research in the international context

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, publishing research in the international context: an analysis of egyptian social sciences scholars’ academic writing behaviour.

The Electronic Library

ISSN : 0264-0473

Article publication date: 4 October 2018

Issue publication date: 5 November 2018

The purpose of this paper is to report the findings of a study to explore the Egyptian social science scholars’ academic writing behaviour in local and international context. Understanding the challenges that scholars in social science and humanities face while publishing in the international outlets would help to suggest strategies to improve academic writing in non-Arabic journals.

Design/methodology/approach

This study deployed mixed methods approach. The quantitative data were collected using an online questionnaire. Interviews were conducted with a group of scholars in the five faculties to elucidate the publishing behaviour of the sample.

The interviews and the questionnaire showed that social science scholars in Egypt prefer local publishing outlets. The number of scholars who publish internationally is very low compared to scholars who publish locally. Scholars who tried to publish internationally faced many challenges, such as language barriers, lack of academic writing skills and lack of appropriate training.

Research limitations/implications

This study was conducted in one university in Egypt. While the results can be generalised to Egyptian and Middle East universities, it cannot be generalised to non-Arab communities because of the differences in culture and education system.

Originality/value

This study provides insight on publishing practices in the international context among social science scholars in Egypt using a mixed methods approach. This helped to capture the scholarly publishing practices and the attitude toward international publishing and the main challenges that scholars face who attempt to publish in international outlets.

• Scholarly publishing
• International publishing
• Publishing in Egypt

Shehata, A.M.k. and Eldakar, M.A.M. (2018), "Publishing research in the international context: An analysis of Egyptian social sciences scholars’ academic writing behaviour", The Electronic Library , Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 910-924. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-01-2017-0005

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

SCIENCE & ENGINEERING INDICATORS

Research and development: u.s. trends and international comparisons.

• Report PDF (808 KB)
• Report - All Formats .ZIP (5.2 MB)
• Supplemental Materials - All Formats .ZIP (513 KB)
• MORE DOWNLOADS OPTIONS
• Share on X/Twitter
• Share on Facebook
• Share on LinkedIn
• Send as Email

Introduction

This report analyzes research and experimental development (R&D) trends in the United States and internationally. R&D refers to creative and systematic work aimed at increasing the stock of knowledge and is broken down into three categories: basic research, applied research, and experimental development (Moris and Pece 2022; OECD 2015). The Glossary section of this report summarizes key definitions.

R&D and other intangibles or intellectual property products (IPPs), such as software investment, contribute to innovation, output and productivity growth, competitiveness, and public policy goals across countries—from defense, cybersecurity, and information infrastructure to sustainable energy, environmental protection, and health (Baily, Bosworth, and Doshi 2020; CRS 2020a; NASEM 2020; Pece 2023b; OECD 2023d, 2023h). The COVID-19 pandemic impacted global science by highlighting the importance of resiliency and security in domestic and international global research networks (OECD 2022, 2023a, 2023b, 2023c, 2023d).

In the private sector, R&D is also a leading component of global value chains (GVCs) for industries at the forefront of advanced manufacturing, emerging and critical technologies, and high-technology services across the globe. International production arrangements and global R&D networks, built over the past decades (Kano, Tsang, and Yeung 2020; Papanastassiou, Pearce, and Zanfei 2020), have been challenged by pandemic-related and geopolitical factors that are impacting the organization of international R&D and economic activity and the role of critical or emerging technologies (IMF 2023; OECD 2023e).

This report is organized into four sections. The first covers U.S. R&D across the major performing and funding sectors, followed by a section on international comparisons. The last two sections focus on business R&D and federal R&D. The report also includes new information on semiconductor and other critical or emerging technologies R&D that feeds into business high-technology supply chains and public policy goals (CRS 2022a, 2022b; USG 2023).

Related Science and Engineering Indicators 2024 reports include “ Academic Research and Development ” and the forthcoming “The STEM Labor Force: Scientists, Engineers, and Skilled Technical Workers.” Three other related reports focus on production supply chains and other post-R&D activities: “ Publications Output: U.S. Trends and International Comparisons ,” “ Invention, Knowledge Transfer, and Innovation ,” and “ Production and Trade of Knowledge- and Technology-Intensive Industries .”

The principal data sources of this report are surveys and the National Patterns of R&D Resources (henceforth, National Patterns) database (NCSES 2024) from the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES), National Science Foundation (NSF). The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Main Science and Technology Indicators (MSTI) database (OECD 2023c) is the source for international R&D statistics. All amounts are reported in U.S. current dollars unless otherwise noted. All years are calendar years unless otherwise noted.

Related Content

• Original article
• Open access
• Published: 05 July 2016

Corporate social responsibility research: the importance of context

• Carol A. Tilt 1  

International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility volume  1 , Article number:  2 ( 2016 ) Cite this article

105k Accesses

50 Citations

2 Altmetric

Metrics details

There has, in recent times, been an increasing interest in understanding corporate social (and environmental) responsibility (CSR) and, in particular, CSR reporting in developing countries. However, many of these studies fail to investigate fully the contextual factors that influence CSR and reporting in those countries, preferring to rely on theories and hypotheses developed from studies undertaken in the West, particularly the US, UK and Australasia.

It may be argued that this is appropriate as many emerging economies are experiencing growth and moving towards having a more market-based orientation. Notwithstanding this, a large number of these countries have an entirely different socio-political environment, with different political regimes, legal systems and cultural influences. These factors have a significant effect on the applicability of theories such as stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory and accountability theory, which are commonly used to explain the phenomenon of reporting.

In State Capitalist countries, such as China, an important influence on companies is the political ideology that underpins the nation’s government. The nature and impact of ideology and hegemony in China has been under-studied and, therefore, investigating how the ideology, and competing forces that may mitigate its influence, manifest themselves in Chinese reporting are essential. In the Middle East, countries such as Saudi Arabia have no free press, are ruled by a royal family, have a market dominated by the oil industry, and potential religious influences. Such socio-cultural differences mean societies develop different understandings of concepts such as sustainability and social responsibility. Finally, countries such as Sri Lanka have some similarities to other developing countries, but their economy is set against a background of a recent civil war – operating in a post-conflict economy is a factor rarely considered in social and environmental disclosure, yet has important influence on policy in these areas.

This paper discusses three contextual issues that warrant more and improved consideration in CSR research, with particular emphasis on CSR reporting research.

More and more corporations worldwide are involved in corporate social responsibility activities, and as a result are providing more social and environmental information to the public. Following from this, CSR disclosure, or reporting, has become one of the major fields of investigation by accounting scholars (Deegan 2009 ; Mathews 1997 ; Tilt 2001 ). Research that considers both CSR activity and CSR reporting has traditionally focused on companies in more developed economies, predominantly the US, UK, Australia and New Zealand (Burritt and Schaltegger 2010 ; Frost et al. 2005 ; Gray 2006 ; Gurvitsh and Sidorova 2012 ; Othman and Ameer 2009 ; Patten 2002 ; Sahay 2004 ), but recently there has been increasing interest in understanding the phenomenon in developing countries particularly as they experience growth and move towards a more capitalist orientation (Sumiani et al. 2007 ). Of the research that does exist, a number of papers suggest that ‘country’ is a determinant for CSR involvement and for the level of disclosure, but do not go much further.

Many of the studies of developing countries however, choose a framework for their investigation based on those shown to be meaningful for explaining disclosure in developed, capitalist economies. That is, they fail to investigate fully the contextual factors that influence firms and their reporting in those countries that have a different social, political, legal and/or cultural context.

It may be argued that this is appropriate as many emerging economies are experiencing growth and moving towards having a more market-based orientation. However, this is rarely acknowledged or questioned in these papers. Yet, it is reasonable to suggest that these factors have a significant effect on the applicability of theories such as stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory and accountability theory, which are commonly used to explain the phenomenon of reporting.

The majority of the world’s population lives in developing countries and each country experiences its own unique social, political and environmental issues (United Nations 2013 ). These countries are in the process of industrialisation and are often characterised by unstable governments, higher levels of unemployment, limited technological capacity, unequal distribution of income, unreliable water supplies and underutilised factors of production. As a result of rapid industrial development, policies are pursued that aim to attract greater foreign investment, and the investors are often keen to start benefitting from fiscal incentives and cheap labour. While these strategies make economic sense, they have adverse social and environmental effects, including the use of child labour, low or unpaid wages, unequal career opportunities, occupational health and safety concerns, and increased pollution.

In a review of the literature on determinants of CSR reporting (Morhardt 2010 ), reports that research on the impact of different variables in different regions is inconclusive due to the lack of enough studies. Factors that may influence CSR disclosure practices fall broadly into internal and external (Fifka 2013 ; Morhardt 2010 ), but are commonly classified further as (Adams 2002 : p224):

Corporate characteristics, such as size, industry group, financial/economic performance and share trading volume, price and risk;

General contextual factors, such as country of origin, time, specific events, media pressure, stakeholders and social, political, cultural and economic context; and

Internal contextual factors, including different aspects of corporate governance.

While CSR reporting has been studied by a large number of scholars, only a few fall into the second of the categories above, and consider context in detail. This is particularly relevant when considering developing countries. A few papers have specifically reviewed studies on developing countries. For example, (Belal and Momin 2009 ) categorise the work on developing countries into three groups: studies of the volume or extent of reporting; studies of the perceptions of CSR reporting by managers; and studies of the perception of CSR reporting by stakeholders. In all the studies reviewed there is little discussion of the context, other than a description of the country, and no real thought about the theoretical assumptions being made.

This paper presents a discussion of the different contextual issues or factors that show some evidence or potential to influence CSR and reporting in developing countries. It focusses on three specific issues and provides a research agenda for future consideration of the influence of context in CSR reporting research. The paper is structured as follows. The next section introduces some broad contextual factors that warrant consideration in the literature on CSR reporting. Next, three specific contextual issues are examined: the role of political ideology and hegemony; the influence of cultural understandings; and the impact of historical economic context. Finally, by way of conclusion, some recommended areas for further research are suggested.

Contextual considerations

Adams ( 2002 ) talks about the social, political, cultural and economic context, so some consideration of what this might mean is needed as each of these concepts themselves cover a variety of aspects, and indeed overlap. While papers may talk about the ‘social context’ in which the companies being examined operate, this is not well defined and little consideration is given to what this means. Some things that could be more explicitly considered include, inter alia : the role of the press; the status of women; the legal/justice system; the level of corruption; the level of government control, cultural understandings; and so on. This paper chooses to highlight three of these areas, and these are discussed briefly below in broad terms, followed by a discussion of some specific aspects of each identified as providing fertile grounds for future research.

