Articles (n = 219)
The depth of content and mode of delivery varied substantially. Common delivery modes for content education included provision of written material (eg, notebooks, pamphlets), static and interactive websites, and in-person visits and classes. Many programs used multiple tactics. For example, one disease management program described mailing quarterly newsletters and disease-specific educational pamphlets to participants with diabetes who were also involved in coaching. 56
2.6 Coaching “Dose.” In the majority of articles reviewed, it was not possible to calculate the “dose” of coaching that was being evaluated in terms of length of individual coaching sessions, number of coaching sessions, or duration of the coaching intervention. Overall, 75% (212 of 284) of the peer-reviewed articles did not specify the length of each individual coaching session, 52% (148 of 284) did not specify the total number of coaching sessions used, and 64% (181 of 284) did not specify the duration of the coaching process. Of those that did specify the session length, sessions lasted for an average of 35.8 minutes, ranging from 5 minutes 57 , 58 to 2.5 hours. 59 Of those that specified the number of coaching sessions, the average reported was 10.1 sessions, ranging from 1 to 90, 60 median = 6. For those articles that reported the length and number of coaching sessions (n = 68), the average contact hours with a coach was 6.2, ranging from 15 minutes 61 to 135 hours, 60 median = 3 hours.
A wide range was also observed in the duration of the entire coaching intervention. As depicted in Table 7 , coaching ranged from a single session to 6 years. For interventions that had a consistent coaching schedule, frequency of coaching ranged from biannual sessions to access to a coach twice per week, with the majority reporting weekly sessions. Coaching frequency appeared to be related to length of the intervention, with shorter programs employing more weekly coaching whereas longer interventions were more likely to use monthly coaching.
Frequency (Percentage) of Given Articles Reporting Various Durations of Coaching
Duration | All Articles (n = 184) | Research and Existing Practice Articles (n = 181) | Conceptual Articles (n = 3) |
---|---|---|---|
1 session to 1 mo | 22 (12.0%) | 22 (12.2%) | 0 (0.0%) |
5 wk to 3 mo | 43 (23.4%) | 42 (23.2%) | 1 (33.33%) |
3.5 mo to 6 mo | 46 (25.0%) | 45 (24.9%) | 1 (33.33%) |
6.5 mo to 9 mo | 9 (4.9%) | 9 (5.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
10 mo to 12.5 mo | 41 (22.3%) | 40 (22.1%) | 1 (33.33%) |
15 mo to 2 y | 19 (10.3%) | 19 (10.5%) | 0 (0.0%) |
3 y to 6 y | 4 (2.2%) | 4 (2.2%) | 0 (0.0%) |
2.7 Was there a consistent coaching relationship? Just over half of the articles (154 of 284, or 54%) provided adequate information to assess whether the participant had an ongoing relationship with the same coach over time. Of these articles, 60% (92 of 154 articles) overtly stated that participants were matched with the same coach over multiple sessions, and another 18% (28 of 154) implied a consistent relationship. In contrast to the 78% that thus indicated a consistent relationship was formed, only 21% (32 of 154) of the programs clearly did not pair the same coach with the same participant over time. Of those programs that did not rely on a consistent coaching relationship, a third of the programs only offered a single coaching session, precluding development of a relationship, and the rest either used interchangeable coaches or automated contacts that were algorithm driven.
3. Who Delivers the Coaching?
3.1 Are they professionals? In 13% (38 of 284) of the studies, there was not enough information provided to determine the coaches' professional background. Of the remaining articles, 95% (234 of 246) of the studies/practices employed human coaches, while the remaining 5% (12 of 246) employed technology-based coaching only. Of those that employed human coaches, 93% (217 of 234) used professionals while only 7% (17 of 234) used lay individuals.
3.2 What kind of professionals? Of coaches with professional training, coaches were overwhelmingly medical (53%) and allied health (51%) professionals ( Table 8 ). * Nurses comprised the clear majority of these professionals (42%). Mental health providers were the second most common (21%: divided between 11% psychologists [doctorate level] and 10% social workers and other master's-level psychotherapists). Dieticians were the third most common professionals to provide coaching (11%), with health educators/health promotion experts (8%), unspecified health professionals (8%) and exercise physiologists/specialists (6%) also well-represented.
