sparked for proposing a hypothesis. During this phase empirical data is gathered using observation. For example: a particular species of flower bloom in a different color only during a specific season.
• Induction: Inductive reasoning is then carried out to form a general conclusion from the data gathered through observation. For example: As stated above it is observed that the species of flower blooms in a different color during a specific season. A researcher may ask a question “does the temperature in the season cause the color change in the flower?” He can assume that is the case, however it is a mere conjecture and hence an experiment needs to be set up to support this hypothesis. So he tags a few set of flowers kept at a different temperature and observes if they still change the color?
• Deduction: This phase helps the researcher to deduce a conclusion out of his experiment. This has to be based on logic and rationality to come up with specific unbiased results.For example: In the experiment, if the tagged flowers in a different temperature environment do not change the color then it can be concluded that temperature plays a role in changing the color of the bloom.
• Testing: This phase involves the researcher to return to empirical methods to put his hypothesis to the test. The researcher now needs to make sense of his data and hence needs to use statistical analysis plans to determine the temperature and bloom color relationship. If the researcher finds out that most flowers bloom a different color when exposed to the certain temperature and the others do not when the temperature is different, he has found support to his hypothesis. Please note this not proof but just a support to his hypothesis.
• Evaluation: This phase is generally forgotten by most but is an important one to keep gaining knowledge. During this phase the researcher puts forth the data he has collected, the support argument and his conclusion. The researcher also states the limitations for the experiment and his hypothesis and suggests tips for others to pick it up and continue a more in-depth research for others in the future. LEARN MORE: Population vs Sample

LEARN MORE: Population vs Sample

There is a reason why empirical research is one of the most widely used method. There are a few advantages associated with it. Following are a few of them.

• It is used to authenticate traditional research through various experiments and observations.
• This research methodology makes the research being conducted more competent and authentic.
• It enables a researcher understand the dynamic changes that can happen and change his strategy accordingly.
• The level of control in such a research is high so the researcher can control multiple variables.
• It plays a vital role in increasing internal validity .

Even though empirical research makes the research more competent and authentic, it does have a few disadvantages. Following are a few of them.

• Such a research needs patience as it can be very time consuming. The researcher has to collect data from multiple sources and the parameters involved are quite a few, which will lead to a time consuming research.
• Most of the time, a researcher will need to conduct research at different locations or in different environments, this can lead to an expensive affair.
• There are a few rules in which experiments can be performed and hence permissions are needed. Many a times, it is very difficult to get certain permissions to carry out different methods of this research.
• Collection of data can be a problem sometimes, as it has to be collected from a variety of sources through different methods.

LEARN ABOUT:  Social Communication Questionnaire

Empirical research is important in today’s world because most people believe in something only that they can see, hear or experience. It is used to validate multiple hypothesis and increase human knowledge and continue doing it to keep advancing in various fields.

For example: Pharmaceutical companies use empirical research to try out a specific drug on controlled groups or random groups to study the effect and cause. This way, they prove certain theories they had proposed for the specific drug. Such research is very important as sometimes it can lead to finding a cure for a disease that has existed for many years. It is useful in science and many other fields like history, social sciences, business, etc.

LEARN ABOUT: 12 Best Tools for Researchers

With the advancement in today’s world, empirical research has become critical and a norm in many fields to support their hypothesis and gain more knowledge. The methods mentioned above are very useful for carrying out such research. However, a number of new methods will keep coming up as the nature of new investigative questions keeps getting unique or changing.

Create a single source of real data with a built-for-insights platform. Store past data, add nuggets of insights, and import research data from various sources into a CRM for insights. Build on ever-growing research with a real-time dashboard in a unified research management platform to turn insights into knowledge.

LEARN MORE         FREE TRIAL

MORE LIKE THIS

AI Question Generator: Create Easy + Accurate Tests and Surveys

Apr 6, 2024

Top 17 UX Research Software for UX Design in 2024

Apr 5, 2024

Healthcare Staff Burnout: What it Is + How To Manage It

Apr 4, 2024

Top 15 Employee Retention Software in 2024

Other categories.

• Academic Research
• Artificial Intelligence
• Assessments
• Brand Awareness
• Case Studies
• Communities
• Consumer Insights
• Customer effort score
• Customer Engagement
• Customer Experience
• Customer Loyalty
• Customer Research
• Customer Satisfaction
• Employee Benefits
• Employee Engagement
• Employee Retention
• Friday Five
• General Data Protection Regulation
• Insights Hub
• Life@QuestionPro
• Market Research
• Mobile diaries
• Mobile Surveys
• New Features
• Online Communities
• Question Types
• Questionnaire
• QuestionPro Products
• Release Notes
• Research Tools and Apps
• Revenue at Risk
• Survey Templates
• Training Tips
• Uncategorized
• Video Learning Series
• What’s Coming Up
• Workforce Intelligence

What is Empirical Research? Definition, Methods, Examples

Appinio Research · 09.02.2024 · 35min read

Ever wondered how we gather the facts, unveil hidden truths, and make informed decisions in a world filled with questions? Empirical research holds the key.

In this guide, we'll delve deep into the art and science of empirical research, unraveling its methods, mysteries, and manifold applications. From defining the core principles to mastering data analysis and reporting findings, we're here to equip you with the knowledge and tools to navigate the empirical landscape.

What is Empirical Research?

Empirical research is the cornerstone of scientific inquiry, providing a systematic and structured approach to investigating the world around us. It is the process of gathering and analyzing empirical or observable data to test hypotheses, answer research questions, or gain insights into various phenomena. This form of research relies on evidence derived from direct observation or experimentation, allowing researchers to draw conclusions based on real-world data rather than purely theoretical or speculative reasoning.

Characteristics of Empirical Research

Empirical research is characterized by several key features:

• Observation and Measurement : It involves the systematic observation or measurement of variables, events, or behaviors.
• Data Collection : Researchers collect data through various methods, such as surveys, experiments, observations, or interviews.
• Testable Hypotheses : Empirical research often starts with testable hypotheses that are evaluated using collected data.
• Quantitative or Qualitative Data : Data can be quantitative (numerical) or qualitative (non-numerical), depending on the research design.
• Statistical Analysis : Quantitative data often undergo statistical analysis to determine patterns , relationships, or significance.
• Objectivity and Replicability : Empirical research strives for objectivity, minimizing researcher bias . It should be replicable, allowing other researchers to conduct the same study to verify results.
• Conclusions and Generalizations : Empirical research generates findings based on data and aims to make generalizations about larger populations or phenomena.