Political system

Assumptions are often made about capitalist systems, whether explicit or implicit, as the vast majority of work on CSR reporting has been done in the Western context. However, there is little research looking at CSR reporting in socialist or communist countries. Some work has been undertaken on China (Dong et al. 2014 ; Gao 2011 ; Situ and Tilt 2012 ), but this work often applies the same conceptual frameworks as Western studies. What about the influence of ideology, and hegemony?

Sociocultural environment

Human beings have “distinctive cultural (learned) characteristics, histories and responses to their environment” and the term ‘sociocultural’ is commonly used in anthropological research to describe these and the “interactions and processes” that this involves (Garbarino 1983 : p1). Some general studies of culture and CSR using Hofstede exist (Silvia and Belen 2013 ), but an in-depth analysis of different understandings and conceptions of terms such as CSR as a result of sociocultural influences is lacking. The work that does examine specific factors often suggests that the Western concept of CSR does not fit these contexts (Wang and Juslin 2009 ).

The majority of work that considers sociocultural factors has looked mainly at religious aspects of CSR, most commonly by reviewing reporting by Islamic organisation, such as Islamic banks (Maali et al. 2006 ; Siwar and Hossain 2009 ; Sudarma et al. 2010 ). The teachings of many religions focus on social responsibility, the relationship with the natural environment, treatment of others, fairness, justice, etc., so there is a natural expectation that religion-based organisations may be more likely to engage in CSR and CSR reporting. A more nuanced consideration of how this manifests itself in different societies would improve understanding of the drivers and motivations of these activities. Similarly, other sociocultural factors, such as national identity, values, social organisation and language, could be incorporated.

Stage of development

The emerging literature on CSR reporting outside the Western world examines countries that are ‘developing’ (Belal and Momin 2009 ; Momin and Parker 2013 ), but little depth is included about where they are in their development journey and how the potential conflict between economic and social goals impacts CSR or CSR reporting. Rostow’s ( 1962 ) Stages of Economic Growth model suggests there are five stages (traditional society, preconditions for take-off, take-off, drive to maturity, and age of high or mass consumption), yet most literature on CSR classifies countries only into developed or developing. The ‘developing’ classification potentially includes countries that are in Rostow’s first, second or third stage which may have an impact on their response to CSR issues. In addition to economic variables however, the United Nations also produces a Human Development Index (HDI) which considers life expectancy, education and income to measure how social, as well as economic, development (UNDP 2015 ). Both these concepts are important for consideration of CSR.

Importantly, consideration of just one or two aspects of these three broader contextual issues may result in misinterpretation of the results. Often these things interact, for example, social issues often cross over with cultural and religious impacts, or even with political influence where the regime is more hegemonic. It is thus important to consider, or at least acknowledge, the holistic nature of the context of the phenomenon being examined.

It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss all of the issues raised here although this would be an important part of a larger research program. Therefore, three particular contextual issues, and three specific contexts, are the focus of this paper: the role of political ideology and hegemony (China); the influence of cultural understandings (Middle East); and the impact of historical economic context (Sri Lanka).

Politics, ideology and state control

Ideology is a set of common beliefs that are shared by a group of people, and is “the fundamental social beliefs that organize and control the social representations of groups and their members” (Van Dijk 2009 : p78). Countries such as China provide a fertile research setting to examine the influence of ideology, and hegemonic approaches of influencing CSR, which have been missing from most CSR research in the region.

The Chinese political model has some unique characteristics. Among these is the dominance of ‘the party state’, which exercises control in different forms over most aspects of the economy that is unmatched when compared to other state capitalist economies. Political leaders use a variety of tools (Bremmer 2010 ) and it is the combination of three particular tools that sets apart the Chinese system: the exercise of control as a dominant shareholder, the ability to appoint key positions in major firms, and the means to influence decision-making via ideology. First, the party exerts shareholder power over state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Chinese SOEs play an instrumental role in society (Du and Wang 2013 ) and make up around 80 % of the stock market (Economist T 2012 ). As protecting the environment is a major part of the guiding ideology and the nation’s policy, SOEs are likely to be keen to provide CER. Second, the party exercises power over the appointment of the senior leadership in SOEs (Landry 2008 ). This has resulted in control as they are “cadres first and company men second. They care more about pleasing their party bosses than about the global market” (Economist T 2012 : p6). Third, party control is exercised through ideology. The party has cells in most larger firms, whether private or state-owned, which influence business decisions made at board meetings. Given that China considers the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist ideology as crucial this distinguishes it most significantly from other varieties of state capitalism that have a more liberal-democratic flavour.

There is some evidence that the first form of party control has been declining in recent times with the number of SOEs under the SASAC’s control halving over the last decade (Mattlin 2009 ). Similarly, since 1999, the share of SOEs in the economy has declined from 37 % to less than 5 %. This results in greater use of regulation and ideological hegemony to achieve its aims, yet most CSR research still uses state-ownership as a proxy for all types of state control.

Even after economic reform, ideology in China was still pervasive (Lieber 2013 ). Lieber ( 2013 ) argues that ideology is widely used to signal loyalty and the government is good at using ideology to “control and direct key vocabularies… (and) vague ideological language can create a climate of uncertainty thus increasing the range of a control regime” (Lieber 2013 : p346). However, the prevailing ideological themes in China are dynamic. In particular, most recently, new ideological themes have developed to respond to the changes in society. When economic reform began, “building up a socialist market economy with specific Chinese characteristics” was the guiding ideology (Zhang 2012 : p25). As such, economic growth was the country’s priority, but in 2005, “building up a harmonious society became the prevailing ideology” (and CSR is a key element of this resolution).

Ideology is used by the Chinese government to exert control over businesses. Traditionally, the government has “been considered a source of moral authority, official legitimacy and political stability…and …political language has been vested with an intrinsic instrumental value: its control represents the most suitable and effective way first to codify, and then widely convey, the orthodox state ideology” (Marinellin 2012 : p26). The language “developed and used by party officials … consists of ‘correct’ formulation, aims to teach the ‘enlarged masses’ how to speak and, how to think” (Marinellin 2012 : p26). The idea of the importance of a ‘Harmonious Society’ is the “re-contextualized discourse in response to the emergent issues in the changing social stratification order” (Zhang 2012 : p33). As a result, Chinese companies have been noticeably adopting the language of social concern and environmental protection.

It may therefore be suggested that CSR reporting in China is directly a response to the government’s ideological hegemony. However, the story is not as straightforward as it may first appear, for two reasons. First, despite a great deal of commitment to social and environmental regulation in China, implementation of these regulations has been limited. Second, as China enters a phase of continued economic development, Western influences may begin to have a moderating effect on the strength of the ideology.

The Chinese economy has grown rapidly in terms of gross domestic product (GDP) (World Bank 2016 ). The economic reforms that took place over the past decades were motivated substantially by the Chinese central government, and recent scholars have noted the positive role that ideology played in driving those reforms, notwithstanding that economists historically view ideology as “distorting… knowledge, judgment and decision making” (Lieber 2013 : p344).

With economic reform however, has come substantial environmental degradation which in turn has led to poor health outcomes for much of society generally. This led to a high level of commitment to environmental regulation in particular from as early as the 1990, followed by the release of even more rigorous regulations on environmental protection in the 2000s. However, despite the high commitment made by the Chinese central government, implementation of these policies is quite poor (Bina 2010 ). In terms of environmental regulation, for example, the implementation problems stem from a number of areas, including: the position of environmental protection agencies in the political framework; conflict between central and local governments; and supervision issues. The system of supervision of local environmental departments is a key problem (Bina 2010 ). When an environmental department is set up in the central government, corresponding environmental departments are set up in local governments. Ideally, these local departments should be agencies of the central department, deliver the central environmental department’s strategies, and supervise local environmental protection implementation. In reality, the local environmental departments are subservient to the local rather than central governments. All their financial support and staff appointments come from local governments. Therefore, rather than supervising local environmental protection implementation, the local environmental departments become “rubber stamps” for local governments (Zheng 2010 ). Therefore, it is unlikely that there will be efficient enforcement of environmental laws, regulations and policies at the local level (Bina 2010 ; Zheng 2010 ).

Finally, as China heads towards a market economy, government intervention becomes a policy choice, and markets function as a tool of national interest (Zhao 2011 ). However, as Chinese firms become more involved with foreign trading partners and markets, their reporting activity is also influenced by foreign and global organisations, leading to potential tension between demonstrating commitment to state ideological goals and meeting the requirements of global stakeholders.

Given the complexity of the context, research into CSR reporting in China needs to take into account the specific aspects of Chinese politics and culture in order to provide a nuanced understanding, and ultimately an improvement, of CSR reporting activities. However, a review done of the literature on CSR in by Chinese showed that it is very descriptive with little depth and much of the CSR literature is conceptual, descriptive, or argumentative in nature (Guan and Noronha 2013 ). The authors noted proper research methodologies are not systematically applied in some studies, and supporting theories are lacking. In the non-Chinese studies on China, there is also a predominance of papers on determinants and volume of reporting (Situ and Tilt 2012 ), with very few considering broader contextual factors, other than a few that look at specific cultural attributes (e.g., Rowe & Guthrie 2009 ).

Sociocultural understandings

Notwithstanding a move towards a market orientation of many developing countries, such as in China as outlined above, conceptions of CSR by management of companies in these countries may be quite different to those in the West (Wang and Juslin 2009 ). These differing conceptions may be a result of differing values and attitudes, language, religion or identity. Even specific elements of CSR are conceived of differently, for example in China, the main understanding of sustainability is in terms of environmental protection (Situ et al. 2013 , 2015 ). These socioculturally derived understandings are inevitably reflected in their reporting.

In another example, in the Middle East, the predominant perception of CSR is that it simply means philanthropic donations. In this region, the issue of social responsibility is relatively new, and as such the number of studies of CSR and CSR reporting in the Gulf region is growing (Al-Khatar and Naser 2003 ; AlNaimi et al. 2012 ; Emtairah et al. 2009 ; Mandurah et al. 2012 ; Marios and Tor 2007 ; Minnee et al. 2013 ; Nalband and Al-Amri 2013 ; Naser et al. 2006 ; Naser and Hassan 2013 ; Qasim et al. 2011 ; Sangeetha and Pria 2012 ). Many of these studies do not consider the cultural context to a very great extent as the research is emerging and focusses on perceptions. For example, Mandurah et al. ( 2012 ) and Emtairah et al. ( 2009 ) explored managerial perceptions of the concept of CSR in Saudi Arabia and found that managers are aware of the concept, but there is little connection between the managerial level perceptions and firms’ workforce. The authors describe CSR as being in its infancy phase, which limits the understanding of the concept to the view that CSR simply means being philanthropic. This indicates a different, and perhaps less developed, understanding of the concept in the region compared with the West, but the reasons for this, and the consequences for CSR reporting, are under-explored. Some authors suggest the narrow use of the term is because of the religious obligations towards society, (Visser 2008 ). There is only minimal evidence of any CSR practices other than philanthropy-based or any strategic approaches to CSR for long-term benefits (Visser 2008 ), but the trend is increasing and the forms that philanthropy takes is expanding.