Frequency (Percentage) of Articles With Given Coach Background
General Category | Specific Background | All Articles (n = 234) | Research and Existing Practice Articles (n = 212) | Conceptual Articles (n = 22) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Physicians | 14 (6.0%) | 11 (5.2%) | 3 (13.6%) | |
Nurses | 98 (41.9%) | 85 (40.1%) | 13 (59.1%) | |
Pharmacists | 10 (4.3%) | 9 (4.2%) | 1 (4.6%) | |
Physician assistants | 1 (0.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (4.6%) | |
Medical staff | 1 (0.4%) | 1 (0.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Dieticians or nutritionists | 26 (11.1%) | 25 (11.8%) | 1 (4.6%) | |
Psychologists (doctorate level) | 25 (10.7%) | 20 (9.4%) | 5 (22.7%) | |
Social workers, psychotherapists, counselors (master's level) | 23 (9.8%) | 19 (9.0%) | 4 (18.2%) | |
All mental health providers | 48 (20.5%) | 39 (18.4%) | 9 (40.9%) | |
Physio- and physical therapists | 10 (4.3%) | 10 (4.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Medical assistants | 8 (3.4%) | 7 (3.3%) | 1 (4.6%) | |
Occupational therapists | 3 (1.3%) | 2 (0.9%) | 1 (4.6%) | |
Exercise physiologists and exercise specialists | 15 (6.4%) | 15 (7.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Unspecified or other allied health professionals | 10 (4.3%) | 9 (4.2%) | 1 (4.6%) | |
Unspecified health professionals | 18 (7.7%) | 14 (6.6%) | 4 (18.2%) | |
Health educators/promotion | 19 (8.1%) | 17 (8.0%) | 2 (9.1%) | |
Research assistants | 5 (2.1%) | 5 (2.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Medical or nursing students | 5 (2.1%) | 5 (2.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Allied health students | 12 (5.1%) | 12 (5.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Other students | 1 (0.4%) | 1 (0.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Health/wellness | 15 (6.4%) | 13 (6.1%) | 2 (9.1%) | |
Life/lifestyle | 2 (0.9%) | 1 (0.5%) | 1 (4.6%) | |
Personal vitality | 2 (0.9%) | 2 (0.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Professional coach | 4 (1.7%) | 4 (1.9%) | 0 (0.0%) |
3.3 Training received by the coaches. We considered both intensity of training and content of training given to coaches for the specific coaching under investigation. As can be seen in Tables 9 and and10, 10 , only 22% (59 of 272) of the articles using human coaches provided information on the amount of training obtained by those performing the coaching ( Figure 3a ). Of these, there was a large range in intensity of coaching-specific training, from less than 2 hours to close to 2 years, median between 6 and 40 hours. At the least intensive end, only 1.5 hours of training were provided to content experts in weight loss and consisted of the rationale for health coaching 62 or 2 hours of coaching-specific training were provided to MD, PharmD, or RN student health coaches to support uninsured patients with hyperten-sion. 63 At the most intensive end, a 9-month curriculum was provided to medical assistants to coach patients with chronic health issues, 64 and an estimated 600 hours of training were provided to non-medical professionals to help newly diagnosed cancer patients navigate the healthcare system and their treatment. 41
Frequency (Percentages) of Given Article Type That Describes Amount of Coaches' Training
Described Coach's Training (n = 57) | No Information Provided (n = 218) | |
---|---|---|
Empirical research | 40 (22.3%) | 139 (77.7%) |
Protocols | 7 (24.1%) | 22 (75.9%) |
Existing clinical practices | 4 (10.8%) | 33 (89.2%) |
Conceptual articles | 6 (20.0%) | 24 (80.0%) |
Frequency of Articles Describing the Training Provided to Coaches
Amount of Training | No. of articles |
---|---|
Described | 57 |
Not sufficiently described | 218 |
1-5 h | 4 |
6-15 h | 9 |
16-23 h | 10 |
24-40 h | 9 |
41-79 h | 3 |
80-120 h | 6 |
4-6 wk, full-time | 5 |
Greater than 6 wk (eg, 1 y experience plus CDE training, 600 h, ICF certification required) | 5 |
Variable (ie, articles on multiple coaching programs that noted “variable” amounts) | 5 |
Total | 57 |
Abbreviations: ICF, International Coaching Federation; CDE, Certified Diabetes Educator.
Frequency of articles reporting various amounts of coach training.
In terms of the specific content of the training received by the coaches, only half (50.4% or 143 of 284) of the articles included descriptive information. Of these, three broad types of training could be identified: (1) behavior change skills, (2) health information briefing (content education), and (3) job training.
3.3.1 Behavior change skills include training in specific behavioral theories and skills used to facilitate behavior change. Table 11 presents these data. Sixty-one percent (87 of 143) of articles in which training content was described reported training coaches in behavior change methods (eg, goal setting, action planning, problem solving, navigating obstacles/barriers to goals, finding resources, self-monitoring, and building self-efficacy) based on multiple theories, including the following: Health Beliefs Model, 65 Social Cognitive Theory, 66 , 67 Theory of Planned Behavior, 68 , 69 the Trans theoretical Model, 70 - 72 Self-Determination Theory, 73 - 75 Self-Perception Theory, 76 and Motivational Enhancement. 77 - 79 Sixty-seven percent of articles reported training coaches in communication skills specifically for developing rapport, expressing empathy, and/or providing emotional support. Sixty-three percent of articles reported training coaches in other communication skills that would enhance the change process: these included the use of powerful questions, assertiveness training, negotiation skills, providing feedback, and various types of reflections including those that emphasize possibilities, underline the positive side of an issue, or high-light the gap between where a patient wants to be and where he or she is now. Note that 42% of articles that documented the content of the coaches' training specifically referred to training in “a communication method” called motivational interviewing (MI). 78 - 80 Training in MI typically includes education in five key skill sets that reflect the “four guiding principles” of MI: expressing empathy, developing discrepancy, rolling with resistance, and supporting self-efficacy. The five key skill sets include (1) use of open-ended questions, (2) affirmations, (3) reflections, (4) summaries that highlight both sides of ambivalence, and (5) reinforcement of the patients use of “change talk.” (For a greater understanding, see the article by Simmons and Wolever in this issue. 80 ) Because MI covers both types of communication strategies coded in our study, we also credited articles that explicitly reported MI training with both types of communication training. In addition to the 42% that reported training in MI, training in other motivational approaches was mentioned by 14% of the articles and an additional 4% specifically noted the use of whole-person approaches. Other motivational techniques included additional aspects of Motivation Enhancement Therapy, patient activation, visioning, and exploration of personal values. Finally, 13% reported training coaches in cognitive behavioral skills (CBT) for working with patients' specific health conditions, including reframing, cognitive restructuring, and CBT-based self-management skills.