Importance of Empirical Research

Empirical research plays a pivotal role in advancing knowledge across various disciplines. Its importance extends to academia, industry, and society as a whole. Here are several reasons why empirical research is essential:

• Evidence-Based Knowledge : Empirical research provides a solid foundation of evidence-based knowledge. It enables us to test hypotheses, confirm or refute theories, and build a robust understanding of the world.
• Scientific Progress : In the scientific community, empirical research fuels progress by expanding the boundaries of existing knowledge. It contributes to the development of theories and the formulation of new research questions.
• Problem Solving : Empirical research is instrumental in addressing real-world problems and challenges. It offers insights and data-driven solutions to complex issues in fields like healthcare, economics, and environmental science.
• Informed Decision-Making : In policymaking, business, and healthcare, empirical research informs decision-makers by providing data-driven insights. It guides strategies, investments, and policies for optimal outcomes.
• Quality Assurance : Empirical research is essential for quality assurance and validation in various industries, including pharmaceuticals, manufacturing, and technology. It ensures that products and processes meet established standards.
• Continuous Improvement : Businesses and organizations use empirical research to evaluate performance, customer satisfaction, and product effectiveness. This data-driven approach fosters continuous improvement and innovation.
• Human Advancement : Empirical research in fields like medicine and psychology contributes to the betterment of human health and well-being. It leads to medical breakthroughs, improved therapies, and enhanced psychological interventions.
• Critical Thinking and Problem Solving : Engaging in empirical research fosters critical thinking skills, problem-solving abilities, and a deep appreciation for evidence-based decision-making.

Empirical research empowers us to explore, understand, and improve the world around us. It forms the bedrock of scientific inquiry and drives progress in countless domains, shaping our understanding of both the natural and social sciences.

How to Conduct Empirical Research?

So, you've decided to dive into the world of empirical research. Let's begin by exploring the crucial steps involved in getting started with your research project.

1. Select a Research Topic

Selecting the right research topic is the cornerstone of a successful empirical study. It's essential to choose a topic that not only piques your interest but also aligns with your research goals and objectives. Here's how to go about it:

• Identify Your Interests : Start by reflecting on your passions and interests. What topics fascinate you the most? Your enthusiasm will be your driving force throughout the research process.
• Brainstorm Ideas : Engage in brainstorming sessions to generate potential research topics. Consider the questions you've always wanted to answer or the issues that intrigue you.
• Relevance and Significance : Assess the relevance and significance of your chosen topic. Does it contribute to existing knowledge? Is it a pressing issue in your field of study or the broader community?
• Feasibility : Evaluate the feasibility of your research topic. Do you have access to the necessary resources, data, and participants (if applicable)?

2. Formulate Research Questions

Once you've narrowed down your research topic, the next step is to formulate clear and precise research questions . These questions will guide your entire research process and shape your study's direction. To create effective research questions:

• Specificity : Ensure that your research questions are specific and focused. Vague or overly broad questions can lead to inconclusive results.
• Relevance : Your research questions should directly relate to your chosen topic. They should address gaps in knowledge or contribute to solving a particular problem.
• Testability : Ensure that your questions are testable through empirical methods. You should be able to gather data and analyze it to answer these questions.
• Avoid Bias : Craft your questions in a way that avoids leading or biased language. Maintain neutrality to uphold the integrity of your research.

3. Review Existing Literature

Before you embark on your empirical research journey, it's essential to immerse yourself in the existing body of literature related to your chosen topic. This step, often referred to as a literature review, serves several purposes:

• Contextualization : Understand the historical context and current state of research in your field. What have previous studies found, and what questions remain unanswered?
• Identifying Gaps : Identify gaps or areas where existing research falls short. These gaps will help you formulate meaningful research questions and hypotheses.
• Theory Development : If your study is theoretical, consider how existing theories apply to your topic. If it's empirical, understand how previous studies have approached data collection and analysis.
• Methodological Insights : Learn from the methodologies employed in previous research. What methods were successful, and what challenges did researchers face?

4. Define Variables

Variables are fundamental components of empirical research. They are the factors or characteristics that can change or be manipulated during your study. Properly defining and categorizing variables is crucial for the clarity and validity of your research. Here's what you need to know:

• Independent Variables : These are the variables that you, as the researcher, manipulate or control. They are the "cause" in cause-and-effect relationships.
• Dependent Variables : Dependent variables are the outcomes or responses that you measure or observe. They are the "effect" influenced by changes in independent variables.
• Operational Definitions : To ensure consistency and clarity, provide operational definitions for your variables. Specify how you will measure or manipulate each variable.
• Control Variables : In some studies, controlling for other variables that may influence your dependent variable is essential. These are known as control variables.

Understanding these foundational aspects of empirical research will set a solid foundation for the rest of your journey. Now that you've grasped the essentials of getting started, let's delve deeper into the intricacies of research design.

Empirical Research Design

Now that you've selected your research topic, formulated research questions, and defined your variables, it's time to delve into the heart of your empirical research journey – research design . This pivotal step determines how you will collect data and what methods you'll employ to answer your research questions. Let's explore the various facets of research design in detail.

Types of Empirical Research

Empirical research can take on several forms, each with its own unique approach and methodologies. Understanding the different types of empirical research will help you choose the most suitable design for your study. Here are some common types:

• Experimental Research : In this type, researchers manipulate one or more independent variables to observe their impact on dependent variables. It's highly controlled and often conducted in a laboratory setting.
• Observational Research : Observational research involves the systematic observation of subjects or phenomena without intervention. Researchers are passive observers, documenting behaviors, events, or patterns.
• Survey Research : Surveys are used to collect data through structured questionnaires or interviews. This method is efficient for gathering information from a large number of participants.
• Case Study Research : Case studies focus on in-depth exploration of one or a few cases. Researchers gather detailed information through various sources such as interviews, documents, and observations.
• Qualitative Research : Qualitative research aims to understand behaviors, experiences, and opinions in depth. It often involves open-ended questions, interviews, and thematic analysis.
• Quantitative Research : Quantitative research collects numerical data and relies on statistical analysis to draw conclusions. It involves structured questionnaires, experiments, and surveys.

Your choice of research type should align with your research questions and objectives. Experimental research, for example, is ideal for testing cause-and-effect relationships, while qualitative research is more suitable for exploring complex phenomena.

Experimental Design

Experimental research is a systematic approach to studying causal relationships. It's characterized by the manipulation of one or more independent variables while controlling for other factors. Here are some key aspects of experimental design:

• Control and Experimental Groups : Participants are randomly assigned to either a control group or an experimental group. The independent variable is manipulated for the experimental group but not for the control group.
• Randomization : Randomization is crucial to eliminate bias in group assignment. It ensures that each participant has an equal chance of being in either group.
• Hypothesis Testing : Experimental research often involves hypothesis testing. Researchers formulate hypotheses about the expected effects of the independent variable and use statistical analysis to test these hypotheses.

Observational Design

Observational research entails careful and systematic observation of subjects or phenomena. It's advantageous when you want to understand natural behaviors or events. Key aspects of observational design include:

• Participant Observation : Researchers immerse themselves in the environment they are studying. They become part of the group being observed, allowing for a deep understanding of behaviors.
• Non-Participant Observation : In non-participant observation, researchers remain separate from the subjects. They observe and document behaviors without direct involvement.
• Data Collection Methods : Observational research can involve various data collection methods, such as field notes, video recordings, photographs, or coding of observed behaviors.

Survey Design

Surveys are a popular choice for collecting data from a large number of participants. Effective survey design is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of your data. Consider the following:

• Questionnaire Design : Create clear and concise questions that are easy for participants to understand. Avoid leading or biased questions.
• Sampling Methods : Decide on the appropriate sampling method for your study, whether it's random, stratified, or convenience sampling.
• Data Collection Tools : Choose the right tools for data collection, whether it's paper surveys, online questionnaires, or face-to-face interviews.