It has also been argued that politics plays a significant role in increasing the awareness of CSR in the Arab world. Avina ( 2013 ) suggests that the perception of CSR in the Middle East changed after the Arab spring event, for both local and international firms. The term CSR more than a decade ago had little meaning to the public (Visser 2008 ) but since the Arab spring, the sense of social responsibility among civil society and the corporate sector has increased Avina 2013 ). Firms realised that they play a role in social responsibility, not just governments, and recognised that CSR should go beyond just donations to charitable causes (Avina 2013 ). Ronnegard ( 2013 ), however, predicts that CSR in the Middle East will not mimic the Western concept because of the strong influence of culture and religion in the region. Moreover, the influence of stakeholders in the Middle East is considered to be limited due to there being a lack of free press, few lobby groups and the different cultural attributes of employees and consumers. Some studies in Gulf countries have however, suggested that stakeholders, such as government and charitable organisations, may have an impact on firms’ behaviour (Emtairah et al. 2009 ; Naser et al. 2006 ). Others suggest that CSR may have developed as a concept due to the increase of foreign direct investment into Arab countries, the trend of shifting family and government owned firms into the public domain, and the globalisation of the region’s large national firms.

From the limited studies that have been undertaken, there is evidence of CSR reporting by Gulf country companies, with human resources and community involvement being the dominant themes in may reports Abu-Baker and Naser 2000 ). Thus, understanding of motivations for CSR reporting is not yet well developed and few existing studies consider the different level of stakeholder pressure in the region. This suggests that more research is needed on the formation of notions of CSR within specific contexts. This region is of particular interest because, according to the Human Development Report (HDI 2013 ), countries in the region are classified as high, or very high, in human development. That is, they are not only trying to develop and improve their economy, but are also trying to improve the quality of life of their citizens (Ramady 2010 ). The overall outlook of these countries indicates that they are performing well, however, Fadaak ( 2010 ) notes that identifying poverty lines is a challenge because of a lack of a clear definition of poverty in the region. There are no official reports considering poverty or other social problems and no GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) countries were found in the list of the World Bank Database in relation to the poverty rate.

Similarly, in other developing countries the importance of local economic, cultural, and religious factors that shape the business environment, and understandings of charity and philanthropy, need to be taken into account. Empirical work in this area is lacking (Lund-Thomsen et al. 2016 ). In Sri Lanka, for example, “the most common arguments used to ‘sell’ the business case for CSR and CP [Corporate Philanthropy], for example an improved brand image, increased market or customer share, employee retention, mitigated regulatory risks, and reduced tax burden, are considered mostly irrelevant” (Global Insights 2013 : p1). Business leaders engage in CSR for a range of business, humanitarian, social, religious, and political reasons. Key amongst them is a belief that ‘giving back’ to society discharges religious obligations to the poor, and an awareness that being seen to contribute to national development goals is important (Global Insights 2013 ). Hence, the conception of CSR in this region is culturally determined, but also shaped by the economic environment.

• Economic development

As well as government control, culture and political factors, the stage of economic development a country is in is also an important contextual factor that may impact CSR reporting. In China, as discussed above, the drive for economic reform led directly to environmental impacts which needed to be addressed. A number of other developing countries have been examined for their reporting on CSR issues, particularly from the Asian region (Andrew et al. 1989 ; Elijido-Ten et al. 2010 ), India (Mishra and Suar 2010 ; Raman 2006 ; Sahay 2004 ), and Bangladesh (Belal and Owen 2007 ; Belal and Roberts 2010 ; Khan 2010 ; Muttakin et al. 2015 ).

While these countries are classified as developing (IMF 2015 ), Bangladesh and India score only medium for human development. Another country in the region, Sri Lanka, has a high rating on the HDI, and has been exhibiting extensive growth since the end of a 30-year war (WPR 2015 ). Thus, exhibiting both economic and social growth aspects makes it an interesting case for studying CSR.

Sri Lanka has a population of over 20 million and foreign companies have increased their investments with one billion US dollars in direct foreign investments in 2013 alone ( BOI ). Classified as a middle income developing country, the challenge for Sri Lanka is to achieve high economic growth without causing irreversible damage to the environment and while continuing to eliminating social issues such as poverty, malnutrition and poor workplace ethics (Goger 2013 ). In addition, Sri Lanka also has a long history of corporate philanthropy, largely led by individuals whose values and actions stem from religious and cultural views (Beddewela and Herzig 2013 ) but has recently seen an increase in private firms offering development-related initiatives. Public infrastructure projects have been the main element of post-war economic planning, but there still remains rural poverty in the country. Thus, the primary motivation for CSR and philanthropy in Sri Lanka is poverty reduction, particularly for children and youth, social welfare organisations like orphanages and elderly homes, hospitals and health services, and veterans’ charities (Global Insights 2013 ). Thus, the economic, cultural, and political context means that these poverty rates have fallen (data indicates that the rate went from approximately 20 % in 2000 to under 9 % in 2013) and that inflation has slowed (Wijesinha 2014 ), so opportunities for private businesses to contribute to infrastructure abound. However, these private, development-orientated, CSR initiatives have often failed to deliver their aims and there is considered to be a danger that they may in fact perpetuate the causes of poverty and ethnic and religious conflict given their ties to particular ethnic groups (Global Insights 2013 ).

Notwithstanding this environment, the topic of CSR reporting in Sri Lanka has received relatively little research attention compared to other parts of the world (see Belal and Momin 2009 , for a review). In terms of motivations for CSR, there is some evidence that firms in which senior management have a positive outlook towards social and environmental practices tend to disclose more on these aspects, as compared to other firms (Fernando and Pandey 2012 ). However, reporting on CSR initiatives is not mandatory thus it is likely that any voluntary reporting by Sri Lankan firms will vary significantly. One study of reporting was conducted by Senaratne and Liyanagedara ( 2012 ) who examined the level of compliance with Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines in the disclosures of publicly listed companies, selected from seven business sectors. The authors conclude that the level of compliance with the GRI is low and that disclosures vary significantly amongst the companies, potentially reflecting varying commitment to CSR. Similarly, a longitudinal study across five years (2005–2010) was carried out by Wijesinghe ( 2012 ) to identify trends in CSR reporting in Sri Lanka and the study identified an increasingly positive trend, predicting similar levels of disclosures provided by companies in developed countries. The few studies that have been conducted examining the predominance of reporting in Sri Lanka, mostly examining multinational companies, conclude that CSR reporting is gaining momentum in Sri Lanka but is still emerging as the concept of CSR itself emerges (Beddewela and Herzig 2012 ; Hunter and Van Wassenhove 2011 ).

Conclusion and a future research agenda

As more and more research on CSR in developing countries emerges in the academic literature, it is important to ensure that appropriate consideration is given to the context in which the research takes place. Examination of CSR and CSR reporting practices without contextualisation could perpetuate flawed understandings that are based on evidence from research in the developed world. Different political, social, cultural and economic environments impact on the both the development of, and reporting of, CSR activities and consequently impact on the value of these activities to benefit society and the natural environment.

A suggested agenda for future research, that considers context in more depth, includes:

Consideration of ideological and hegemonic regimes and their attitude towards CSR. This research would consider potential positive and negative impacts of the political and governance system. In China, for example, the potential for Communist Party ideology to increase environmental protection and improve social conditions is vast, and is starting to be seen to have a strong impact on firm behaviour. Examination of this over time will provide an important contribution to understanding the role of government beyond the more common analysis of environmental protection regulation.

Greater examination of sociocultural variables in different countries, beyond analysis of religious influence, and beyond the use of Hofstede. Understandings of concepts such as CSR in countries in Asia, the Middle East and the Asian sub-continent, are known to differ from those in the West, so understanding their potential to lead to better (worse) CSR outcomes is important. The variety of variables that could be included is vast, but some clearly important issues include: language, secularism, freedom of the press, access to information, homogeneity of values and attitudes, and the existence of a national figurehead or identity.

Longitudinal examination of the process of economic development. Countries where the economy is developing rapidly, such as China and the Middle East; and countries where the historical economic context differs dramatically, such as in Sri Lanka where the need for development is borne out of conflict, provide rich backgrounds to consider how CSR is developing alongside economic developments.

A comprehensive framework for examining these, and other, potential factors that influence CSR and CSR reporting in developing countries does not exist, but Table  1 attempts to provide a preliminary outline of some factors that could comprise such a framework, and be used to guide future research. As mentioned earlier, it is important to note, however, that these variables are not discreet and are likely to interact with each other. This is noted in the table as a reminder that the classifications are somewhat artificial and that acknowledgement of a more holistic consideration is important.

These are clearly only a selection of opportunities for CSR research on developing nations and emerging economies. Calls for more work on these factors have continued since Adams’ ( 2002 ) original call, but there is still vast scope to improve our understanding of CSR practice throughout the world (Fifka 2013 ), where much of the social and environmental damage is taking place.

Importantly, research of this kind must be transdisciplinary as perspectives from areas such as political science, philosophy and economics are essential. Only with in-depth, contextualised understandings can improvements to the nature of CSR activity be implemented.

Abu-Baker, N., & Naser, K. (2000). Empirical evidence on corporate social disclosure (CSD) practices in Jordan. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 10 (3/4), 18–34.

Article   Google Scholar  

Adams, C. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: beyond current theorising. Accounting Auditing Account Journal, 15 (2), 223–50.

Al-Khatar, K., & Naser, K. (2003). User’s perceptions of corporate social responsibility and accountability: evidence from an emerging economy. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18 (6/7), 538–48.

AlNaimi, H. A., Mohammed, H., & Momin, M. A. (2012). Corporate social responsibility reporting in Qatar: a descriptive analysis. Social Responsibility Journal, 8 (4), 511–26.

Andrew, B. H., Gul, F. A., Guthrie, J., & Teoh, H. Y. (1989). A note of corporate social disclosure practices in developing countries: the case of Malaysia and Singapore. The British Accounting Review, 21 (01), 371–76.