Frequency (Percentage) of Articles Describing Content of Training to Professionals and Non-professionals Who Delivered the Coaching
Content of Training (when described) | All literature (n = 143) | When coaches were professionals (n = 116) | When coaches were non-professionals (n = 19) | When unclear or n/A (n = 8) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Behavior change (including training in health behavior models and methods) | 87 (60.8%) | 69 (59.5%) | 14 (73.7%) | 4 (50.0%) |
Communication skills to develop rapport, express empathy, and provide emotional support | 96 (67.1%) | 78 (67.2%) | 12 (63.2%) | 6 (75.0%) |
Other communication skills (eg, powerful questions, various types of reflection, negotiation skills, assertive-ness, providing feedback) | 90 (62.9%) | 74 (63.8%) | 11 (57.9%) | 5 (62.5%) |
Motivational interviewing | 60 (42.0%) | 50 (43.1%) | 5 (26.3%) | 5 (62.5%) |
Other motivational approaches (eg, other aspects of motivation enhancement therapy, patient activation, visioning, values exploration) | 20 (14.0%) | 16 (13.8%) | 3 (15.8%) | 1 (12.5%) |
Whole person | 6 (4.2%) | 6 (5.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Cognitive-behavioral skills, including reframing, cognitive restructuring, and self-management | 18 (12.6%) | 16 (13.8%) | 2 (10.5%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Exercise or physical activity guidelines, information | 12 (8.4%) | 12 (10.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Nutrition | 13 (9.1%) | 13 (11.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Disease- or condition-based information | 52 (36.4%) | 39 (33.6%) | 11 (57.9%) | 2 (25.0%) |
Protocol-specific training | 39 (27.3%) | 32 (27.6%) | 6 (31.6%) | 1 (12.5%) |
Navigating the health system | 13 (9.1%) | 10 (8.6%) | 3 (15.8%) | 0 (0.0%) |
3.3.2 Health information briefing includes content education regarding healthy lifestyles (eg, physical activity guidelines, nutrition information) and/or information specific to the disease or health condition under investigation (eg, pathophysiology, onset and course of the illness or condition, treatments). Of those articles that described training content, 36% described briefing coaches with disease-or health condition—specific information (eg, regarding diabetes, heart disease risk, etc). Nine percent described providing coaches with information on nutrition, and 8% of articles described providing coaches with information on physical activity/exercise.
3.3.3 Job training includes training related to the coach's job role (eg, training on clinic flow) or study-specific training (eg, review of protocol). Twenty-seven percent of the articles that described the coach training described protocol-specific training, whereas 9% of articles provided coaches with education on navigating the health system.
While we evaluated our questions of interest using all the obtained medical literature, we also compared the literature on empirical studies and existing, operationalized practices to the literature that was conceptual only to assess potential sources of bias. Several differences emerged that merit mention. First, as can be seen in Tables 2 through through4, 4 , a considerably higher percentage of conceptual articles fully support a definition of coaching as a patient-centric process that uses patient-determined goals and self-discovery processes. Second, compared to research and existing practice articles, a somewhat lower percentage of conceptual articles discusses the inclusion of accountability mechanisms ( Table 5 ) and proposes content education as part of the coaching intervention ( Table 6 ). Third, the conceptual articles, taken together, posit a more intense training trajectory than do the articles on empirical work and existing practices ( Figure 3b ). Finally, the conceptual articles cite greater use of nurses and mental health providers.
Percentage of research and existing practice articles versus conceptual articles reporting various amounts of coach training.
Early reviews of the effectiveness of health coaching have called for conceptual and operational clarification of health and wellness coaching. 34 Indeed, as the trajectory of peer-reviewed articles on this approach rapidly increases, continued variability in definitions of health coaching precludes the ability to perform rigorous reviews or meta-analyses. This variability also insures continued confusion over the coaching approach and confounds the skills needed by the rapidly growing number of professionals providing health and wellness coaching. To move the field forward, we must first clarify what the intervention is. With an evidence-based, consensus definition, stronger efficacy and effectiveness studies can ensue, and professional training can be improved. Eventually, we will be able to consistently replicate and widely disseminate the intervention while also assessing the cost:benefit ratio of using health coaching to address the myriad behavior changes needed to prevent and manage chronic disease.