Case Study Design

Case studies are an in-depth exploration of one or a few cases to gain a deep understanding of a particular phenomenon. Key aspects of case study design include:

• Single Case vs. Multiple Case Studies : Decide whether you'll focus on a single case or multiple cases. Single case studies are intensive and allow for detailed examination, while multiple case studies provide comparative insights.
• Data Collection Methods : Gather data through interviews, observations, document analysis, or a combination of these methods.

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research

In empirical research, you'll often encounter the distinction between qualitative and quantitative research . Here's a closer look at these two approaches:

• Qualitative Research : Qualitative research seeks an in-depth understanding of human behavior, experiences, and perspectives. It involves open-ended questions, interviews, and the analysis of textual or narrative data. Qualitative research is exploratory and often used when the research question is complex and requires a nuanced understanding.
• Quantitative Research : Quantitative research collects numerical data and employs statistical analysis to draw conclusions. It involves structured questionnaires, experiments, and surveys. Quantitative research is ideal for testing hypotheses and establishing cause-and-effect relationships.

Understanding the various research design options is crucial in determining the most appropriate approach for your study. Your choice should align with your research questions, objectives, and the nature of the phenomenon you're investigating.

Data Collection for Empirical Research

Now that you've established your research design, it's time to roll up your sleeves and collect the data that will fuel your empirical research. Effective data collection is essential for obtaining accurate and reliable results.

Sampling Methods

Sampling methods are critical in empirical research, as they determine the subset of individuals or elements from your target population that you will study. Here are some standard sampling methods:

• Random Sampling : Random sampling ensures that every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected. It minimizes bias and is often used in quantitative research.
• Stratified Sampling : Stratified sampling involves dividing the population into subgroups or strata based on specific characteristics (e.g., age, gender, location). Samples are then randomly selected from each stratum, ensuring representation of all subgroups.
• Convenience Sampling : Convenience sampling involves selecting participants who are readily available or easily accessible. While it's convenient, it may introduce bias and limit the generalizability of results.
• Snowball Sampling : Snowball sampling is instrumental when studying hard-to-reach or hidden populations. One participant leads you to another, creating a "snowball" effect. This method is common in qualitative research.
• Purposive Sampling : In purposive sampling, researchers deliberately select participants who meet specific criteria relevant to their research questions. It's often used in qualitative studies to gather in-depth information.

The choice of sampling method depends on the nature of your research, available resources, and the degree of precision required. It's crucial to carefully consider your sampling strategy to ensure that your sample accurately represents your target population.

Data Collection Instruments

Data collection instruments are the tools you use to gather information from your participants or sources. These instruments should be designed to capture the data you need accurately. Here are some popular data collection instruments:

• Questionnaires : Questionnaires consist of structured questions with predefined response options. When designing questionnaires, consider the clarity of questions, the order of questions, and the response format (e.g., Likert scale, multiple-choice).
• Interviews : Interviews involve direct communication between the researcher and participants. They can be structured (with predetermined questions) or unstructured (open-ended). Effective interviews require active listening and probing for deeper insights.
• Observations : Observations entail systematically and objectively recording behaviors, events, or phenomena. Researchers must establish clear criteria for what to observe, how to record observations, and when to observe.
• Surveys : Surveys are a common data collection instrument for quantitative research. They can be administered through various means, including online surveys, paper surveys, and telephone surveys.
• Documents and Archives : In some cases, data may be collected from existing documents, records, or archives. Ensure that the sources are reliable, relevant, and properly documented.

To streamline your process and gather insights with precision and efficiency, consider leveraging innovative tools like Appinio . With Appinio's intuitive platform, you can harness the power of real-time consumer data to inform your research decisions effectively. Whether you're conducting surveys, interviews, or observations, Appinio empowers you to define your target audience, collect data from diverse demographics, and analyze results seamlessly.

By incorporating Appinio into your data collection toolkit, you can unlock a world of possibilities and elevate the impact of your empirical research. Ready to revolutionize your approach to data collection?

Book a Demo

Data Collection Procedures

Data collection procedures outline the step-by-step process for gathering data. These procedures should be meticulously planned and executed to maintain the integrity of your research.

• Training : If you have a research team, ensure that they are trained in data collection methods and protocols. Consistency in data collection is crucial.
• Pilot Testing : Before launching your data collection, conduct a pilot test with a small group to identify any potential problems with your instruments or procedures. Make necessary adjustments based on feedback.
• Data Recording : Establish a systematic method for recording data. This may include timestamps, codes, or identifiers for each data point.
• Data Security : Safeguard the confidentiality and security of collected data. Ensure that only authorized individuals have access to the data.
• Data Storage : Properly organize and store your data in a secure location, whether in physical or digital form. Back up data to prevent loss.

Ethical Considerations

Ethical considerations are paramount in empirical research, as they ensure the well-being and rights of participants are protected.

• Informed Consent : Obtain informed consent from participants, providing clear information about the research purpose, procedures, risks, and their right to withdraw at any time.
• Privacy and Confidentiality : Protect the privacy and confidentiality of participants. Ensure that data is anonymized and sensitive information is kept confidential.
• Beneficence : Ensure that your research benefits participants and society while minimizing harm. Consider the potential risks and benefits of your study.
• Honesty and Integrity : Conduct research with honesty and integrity. Report findings accurately and transparently, even if they are not what you expected.
• Respect for Participants : Treat participants with respect, dignity, and sensitivity to cultural differences. Avoid any form of coercion or manipulation.
• Institutional Review Board (IRB) : If required, seek approval from an IRB or ethics committee before conducting your research, particularly when working with human participants.

Adhering to ethical guidelines is not only essential for the ethical conduct of research but also crucial for the credibility and validity of your study. Ethical research practices build trust between researchers and participants and contribute to the advancement of knowledge with integrity.

With a solid understanding of data collection, including sampling methods, instruments, procedures, and ethical considerations, you are now well-equipped to gather the data needed to answer your research questions.

Empirical Research Data Analysis

Now comes the exciting phase of data analysis, where the raw data you've diligently collected starts to yield insights and answers to your research questions. We will explore the various aspects of data analysis, from preparing your data to drawing meaningful conclusions through statistics and visualization.

Data Preparation

Data preparation is the crucial first step in data analysis. It involves cleaning, organizing, and transforming your raw data into a format that is ready for analysis. Effective data preparation ensures the accuracy and reliability of your results.

• Data Cleaning : Identify and rectify errors, missing values, and inconsistencies in your dataset. This may involve correcting typos, removing outliers, and imputing missing data.
• Data Coding : Assign numerical values or codes to categorical variables to make them suitable for statistical analysis. For example, converting "Yes" and "No" to 1 and 0.
• Data Transformation : Transform variables as needed to meet the assumptions of the statistical tests you plan to use. Common transformations include logarithmic or square root transformations.
• Data Integration : If your data comes from multiple sources, integrate it into a unified dataset, ensuring that variables match and align.
• Data Documentation : Maintain clear documentation of all data preparation steps, as well as the rationale behind each decision. This transparency is essential for replicability.