Avina, J. (2013). The evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the Arab Spring. The Middle East Journal, 67 (1), 77–92.

Beddewela, E., Herzig, C. (2012). Corporate social reporting by mncs’ subsidiaries in Sri Lanka. Paper presented at Accounting Forum.

Beddewela, E., & Herzig, C. (2013). Corporate social reporting by MNCs’ subsidiaries in Sri Lanka. Accounting Forum, 37 (2), 135–49.

Belal, A., & Momin, M. (2009). Corporate social reporting in emerging economies: a review and future direction. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, 9 , 119–45.

Google Scholar  

Belal, A. R., & Owen, D. L. (2007). The views of corporate managers on the current state of, and future prospects for, social reporting in Bangladesh: an engagement-based study. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20 (3), 472–94.

Belal, A. R., & Roberts, R. W. (2010). ‘Stakeholders’ perceptions of corporate social reporting in Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics, 97 (2), 311–11-24.

Bina, O. (2010). Environmental governance in China: weakness and potential from an environmental policy integration perspective*. The China Review, 10 (1), 207–40.

BOI. Why Sri Lanka Now?. http://www.investsrilanka.com/ : Board of investment of Sri Lanka. nd. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.

Bremmer, I. (2010). The end of the free market: who wins the war between states and corporations. European View, 9 (2), 249–52.

Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23 (7), 829–46.

Deegan, C. (2009). Extended systems of accounting - the incorporation of social and environmental factors within external reporting. In Financial accounting theory (pp. 378–425). Sydney: McGraw-Hill.

Dong, S., Burritt, R., & Qian, W. (2014). Salient stakeholders in corporate social responsibility reporting by Chinese mining and minerals companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84 , 59–69.

Du, J., Wang, Y. (2013). Reforming SOEs under China’s State Capitalism, Unfinished Reforms in the Chinese Economy . p. 1–38.

Economist, T. (2012). State capitalism , The economist . p. 1–14.

Elijido-Ten, E., Kloot, L., & Clarkson, P. (2010). Extending the application of stakeholder influence strategies to environmental disclosures: An exploratory study from a developing country. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23 (8), 1032–59.

Emtairah, T., Al-Ashaikh, A., & Al-Badr, A. (2009). Contexts and corporate social responsibility: the case of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 1 (4), 325–46.

Fadaak, T. (2010). Poverty in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: an exploratory study of poverty and female-headed households in Jeddah City. Social Policy and Administration, 44 (6), 689–707.

Fernando, A., & Pandey, I. (2012). Corporate social responsibility reporting: a survey of listed Sri Lankan companies. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 6 (2), 172–87.

Fifka, M. S. (2013). Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective – a review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22 (1), 1–35.

Frost, G., Jones, S., Loftus, J., & Van Der Laan, S. (2005). A survey of sustainability reporting practices of Australian reporting entities. Australian Accounting Review, 15 (1), 89–96.

Gao, Y. (2011). CSR in an emerging country: a content analysis of CSR reports of listed companies. Baltic Journal of Management, 6 (2), 263–91.

Garbarino, M. S. (1983). Sociocultural theory in anthropology. A short history . Long Grove: Waveland Press Inc.

Global Insights. Corporate responsibility, philanthropy and development, Policy Brief 08, 2016:13 January. 2013. [online at https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=corporate-responsibility-and-development-global-insights-08-web.pdf&site=11 ].

Goger, A. (2013). The making of a ‘business case’ for environmental upgrading: Sri Lanka’s eco-factories. Geoforum, 47 , 73–83.

Gray, R. (2006). Does sustainability reporting improve corporate behaviour?: Wrong question? Right time? Accounting and Business Research, 36 (sup1), 65–88.

Guan, J., & Noronha, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility reporting research in the Chinese academia: a critical review. Social Responsibility Journal, 9 (1), 35–55.

Gurvitsh, N., & Sidorova, I. (2012). Environmental and social accounting disclosures as a vital component of sustainability reporting integrated into annual reports of the Baltic companies for the Years 2007–2011: Based on companies listed on NASDAQ OMX Baltic Main List as of June 2012. GSTF Business Review (GBR), 2 (1), 38–44.

HDI. Human Development Report 2013. United Nations Development Programm; 2013. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2013_EN_complete.pdf

Hunter, M. L., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2011). Hayleys PLC: corporate responsibility as stakeholder relations. The Journal of Management Development, 30 (10), 968–84.

IMF. (2015). World economic outlook, April 2015 . Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

Khan, M. H. U. Z. (2010). The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: Empirical evidence from private commercial banks of Bangladesh. International Journal of Law and Management, 52 (2), 82–109.

Landry, P. F. (2008). Decentralized authoritarianism in China . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

Lieber, A. (2013). The Chinese ideology: reconciling the politics with the economics of contemporary reform. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 18 (4), 335–53.

Lund-Thomsen, P., Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. (2016). Industrial clusters and corporate social responsibility in developing countries: what we know, what we do not know, and what we need to know. Journal of Business Ethics, 133 (1), 9–24.

Maali, B., Casson, P., & Napier, C. (2006). Social reporting by islamic banks. Abacus, 42 (2), 266–89.

Mandurah, S., Khatib, J., & Al-Sabaan, S. (2012). Corporate social responsibility among Saudi Arabian Firms: an empirical investigation. Journal of Applied Business Research, 28 (5), 1049–57.

Marinellin, M. (2012). Disembodied Words: The Ritualistic quality of political discourse in the era of Jiang Zemin. In P. Chilton, H. Tian, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Discourse and Socio-political Transformations in Contemporary China . Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Marios, I. K., & Tor, B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: an exploratory study in the United Arab Emirates. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 72 (4), 9–20,2.

Mathews, M. R. (1997). Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research - Is there a silver jubilee to celebrate? Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 10 (4), 481–531.

Mattlin, M. (2009). Chinese Strategic state-owned enterprises and ownership control. BICCS Asia Paper, 4 (6), 1–28.

Minnee, F., Shanka, T., Taylor, R., & Handley, B. (2013). Exploring corporate responsibility in Oman – social expectations and practice. Social Responsibility Journal, 9 (2), 326–39.

Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2010). Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies? Journal of Business Ethics, 95 (4), 571–601.

Momin, M. A., & Parker, L. D. (2013). Motivations for corporate social responsibility reporting by MNC subsidiaries in an emerging country: The case of Bangladesh. The British Accounting Review, 45 (3), 215–28.

Morhardt, J. E. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the internet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19 , 436–52.

Muttakin, M. B., Khan, A., & Subramaniam, N. (2015). Firm characteristics, board diversity and corporate social responsibility: evidence from Bangladesh. Pacific Accounting Review, 27 (3), 353–72.

Nalband, N. A., & Al-Amri, M. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility–perception, practices and performance of listed companies of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Business Journal incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 23 (3), 5–5.

Naser, K., Al-Hussaini, A., Al-Kwari, D., & Nuseibeh, R. (2006). Determinants of corporate social disclosure in developing countries: the case of Qatar. Advances in International Accounting, 19 (6), 1–23.

Naser, K., & Hassan, Y. (2013). Determinants of corporate social responsibility reporting: evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business Research, 3 (2), 56–74.

Othman, R., & Ameer, R. (2009). Corporate social and environmental reporting: Where are we heading? A survey of the literature. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 6 (4), 298–320.

Patten, D. M. (2002). The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27 (8), 763–73.

Qasim, Z., Muralidharan, P., Ramaswamy, G. 2011. Corporate social responsibility and impact of CSR Practices in the United Arab Emirates. Paper presented at International Conference on Technology and Business Management March.

Ramady, M. A. (2010). The Saudi Arabian economy: policies, achievements and challenges . New York: Springer.

Raman, S. R. (2006). Corporate social reporting in India—a view from the top. Global Business Review, 7 (2), 313–24.

Ronnegard, D. (2013). CSR in Saudi Arabia: Far behind or another path? Fountainebleau: INSEAD.

Rostow, W. W. (1962). The stages of economic growth . London: Cambridge University Press.

Rowe, A. L., & Guthrie, J. (2009). 'Institutional Cultural Norms of Chinese Corporate Environmental Reporting.' Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Accounting Conference . Austria: University Innsbruck.

Sahay, A. (2004). Environmental reporting by Indian corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11 (1), 12–22.

Sangeetha, K., & Pria, S. (2012). Resources affecting banks’ CSR in sultanate of Oman: a stakeholders’ perspective. Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 17 (1), 31–40.

Senaratne, S., Liyanagedara, K. (2012). Corporate sustainability reporting in Sri Lanka . Paper presented at International Conference on Business Management.

Silvia, R., & Belen, F.-F. (2013). Effect of Hofstede’s cultural differences in corporate social responsibility disclosure. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change (IJISSC), 4 (1), 68–84.

Situ, H., & Tilt, C. A. (2012). Chinese government as a determinant of corporate environmental reporting: a study of large Chinese listed companies. Journal of the Asia Pacific Centre for Environmental Accountability, 18 (4), 251–86.

Situ, H., Tilt, C. A., Seet, P. S., & Max, S. (2013). Understanding the impact of Chinese government and other stakeholders on Corporate Environmental Reporting in China . Kobe, Japan: 7th Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference (APIRA). Available at: http://www.apira2013.org/proceedings/ .

Situ, H., Tilt, CA., Seet, PS. (2015). Corporate Environmental Reporting (CER) in China: A Stakeholder Perspective . Paper presented at Australasian Conference on Social and Environmental Accounting Research.

Siwar, C., & Hossain, M. (2009). An analysis of Islamic CSR concept and the opinions of Malaysian managers. Management of Environmental Quality, 20 (3), 290–98.

Sudarma, M., Triyuwono, I., Ludigdo, U., Meutia, I. (2010). Qualitative approach to build the concept of social responsibility disclosures based on Shari’ah Enterprise Theory.

Sumiani, Y., Haslinda, Y., & Lehman, G. (2007). Environmental reporting in a developing country: a case study on status and implementation in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15 (10), 895–901.

Tilt, C. A. (2001). The content and disclosure of Australian corporate environmental policies. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14 (2), 190–212.

UNDP. Human Development Report (DHR). 2015. [online at http://hdr.undp.org/en ]. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.

United Nations, D. o. E. a. S. A. Population Trends. 2013. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/theme/trends/index.shtml : United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Accessed 12 Feb 2016.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical Discourse Analysis: A Sociocognitive Approach. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed., pp. 62–86). Los Angeles: SAGE Publication Ltd.

Visser, W. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries . The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. p. 473–79

Wang, L., & Juslin, H. (2009). The impact of Chinese culture on corporate social responsibility: the harmony approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 88 , 433–51.