Our analysis used a comprehensive, systematic review to evaluate well over 200 peer-reviewed empirical articles and close to 70 expert opinions available in the peer-reviewed medical literature to form the foundation of a definition for health and wellness coaching that can be broadly accepted and adopted for future use. Despite the evident variability in use of the terms health coaching and wellness coaching , our systematic study of the state of academic knowledge on health and wellness coaching reveals areas of consensus emerging in the literature, as well as areas that need clarification for the field to move forward. In sum, the emerging consensus defines the conceptual and interventional components of health and wellness coaching as
a patient-centered approach wherein patients at least partially determine their goals, use self-discovery or active learning processes together with content education to work toward their goals, and self-monitor behaviors to increase accountability, all within the context of an interpersonal relationship with a coach. The coach is a healthcare professional trained in behavior change theory, motivational strategies, and communication techniques, which are used to assist patients to develop intrinsic motivation and obtain skills to create sustainable change for improved health and well-being.
Specifically, 86% of the articles describe health and wellness coaching as a process that is patient-centered. Seventy-one percent describe coaching as an intervention that supports patients' pursuit of self-identified goals (rather than goals prescribed by the provider). Sixty-three percent define coaching as a process in which the patient is an active learner whose own self-discovery process is supported to resolve problems, overcome challenges, and negotiate barriers to goals. Eighty-six percent of articles describe specific mechanisms to support patient accountability for behavior change through various self-monitoring techniques and reporting back to their coach. Seventy-eight percent of articles describe coaching that occurs in the context of a consistent ongoing relationship with a human coach designated to play a defined role.
The definition of health coaching emerging from the peer-reviewed literature is consistent with the evolving science of human motivation and the psycho-social underpinnings of sustainable behavioral change. There is evidence that behavior change and learning occur most reliably when there is a helping relationship that (1) acknowledges the individual, (2) is collaborative, and (3) encourages active learning. (See Dill and Gumpert for review. 81 ) Reaching back to the theoretical roots of Adler, 82 , 83 Jung, 84 , 85 and Rogers, 86 health and wellness coaching conceptualizes patients as lifelong learners whose individual personal values and innate internal resources can be cultivated in the context of a supportive relationship to guide them toward their own desired vision of health. 87 , 88
This systematic review takes the field an important step forward, yet we need to further upgrade the science to better evaluate health and wellness coaching. It is concerning that up to a third of the articles did not describe the actual coaching methods used, making it impossible to fully evaluate or replicate specific processes. Further, only a small minority of articles provided information that allows for calculation of a coaching “dose” (25% reported length of each individual coaching session, 48% reported the number of coaching sessions delivered, 36% reported the duration of the coaching process, and very few reported all three.) Going forward and until there is a well-accepted international standard to determine competency in health and wellness coaching, it is imperative that publications report the theories on which interventions are based and fully describe the processes, techniques, and intensity of the intervention being investigated. To move the field ahead, empirical articles must describe the approaches they are evaluating in a way that allows replication. With a consensus definition of health and wellness coaching in place, we will be able to understand what components of coaching are essential to affect health outcomes and health behavior change in general. For example, it will be of great interest to revisit the issue of whether health coaching will be consistently effective at promoting health change if health coaching is defined, as by this consensus, as patient-centered and incorporating patient-determined goals, self-discovery processes, accountability mechanisms, and content information, in the context of an ongoing helping relationship.
We also will be able to understand what components, at what “dose,” can be adapted in what way, to affect health outcomes and health behavior change for specific patient populations and specific illnesses or conditions. We have statistical capability to evaluate the impact of individual components of heterogeneous interventions. For example, Michie (2009) found strong evidence for the efficacy of the following specific interventions in the behavioral change literature on dietary intake and physical activity: self-monitoring of behavior, prompting intention formation, prompting specific goal setting, providing feedback on performance, and prompting participants to review behavioral goals. 89 Also, Olsen and Nesbitt (2010) found evidence that four specific interventions were the effective components of health coaching programs: (1) goal setting, (2) selected components of motivational interviewing, (3) collaborations with healthcare providers, and (4) program durations of 6 to 12 months. 34 In the near future, we look forward to being able to define best practices in health and wellness coaching applied to specific populations and specific targets for health outcomes and health behavior change.
While the specific professional background of health and wellness coaches is diverse, there is an emerging consensus in the literature that coaching be provided by health professionals (currently a diverse range is represented) who, further, have specific training in coaching processes and not only expertise in the knowledge base of their profession. Coaches' training, when described, fell in the general categories of behavior change skills, health information briefing, and job training. However, it is of significant concern that only half of the articles provided descriptions of the content of coaches' training for the specific study, and only 22% of articles reported on the extent of training received by the coaches. As previously stated, if we are to move the field of health coaching forward, empirical articles must describe the approaches they are evaluating in a way that allows replication; this includes concrete descriptions of content and intensity of training provided and/or evidence by replicable standards that coaches had achieved a level of competence relevant for the coaching they delivered. However, if we refer to the emerging consensus definition of what health and wellness coaching is , we can extrapolate coaches' necessary core competencies with the caveat that their effect on health outcomes remains to be determined.