Effective data preparation lays the foundation for accurate and meaningful analysis. It allows you to trust the results that will follow in the subsequent stages.

Descriptive Statistics

Descriptive statistics help you summarize and make sense of your data by providing a clear overview of its key characteristics. These statistics are essential for understanding the central tendencies, variability, and distribution of your variables. Descriptive statistics include:

• Measures of Central Tendency : These include the mean (average), median (middle value), and mode (most frequent value). They help you understand the typical or central value of your data.
• Measures of Dispersion : Measures like the range, variance, and standard deviation provide insights into the spread or variability of your data points.
• Frequency Distributions : Creating frequency distributions or histograms allows you to visualize the distribution of your data across different values or categories.

Descriptive statistics provide the initial insights needed to understand your data's basic characteristics, which can inform further analysis.

Inferential Statistics

Inferential statistics take your analysis to the next level by allowing you to make inferences or predictions about a larger population based on your sample data. These methods help you test hypotheses and draw meaningful conclusions. Key concepts in inferential statistics include:

• Hypothesis Testing : Hypothesis tests (e.g., t-tests, chi-squared tests) help you determine whether observed differences or associations in your data are statistically significant or occurred by chance.
• Confidence Intervals : Confidence intervals provide a range within which population parameters (e.g., population mean) are likely to fall based on your sample data.
• Regression Analysis : Regression models (linear, logistic, etc.) help you explore relationships between variables and make predictions.
• Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) : ANOVA tests are used to compare means between multiple groups, allowing you to assess whether differences are statistically significant.

Inferential statistics are powerful tools for drawing conclusions from your data and assessing the generalizability of your findings to the broader population.

Qualitative Data Analysis

Qualitative data analysis is employed when working with non-numerical data, such as text, interviews, or open-ended survey responses. It focuses on understanding the underlying themes, patterns, and meanings within qualitative data. Qualitative analysis techniques include:

• Thematic Analysis : Identifying and analyzing recurring themes or patterns within textual data.
• Content Analysis : Categorizing and coding qualitative data to extract meaningful insights.
• Grounded Theory : Developing theories or frameworks based on emergent themes from the data.
• Narrative Analysis : Examining the structure and content of narratives to uncover meaning.

Qualitative data analysis provides a rich and nuanced understanding of complex phenomena and human experiences.

Data Visualization

Data visualization is the art of representing data graphically to make complex information more understandable and accessible. Effective data visualization can reveal patterns, trends, and outliers in your data. Common types of data visualization include:

• Bar Charts and Histograms : Used to display the distribution of categorical or discrete data.
• Line Charts : Ideal for showing trends and changes in data over time.
• Scatter Plots : Visualize relationships and correlations between two variables.
• Pie Charts : Display the composition of a whole in terms of its parts.
• Heatmaps : Depict patterns and relationships in multidimensional data through color-coding.
• Box Plots : Provide a summary of the data distribution, including outliers.
• Interactive Dashboards : Create dynamic visualizations that allow users to explore data interactively.

Data visualization not only enhances your understanding of the data but also serves as a powerful communication tool to convey your findings to others.

As you embark on the data analysis phase of your empirical research, remember that the specific methods and techniques you choose will depend on your research questions, data type, and objectives. Effective data analysis transforms raw data into valuable insights, bringing you closer to the answers you seek.

How to Report Empirical Research Results?

At this stage, you get to share your empirical research findings with the world. Effective reporting and presentation of your results are crucial for communicating your research's impact and insights.

1. Write the Research Paper

Writing a research paper is the culmination of your empirical research journey. It's where you synthesize your findings, provide context, and contribute to the body of knowledge in your field.

• Title and Abstract : Craft a clear and concise title that reflects your research's essence. The abstract should provide a brief summary of your research objectives, methods, findings, and implications.
• Introduction : In the introduction, introduce your research topic, state your research questions or hypotheses, and explain the significance of your study. Provide context by discussing relevant literature.
• Methods : Describe your research design, data collection methods, and sampling procedures. Be precise and transparent, allowing readers to understand how you conducted your study.
• Results : Present your findings in a clear and organized manner. Use tables, graphs, and statistical analyses to support your results. Avoid interpreting your findings in this section; focus on the presentation of raw data.
• Discussion : Interpret your findings and discuss their implications. Relate your results to your research questions and the existing literature. Address any limitations of your study and suggest avenues for future research.
• Conclusion : Summarize the key points of your research and its significance. Restate your main findings and their implications.
• References : Cite all sources used in your research following a specific citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago). Ensure accuracy and consistency in your citations.
• Appendices : Include any supplementary material, such as questionnaires, data coding sheets, or additional analyses, in the appendices.

Writing a research paper is a skill that improves with practice. Ensure clarity, coherence, and conciseness in your writing to make your research accessible to a broader audience.

2. Create Visuals and Tables

Visuals and tables are powerful tools for presenting complex data in an accessible and understandable manner.

• Clarity : Ensure that your visuals and tables are clear and easy to interpret. Use descriptive titles and labels.
• Consistency : Maintain consistency in formatting, such as font size and style, across all visuals and tables.
• Appropriateness : Choose the most suitable visual representation for your data. Bar charts, line graphs, and scatter plots work well for different types of data.
• Simplicity : Avoid clutter and unnecessary details. Focus on conveying the main points.
• Accessibility : Make sure your visuals and tables are accessible to a broad audience, including those with visual impairments.
• Captions : Include informative captions that explain the significance of each visual or table.

Compelling visuals and tables enhance the reader's understanding of your research and can be the key to conveying complex information efficiently.

3. Interpret Findings

Interpreting your findings is where you bridge the gap between data and meaning. It's your opportunity to provide context, discuss implications, and offer insights. When interpreting your findings:

• Relate to Research Questions : Discuss how your findings directly address your research questions or hypotheses.
• Compare with Literature : Analyze how your results align with or deviate from previous research in your field. What insights can you draw from these comparisons?
• Discuss Limitations : Be transparent about the limitations of your study. Address any constraints, biases, or potential sources of error.
• Practical Implications : Explore the real-world implications of your findings. How can they be applied or inform decision-making?
• Future Research Directions : Suggest areas for future research based on the gaps or unanswered questions that emerged from your study.

Interpreting findings goes beyond simply presenting data; it's about weaving a narrative that helps readers grasp the significance of your research in the broader context.

With your research paper written, structured, and enriched with visuals, and your findings expertly interpreted, you are now prepared to communicate your research effectively. Sharing your insights and contributing to the body of knowledge in your field is a significant accomplishment in empirical research.

Examples of Empirical Research

To solidify your understanding of empirical research, let's delve into some real-world examples across different fields. These examples will illustrate how empirical research is applied to gather data, analyze findings, and draw conclusions.

Social Sciences

In the realm of social sciences, consider a sociological study exploring the impact of socioeconomic status on educational attainment. Researchers gather data from a diverse group of individuals, including their family backgrounds, income levels, and academic achievements.

Through statistical analysis, they can identify correlations and trends, revealing whether individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are less likely to attain higher levels of education. This empirical research helps shed light on societal inequalities and informs policymakers on potential interventions to address disparities in educational access.