Wijesinghe, KN. (2012). Current context of disclosure of corporate social responsibility in Sri Lanka.

World Bank. Macroeconomics & Economic Growth in South Asia. nd. http://go.worldbank.org/6GS5XVH1O0 . Accessed 5 Feb 2016.

Wijesinha A. 'Can Sri Lanka build a prosperous post-war future?', 2014; [online at http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2014/06/10/can-sri-lanka-build-a-prosperous-post-warfuture/ ]. Accessed 12 Feb 2016.

WPR 2015. Sri Lanka Population 2015. http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/sri-lanka-population/ : World Population Review. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.

Zhang, Q. (2012). The discursive construction of the social stratification order in reforming China. In P. Chilton, H. Tian, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Discourse and socio-political transformations in Contemporary China (pp. 19–37). Amesterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Zhao J. Funding energy industry: International Finance Corporation invest in Chinese Green Energy (为能源业提供融资动力:国际金融公司投资中国绿色能源), China WTO Tribune. 2011. p. 10.

Zheng, Y. (2010). China model: experience and dilemma (中国模式:经验与困局) . Zhengzhou, China: Zhengzhou People Publishing House.

Download references

Acknowledgements

It is important to acknowledge that this paper provides an overview of a larger research program currently being undertaken by a team of doctoral students at Flinders University and the University of South Australia. Credit must be given to Ms Hui Situ (Flinders University) who is researching environmental reporting in China, Mr Abdullah Silawi (Flinders University) who is researching social responsibility reporting in the Gulf region, and Ms Dinithi Dissanayake (University of SA), who is researching environmental disclosure in Sri Lanka.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Commerce, University of South Australia Business School, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, South Australia

Carol A. Tilt

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol A. Tilt .

Additional information

Competing interests.

The author declares that she has no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Tilt, C.A. Corporate social responsibility research: the importance of context. Int J Corporate Soc Responsibility 1 , 2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0003-7

Download citation

Received : 14 March 2016

Accepted : 18 May 2016

Published : 05 July 2016

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0003-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Corporate social responsibility
• Corporate environmental reporting
• State capitalism
• Developing countries
• Middle East

International research collaboration in Africa: a bibliometric and thematic analysis

• Published: 25 March 2022
• Volume 127 , pages 2747–2772, ( 2022 )

Cite this article

• Elizabeth S. Vieira   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2240-110X 1 , 2  

940 Accesses

6 Citations

Explore all metrics

It is widely recognised that science in Africa will benefit from international research collaboration (IRC), and therefore studies have been done on IRC in Africa (hereafter: Africa-related IRC research). However, there is no information on the development of Africa-related IRC research, the geographical location of the scientists interested in the topic, the visibility of the literature and the themes researched. This information makes it possible to understand relevant aspects in the context of IRC in Africa, which are useful for identifying IRC strengths, weaknesses and opportunities. It also allows paving the way for future research on this topic. Using discipline–specific terms, bibliometric, and thematic analysis, I collected the literature on Africa-related IRC research indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS). The results showed that the number of publications on the topic has increased, few African countries have researched the topic, a third of the publications were written exclusively by African scientists, and the topic has high visibility. The panoply of publications revealed that patterns, driving factors, effects, networks, asymmetries, and policies concerning IRC were the main themes researched.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

https://worldreport.nih.gov/wrapp/#/search?searchId=606adb28b2c24a12eaba129d

Similar content being viewed by others

Challenges for African Scholars in the Globalization Era: Contexts Speak

The integration of African countries in international research networks

Africa: International Collaboration in African Research—Who Wins?

Achachi, H., Amor, Z., Dahel-Mekhancha, C. C., Cherraj, M., Bouabid, H., Selmanovic, S., & Lariviere, V. (2016). Factors affecting researchers’ collaborative patterns: A case study from Maghreb Universities. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Information Et De Bibliotheconomie, 40 (3), 234–253.

Google Scholar  

Adams, J., Gurney, K., Hook, D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). International collaboration clusters in Africa. Scientometrics, 98 (1), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1060-2

Article   Google Scholar  

Asubiaro, T. (2019). How collaboration type, publication place, funding and author’s role affect citations received by publications from Africa: A bibliometric study of LIS research from 1996 to 2015. Scientometrics, 120 (3), 1261–1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03157-1

Asubiaro, T. V., & Badmus, O. M. (2020a). Collaboration clusters, interdisciplinarity, scope and subject classification of library and information science research from Africa: An analysis of Web of Science publications from 1996 to 2015. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52 (4), 1169–1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000620907958

Asubiaro, T. V., & Badmus, O. M. (2020b). Collaboration clusters, interdisciplinarity, scope and subject classification of library and information science research from Africa: An analysis of Web of Science publications from 1996 to 2015. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science . https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000620907958

AUC. (2014). Science, technology and innovation strategy for Africa 2024 . Retrieved from https://au.int/sites/default/files/newsevents/workingdocuments/33178-wd-stisa-english_-_final.pdf

Azondekon, R., Harper, Z. J., Agossa, F. R., Welzig, C. M., & McRoy, S. (2018). Scientific authorship and collaboration network analysis on malaria research in Benin: Papers indexed in the web of science (1996–2016). Global Health Research and Policy . https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-018-0067-x

Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration, (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52 (3), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014254214337

Beaver, D. D., & Rosen, R. (1979a). Studies in scientific collaboration. 2. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the french scientific elite, 1799–1830. Scientometrics, 1 (2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02016966

Beaver, D. D., & Rosen, R. (1979b). Studies in scientific collaboration. 3. Professionalization and the natural-history of modern scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1 (3), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02016308

Bleck, J., Dendere, C., & Sangare, B. (2018). Making North-South Research Collaborations Work. Ps-Political Science & Politics, 51 (3), 554–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096518000458

Boekholt, P., Edler, J., Cunningham, P., & Flanagan, K. (2009). Drivers of international collaboration in research . Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/712e874d-4f61-4977-9512-3bb326c2ce63/language-en

Bordons, M., Gomez, I., Fernandez, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Mendez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37 (2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02093625

Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39 (1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887

Boshoff, N. (2009). Neo-colonialism and research collaboration in Central Africa. Scientometrics, 81 (2), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2211-8

Boshoff, N. (2010). South-South research collaboration of countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). Scientometrics, 84 (2), 481–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0120-0

Bote, V. P. G., Olmeda-Gomez, C., & de Moya-Anegon, F. (2013). Quantifying the benefits of international scientific collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64 (2), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22754

Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33 (4), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cash-Gibson, L., Guerra, G., & Salgado-de-Snyder, V. N. (2015). SDH-NET: A South-North-South collaboration to build sustainable research capacities on social determinants of health in low- and middle-income countries. Health Research Policy and Systems . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0048-1

Cato, K. D., Sun, C., Dohrn, J., Ferng, Y. H., Klopper, H. C., & Larson, E. (2019). Nurse and midwife researcher collaboration in eastern sub-Saharan Africa: A social network analysis. International Nursing Review, 66 (4), 571–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12542

Chandiwana, S., & Ornbjerg, N. (2003). Review of North-South and South-South cooperation and conditions necessary to sustain research capability in developing countries. Journal of Health Population and Nutrition, 21 (3), 288–297.

Chen, K. H., Zhang, Y., & Fu, X. L. (2019). International research collaboration: An emerging domain of innovation studies? Research Policy, 48 (1), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.005

Chimhundu, C., de Jager, K., & Douglas, T. (2015). Sectoral collaboration networks for cardiovascular medical device development in South Africa. Scientometrics, 105 (3), 1721–1741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1743-y

Crane, D. (1971). Transnational networks in basic science. International Organization, 25 (3), 585–601. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300026333

Currie-Alder, B., Cundill, G., Scodanibbio, L., Vincent, K., Prakash, A., & Nathe, N. (2020). Managing collaborative research: insights from a multi-consortium programme on climate adaptation across Africa and South Asia. Regional Environmental Change . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01702-w

Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Ahimbisibwe, J., Van Moll, R., & Koedam, N. (2003). Neo-colonial science by the most industrialised upon the least developed countries in peer-reviewed publishing. Scientometrics, 56 (3), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022374703178

de Jager, K., Chimhundu, C., Saidi, T., & Douglas, T. S. (2019). Medical device innovation in South Africa: Evolution of collaboration networks (2001–2013). South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 30 (2), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.7166/30-2-1977

de Schweinitz, P., Ansong, D., Manortey, S., Amuasi, J., Boakye, I., Crookston, B. T., & Alder, S. (2009). Evaluating international collaboration: Differential perceptions of partnership in a CBPR project in Ghana. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4 (4), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2009.4.4.53

Debbeaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. 1. Professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1 (1), 65–84.

Ding, W. W., Levin, S. G., Stephan, P. E., & Winkler, A. E. (2010). The Impact of Information Technology on Academic Scientists’ Productivity and Collaboration Patterns. Management Science, 56 (9), 1439–1461. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1195

Dodsworth, S., & Cheeseman, N. (2018). The potential and pitfalls of collaborating with development organizations and policy makers in Africa. African Affairs, 117 (466), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adx041

Efstathiou, J. A., Bvochora-Nsingo, M., Gierga, D. P., Kayembe, M. K. A., Mmalane, M., Russell, A. H., & Dryden-Peterson, S. (2014). Addressing the Growing Cancer Burden in the Wake of the AIDS Epidemic in Botswana: The BOTSOGO Collaborative Partnership. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 89 (3), 468–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.03.033

Elobu, A. E., Kintu, A., Galukande, M., Kaggwa, S., Mijjumbi, C., Tindimwebwa, J., & Lipnick, M. (2014). Evaluating international global health collaborations: Perspectives from surgery and anesthesia trainees in Uganda. Surgery, 155 (4), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.11.007

Ettarh, R. R. (2015). Institution-level collaboration in cardiovascular research in sub-Saharan Africa. Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy, 5 (4), 311–315. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2015.07.04

Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 42 (3), 293–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002

Etzkowitz, H., & D. J. (2007). The Triple Helix of Innovation: Towards a University-led Development Strategy for Africa. African Technology Development Forum Journal, 4 (2), 3–10.

Fisher, A., Wallis, S., Hassall, O., Martin, R., & Bates, I. (2020). Collaborations on blood transfusion research in sub-Saharan Africa: Who, what and where. Vox Sanguinis, 115 (3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.12884

Fordelone, T. Y. (2011). Triangular Co-Operation and Aid Effectiveness. https://doi.org/10.1787/gen_papers-2010-5kgc6cl31rnx

Frame, J. D., & Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International research collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 9 (4), 481–497.