First, coaches must have training in a model of change that is patient-centered , and based on facilitating the patient's personal change process, rather than dictating it. Coaches must also have the interpersonal skills to understand the unique values, motivations, resources, and obstacles that the patient brings to the change process and the ability to express their understanding effectively. Second, and along similar lines, the coach must be able to help patients identify their own goals for change that are personally important and achievable. Third, coaches must be trained in the use of a self-discovery process that facilitates patients working toward their goals through exploration and an active learning process rather than by dictating what should be done. Fourth, coaches must understand how to help patients be accountable to themselves and monitor their progress. Finally, coaches must have the relevant content knowledge to help their patients with the above four processes in the arena of change. Coaches also must have the interpersonal skill to integrate the content information into the patient's change process rather than dictating it. These competencies require not only use of multiple communication skills and empowerment strategies, but also require a consistent stance on the part of the coach to simultaneously hold the patient's agenda, convey that the patient is resourceful and a lifelong learner, and guide them toward sound health decisions without advising, all the while respecting patients as the best experts on what may work best in their individual lives.
It is critical to note that this paradigm is distinct from that of conventional medicine. 87 As well-explicated in Linden, Butterworth, and Prochaska (2010), typical disease management interventions often employ healthcare professionals who do not necessarily value patient empowerment, who may not have exposure to or adequate training in the science of behavioral change, and who may not have the complex interpersonal skills to facilitate behavior change effectively. 90 This leaves those trained in the conventional medical model vulnerable to using approaches that are expert-driven, authoritarian, and advice-giving as opposed to taking stances that are supported by the latest research in behavior change models. 87 , 91 , 92 Thus, we conclude that specific training in these core competencies and credentialing will be necessary if coaches are to deliver health and wellness coaching as described in this consensus definition.
Next steps..
The most recent prior review of the effectiveness of health coaching reviewed only 15 articles and concluded that the body of literature as a whole was inconclusive due to theoretical and methodological issues. 34 It will be of great interest to revisit the issue of whether health coaching will be consistently effective at promoting health change now that we have a much larger body of work to review (284 articles), and if health coaching is defined, as by this consensus, as patient-centered, incorporating patient-determined goals, self-discovery processes, accountability, and content information, in the context of an ongoing helping relationship. This unified assessment will be fundamental to establishing the merit of this approach to helping people achieve good health outcomes and change their health behaviors. We also will be able to understand what components of health and wellness coaching, at what “doses,” can be adapted in what way to best promote health outcomes and health behavior change for specific patient populations and specific illnesses or conditions. Several other areas within health and wellness coaching merit more rigorous study, including the role of the coach, individualized vs protocol-driven coaching, and the integration of technology into coaching.
One issue for future investigation is the role of the coach and specifically whether one coach can play multiple roles effectively. Of the literature that provided sufficient information to determine the presence of content education for participants, 91% included content education as a key addition to the coaching process. It was not uncommon to see coaching provided as an adjunct to educational modules, as well as to observe education components provided to a primarily coaching intervention. As multiple authors have distinguished between educating and coaching, 28 , 87 , 91 it is undoubtedly important to differentiate the processes. When the health coach is providing information within the context of coaching, plainly defined processes need to be outlined. For example, one component of motivational interviewing, an approach that can be used within the coaching process, 89 emphasizes the importance of obtaining permission to present information. 78 Indeed, asking permission has also been found empirically to benefit the coaching process and serves to empower the patient. 92
A second option identified as a way to provide education in the context of coaching is that of presenting information as tentative and for consideration of possibilities rather than as directive knowledge. 92 This distinction highlights the import of training coaches in skills designed to incorporate educational information so that the process remains patient-centered. Relatedly, there is a stark lack of clarity in the literature regarding the role of health coaches as educators and whether the same person can effectively serve in both roles simultaneously while still ensuring the coaching process is patient-centered. For example, if a healthcare provider is both coaching and educating, a patient may defer to this person's expertise and assume that the education provided is what “should” be done, even if it conflicts with the individual's values, readiness, or desires around the behavior. This raises the need for a clear division of roles with commensurate professional training. Whether the psychological (eg, building self-efficacy) and behavioral (eg, setting goals that are consistent with values) strategies used in health coaching complement or conflict with simultaneous delivery of content information is an intriguing question. It seems that both can be used to the benefit of the patient, however, the best mechanism for delivering these strategies is yet to be determined. Assessing whether, and if so how, the health coach provides content information will be critical to defining health or wellness coaching best practices.
Similarly, in a setting where the provider is serving a dual role as clinician and coach, further investigation into what constitutes the coaching segment of a visit and how that looks different from the clinical care component of the visit will be essential to understanding how such a brief encounter might work. At least 13 articles alluded to the role of the coach as someone to help patients navigate some aspect of the health system. This role presents yet another potential conflict for patient-centered guidance wherein the coach supports, but does not “do for” the patient. Each of these approaches will look different, emphasize different skills, and needs to be carefully considered to ensure that coaches receive the appropriate training to differentiate roles and protect patients. Moreover, there likely will need to be a patient-education component of this approach, where patients learn how coaching is being integrated into a clinical visit, what their “job” or “role” is in this encounter, and how that looks different from when they are receiving information about their health.