Environmental Science

Environmental scientists often employ empirical research to assess the effects of environmental changes. For instance, researchers studying the impact of climate change on wildlife might collect data on animal populations, weather patterns, and habitat conditions over an extended period.

By analyzing this empirical data, they can identify correlations between climate fluctuations and changes in wildlife behavior, migration patterns, or population sizes. This empirical research is crucial for understanding the ecological consequences of climate change and informing conservation efforts.

Business and Economics

In the business world, empirical research is essential for making data-driven decisions. Consider a market research study conducted by a business seeking to launch a new product. They collect data through surveys, focus groups, and consumer behavior analysis.

By examining this empirical data, the company can gauge consumer preferences, demand, and potential market size. Empirical research in business helps guide product development, pricing strategies, and marketing campaigns, increasing the likelihood of a successful product launch.

Psychological studies frequently rely on empirical research to understand human behavior and cognition. For instance, a psychologist interested in examining the impact of stress on memory might design an experiment. Participants are exposed to stress-inducing situations, and their memory performance is assessed through various tasks.

By analyzing the data collected, the psychologist can determine whether stress has a significant effect on memory recall. This empirical research contributes to our understanding of the complex interplay between psychological factors and cognitive processes.

These examples highlight the versatility and applicability of empirical research across diverse fields. Whether in medicine, social sciences, environmental science, business, or psychology, empirical research serves as a fundamental tool for gaining insights, testing hypotheses, and driving advancements in knowledge and practice.

Conclusion for Empirical Research

Empirical research is a powerful tool for gaining insights, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions. By following the steps outlined in this guide, you've learned how to select research topics, collect data, analyze findings, and effectively communicate your research to the world. Remember, empirical research is a journey of discovery, and each step you take brings you closer to a deeper understanding of the world around you. Whether you're a scientist, a student, or someone curious about the process, the principles of empirical research empower you to explore, learn, and contribute to the ever-expanding realm of knowledge.

How to Collect Data for Empirical Research?

Introducing Appinio , the real-time market research platform revolutionizing how companies gather consumer insights for their empirical research endeavors. With Appinio, you can conduct your own market research in minutes, gaining valuable data to fuel your data-driven decisions.

Appinio is more than just a market research platform; it's a catalyst for transforming the way you approach empirical research, making it exciting, intuitive, and seamlessly integrated into your decision-making process.

Here's why Appinio is the go-to solution for empirical research:

• From Questions to Insights in Minutes : With Appinio's streamlined process, you can go from formulating your research questions to obtaining actionable insights in a matter of minutes, saving you time and effort.
• Intuitive Platform for Everyone : No need for a PhD in research; Appinio's platform is designed to be intuitive and user-friendly, ensuring that anyone can navigate and utilize it effectively.
• Rapid Response Times : With an average field time of under 23 minutes for 1,000 respondents, Appinio delivers rapid results, allowing you to gather data swiftly and efficiently.
• Global Reach with Targeted Precision : With access to over 90 countries and the ability to define target groups based on 1200+ characteristics, Appinio empowers you to reach your desired audience with precision and ease.

Get free access to the platform!

Join the loop 💌

Be the first to hear about new updates, product news, and data insights. We'll send it all straight to your inbox.

Get the latest market research news straight to your inbox! 💌

Wait, there's more

05.04.2024 | 27min read

What is Field Research? Definition, Types, Methods, Examples

03.04.2024 | 29min read

What is Cluster Sampling? Definition, Methods, Examples

01.04.2024 | 26min read

Cross-Tabulation Analysis: A Full Guide (+ Examples)

Empirical Research: Business Research

• Introduction
• Find Empirical Articles

Business Research

• General Studies Research
• Safety & Emergency Services Research

Empirical Research

• Reports research based on experience, observation or experiment
• Tests a hypothesis against real data
• May use quantitative research methods that generate numerical data to establish causal relationships between variables 
• May use qualitative research methods that analyze behaviors, beliefs, feelings, or values 

College of Business Undergraduate Guides

• Advertising
• Business Ethics
• Business Law
• Health Care Administration
• Hospitality and Tourism
• Human Resource Management
• International Business
• Macroeconomics
• Organizational Communication
• Project Management
• Sport Management
• Undergraduate General Business

College of Business Graduate Guides

• Graduate General Business
• Compensation Management
• Employment Law
• Organizational Research and Theory
• Public Administration
• Public Policy
• Research Methods
• Vietnam - Masters of Business Administration (MBA)

Doctoral Research Guides :

• Doctoral Programs

For empirical research studies, especially targeting Business topics, you could explore the database options below.

In each database, select the box for  Peer Reviewed  or  Scholarly Peer Reviewed Journals  to help filter the results to the type of publication that would have empirical research.

• Business Source Ultimate Offering a comprehensive full-text coverage plus indexing and abstracts for the most important scholarly business journals, dating back as far as 1886.
• ABI/INFORM Collection 2,700 scholarly business journals and thousands of worldwide business periodicals.
• Academic Search Ultimate Scholarly full-text peer-reviewed academic journals plus thousands of periodicals, trade publications and magazines supporting all subjects and programs.

Sample Search Strategy

 In the databases you can search phrases in quotation marks like "qualitative research", "qualitative research", "empirical research", etc.

If for example you are seeking qualitative research studies in business, you could try searching in the Business Source Ultimate  database for: "empirical research" AND business. The peer reviewed box would need to be selected to filter the results to review only the peer reviewed scholarly/academic journals.

For healthcare related topics you could try these databases:

• Public Health This database delivers core public health literature from over 8,000 publications. With journals, dissertations, videos, news, trade publications, reports, and more.
• MEDLINE Plus This resource offers medical professionals and researchers access to unmatched evidence-based and peer-reviewed full-text content from more of the top biomedical journals.

As you move through your research, if you have questions on selecting a topic or verification of a source, please feel free to connect with the course professor. The course professor is the resource for clarification of course content and assignment expectations.

• << Previous: Find Empirical Articles
• Next: General Studies Research >>
• Last Updated: Mar 28, 2024 1:11 PM
• URL: https://libguides.columbiasouthern.edu/empiricalresearch

Advancing empirical research in international business

Multinational Business Review

ISSN : 1525-383X

Article publication date: 16 November 2012

Rugman, A.M. (2012), "Advancing empirical research in international business", Multinational Business Review , Vol. 20 No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1108/mbr.2012.57220daa.001

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Article Type: Letter from the Editor From: Multinational Business Review, Volume 20, Issue 4

The lead paper in this issue of MBR is by Paloma Almodóvar. In a unique integration of work in international marketing, international business, and strategic management, she explores the performance of separate sets of standardizing versus customizing firms. In careful original empirical work, she finds that there is a standard M curve relationship between the degree of internationalization (DOI) and firm performance. In contrast, for customizing firms, she finds a significant inverted M curve relationship between DOI and performance.

Of particular interest in this paper is the careful theoretical development and hypotheses explaining the four phases and turning points of each of these M curves. This theoretical work, largely developed in the international business domain, has previously been neglected in the international marketing literature. At MBR we are pleased to offer these new concepts to our colleagues in international marketing. To advance such empirical work across functional fields increasingly dominated by a narrow “silo” mentality requires imaginative new thinking as demonstrated so ably in the paper by Paloma Almodóvar.