Gaillard, J. (1992). Science policies and cooperation in Africa-trends in the production and utilization of knowledge. Knowledge-Creation Diffusion Utilization, 14 (2), 212–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554709201400212

Gertler, M. S. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3 (1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.1.75

Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51 (1), 69–115. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010512628145

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50 (2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010561321723

Gonzalez-Alcaide, G., Menchi-Elanzi, M., Nacarapa, E., & Ramos-Rincon, J. M. (2020). HIV/AIDS research in Africa and the Middle East: Participation and equity in North-South collaborations and relationships. Globalization and Health, 16 (1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00609-9

Gonzalez-Alcaide, G., Park, J., Huamani, C., & Ramos, J. M. (2017). Dominance and leadership in research activities: Collaboration between countries of differing human development is reflected through authorship order and designation as corresponding authors in scientific publications. PLoS ONE, 12 (8), 30. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182513

Graef, F., Mutabazi, K. D., Sieber, S., Asch, F., Makoko, B., Bonatti, M., & William, L. (2019). Multi-disciplinary North-South collaboration in participatory action research on food value chains: A German-Tanzanian case study on perceptions, experiences and challenges. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 32 (4), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-018-9458-7

Guns, R., & Wang, L. L. (2017). Detecting the emergence of new scientific collaboration links in Africa: A comparison of expected and realized collaboration intensities. Journal of Informetrics, 11 (3), 892–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.07.004

Gureje, O., Seedat, S., Kola, L., Appiah-Poku, J., Othieno, C., Harris, B., & Esan, O. (2019). Partnership for mental health development in Sub-Saharan Africa (PaM-D): A collaborative initiative for research and capacity building. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 28 (4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045796018000707

Hampton, I., & Sweijd, N. (2008). Achievements and lessons learned from the Benguela Environment, Fisheries, Interaction and Training (BENEFIT) research programme. African Journal of Marine Science, 30 (3), 541–564. https://doi.org/10.2989/ajms.2008.30.3.9.643

Hanlin, R., & Tigabu, A. (2017). Case Studies of the Political Economy of Science Granting Councils in Sub-Saharan Africa . Retrieved from https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/handle/10625/56808

Haunschild, R., Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2016). Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics. PLoS ONE . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160393

Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39 (5), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.012

Holmarsdottir, H. B. (2013). COMPARE Forum: The idea of North-South and South-South collaboration. Compare-a Journal of Comparative and International Education, 43 (2), 265–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.765274

Hydén, G. (2016). The role and impact of funding agencies on higher education and research for development. In T. Halvorsen & J. Nossum (Eds.), North–South Knowledge Networks -Towards equitable collaboration between academics, donors and universities (pp. 1–39). South Africa: African Minds.

IOC-UNESCO. (2017). Global Ocean Science Report: The Current Status of Ocean Science around the World (L (Valdés). UNESCO Publishing.

Jespersen, S., Hong, B. L., Oliveira, I., Medina, C., Te, D. D., Correia, F. G., & Bissau, H. I. V. C. S. G. (2014). Challenges facing HIV treatment in Guinea-Bissau: The benefits of international research collaborations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92 (12), 909–914. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.14.135749

Jiang, L., Zhu, N. B., Yang, Z. L., Xu, S., & Jun, M. (2018). The relationships between distance factors and international collaborative research outcomes: A bibliometric examination. Journal of Informetrics, 12 (3), 618–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.04.004

Katz, J. S. (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 31 (1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02018100

Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26 (1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00917-1

Keynan, A., & Shoham, D. (1998). Scientific cooperation in agriculture and medical research as a means for normalizing relations between Egypt and Israel. In A. L. C. deCerreno & A. Keynan (Eds.), Scientific Cooperation, State Conflict: The Role of Scientists in Mitigating International Discord (Vol. 866, pp. 182–199).

Kok, M. O., Gyapong, J. O., Wolffers, I., Ofori-Adjei, D., & Ruitenberg, E. J. (2017). Towards fair and effective North-South collaboration: Realising a programme for demand-driven and locally led research. Health Research Policy and Systems . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0251-3

Kontinen, T., & Nguyahambi, A. M. (2020). Disrupting habits of North-South research collaboration: Learning in co-authoring. European Journal of Development Research, 32 (3), 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00276-x

Kot, F. C. (2016). The perceived benefits of international partnerships in Africa: A case study of two public universities in tanzania and the democratic Republic of Congo. Higher Education Policy, 29 (1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.2

Kozma, C., & Calero-Medina, C. (2019). The role of South African researchers in intercontinental collaboration. Scientometrics, 121 (3), 1293–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03230-9

Kraut, R., Egido, C., & Galegher, J. (1988). Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration . Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Kruss, G., Adeoti, J., & Nabudere, D. (2012). Universities and Knowledge-based Development in sub-Saharan Africa: Comparing University-Firm Interaction in Nigeria, Uganda and South Africa. Journal of Development Studies, 48 (4), 516–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2011.604410

Landini, F., Malerba, F., & Mavilia, R. (2015). The structure and dynamics of networks of scientific collaborations in Northern Africa. Scientometrics, 105 (3), 1787–1807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1635-1

Loukanova, S., Prytherch, H., Blank, A., Duysburgh, E., Tomson, G., Gustafsson, L. L., & Fonn, S. (2014). Nesting doctoral students in collaborative North-South partnerships for health systems research. Global Health Action . https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.24070

Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 17 (1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700106

Maluleka, J. R., Onyancha, O. B., & Ajiferuke, I. (2016). Factors influencing research collaboration in LIS schools in South Africa. Scientometrics, 107 (2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1846-0

Marfo, K., Pence, A., LeVine, R. A., & LeVine, S. (2011). Strengthening Africa’s Contributions to Child Development Research: Introduction. Child Development Perspectives, 5 (2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00164.x

Matenga, T. F. L., Zulu, J. M., Corbin, J. H., & Mweemba, O. (2019). Contemporary issues in north-south health research partnerships: Perspectives of health research stakeholders in Zambia. Health Research Policy and Systems . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0409-7

Mathai, M., Vander Stoep, A., Kumar, M., Kuria, M., Obondo, A., Kimani, V., & Rao, D. (2019). Building Mental Health Research Capacity in Kenya: A South-North Collaboration. Global Social Welfare, 6 (3), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-018-0126-8

Mbaku, J. M. (2020). Deepening good governance: inclusion, democracy, and security . Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/ForesightAfrica2020_20200110.pdf

Megnigbeto, E. (2013). International collaboration in scientific publishing: The case of West Africa (2001–2010). Scientometrics, 96 (3), 761–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0963-2

Mêgnigbêto, E. (2013). Triple Helix of university-industry-government relationships in West Africa. Journal of Scientometric Research, 2 , 214–222.

Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization - Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29 (1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00031-1

Monge-Najera, J., Megnigbeto, E., & Ho, Y. S. (2020). Research impact and productivity of Benin according to the Science Citation Index Expanded (1973 to 2018). Revista De Biologia Tropical, 68 (3), 909–918.

Muchie, M., & Patra, S. K. (2020). China-Africa science and technology collaboration: Evidence from collaborative research papers and patents. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 18 (1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2019.1647004

Munung, N. S., Mayosi, B. M., & de Vries, J. (2017). Equity in international health research collaborations in Africa: Perceptions and expectations of African researchers. PLoS ONE, 12 (10), 17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186237

Muriithi, P., Horner, D., & Pemberton, L. (2016). Factors contributing to adoption and use of information and communication technologies within research collaborations in Kenya. Information Technology for Development, 22 , 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1121856

Muriithi, P., Horner, D., Pemberton, L., & Wao, H. (2018). Factors influencing research collaborations in Kenyan universities. Research Policy, 47 (1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.002

Nago, M., & Krott, M. (2020). Systemic failures in north-south climate change knowledge transfer: A case study of the Congo Basin. Climate Policy . https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1820850

Nagpaul, P. S. (2003). Exploring a pseudo-regression model of transnational cooperation in science. Scientometrics, 56 (3), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022335021834

Narteh, B. (2008). Knowledge transfer in developed-developing country interfirm collaborations: A conceptual framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12 (1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810852403

Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101 , 5200–5205. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100

NPCA. (2014). African Innovation Outlook 2014 . Retrieved from https://www.nepad.org/publication/african-innovation-outlook-ii

Olechnicka, A., Ploszaj, A., & Celińska-Janowicz, D. (2018). Scientific collaboration policy. In The Geography of Scientific Collaboration . Routledge.

Book   Google Scholar  

Onyancha, O. B. (2018). Mapping collaboration and impact of library and information science research in sub-Saharan Africa, from 1995 to 2016. Library Management, 39 (6–7), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-06-2017-0059

Onyancha, O. B., & Maluleka, J. R. (2011). Knowledge production through collaborative research in sub-Saharan Africa: How much do countries contribute to each other’s knowledge output and citation impact? Scientometrics, 87 (2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0330-5

Owusu-Nimo, F., & Boshoff, N. (2017). Research collaboration in Ghana: Patterns, motives and roles. Scientometrics, 110 (3), 1099–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2221-x

Paina, L., Ssengooba, F., Waswa, D., M’Imunya, J. M., & Bennett, S. (2013). How does investment in research training affect the development of research networks and collaborations? Health Research Policy and Systems . https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-11-18

Patra, S. K., & Muchie, M. (2018). Research and innovation in South African universities: From the triple helix’s perspective. Scientometrics, 116 (1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2764-0

Payumo, J. G., Monson, J., Jamison, A., & Fenwick, B. W. (2019). Metrics-based profiling of university research engagement with Africa: Research management, gender, and internationalization perspective. Scientometrics, 121 (2), 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03211-y

Pouris, A., & Ho, Y. S. (2014). Research emphasis and collaboration in Africa. Scientometrics, 98 (3), 2169–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1156-8

Quayle, M., & Greer, M. (2014). Mapping the state of the field of social psychology in Africa and patterns of collaboration between African and international social psychologists. International Journal of Psychology, 49 (6), 498–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12059

Radwan, A., & Sakr, M. (2018). Exploring “brain circulation” as a concept to mitigate brain drain in Africa and improve EU-Africa cooperation in the field of science and technology. South African Journal of International Affairs-Sajia, 25 (4), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2018.1551151

Reddy, P., Taylor, S. E., & Sifunda, S. (2002). Research capacity building and collaboration between South African and American partners: The adaptation of an intervention model for HIV/AIDS prevention in corrections research. Aids Education and Prevention, 14 (5), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.14.7.92.23860

Scherngell, T., & Hu, Y. J. (2011). Collaborative knowledge production in China: Regional evidence from a gravity model approach. Regional Studies, 45 (6), 755–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003713373

Schmink, M., Smart, J. C., Sitoe, I., Bowen, W., Silva, H. R., Ecole, C. C., & Haber, L. (2020). Challenges and opportunities of trilateral co-operation: Collaboration by the USA, Brazil and Mozambique on horticultural research, 2011–2015. Development Policy Review, 38 (5), 575–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12437

Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1990). International collaboration in the sciences 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 19 (1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02130461

Schubert, T., & Sooryamoorthy, R. (2010). Can the centre-periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany. Scientometrics, 83 (1), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0074-2

Shehatta, I., & Mahmood, K. (2017). Bibliometric patterns and indicators of research collaboration of Egyptian health scientists: 1980–2014. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 22 (2), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol22no2.4

Skupien, S., & Ruffin, N. (2020). The Geography of research funding: Semantics and beyond. Journal of Studies in International Education, 24 (1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319889896

Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa? Scientometrics, 80 (2), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2074-z

Sooryamoorthy, R. (2010). Science and scientific collaboration in South Africa: Apartheid and after. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0106-y

Sooryamoorthy, R. (2017). Do types of collaboration change citation? A scientometric analysis of social science publications in South Africa. Scientometrics, 111 (1), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2265-6

Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4 (4), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027

Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration - A review. Journal of Information Science, 6 (1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158300600105

Taylor, S., & Osland, J. S. (2015). The Impact of Intercultural Communication on Global Organizational Learning. In M. Easterby‐Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (pp. 579–604).