Another area for further investigation is the delicate balance between conducting patient-centric, highly individualized approaches and using more standardized, protocol-based approaches to health and wellness coaching. Of the articles that provided descriptions of the actual coaching processes, a number of them included a more generalized approach with set protocols and prompts that were disease-specific in some cases but not based on the individual needs or values of the participant. Some might argue that such a standardized approach is easier to describe, disseminate, measure, and ultimately compare. However, our review indicates that there are examples of individualized processes that can be standardized with the same effect. For example, although only emerging in the past decade, one brand of integrative health coaching has been well described, standardized within a framework that allows for individual tailoring, 87 , 88 and shown to be effective. 17 , 21 , 93 , 94 Perhaps the best example of standardization of individually tailored processes is seen in motivational interviewing; the MI processes have been well described, standardized within a framework, widely disseminated, and demonstrated to be effective in many settings. 9 , 78 , 79 , 90 , 95 - 97 Moreover, motivational interviewing has the advantage of several psychometrically sound program evaluation measures (eg, Motivational Interviewing Skills Code, 98 Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity 99 ) that can be used to ensure intervention integrity and assess intervention outcomes for common threats to validi-ty. 9 While motivational interviewing uses only a subset of skills needed in health or wellness coaching, 80 it serves as an excellent example of how general processes that are used in highly individualized ways can be thoroughly described and well-validated.
Some articles used the term coaching to describe interventions in which there are actually no human providers. Instead, technology (eg, computer programs, algorithm-driven text messages) was used to drive the behavior change process. While there is no doubt that technology provides myriad potential advantages, close to four in five articles posit coaching as a relationship-based approach. We propose that technology has a definite role in supporting individuals in the process of behavior change, particularly in facilitating the process of self-monitoring, the most strongly supported behavior change technique studied at least for eating and physical activity. 89 Many practices described the use of technology including text-based messaging, mobile applications, websites, and even sensor technology (eg, ear buds, wristbands) to facilitate accumulation and tracking of data on behaviors of interest. For example, in the Davis et al study, a TriFit machine was the primary means for tracking data. 100 Despite the important contribution of technology to self-monitoring, three-quarters of the articles stated or implied (78%) that participants were matched with the same coach over multiple sessions whereas a consistent relationship was not developed with a coach about a fifth of the time. Though multiple theorists describe the health and wellness coaching process as building on the critical foundation of a human relationship, further research is needed to determine the degree to which the relationship itself is seminal in facilitating personal learning. The value of human connection to facilitate deep learning is well-described in other evidence bases. 101 In the health and wellness coaching literature, qualitative studies have noted the power of interpersonal support in building courage to try new behaviors, 102 in strengthening a sense of accountability toward the other person (coach), 103 , 104 and in developing a sense of empowerment. 92 Additionally, interpersonal interactions may be necessary for participants to move from cognitive understanding of ambivalence, motivators, and barriers to change to a deeper, “felt sense” understanding more likely to sustain behav-ior. 81 , 101 The potential role of relationship in this emerging approach remains an important area for further exploration.
This study is not without its limitations. Indeed, for each of the domains for which we abstracted data, there were data missing because the authors did not provide the information in their report. First, we included all studies of health coaching, even when there were multiple reports of the same intervention. This may have inflated certain counts of the various domains of coaching reported. Second, although two to three investigators reviewed each study, there were many instances in which the team made judgment calls regarding a particular domain of the coaching based on limited descriptions in the articles that may or may not have been what was actually implemented. Thus, our review may have mischaracterized some of the coaching interventions in the literature. Third, and relatedly, for several of the review questions for which we abstracted data, anywhere from 11% to 78% of articles did not describe the pertinent domain in sufficient detail to allow us to code them. Finally, our methods included only articles in the PubMed database. Though we expect the vast majority of health and wellness coaching articles to be indexed within PubMed, we are aware that some relevant articles may exist outside this database. Thus, the picture presented here likely does not fully reflect all of the coaching models in the literature. Similarly, health coach training paradigms and programs that are not reflected in PubMed are also not reflected in this systematic review.
Despite these limitations, our systematic review of health and wellness coaching is the first in the literature to characterize this growing field in healthcare. Variation in approaches and practices that have been defined and operationalized as health or wellness coaching makes it difficult to compare approaches and identify those that are most effective for chronic disease prevention and management. Indeed, our findings point to the critical need for future systematic investigations of the effectiveness of various health and wellness coaching approaches in order to identify the best practices in the field, further refine the definition, and iteratively operationalize health or wellness coaching in research and practice. These “best practices” should include both the coach's minimum necessary skills and the coaching processes that facilitate a patient-centric approach to behavioral change. Moreover, future reports of coaching interventions should aim to describe in as much detail as possible the coaching intervention, including a thorough description of the individuals providing coaching with professional background and coaching-specific training, and the breadth and depth of the skills and processes used. These detailed descriptions will enable robust comparison of approaches across disease states and populations, so that a compendium of coaching models that have proven most effective can be generated and disseminated. These efforts will help to ensure that health and wellness coaching is an evidence-based practice that can make a demonstrable difference in the prevention and management of chronic disease in healthcare systems worldwide.
We wish to acknowledge the support of Kathy Buarotti in tracking and securing articles and Anita Bhat for her early participation in brainstorming about this review.
Disclosures The authors completed the ICMJE Form for Potential Conflicts of Interest and declared no relevant conflicts.