The second paper, by Alina Kudina, also examines the relationship between multinationality (DOI) and performance but within the more conventional confines of international business research. In conducting such research on the performance of multinational firms, it is now well established that the explanatory variable called “multinationality” needs to be adjusted to account for the home region effect. In her interesting contribution to this literature, Alina Kudina addresses four unresolved empirical issues in this relatively new area of research.

First, in measuring performances she uses firm level accounting data on the return on assets and return on sales of large multinational enterprises. These data are taken from the somewhat neglected OSIRIS database. These accounting data need to be treated with care, as discussed in point four below.

Second, Kudina divides the sales and assets of multinational firms into those taking place in the rest of the home region (R/T) and the rest of the world (G/T). She does this to eliminate sales in the home country. While this, indeed, partly overcomes the unique problem of the US being a dominant force in the North American region of the triad, it makes the analysis largely irrelevant for all other countries in the world. In other words, in order to successfully incorporate data for US multinationals this analysis wastes valuable data for all other multinationals. However, Kudina’s approach is superior to that of others who use up to ten regions; she uses only the home region, and the rest of the world. In practice, only the triad regions matter.

Third, Kudina states correctly that the number of countries in which there is a subsidiary, and the total number of subsidiaries, are poor metrics for multinationality. However, she includes them as control variables but finds that they are insignificant in explaining performance. Instead, she finds that there is a linear relationship between performance and both return on assets and return on sales. It is somewhat surprising that she does not find the S shape (or M shape) relationships being reported in recent studies, including in MBR.

Fourth, Kudina grapples with the familiar problem that her data on performance is for the consolidated accounting data of multinational firms. She apparently reports no breakdown of performance data for rest of the region (ROR) and rest of the world (G/T). In particular, there are no separate data reported on home country performance. Thus the multinationality metrics (R/T and G/T) are not formally aligned to separate performance metrics in these categories. Apparently, only the overall corporate performance is reported.

In summary, the paper by Alina Kudina wrestles with unresolved issues in the empirical work on multinationality and regional versus global performance. This is an area of ongoing interest at MBR and we publish this paper as a further contribution to the unfinished debate about regional versus global strategy and performance.

The third paper, by Xiaoming He and Lin Cui, uses institutional theory to examine the relationship between internationalization and home country specific advantages (CSAs). In this case the key CSA examined is a strong regulatory framework. The authors examine six types of regulatory governance CSAs across large multinationals, again from the OSIRIS database. They find that strong home country regulatory governance institutions directly affect the international expansion of firms.

The fourth paper in this issue, by François Outreville, examines the net benefits of international (geographic) diversification for the world’s largest reinsurance companies. This paper also has to wrestle with still unresolved theoretical and empirical issues, some 40 years after the initial empirical papers on international diversification, back in the 1970s. It would appear that bridging the gap between international business literature and international finance still remains a challenge.

Overall, the four empirical papers help us to continue advancing our insights into the nature of international business activity and the performance of both large MNEs and smaller exporting firms. They also demonstrate that empirical work needs to be closely aligned to good theory. The first paper is the most challenging to publish as it incorporates truly interdisciplinary thinking, which is the most difficult for referees and editors to assess. At MBR we are pleased to meet this challenge.

Alan M. Rugman Editor-in-Chief

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

Empiricism in business ethics: Suggested research directions

• Published: August 1993
• Volume 12 , pages 585–599, ( 1993 )

Cite this article

• Diana C. Robertson 1  

782 Accesses

108 Citations

Explore all metrics

This paper considers future directions of empirical research in business ethics and presents a series of recommendations. Greater emphasis should be placed on the normative basis of empirical studies, behavior (rather than attitudes) should be established as the key dependent variable, theoretical models of ethical decision making should be tested, and empirical studies need to focus on theory-building. Extensions of methodology and the unit of analysis are proposed together with recommendations concerning the need for replication and validity, and building links to managerial and public policy applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment

Business Ethics

Adler, Nancy J.: 1983, ‘Cross-Cultural Management Research: The Ostrich and the Trend’, Academy of Management Review 8 (2), 226–232.

Google Scholar  

Ajzen, Icek: 1991, ‘The Theory of Planned Behavior: Some Unresolved Issues’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 , 179–211.

Aupperle, Kenneth E., Archie B. Carroll, and John D. Hatfield: 1985, ‘An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability’, Academy of Management Journal 28 (2), 446–463.

Bangert-Drowns, Robert L.: 1986, ‘Review of Developments in Meta-Analytic Method’, Psychological Bulletin 99 (3), 388–399.

Baumhart, Raymond C.: 1961, ‘How Ethical Are Businessmen?’, Harvard Business Review 39 (July–August) 6–19, 156–176.

Beauchamp, Tom L. and Norman E. Bowie: 1979, Eds., Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

Becker, Helmut and David J. Fritzsche: 1987, ‘A Comparison of the Ethical Behavior of American, French and German Managers’, Columbia Journal of World Business Winter, 87–95.

Berenbeim, Ronald E.: 1988, ‘An Outbreak of Ethics’, Across the Board 25 (5), 15–19.

Berenbeim, Ronald E.: 1992, Corporate Ethics Practices (The Conference Board, Inc., New York).

Betz, Michael, Lenahan O'Connell, and Jon M. Shepard: 1989, ‘Gender Differences in Proclivity for Unethical Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 8 (5), 321–324.

Blasi, Augusto: 1980, ‘Bridging Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A Critical Review of the Literature’, Psychological Bulletin 88 (1)(July) 1–45.

Bommer, Michael, Clarence Gratto, Jerry Gravander, and Mark Tuttle: 1987: ‘A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 6 , 265–280.

Bowie, Norman E.: 1982, Business Ethics (Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

Boyce, W. D. and L. C. Jensen: 1978, Moral Reasoning: A Psychological-Philosophical Integration (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE).

Brenner, Steven N. and Earl A. Molander: 1977, ‘Is the Ethics of Business Changing?’, Harvard Business Review 55 (1), 57–71.

Brooks, Leonard J., Jr: 1989, ‘Corporate Codes of Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2, 3), 117–129.

Browning, John and Noel B. Zabriskie: 1983, ‘How Ethical Are Industrial Buyers?’, Industrial Marketing Management 12 , 219–224.

Buchman, Thomas A. and John A. Tracy: 1982, ‘Obtaining Responses to Sensitive Questions: Conventional Questionnaire versus Randomized Response Technique’, Journal of Accounting Research 20 (1), 263–268.

Carr, Albert Z.: 1968, ‘Is Business Bluffing Ethical?’, Harvard Business Review 46 , 143–148.

Cavanaugh, Gerald F. and David J. Fritzsche: 1985, ‘Using Vignettes in Business Ethics Research’, Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 7 , JAI Press Inc., 279–293.

Cavanaugh, Gerald F., D. J. Moberg, and Manuel Velasquez: 1981, ‘The Ethics of Organizational Politics’, Academy of Management Review 6 , 363–374.