Tierney, W. M., Nyandiko, W. N., Siika, A. M., Wools-Kaloustian, K., Sidle, J. E., Kiplagat, J., & Inui, T. S. (2013). "These are Good Problems to Have ": Establishing a Collaborative Research Partnership in East Africa. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28 , S625–S638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2459-4

Tijssen, R. J. W., & Winnink, J. J. (2018). Capturing “R&D excellence”: Indicators, international statistics, and innovative universities. Scientometrics, 114 (2), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2602-9

Toivanen, H., & Ponomariov, B. (2011). African regional innovation systems: Bibliometric analysis of research collaboration patterns 2005–2009. Scientometrics, 88 (2), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0390-1

UNESCO. (2010). UNESCO Science Report 2010 . Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/sc_usr10_sub-saharan_africa_EN.pdf

UNESCO. (2015). UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030 . Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/unesco_science_report

Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34 (10), 1608–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002

Wagner, C. S., Whetsell, T. A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Growth of international collaboration in science: Revisiting six specialties. Scientometrics, 110 (3), 1633–1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2230-9

Walsh, J. P. (1996). The virtual college: Computer-mediated communication and scientific work. The Information Society, 12 (4), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722496129341

Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2011). Towards a new crown indicator: An empirical analysis. Scientometrics, 87 (3), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0354-5

Wambu, E. W., & Ho, Y. S. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of drinking water research in Africa. Water Sa, 42 (4), 612–620. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v42i4.12

Western, D. (2003). Conservation science in Africa and the role of international collaboration. Conservation Biology, 17 (1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02089.x

Yevide, A. S. I., Wu, B. F., Khan, A. S., Zeng, Y., & Liu, J. (2016). Bibliometric analysis of ecosystem monitoring-related research in Africa: Implications for ecological stewardship and scientific collaboration. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 23 (5), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1129998

Zdravkovic, M., Chiwona-Karltun, L., & Zink, E. (2016). Experiences and perceptions of South-South and North-South scientific collaboration of mathematicians, physicists and chemists from five southern African universities. Scientometrics, 108 (2), 717–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1989-z

Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., & Okubo, Y. (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top of science five producers. Scientometrics, 47 (3), 627–657. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005632319799

Zuijdam, F., Boekholt, P., Deuten, J., Meijer, I., & Vermeulen, N. (2011). The role and added value of large-scale research facilities . Retrieved from https://www.ceric-eric.eu/wp-cntent/uploads/2018/10/RAMIRIref_2011_Technopolis_report.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

Elizabeth S. Vieira thanks FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia) for funding through program DL 57/2016 – Norma transitória (DL 57/2016/CP1346/CT0017). This work received financial support from PT national funds (FCT/MCTES, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior) through the Project UIDB/50006/2020.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

LAQV/REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências Dos Computadores, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade Do Porto, Rua Do Campo Alegre, 4169-007, Porto, Portugal

Elizabeth S. Vieira

CIBIO/InBIO, Centro de Investigacão em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade Do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, nº, 74485-661, Vairão, Portugal

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth S. Vieira .

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 41 KB)

Rights and permissions.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Vieira, E.S. International research collaboration in Africa: a bibliometric and thematic analysis. Scientometrics 127 , 2747–2772 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04349-y

Download citation

Received : 23 September 2021

Accepted : 10 March 2022

Published : 25 March 2022

Issue Date : May 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04349-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• International research collaboration
• Bibliometrics
• Thematic analysis
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• Privacy Policy

Home » Context of the Study – Writing Guide and Examples

Context of the Study – Writing Guide and Examples

Table of Contents

Context of the Study

The context of a study refers to the set of circumstances or background factors that provide a framework for understanding the research question , the methods used, and the findings . It includes the social, cultural, economic, political, and historical factors that shape the study’s purpose and significance, as well as the specific setting in which the research is conducted. The context of a study is important because it helps to clarify the meaning and relevance of the research, and can provide insight into the ways in which the findings might be applied in practice.

Structure of Context of the Study

The structure of the context of the study generally includes several key components that provide the necessary background and framework for the research being conducted. These components typically include:

• Introduction : This section provides an overview of the research problem , the purpose of the study, and the research questions or hypotheses being tested.
• Background and Significance : This section discusses the historical, theoretical, and practical background of the research problem, highlighting why the study is important and relevant to the field.
• Literature Review: This section provides a comprehensive review of the existing literature related to the research problem, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of previous studies and identifying gaps in the literature.
• Theoretical Framework : This section outlines the theoretical perspective or perspectives that will guide the research and explains how they relate to the research questions or hypotheses.
• Research Design and Methods: This section provides a detailed description of the research design and methods, including the research approach, sampling strategy, data collection methods, and data analysis procedures.
• Ethical Considerations : This section discusses the ethical considerations involved in conducting the research, including the protection of human subjects, informed consent, confidentiality, and potential conflicts of interest.
• Limitations and Delimitations: This section discusses the potential limitations of the study, including any constraints on the research design or methods, as well as the delimitations, or boundaries, of the study.
• Contribution to the Field: This section explains how the study will contribute to the field, highlighting the potential implications and applications of the research findings.

How to Write Context of the study

Here are some steps to write the context of the study:

• Identify the research problem: Start by clearly defining the research problem or question you are investigating. This should be a concise statement that highlights the gap in knowledge or understanding that your research seeks to address.
• Provide background information : Once you have identified the research problem, provide some background information that will help the reader understand the context of the study. This might include a brief history of the topic, relevant statistics or data, or previous research on the subject.
• Explain the significance: Next, explain why the research is significant. This could be because it addresses an important problem or because it contributes to a theoretical or practical understanding of the topic.
• Outline the research objectives : State the specific objectives of the study. This helps to focus the research and provides a clear direction for the study.
• Identify the research approach: Finally, identify the research approach or methodology you will be using. This might include a description of the data collection methods, sample size, or data analysis techniques.

Example of Context of the Study

Here is an example of a context of a study:

Title of the Study: “The Effectiveness of Online Learning in Higher Education”

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many educational institutions to adopt online learning as an alternative to traditional in-person teaching. This study is conducted in the context of the ongoing shift towards online learning in higher education. The study aims to investigate the effectiveness of online learning in terms of student learning outcomes and satisfaction compared to traditional in-person teaching. The study also explores the challenges and opportunities of online learning in higher education, especially in the current pandemic situation. This research is conducted in the United States and involves a sample of undergraduate students enrolled in various universities offering online and in-person courses. The study findings are expected to contribute to the ongoing discussion on the future of higher education and the role of online learning in the post-pandemic era.

Context of the Study in Thesis

The context of the study in a thesis refers to the background, circumstances, and conditions that surround the research problem or topic being investigated. It provides an overview of the broader context within which the study is situated, including the historical, social, economic, and cultural factors that may have influenced the research question or topic.

Context of the Study Example in Thesis

Here is an example of the context of a study in a thesis:

Context of the Study:

The rapid growth of the internet and the increasing popularity of social media have revolutionized the way people communicate, connect, and share information. With the widespread use of social media, there has been a rise in cyberbullying, which is a form of aggression that occurs online. Cyberbullying can have severe consequences for victims, such as depression, anxiety, and even suicide. Thus, there is a need for research that explores the factors that contribute to cyberbullying and the strategies that can be used to prevent or reduce it.

This study aims to investigate the relationship between social media use and cyberbullying among adolescents in the United States. Specifically, the study will examine the following research questions:

• What is the prevalence of cyberbullying among adolescents who use social media?
• What are the factors that contribute to cyberbullying among adolescents who use social media?
• What are the strategies that can be used to prevent or reduce cyberbullying among adolescents who use social media?

The study is significant because it will provide valuable insights into the relationship between social media use and cyberbullying, which can be used to inform policies and programs aimed at preventing or reducing cyberbullying among adolescents. The study will use a mixed-methods approach, including both quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon of cyberbullying among adolescents who use social media.

Context of the Study in Research Paper

The context of the study in a research paper refers to the background information that provides a framework for understanding the research problem and its significance. It includes a description of the setting, the research question, the objectives of the study, and the scope of the research.

Context of the Study Example in Research Paper

An example of the context of the study in a research paper might be:

The global pandemic caused by COVID-19 has had a significant impact on the mental health of individuals worldwide. As a result, there has been a growing interest in identifying effective interventions to mitigate the negative effects of the pandemic on mental health. In this study, we aim to explore the impact of a mindfulness-based intervention on the mental health of individuals who have experienced increased stress and anxiety due to the pandemic.

Context of the Study In Research Proposal

The context of a study in a research proposal provides the background and rationale for the proposed research, highlighting the gap or problem that the study aims to address. It also explains why the research is important and relevant to the field of study.

Context of the Study Example In Research Proposal

Here is an example of a context section in a research proposal:

The rise of social media has revolutionized the way people communicate and share information online. As a result, businesses have increasingly turned to social media platforms to promote their products and services, build brand awareness, and engage with customers. However, there is limited research on the effectiveness of social media marketing strategies and the factors that contribute to their success. This research aims to fill this gap by exploring the impact of social media marketing on consumer behavior and identifying the key factors that influence its effectiveness.