* Since we could find no consensus among professional organizations about which professions constitute “medical” or “allied health” professions, we chose a common view to classify professionals as indicated on Wikipedia. We thus categorized the professional background of the coaches into six groups: (1) medical professionals (eg, physicians, nurses, pharmacists), (2) allied health professionals (eg, dieticians, psychologists, social workers, physiotherapists, medical assistants, occupational therapists, and exercise physiologists), (3) other health professionals (eg, health educators, medical or allied health students), (4) professional coaches (eg, health, wellness, life), (5) various providers noted in same article but not quantified (eg, used two or more coaches from two or more professional backgrounds), and (6) no information provided. Fourteen articles discussed peer coaching, although 11 of them were excluded because they covered only peer coaching rather than also including coaching provided by professionals.
Ruth Q. Wolever, Duke Integrative Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Leigh Ann Simmons, Duke Integrative Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina and Duke School of Nursing, Durham, United States.
Gary A. Sforzo, Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, School of Health Science and Human Performance, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Diana Dill, Working Together For Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Miranda Kaye, Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, School of Health Science and Human Performance, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Elizabeth M. Bechard, Duke Integrative Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Mary Elaine Southard, Integrative Health Consulting and Coaching, LLC, Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States.
Mary Kennedy, Institute of Lifestyle Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Justine Vosloo, Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, School of Health Science and Human Performance, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Nancy Yang, Duke School of Nursing, Durham, United States.
Elektrostal Localisation : Country Russia , Oblast Moscow Oblast . Available Information : Geographical coordinates , Population, Altitude, Area, Weather and Hotel . Nearby cities and villages : Noginsk , Pavlovsky Posad and Staraya Kupavna .
Find all the information of Elektrostal or click on the section of your choice in the left menu.
Country | |
---|---|
Oblast |
Information on the people and the population of Elektrostal.
Elektrostal Population | 157,409 inhabitants |
---|---|
Elektrostal Population Density | 3,179.3 /km² (8,234.4 /sq mi) |
Geographic Information regarding City of Elektrostal .
Elektrostal Geographical coordinates | Latitude: , Longitude: 55° 48′ 0″ North, 38° 27′ 0″ East |
---|---|
Elektrostal Area | 4,951 hectares 49.51 km² (19.12 sq mi) |
Elektrostal Altitude | 164 m (538 ft) |
Elektrostal Climate | Humid continental climate (Köppen climate classification: Dfb) |
Distance (in kilometers) between Elektrostal and the biggest cities of Russia.
Locate simply the city of Elektrostal through the card, map and satellite image of the city.
Weather forecast for the next coming days and current time of Elektrostal.
Find below the times of sunrise and sunset calculated 7 days to Elektrostal.
Day | Sunrise and sunset | Twilight | Nautical twilight | Astronomical twilight |
---|---|---|---|---|
8 June | 02:43 - 11:25 - 20:07 | 01:43 - 21:07 | 01:00 - 01:00 | 01:00 - 01:00 |
9 June | 02:42 - 11:25 - 20:08 | 01:42 - 21:08 | 01:00 - 01:00 | 01:00 - 01:00 |
10 June | 02:42 - 11:25 - 20:09 | 01:41 - 21:09 | 01:00 - 01:00 | 01:00 - 01:00 |
11 June | 02:41 - 11:25 - 20:10 | 01:41 - 21:10 | 01:00 - 01:00 | 01:00 - 01:00 |
12 June | 02:41 - 11:26 - 20:11 | 01:40 - 21:11 | 01:00 - 01:00 | 01:00 - 01:00 |
13 June | 02:40 - 11:26 - 20:11 | 01:40 - 21:12 | 01:00 - 01:00 | 01:00 - 01:00 |
14 June | 02:40 - 11:26 - 20:12 | 01:39 - 21:13 | 01:00 - 01:00 | 01:00 - 01:00 |
Our team has selected for you a list of hotel in Elektrostal classified by value for money. Book your hotel room at the best price.
Located next to Noginskoye Highway in Electrostal, Apelsin Hotel offers comfortable rooms with free Wi-Fi. Free parking is available. The elegant rooms are air conditioned and feature a flat-screen satellite TV and fridge... | from | |
Located in the green area Yamskiye Woods, 5 km from Elektrostal city centre, this hotel features a sauna and a restaurant. It offers rooms with a kitchen... | from | |
Ekotel Bogorodsk Hotel is located in a picturesque park near Chernogolovsky Pond. It features an indoor swimming pool and a wellness centre. Free Wi-Fi and private parking are provided... | from | |
Surrounded by 420,000 m² of parkland and overlooking Kovershi Lake, this hotel outside Moscow offers spa and fitness facilities, and a private beach area with volleyball court and loungers... | from | |
Surrounded by green parklands, this hotel in the Moscow region features 2 restaurants, a bowling alley with bar, and several spa and fitness facilities. Moscow Ring Road is 17 km away... | from | |
Below is a list of activities and point of interest in Elektrostal and its surroundings.
Direct link | |
---|---|
DB-City.com | Elektrostal /5 (2021-10-07 13:22:50) |
COMMENTS
2. Definitions of Physical Activity, Exercise, Training, Sport, and Health. Definitions and terms are based on "Physical activity in the prevention and treatment of disease" (FYSS, www.fyss.se [Swedish] []), World Health Organization (WHO) [] and the US Department of Human Services [].The definition of physical activity in FYSS is: "Physical activity is defined purely physiologically, as ...
Abstract. Purpose of review: The health benefits of physical activity and exercise are clear; virtually everyone can benefit from becoming more physically active. Most international guidelines recommend a goal of 150 min/week of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity. Many agencies have translated these recommendations to indicate ...
Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely absence of disease [ 1 ]. Fitness is an ability to execute daily functional activities with optimal performance, endurance, and strength to manage minimalist of disease, fatigue, stress and reduced sedentary behavior [ 2 ]. In the modern era with advancement in ...
A review of SRs of Tai Chi studies found fair evidence for increased well-being as a result of participation in Tai Chi but not excellent or good evidence as found for other health outcomes . A review of reviews found that walking programs improved psychological well-being and subjective well-being, although findings varied in effectiveness and ...
changes take place or have already taken place, such as menopause and andropause, which involve. diverse psychological impacts and, frequently, physiological changes. A loss of bone mass, for ...
Level of physical activity. Recommendations regarding the level of PA required for physical health benefits and the prevention of chronic disease, across the lifespan, are well established (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Citation 2018).It is recommended that children and adolescents aged 6-17 years engage in PA of moderate to vigorous intensity for a minimum of 60 min per day.
Background Sedentary lifestyle is a major risk factor for noncommunicable diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer and diabetes. It has been estimated that approximately 3.2 million deaths each year are attributable to insufficient levels of physical activity. We evaluated the available evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) on the effectiveness of exercise/physical activity ...
Background: The purpose was to: 1) perform a systematic review of studies examining the relation between physical activity, fitness, and health in school-aged children and youth, and 2) make recommendations based on the findings. Methods: The systematic review was limited to 7 health indicators: high blood cholesterol, high blood pressure, the metabolic syndrome, obesity, low bone density ...
The links between increased participation in Physical Activity (PA) and improvements in health are well established. As this body of evidence has grown, so too has the search for measures of PA with high levels of methodological effectiveness (i.e. validity, reliability and responsiveness to change). The aim of this "review of reviews" was to provide a comprehensive overview of the ...
Muscle fitness is widely recognized as a key fitness component for maintaining overall health and is negatively correlated with obesity 66.In this review, five studies confirmed the effects of ...
1. Our review found that the term "fitness professional" is being used inconsistently to refer to a broad range of occupational roles. For example, these include the related roles of "personal trainer," "fitness instructor," "exercise referral specialist," and many more.
Physical activity reduces cardiovascular risk through lowering of blood pressure, improved glucose tolerance, reduced obesity, improvement in lipid profile, enhanced fibrinolysis, improved endothelial function and enhanced parasympathetic autonomic tone. Conclusion: Physical exercise has many health benefits and the evidence for this continues ...
Find methods information, sources, references or conduct a literature review on PHYSICAL FITNESS Science topics: Medicine Public Health Health Education and Promotion Health Education Physical Fitness
This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines (Liberati et al., 2009). We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Bibliography of Native North Americans, and the University of New Mexico's Native Health Databases using keywords and medical subject head-
In 2008 a second systematic review of literature examining the relation between physical activity and key fitness and health outcomes within school-aged children and youth was published. This systematic review was part of the "Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans" project that was undertaken by the Unites States Department of Health and ...
The literature review summary has 4 main sections. This Introduction provides background information about the rationale for focusing on older adults and the process for reviewing the literature and developing the conclusions. The Methods utilized by the Literature Review Team are detailed in the following section.
The purpose was to: 1) perform a systematic review of studies examining the relation between physical activity, fitness, and health in school-aged children and youth, and 2) make recommendations based on the findings. The systematic review was limited to 7 health indicators: high blood cholesterol, high blood pressure, the metabolic syndrome, obesity, low bone density, depression, and injuries.
health services, and more focus is needed on the positive contribution that exercise can exert on life and recovery from mental illness (Mason and Holt, 2012). This literature review will describe evidence-based research that explore the benefits of exercise on mental health. It will integrate evidence connected to the relationship between
A traditional literature review of the academic, policy, and gray literatures was conducted between October 2012 - October 2015. The purpose of this type of review is to analyze a large
40 Facts About Elektrostal. Elektrostal is a vibrant city located in the Moscow Oblast region of Russia. With a rich history, stunning architecture, and a thriving community, Elektrostal is a city that has much to offer. Whether you are a history buff, nature enthusiast, or simply curious about different cultures, Elektrostal is sure to ...
Elektrostal is a city in Moscow Oblast, Russia, located 58 kilometers east of Moscow. Elektrostal has about 158,000 residents. Mapcarta, the open map.
The Moscow oblast is the most highly developed and most populated region in Russia. There was a legend that Moscow was built upon seven hills, just like Rome, was exaggerated, and the truth is that there are a only few small hills in and around the city center. In the southwest corner of the city, there is an upland region, called the ...
The most recent prior review of the effectiveness of health coaching reviewed only 15 articles and concluded that the body of literature as a whole was inconclusive due to theoretical and methodological issues. 34 It will be of great interest to revisit the issue of whether health coaching will be consistently effective at promoting health ...
Elektrostal Geography. Geographic Information regarding City of Elektrostal. Elektrostal Geographical coordinates. Latitude: 55.8, Longitude: 38.45. 55° 48′ 0″ North, 38° 27′ 0″ East. Elektrostal Area. 4,951 hectares. 49.51 km² (19.12 sq mi) Elektrostal Altitude.