Center for Business Ethics: 1986, ‘Are Corporations Institutionalizing Ethics?’, Journal of Business Ethics 5 (2), 85–91.

Ciulla, Joanne B.: 1988, ‘When E. F. Hutton Speaks’, in Thomas Donaldson and Patricia H. Werhane (eds.), Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 123–139.

Clark, John C.: 1966, Religion and Moral Standards of American Business (Southwestern Publishing, Cincinnati, OH).

Clinard, Marshall B. and Peter C. Yaeger: 1990, Corporate Crime (Free Press, New York).

Cochran, Philip L. and Robert A. Wood: 1984, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 27 (1), 42–56.

Cochran, Philip L. and D. Nigh: 1986, ‘Illegal Corporate Behavior: An Empirical Examination’, paper presented to the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL.

Cressey, Donald R. and Charles A. Moore: 1983, ‘Managerial Values and Corporate Codes of Ethics’, California Management Review 25 (4), 53–77.

Dalton, Dan R. and Michael B. Metzgar: 1992, ‘Towards Candor, Cooperation, and Privacy in Applied Business Ethics Research: The Randomized Research Technique’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (2), 207–221.

Dees, J. Gregory and Peter C. Crampton: 1991, ‘Shrewd Bargaining on the Moral Frontier: Toward a Theory of Morality in Practice’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (2), 135–167.

DeGeorge, Richard R.: 1990, Business Ethics (Macmillan Publishing, New York).

Derry, Robbin and Ronald M. Green: 1989, ‘Ethical Theory in Business Ethics: A Critical Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 8 (7), 521–533.

Donaldson, John: 1991, European Cases in Business Ethics (Academic Press Limited, London).

Donaldson, Thomas: 1989, The Ethics of International Business (Oxford University Press, New York).

Drake, Bruce H. and Eileen Drake: 1988, ‘Ethical and Legal Aspects of Managing Corporate Cultures’, California Management Review Winter, 107–123.

Dubinsky, Alan J. and B. Loken: 1989, ‘Analyzing Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Business Research 19 (2), 83–107.

Dunfee, Thomas W.: 1991, ‘Business Ethics and Extant Social Contracts’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1), 23–51.

England, George W.: 1975, The Manager and His Values: An International Perspective (Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge).

Ethics Resource Center: 1990, Ethics Policies and Programs in American Business: Report of a Landmark Survey of U.S. Corporations (Ethics Resource Center and the Behavior Research Center, Washington, D.C.).

Ferrell, O. C. and Larry G. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 49 (Summer), 87–96.

Ferrell, O. C., Larry G. Gresham, and John Fraedrich: 1989, ‘A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Models for Marketing’, Journal of Macromarketing Fall, 55–64.

Fishbein, Martin and I. Ajzen: 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).

Fleming, John E.: 1987, ‘A Survey and Critique of Business Ethics Research, 1986’, in William C. Frederick (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (Jai Press Inc., Greenwich, CT), pp. 1–23.

Forsyth, Donelson R.: 1980, ‘A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 , 175–184.

Forsyth, Donelson R. and Rick E. Berger: 1982, ‘The Effects of Ethical Ideology on Moral Behavior’, The Journal of Social Psychology 117 , 53–56.

Forsyth, Donelson R. and William Ray Pope: 1984, ‘Ethical Ideology and Judgments of Social Psychological Research: Multidimensional Analysis’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (6), 1365–1375.

Frederick, William C.: 1992, ‘The Empirical Quest for Normative Meaning: Introduction and Overviews’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (2), 91–98.

Frederick, William C.: 1991, ‘The Moral Authority of Transnational Corporate Codes’, Journal of Business Ethics 10 (3), 165–177.

Fritzsche, David J.: 1991, ‘A Model of Decision-Making Incorporating Ethical Values’, Journal of Business Ethics 10 (11), 841–852.

Fritzsche, David J. and Helmut Becker: 1984, ‘Linking Management Behavior to Ethical Philosophy — An Empirical Investigation’, Academy of Management Journal 27 (1), 166–175.

Garrett, Karen and Peter H. Rossi, ‘Judging the Seriousness of Child Abuse’, Medical Anthropology 2 (1) (Winter), 1–48.

Gatewood, Robert D. and Archie B. Carroll: 1991, ‘Assessment of Ethical Performance of Organization Members: A Conceptual Framework’, Academy of Management Review 16 (4), 667–690.

Glass, G. V., B. McGaw, and M. L. Smith: 1981, Meta-analysis in Social Research (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).

Goodpaster, Kenneth E.: 1984, Ethics in Management (Harvard Business School, Boston).

Goodpaster, Kenneth E.: 1991, ‘Business Ethics and Stake-holder Analysis’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1), 53–73.

Green, Bert F. and Judith A. Hall: 1984, ‘Quantitative Methods for Literature Reviews’, Annual Review of Psychology 35 , 37–53.

Haan, N.: 1982, ‘Can Research on Morality be ‘Scientific’?’, American Psychologist 37 , 1096–1104.

Hegarty, W. Harvey and Henry P. Sims, Jr.: 1978, ‘Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 63 , 451–457.

Hegarty, W. Harvey and Henry P. Sims, Jr.: 1979, ‘Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 64 (3), 331–338.

Hembroff, Larry A. ‘The Seriousness of Acts and Social Contexts: A Test of Black's Theory of the Behavior of Law’, American Journal of Sociology 93 (2), 322–347.

Hoffman, W. Michael: 1991, ‘Business and Environmental Ethics’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (2), 169–184.

Hunt, Shelby D. and Scott Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 6 (Spring), 5–16.

Izraeli, Dove: 1988, ‘Ethical Beliefs and Behavior Among Managers: A Cross-Cultural Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 7 (4), 263–271.

Jackall, Robert: 1988, Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers (Oxford University Press, New York).

Jones, Thomas M.: 1991, ‘Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model’, Academy of Management Review 16 (2), 366–395.

Kahn, William A.: 1990, ‘Toward an Agenda for Business Ethics Research’, Academy of Management Review 15 (2), 311–328.

Keeley, Michael: 1988, A Social-Contract Theory of Organizations (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN).

Kohlberg, Lawrence: 1969, ‘Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization’, in D. A. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (Rand McNally, Chicago), pp. 347–480.

Kohlberg, Lawrence: 1981, The Philosophy of Moral Development (Harper & Row, San Francisco).

Kurtines, William M.: 1986, ‘Moral Behavior as Rule Governed Behavior: Person and Situation Effects on Moral Decison Making’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (4), 784–791.

Laczniak, Gene R.: 1983, ‘Framework for Analyzing Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 1 , 48–57.

Laczniak, Gene R. and Edward J. Inderrieden: 1987, ‘The Influence of Stated Organizational Concern upon Ethical Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 6 (1), 297–307.

Lewis, P. V.: 1985, ‘Defining ‘Business Ethics’: Like Nailing Jello to the Wall’, Journal of Busines Ethics 4 , 377–383.

Liedtka, Jeanne M.: 1992, ‘Exploring Ethical Issues Using Personal Interviews’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (2), 161–181.

Marshall, Catherine and Gretchen B. Rossman: 1989, Designing Qualitative Research (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).