Purpose of Context of the Study

The purpose of providing context for a study is to help readers understand the background, scope, and significance of the research being conducted. By contextualizing the study, researchers can provide a clear and concise explanation of the research problem, the research question or hypothesis, and the research design and methodology.

The context of the study includes information about the historical, social, cultural, economic, and political factors that may have influenced the research topic or problem. This information can help readers understand why the research is important, what gaps in knowledge the study seeks to address, and what impact the research may have in the field or in society.

Advantages of Context of the Study

Some advantages of considering the context of a study include:

• Increased validity: Considering the context can help ensure that the study is relevant to the population being studied and that the findings are more representative of the real world. This can increase the validity of the study and help ensure that its conclusions are accurate.
• Enhanced understanding: By examining the context of the study, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the factors that influence the phenomenon under investigation. This can lead to more nuanced findings and a richer understanding of the topic.
• Improved generalizability: Contextualizing the study can help ensure that the findings are applicable to other settings and populations beyond the specific sample studied. This can improve the generalizability of the study and increase its impact.
• Better interpretation of results: Understanding the context of the study can help researchers interpret their results more accurately and avoid drawing incorrect conclusions. This can help ensure that the study contributes to the body of knowledge in the field and has practical applications.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

How to Cite Research Paper – All Formats and...

Data Collection – Methods Types and Examples

Delimitations in Research – Types, Examples and...

Research Paper Format – Types, Examples and...

Research Process – Steps, Examples and Tips

Research Design – Types, Methods and Examples

• Search Menu
• Sign in through your institution
• Conflict, Security, and Defence
• East Asia and Pacific
• Energy and Environment
• Global Health and Development
• International History
• International Governance, Law, and Ethics
• International Relations Theory
• Middle East and North Africa
• Political Economy and Economics
• Russia and Eurasia
• Sub-Saharan Africa
• Advance Articles
• Editor's Choice
• Special Issues
• Virtual Issues
• Reading Lists
• Archive Collections
• Book Reviews
• Author Guidelines
• Submission Site
• Open Access
• Self-Archiving Policy
• About International Affairs
• About Chatham House
• Editorial Board
• Advertising & Corporate Services
• Journals Career Network
• Journals on Oxford Academic
• Books on Oxford Academic

Reading List: International Development

This reading list explores the history of international development as well as a range of developing debates in the field. This includes the rise of private philanthropy, the role of faith in development frameworks, donor politics, the contribution of infrastructure to peacebuilding and much more.

1. Contesting global justice from the South: redistribution in the international order

Discussion questions:

1) In your opinion, can redistribution help achieve a more just and equal global society? 2) How can countries in the global South push for redistribution through legal and diplomatic tools?

2. Backlash advocacy and NGO polarization over women's rights in the United Nations

1) Why is there growing polarization between feminist and conservation NGOs in the UN? 2) '[Conservation NGOs] are not merely pushing against feminist norms, but are also actively working on instituting a new normative order.' Do you agree?

3. Global aid and faith actors: the case for an actor-orientated approach to the ‘turn to religion’

1) Are faith-based actors being instrumentalized to serve neo-liberal development goals? 2) To what extent do faith-based institutions shape contemporary development frameworks?

4. Civil society perspectives on sexual violence in conflict: patriarchy and war strategy in Colombia

1) How can experiences of local civil society activists better inform the global understanding of conflict-related sexual violence? 2) What are the dangers of decontextualizing conflict-related sexual violence from larger structural factors?

5. State, media and civil society in the information warfare over Ukraine: citizen curators of digital disinformation

1) 'Civil society is not just a target for information warfare, but appears as the most central producer of disinformation'. What are the implications of this finding? 2) Why do citizens actively participate in disinformation campaigns?

6. Concrete approaches to peace: infrastructure as peacebuilding

1) What is the value of studying infrastructural development as part of peacebuilding practices? 2) 'Infrastructure is profoundly entwined with contemporary peacebuilding'. Do you agree?

7. Instrumentalizing AIDS empowerment discourses in Malawi and Zambia: an actor-oriented view of donor politics

1) What are the implications of local communities' instrumentalization of empowerment discourses? 2) To what extent do development discourses privilege some recipient groups over others?

8. The promise of pillar II: analysing international assistance under the Responsibility to Protect

1) Do you believe that pillar II of R2P offers a robust framework to respond to global crises? 2) What is at stake when appealing to selectivity rather than conditionality in cases of assistance?

9. International development in transition

1) What explains a shift in donor priorities towards infrastructure and middle-income country investment? 2) How has the rise of private philanthropy changed the international development landscape?

10. Multinationals and NGOs amid a changing balance of power

1) How have firms from rising power economies shaped the global economic order? 2) How does the growing heterogeneity of the international political economy impact NGOs?

• Recommend to Your Librarian
• Advertising and Corporate Services

Affiliations

• Online ISSN 1468-2346
• Print ISSN 0020-5850
• Copyright © 2024 The Royal Institute of International Affairs
• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

The current challenges in delivering school-based sex education in Indonesia: A scoping review.

International public health dissertation prize winner.

• Ashela Risa

Background: School-based sex education is important in Indonesia because the incidence of sexual violence and risky sexual behaviour among children and adolescents is increasing. However, existing sex education remains inadequate with many obstacles to its implementation. The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the available evidence on the challenges in providing school-based sex education and to identify key themes and potential research gaps.

Methods: A scoping review of literature from 2010 to 2023 was conducted in June 2023 using five major databases to identify relevant studies. Additional searches were conducted through manual reference searches and grey literature. The screening process involved evaluating studies based on their title, abstract, and full text against specific inclusion criteria. The scoping review followed the nine-stage methodology guidance provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The data extracted were organised, categorised, analysed, and synthesised in charts, tables, and narrative format.

Results : After the screening process, 10 studies were incorporated into the review. The difficulties in providing sex education in Indonesia encompass various aspects at different levels. At the individual level, challenges arise from the characteristics of teachers, parents, and students. At the school level, issues include a lack of supportive leadership, materials and facilities, and inadequate implementation. At the system level, obstacles include the absence of national guidelines, political and cultural factors, gender disparities, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in more recent time.

Conclusion: This review emphasises the potential for improvements in addressing the challenges. It is crucial to initiate systemic and institutional changes, which will ultimately influence the individual level. Establishing a legal framework, curriculum, and national guidelines will provide the basis for implementation at the institutional level. Collaborative efforts among relevant stakeholders are also important for maximising program acceptance. Further initiatives are needed to enhance teachers' capacity and motivation. Further research is required to examine perceptions and acceptance in different types of schools and cultural backgrounds. Furthermore, exploring which approaches are most effective in the Indonesian context is important.

Copyright (c) 2024 Ashela Risa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Developed By

Hosted by LJMU Library Journal Hosting Service

The International Journal of Indian Psychȯlogy

Exploring the Absence of Associations: Post-Traumatic Growth, Flourishing, and Social Support in Young Adults

| Published: May 24, 2024

This study tries to understand the relationship between Post traumatic Growth, Flourishment, and Social Support and aiming to uncover potential correlational and regression effects. A series of psychometric evaluations that included Trauma History Questionnaire, Post Traumatic Growth Inventory, The Flourishing Scale, and Social Support Inventory were administered on a sample of 75 young adults. Contrary to expectations, no significant correlation or regression was found between any variables. (PTG-flourishing: (r = 0.123, p = 0.293); PTG-social support: (r = -0.024, p = 0.842); flourishing-social support: (r = -0.071, p = 0.549). This absence of associations prompts a re-evaluation of existing theoretical frameworks and underscores the complexity of factors influencing post-traumatic experiences and psychological well-being. The implications and the possible explanations of these findings are discussed in the context of future research directions.

Post-traumatic growth , Flourishing , Social support , Non-significant correlation , Trauma

This is an Open Access Research distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any Medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

© 2024, Mishra, S. & Dutt, S.

Received: May 01, 2024; Revision Received: May 21, 2024; Accepted: May 24, 2024

Sidharth Mishra @ [email protected]

Article Overview

Published in   Special Issues of Volume 12, Issue 2, 2024

Search for tags

• Humboldt Professorships for AI
• Humboldt Professorships
• KOSMOS - Focus
• KOSMOS - Brief Enquiries
• KOSMOS - Humboldtians in private

Allegations regarding the selection procedure for the Bessel Research Award

In the context of the selection procedure for the Humboldt Foundation's Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel Research Award 2023/2024, allegations have been made against the Foundation, which the Head Office would like to address in a statement.

• from 23. May 2024

Press, Communications and Marketing Tel.: +49 228 833-144 Fax: +49 228 833-441 presse[at]avh.de

In an open letter of the British Society for Middle Eastern Studies (BRISMES) and in various social media posts the Humboldt Foundation was accused of having rejected Dr Huda Fakhreddine during the selection procedure for the Bessel Award on the grounds of her publicly expressed opinions on the war in the Middle East. We very much regret that Dr Fakhreddine feels she has been treated unfairly. This was certainly not our intention.

The selection process for the Bessel Award is a multi-stage procedure. Firstly, established researchers in Germany submit a nomination whereby it is not the Humboldt Foundation that decides who should receive awards and fellowships but selection committees – in the case of the Bessel Award consisting of 23 academics from various disciplines. After the documents have been checked by the Humboldt Foundation's Head Office to ensure they are complete and fulfil the formal requirements, two independent scientific reviews are normally requested for each application. In the run-up to the selection meeting, the reviewed applications are then sent to the members of the selection committee in preparation for presenting the nomination at the meeting.

The Humboldt Foundation provides the framework for this selection process, the committee is, however, completely independent in its decision-making. In the course of the entire review process, all researchers involved are free to pursue their own enquiries. During the review process, Humboldt Foundation Head Office was notified about opinions expressed by Ms Fakhreddine on the war in the Middle East that gave cause for concern that these opinions might be incompatible with the values upheld in the Humboldt Network – to promote and foster intercultural dialogue. 

After consulting with the selection committee, the Humboldt Foundation asked the nominator to classify the statements made by Dr Fakhreddine on social media. The nominator then made contact with Ms Fakhreddine directly. The results were reported back to the committee. No further measures were taken based on the comments. The process played no role in the specialist assessment of the application.

The nomination for the Bessel Award was rejected. The grounds for voting decisions are not generally recorded. In previous years, on average, approximately 35 percent of nominations were successful.

In a complicated political situation and emotionally charged debates, we hope that it will still be possible to maintain a dialogue.

This site uses cookies in order to provide you with the best possible service. You will find further information in our privacy policy and the cookie settings .