Mathews, M. Cash: 1988, Strategic Intervention in Organizations: Resolving Ethical Dilemmas (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).

McDonald, Gael M. and Raymond A. Zepp: 1988, ‘Ethical Perceptions of Hong Kong Chinese Business Managers’, Journal of Business Ethics 7 (11), 835–845.

Negandhi, A. R.: 1983, ‘Cross Cultural Management Research: Trend and Future’, Journal of International Business Studies 14 , 17–28.

Norton, Edgar: 1989, ‘A Simple Quantitative Test of Financial Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 8 (7), 561–564.

Nunnally, Jum C.: 1973, Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).

Payne, Stephen L. and Robert A. Giacolone: 1990, ‘Social Psychological Approaches to the Perception of Ethical Dilemmas’, Human Relations 43 (7), 649–665.

Posner, Barry Z. and Warren H. Schmidt: 1987, ‘Ethics in American Companies: A Managerial Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 6 (5), 383–391.

Raelin, Joseph A.: 1987, ‘The Professional as the Executive's Ethical Aide-de-Camp’, The Academy of Management Executive 1 (2), 171–183.

Randall, Donna M. and Maria F. Fernandes: 1991, ‘The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 10 (11), 805–817.

Randall, Donna M. and Annetta M. Gibson: 1990, ‘Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 9 (6), 457–471.

Rawls, John: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

Reichardt, Charles S. and Thomas D. Cook: 1979, ‘Beyond Qualitative versus Quantitative Methods’, in Thomas D. Cook and Charles S. Reichardt (eds.), Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), pp. 7–32.

Reidenbach, R. Eric, and Donald P. Robin: 1991, ‘A Conceptual Model of Corporate Moral Development’, Journal of Business Ethics 10 (4), 273–284.

Reinmuth, James E. and Michael D. Geurts: 1975, ‘The Collection of Sensitive Information Using a Two-Stage, Randomized Response Model’, Journal of Marketing Research 12 (November), 402–407.

Rest, James R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger, New York).

Robertson, Diana C. and Erin Anderson: 1993, ‘Control System and Task Environment Effects on Ethical Judgment: An Exploratory Study of Industrial Salespeople’, Organization Science , forthcoming.

Robertson, Diana C. and Bodo B. Schlegelmilch: 1993, ‘Corporate Institutionalization of Ethics in the United States and Great Britain’, Journal of Business Ethics 12 , 133–144.

Romer, Daniel, Charles L. Gruder, and Terri Lizzardo: 1986, ‘A Person-Situation Approach to Altruistic Behavior’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (5), 1001–1012.

Sathe, Vijay: 1986, ‘How to Decipher and Change Organizational Culture’, in R. H. Kilman and Associates (ed.), Managing Corporate Cultures (Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco).

Schwab, D. P.: 1980, ‘Construct Validity in Organizational Behavior’, in Barry M. Staw and Larry L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 2 , 3–43.

Sieber, Sam D.: 1973, ‘The Integration of Field Work and Survey Methods’, American Journal of Sociology 78 (May), 1335–1359.

Smith, N. Craig: 1990, Morality and the Market: Consumer Pressure for Corporate Accountability (Routledge, London and New York).

Staw, Barry M. and Eugene Szwajkowski: 1975, ‘The Scarcity-Munificence Component of Organizations Environments and the Commission of Illegal Acts’, Administrative Science Quarterly 20 , 345–354.

Stead, W. Edward, Dan L. Worrell, and Jean Garner Stead: 1990, ‘An Integrative Model for Understanding and Managing Ethical Behavior in Business Organizational’, Journal of Business Ethics 9 (3), 233–242.

Toffler, Barbara L.: 1991, Managers Talk Ethics: Making Tough Choices in a Competitive Business World (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York).

Trevino, Linda Klebe: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’, Academy of Management Review 11 (3), 601–617.

Trevino, Linda Klebe: 1992, ‘Experimental Approaches to Studying Ethical-Unethical Behavior in Organizations’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (2), 121–136.

Trevino, Linda Klebe and Stuart A. Youngblood: 1990, ‘Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior’, Journal of Applied Psychology 75 (4), 378–385.

Tsalikis, John and David J. Fritzsche: 1989, ‘Business Ethics: A Literature Review with a Focus on Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 8 (9), 695–743.

U.S. Sentencing Commission: 1991, Unpublished manuscript, Sentencing of Organizations .

Victor, Bart and John B. Cullen: 1988, ‘The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates’, Administrative Science Quarterly 33 (1), 101–125.

Waterman, Alan S.: 1988, ‘On the Uses of Psychological Theory and Research in the Process of Ethical Inquiry’, Psychological Bulletin 103 (3), 283–298.

Weber, James: 1992, ‘Scenarios in Business Ethics Research: Review, Critical Assessment, and Recommendations’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (2), 137–159.

Werhane, Patricia H.: 1988, ‘Two Ethical Issues in Mergers and Acquisitions’, Journal of Business Ethics 7 (1, 2), 41–45.

Wolfe, Art: 1991, ‘Reflections on Business Ethics: What Is It? What Causes It? And, What Should a Course in Business Ethics Include?’ Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (4), 409–439.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Legal Studies, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 19104-6369, Philadelphia, PN, USA

Diana C. Robertson

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Additional information

Diana C. Robertson is Robert Egelston Term Assistant Professor of Legal Studies at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. While working on this paper, Dr. Robertson was a Visiting Assistant Professor at The London Business School. Her research interests include individuals' decision-making processes about ethical issues and the impact of corporate compensation and control systems on employees' ethical behavior. Dr. Robertson has published articles in the Sloan Management Review, Journal of Business Ethics, and Organization Science .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Robertson, D.C. Empiricism in business ethics: Suggested research directions. J Bus Ethics 12 , 585–599 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01845895

Download citation

Issue Date : August 1993

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01845895

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Decision Making
• Economic Growth
• Theoretical Model
• Empirical Study
• Public Policy
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

Research: How Different Fields Are Using GenAI to Redefine Roles

• Maryam Alavi

Examples from customer support, management consulting, professional writing, legal analysis, and software and technology.

The interactive, conversational, analytical, and generative features of GenAI offer support for creativity, problem-solving, and processing and digestion of large bodies of information. Therefore, these features can act as cognitive resources for knowledge workers. Moreover, the capabilities of GenAI can mitigate various hindrances to effective performance that knowledge workers may encounter in their jobs, including time pressure, gaps in knowledge and skills, and negative feelings (such as boredom stemming from repetitive tasks or frustration arising from interactions with dissatisfied customers). Empirical research and field observations have already begun to reveal the value of GenAI capabilities and their potential for job crafting.

There is an expectation that implementing new and emerging Generative AI (GenAI) tools enhances the effectiveness and competitiveness of organizations. This belief is evidenced by current and planned investments in GenAI tools, especially by firms in knowledge-intensive industries such as finance, healthcare, and entertainment, among others. According to forecasts, enterprise spending on GenAI will increase by two-fold in 2024 and grow to $151.1 billion by 2027 .

• Maryam Alavi is the Elizabeth D. & Thomas M. Holder Chair & Professor of IT Management, Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology .

Partner Center